Daniel Thiebaud

Dose-response study of ibandronate in the treatment of cancer-associated hypercalcaemia

Hypercalcaemia is an important cause of morbidity in malignant disease. We studied the efficacy and safety of intravenous ibandronate (a new, potent bisphosphonate) in a multicentre study of 147 patients with severe cancer-associated hypercalcaemia which had been resistant to treatment with rehydration alone. Of 131 randomized patients who were eligible for evaluation, 45 were allocated to receive 2 mg ibandronate, 44 patients to receive 4 mg and 42 patients to receive 6 mg. Serum calcium values fell progressively in each group from day 2, reaching a nadir at day 5, and in some patients normocalcaemia was maintained for up to 36 days after treatment. The 2-mg dose was significantly less effective than the 4-mg or 6-mg dose in correcting hypercalcaemia, as the number of patients who achieved serum calcium values below 2.7 mM after treatment was 50% in the 2-mg group compared with 75.6% in the 4-mg group and 77.4% in the 6-mg group (P < 0.05; 2 mg vs others). In a logistic regression analysis, three factors were found to predict response; ibandronate dose (higher doses were more effective), severity of presenting hypercalcaemia (severe hypercalcaemia was associated with less complete response) and tumour type (patients with breast carcinoma and haematological tumours responded better than those with other tumours). Ibandronate was generally well tolerated and no serious drug-related adverse events were observed. We conclude that ibandronate is a safe, well tolerated and effective treatment for cancer-associated hypercalcaemia, which should prove a useful addition to the current range of therapies available to treat this condition.

Randomized phase II trial comparing different doses of the bisphosphonate ibandronate in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy.

PURPOSE To evaluate the hypocalcemic effect and safety of three different doses of the bisphosphonate ibandronate in tumor-associated hypercalcemia, and to identify factors predicting response. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred seventy-four cancer patients with a serum calcium level greater than 2.7 mmol/L (10.8 mg/dL) were enrolled onto the trial. If hypercalcemia persisted after fluid repletion, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 0.6 mg, 1.1 mg, and 2.0 mg of ibandronate. Response, defined as restoration of normocalcemia, was evaluated by an intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS One hundred seventy-three (99%) patients were assessable for toxicity and 151 (87%) for efficacy. The administration of 0.6 mg (group A), 1.1 mg (group B), or 2.0 mg (group C) of ibