Daniel Molé

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years.

BACKGROUND Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is currently being used to treat selected patients with disabling shoulder arthropathy. The purposes of this study were to investigate the medium-term results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and to analyze the influence of etiology on the result. METHODS We carried out a multicenter study with a minimum follow-up of five years and determined the survival rate of the prosthesis according to the initial etiology of the shoulder arthropathy. Eighty prostheses were implanted in seventy-seven patients between 1992 and 1998. Sixty-six shoulders had an arthropathy with a massive rotator cuff tear, and fourteen shoulders had a disorder with another etiology (rheumatoid arthritis, trauma, or revision arthropathy). At the time of review, eighteen patients had died and two were lost to follow-up. The remaining fifty-seven patients (sixty shoulders) were examined or interviewed by telephone at a mean follow-up of 69.6 months. Cumulative survival curves were generated with replacement of the prosthesis, glenoid loosening, and a functional Constant score of <30 as the end points. RESULTS The survival rate with replacement of the prosthesis and glenoid loosening as the end points were 91% and 84%, respectively, at 120 months, with shoulders that had arthropathy with a massive rotator cuff tear demonstrating a significantly better result than those that had a disorder with another etiology (p < 0.05). On the other hand, the survival rate with an absolute Constant score of <30 as an end point was 58% at 120 months, with no significant difference with respect to etiology. Two breaks were observed in the survival curves. The first concerned survival until replacement of the prosthesis and occurred at around three years, reflecting early loosening of the prosthesis. The curve then became stable. A second break started at around six years and reflected progressive deterioration of the functional result. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that the reverse total prosthesis should be reserved for the treatment of very disabling shoulder arthropathy with a massive rotator cuff rupture, and it should be used exclusively in patients over seventy years old with low functional demands.

Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

The causes and consequences of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) were investigated in 326 consecutive patients (337 shoulders) undergoing RSA between 1991 and 2003. Patients underwent 269 (80%) primary RSAs and 68 revisions of unconstrained shoulder prosthesis. At last follow-up (average, 47 months; range, 24-120 months) 62% had scapular notching. Notching frequency and extension were correlated to the length of follow-up (P = .0005). Notching was more frequent in cuff tear arthropathy (P = .0004), grade 3 or 4 fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus (P = .01), and narrowed acromiohumeral distance (P < .0001). Glenoids preoperatively oriented superiorly were more at risk for notching (P = .006). More notching occurred when the RSA was implanted using an anterosuperior approach vs a deltopectoral approach (P < .0001). Notching was correlated with humeral radiolucencies in proximal zones (P < .0001) and with glenoid radiolucent lines (P < .0001). Positioning of the baseplate definitely influences scapular notching. High positioning of the baseplate and superior tilting must be avoided.

Repair of Tears of the Subscapularis

BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis are less common than those involving the superior aspect of the rotator cuff. The purpose of the present study was to report the results of repair of isolated tears of the subscapularis. METHODS The records on eighty-four shoulders that had undergone open repair of the subscapularis tendon were reviewed. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 53.2 years. The mean interval from the onset of symptoms to the time of surgery was 12.5 months. Fifty-seven tears were traumatic, and twenty-seven were degenerative. Twenty-three tears involved the superior one-third of the subscapularis tendon, forty-one tears involved the superior two-thirds, and twenty tears were complete. Fifty-four shoulders had a dislocation or subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon, and ten shoulders had a rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon. Forty-eight shoulders underwent concomitant biceps tenodesis, thirteen shoulders underwent concomitant biceps tenotomy, and four shoulders underwent concomitant recentering of the biceps. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at a mean of forty-five months (range, twenty-four to 132 months) postoperatively. RESULTS The mean Constant score increased from 55.0 points preoperatively to 79.5 points postoperatively. Seventy-five patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the result. Preoperatively, four shoulders had mild glenohumeral arthritis. Postoperatively, twenty-five shoulders had mild glenohumeral arthritis and two shoulders had moderate glenohumeral arthritis. Tenodesis or tenotomy of the biceps tendon at the time of subscapularis repair was associated with improved subjective and objective results, independent of the preoperative condition of the biceps tendon. CONCLUSIONS Repair of isolated subscapularis tears yields acceptable improvement in shoulder function in selected patients. Additionally, the results of the present study support routine tenodesis or tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon at the time of subscapularis repair.

The Influence Of Glenohumeral Prosthetic Mismatch On Glenoid Radiolucent Lines: Results Of A Multicenter Study

Background: In shoulder arthroplasty, mismatch is defined as the difference in the radius or diameter of curvature between the humeral head and glenoid components. Recommendations for mismatch have not been substantiated scientifically. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of mismatch on glenoid radiolucent lines.Methods: The results of 319 total shoulder arthroplasties performed for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis were evaluated. All of the arthroplasties were performed with a single type of prosthesis (Aequalis; Tornier, Montbonnot, France) that included a cemented, all-polyethylene glenoid component. Three sizes of glenoid components and seven humeral head diameters were utilized. Radial mismatch was categorized as ≤4 mm, 4.5 to 5.5 mm, 6 to 7 mm, or >7 to 10 mm. Radiographs were evaluated at a mean of 53.5 months (range, twenty-four to 110 months) postoperatively. Glenoid radiolucent lines were scored with a scale ranging from 0 points for no radiolucency to 18 points for radiolucent lines exceeding 2 mm in six zones. Variance, linear contrasts polynomial, quadratic polynomial contrast statistical, and linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between radial mismatch and glenoid radiolucent lines.Results: A significant linear relationship was found between mismatch and the glenoid radiolucency score (p < 0.0001), with significantly lower (better) radiolucency scores associated with radial mismatches of >5.5 mm.Conclusions: In this study of glenohumeral prosthetic mismatch ranging from 0 to 10 mm, the mismatch had a significant influence on the scores for the glenoid radiolucent lines, which were best when the radial mismatch was between 6 and 10 mm. The theoretical risk of prosthetic instability with larger mismatch values was not demonstrated within the range of mismatch values evaluated in this series.

Patterns of loosening of polyethylene keeled glenoid components after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study with more than five years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to radiographically analyze the long-term glenoid migration patterns following total shoulder arthroplasty to better understand the factors responsible for loosening. METHODS Complete radiographic follow-up of more than five years was available for 518 total shoulder arthroplasties performed for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis with use of an anatomically designed prosthesis with a cemented, all-polyethylene, keeled glenoid component. Radiographs were assessed for humeral head subluxation, periprosthetic radiolucent lines, and shifting of the position of the glenoid component. The type of migration of the glenoid was defined according to the direction of tilt, or as subsidence in the case of medial migration. RESULTS Definite radiographic evidence of glenoid loosening was observed in 166 shoulders (32%) and was characterized by radiolucency of ≥2 mm over the entire bone-cement interface in thirty shoulders and by a migration of the glenoid component (shift or subsidence) in 136 shoulders. Three predominant patterns of migration of the glenoid component were observed: superior tilting in fifty-two shoulders (10%), subsidence in forty-one shoulders (7.9%), and posterior tilting in thirty-three shoulders (6.4%). Superior tilting of the glenoid was associated with three risk factors: low positioning of the glenoid component, superior tilt of the glenoid component on the immediate postoperative coronal plane radiographs, and superior subluxation of the humeral head (p < 0.05 for all). Subsidence of the glenoid component was associated with the use of reaming to optimize the seating and positioning of the glenoid component (p < 0.001). Posterior tilting of the glenoid component was associated with preoperative posterior subluxation (i.e., a Walch type-B glenoid) and with excessive reaming (p < 0.01 for both). CONCLUSIONS The three patterns of migration observed in this study underscore the potential importance of the supporting bone beneath the glenoid component. In some shoulders, use of a keel or pegs to provide fixation of a polyethylene component in the absence of good support from subchondral bone may not be sufficient to resist compressive and eccentric forces, resulting in loosening. Preserving subchondral bone may be important for long-term longevity of the glenoid component.

A multicentre study of the long-term results of using a flat-back polyethylene glenoid component in shoulder replacement for primary osteoarthritis

We report the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of the Aequalis total shoulder replacement with a cemented all-polyethylene flat-back keeled glenoid component implanted for primary osteoarthritis between 1991 and 2003 in nine European centres. A total of 226 shoulders in 210 patients were retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 122.7 months (61 to 219) or at revision. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Constant score, patient satisfaction score and range of movement. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with glenoid revision for loosening and radiological glenoid loosening (SD) as endpoints. The Constant score was found to improve from a mean of 26.8 (SD 10.3) pre-operatively to 57.6 (SD 20.0) post-operatively (p < 0.001). Active forward flexion improved from a mean of 85.3° (SD 27.4) pre-operatively to 125° (SD 37.3) postoperatively (p < 0.001). External rotation improved from a mean of 7° (SD 6.5) pre-operatively to 30.3° (SD 21.8°) post-operatively (p < 0.001). Survivorship with revision of the glenoid component as the endpoint was 99.1% at five years, 94.5% at ten years and 79.4% at 15 years. Survivorship with radiological loosening as the endpoint was 99.1% at five years, 80.3% at ten years and 33.6% at 15 years. Younger patient age and the curettage technique for glenoid preparation correlated with loosening. The rate of glenoid revision and radiological loosening increased with duration of follow-up, but not until a follow-up of five years. Therefore, we recommend that future studies reporting radiological outcomes of new glenoid designs should report follow-up of at least five to ten years.

Acromial insufficiency in reverse shoulder arthroplasties

HYPOTHESIS Reverse shoulder prostheses depend on deltoid function. An injury to the acromion, either fracture or meso-acromion, or deltoid injury, may affect the outcomes of patients after receiving a reverse shoulder prosthesis. METHODS Four-hundred and fifty-seven consecutive reverse shoulder prostheses were implanted between January 1992 and June 2003 by one of seven surgeons in five separate centers. Forty-one patients were noted to have a pre-operative lesion of the acromion or scapular spine. Twenty-three presented with an os acromiale (meso-acromion). Seventeen had fracture or fragmentation of the acromion. One patient had a pseudarthrosis of the scapular spine. RESULTS Preoperative acromial pathology, surgical approach, and amount of inferior acromial tilt did not diminished postoperative range of motion, Constant score, or subjective results when compared to patients without acromial pathology. In contrast, the four patients with postoperative acromial spine fractures had inferior results with respect to functional and subjective results. CONCLUSION Preoperative acromial lesions are not a contraindication to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Postoperative fracture of the acromial spine has a significant effect on results and treatment is uncertain.

Dual mobility cups hip arthroplasty as a treatment for displaced fracture of the femoral neck in the elderly. A prospective, systematic, multicenter study with specific focus on postoperative dislocation

INTRODUCTION Displaced fractures of the femoral neck in the elderly are best treated with arthroplasty. The type of arthroplasty to be used, either hemi- or total hip arthroplasty, remains controversial as total hip replacements potentially have a higher rate of dislocation. HYPOTHESIS Dual mobility cups have a low dislocation rate when used to manage acute fractures of the femoral neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multicenter prospective study conducted in France over an inclusion time of 3 months, all displaced fractures of the femoral neck treated with arthroplasty were operated on with insertion of a dual mobility cup. Patients had clinical and radiological assessment at 3, 6, and 9 months postoperative. RESULTS Two hundred and fourteen hips in 214 patients with a mean age of 83 years (range, 70-103 years) were included. None of the patients was lost to follow-up. The mortality rate after 9 months was 19%. Two patients (1%) had early postoperative infection successfully treated with lavage and antibiotics. Three patients (1.4%), operated through a posterior approach, presented one postoperative dislocation, all of which were posterior. Reduction was performed through closed external manipulation under general anesthesia. There was no recurrence of dislocation. DISCUSSION This low rate of dislocation after acute total hip replacement using dual mobility design cups favorably compares with hemiarthroplasties. Dual mobility cups might therefore be considered a valuable option to prevent postoperative dislocation when treating displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur in elderly patients if a total hip replacement is recommended. Further study is needed before extending the indications for total hip arthroplasty following a fracture of the femoral neck, to assess the potential cost and complications of a longer procedure with its potential acetabular complication, and weigh them against the potential benefits.

Omarthrose ecentrée: symposium

Cuff tear arthropathy is defined as the combination of a gleno-humeral arthritis and a massive rotators cuff tear. It is generally admitted that the cuff tear, or its deficiency jeopardises the results of anatomic prosthesis. Grammont imagined and grew the concept of the reverse prosthesis whose aim was to remedy the insufficiency of the rotator cuff and whose use has dramatically modified the therapeutic approach in these complicated situations. The aim of this symposium is to analyse the results of shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic prosthesis, bipolar or reverse) in cuff tear arthropathy, in massive and isolated cuff tears which justify the use of prosthetic surgery, and in centered osteoarthritis with deficient cuff also justifying this use. Massive cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy have been considered as the stages of a same pathology by Hamada whose classification has been used for the purposes of this study. Out of the 738 initial prosthesis, 111 have been eliminated because of death, incomplete files or lost of sight, without any known complication. Out of the remaining 627 who were used as a basis for this symposium (representing 85% of initial cases), 570 who still had their prosthesis were reviewed and their functional results analysed after 2 years or more. The population was mainly female (72%) who were injured on the dominant side (75%) with a mean age of 72 years. The preoperative Constant score was in average 24 and 24% of the patients had already been operated on their shoulder. For those who had an acetabulization of the acromion, the strength in external rotation was significantly less satisfying and the lesion of the infraspinatus and the teres minor were more frequent. 48 hemiarthroplasties, 52 bipolar and 527 reverse prosthesis were studied. At revision, with an average follow up of 52 months, the revision rate was 23% for hemiarthroplasties, 14% for reversed prosthesis and only 8% for bipolar prosthesis. The prosthesis was removed in 21% of hemiarthroplasties, 5% of reverse and 2% of bipolar. No infection to report in the hemi group or the bipolar group, whereas there was an infection rate of 5% in the reverse group. Nevertheless, the Constant score was significantly better with reverse (62) than with bipolar (45) or hemi (44). The active elevation was also better with the reverse whereas the external rotation was not as good as with anatomic prosthesis. The analytic study of the results of the reverse prosthesis shows a negative influence of the lesion of the sub-scapularis and the teres minor. The results are disappointing with young patients and those who had surgical precedents. On X-ray, we can notice 0.5% of humeral loosening withouth any correlation to the fact that the implant is cemented or not, 3.6% of glenoid loosening and 68% of scapular notches without any significant change on the Constant score. Their occurrence is correlated to a preoperative rising of the humeral head and a superior glenoid lesion. It is observed more frequently with the supero-lateral approach compared to the delto-pectoral one. The frequency of these notches grows with the follow up and their occurrence is often associated to humeral radiolucent lines. On the long term, the survival rate of these prosthesis is 89% at 10 years. The Constant score deteriorates gradually after 7 years; this seems to be linked to the occurrence of x-ray modifications in the years that followed. The main complications observed with reverse prosthesis were the infections (5.1%), the glenoid problems (5.1%), the instabilities (3.6%), the acromion fractures (3.0%). Infections can be treated by a wash out and antibiotics in the first 3 months, then the removal of the prosthesis becomes necessary. The instabilities occur more often for males, with delto-pectoral approach and with 36mm diameter glenoids. The glenoid problems are frequent in the first years and often due to technical errors or material defects (unscrewing of the glenosphere). Acromion fractures have an important clinical impact when they concern the spine and there healing is difficult to obtain, whichever method is used. In conclusion, the use of a prosthesis for cuff tear arthropathies must be thought about, especially in massive cuff tear without osteoarthritis, in patients with previous surgery, and in patients younger than 70. If the active elevation is conserved and the patient is young, the use of an hemi or a bipolar prosthesis can be debated. In other cases, the indication of a reverse prosthesis is preferable given that the clinical results are better. In these cases, the surgical technique must be accurate, bearing in mind the advantages and disadvantages of the two possible approaches, the type of implant (36 vs 42), the position and orientation of the glenoid baseplate according to the pre-operative bone wear, the orientation of the humeral implant, the need for reinsertion of the subscapularis and, maybe, the possibility of an associated transfer of the latissimus dorsi.Cuff tear arthropathy is defined as the combination of a gleno-humeral arthritis and a massive rotators cuff tear. It is generally admitted that the cuff tear, or its deficiency jeopardises the results of anatomic prosthesis. Grammont imagined and grew the concept of the reverse prosthesis whose aim was to remedy the insufficiency of the rotator cuff and whose use has dramatically modified the therapeutic approach in these complicated situations. The aim of this symposium is to analyse the results of shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic prosthesis, bipolar or reverse) in cuff tear arthropathy, in massive and isolated cuff tears which justify the use of prosthetic surgery, and in centered osteoarthritis with deficient cuff also justifying this use. Massive cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy have been considered as the stages of a same pathology by Hamada whose classification has been used for the purposes of this study. Out of the 738 initial prosthesis, 111 have been eliminated because of death, incomplete files or lost of sight, without any known complication. Out of the remaining 627 who were used as a basis for this symposium (representing 85% of initial cases), 570 who still had their prosthesis were reviewed and their functional results analysed after 2 years or more. The population was mainly female (72%) who were injured on the dominant side (75%) with a mean age of 72 years. The preoperative Constant score was in average 24 and 24% of the patients had already been operated on their shoulder. For those who had an acetabulization of the acromion, the strength in external rotation was significantly less satisfying and the lesion of the infraspinatus and the teres minor were more frequent. 48 hemiarthroplasties, 52 bipolar and 527 reverse prosthesis were studied. At revision, with an average follow up of 52 months, the revision rate was 23% for hemiarthroplasties, 14% for reversed prosthesis and only 8% for bipolar prosthesis. The prosthesis was removed in 21% of hemiarthroplasties, 5% of reverse and 2% of bipolar. No infection to report in the hemi group or the bipolar group, whereas there was an infection rate of 5% in the reverse group. Nevertheless, the Constant score was significantly better with reverse (62) than with bipolar (45) or hemi (44). The active elevation was also better with the reverse whereas the external rotation was not as good as with anatomic prosthesis. The analytic study of the results of the reverse prosthesis shows a negative influence of the lesion of the sub-scapularis and the teres minor. The results are disappointing with young patients and those who had surgical precedents. On X-ray, we can notice 0.5% of humeral loosening withouth any correlation to the fact that the implant is cemented or not, 3.6% of glenoid loosening and 68% of scapular notches without any significant change on the Constant score. Their occurrence is correlated to a preoperative rising of the humeral head and a superior glenoid lesion. It is observed more frequently with the supero-lateral approach compared to the delto-pectoral one. The frequency of these notches grows with the follow up and their occurrence is often associated to humeral radiolucent lines. On the long term, the survival rate of these prosthesis is 89% at 10 years. The Constant score deteriorates gradually after 7 years; this seems to be linked to the occurrence of x-ray modifications in the years that followed. The main complications observed with reverse prosthesis were the infections (5.1%), the glenoid problems (5.1%), the instabilities (3.6%), the acromion fractures (3.0%). Infections can be treated by a wash out and antibiotics in the first 3 months, then the removal of the prosthesis becomes necessary. The instabilities occur more often for males, with delto-pectoral approach and with 36mm diameter glenoids. The glenoid problems are frequent in the first years and often due to technical errors or material defects (unscrewing of the glenosphere). Acromion fractures have an important clinical impact when they concern the spine and there healing is difficult to obtain, whichever method is used. In conclusion, the use of a prosthesis for cuff tear arthropathies must be thought about, especially in massive cuff tear without osteoarthritis, in patients with previous surgery, and in patients younger than 70. If the active elevation is conserved and the patient is young, the use of an hemi or a bipolar prosthesis can be debated. In other cases, the indication of a reverse prosthesis is preferable given that the clinical results are better. In these cases, the surgical technique must be accurate, bearing in mind the advantages and disadvantages of the two possible approaches, the type of implant (36 vs 42), the position and orientation of the glenoid baseplate according to the pre-operative bone wear, the orientation of the humeral implant, the need for reinsertion of the subscapularis and, maybe, the possibility of an associated transfer of the latissimus dorsi.

Surgical Technique: The Anterosuperior Approach for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe anterosuperior approach used for reverse shoulder arthroplasty is an intermediate between the transacromial approach originally proposed by Paul Grammont and the anterosuperior approach described by D. B. Mackenzie for shoulder arthroplasty. As an alternative to the deltopectoral approach, the anterosuperior approach has the advantages of simplicity and postoperative stability.Description of TechniqueThe anterior deltoid is divided from the anterior edge of the acromioclavicular arch, allowing exposure to the glenoid for glenosphere implantation.Patients and MethodsWe used the findings of published studies to assess instability, function and pain scores, scapular notching, and complications after this approach.ResultsIn a comparison of the deltopectoral and anterosuperior approaches in 527 reverse arthroplasties with a minimum 2-year followup, postoperative instability rate was greater with the deltopectoral (5.1%) than with the anterosuperior (0.8%) approach. Other published studies confirm this finding. No differences in Constant-Murley score or active mobility were found. Scapular notching occurred at similar rates after the anterosuperior (74%) and deltopectoral (63%) approaches. Humeral diaphyseal fracture rates were similar, whereas the acromial fracture rate was higher using the deltopectoral approach. Loosening tended to occur more often with the anterosuperior approach.ConclusionsThe anterosuperior approach can be used in primary and revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty, as well as in acute humeral head fracture. Its main apparent advantages are simplicity, ease of axial humerus preparation, quality of frontal exposure of the glenoid, and due to subscapularis tendon preservation, a low risk of postoperative instability. Its drawbacks are risk of inaccurate glenoid positioning, axillary nerve palsy, and deltoid weakening.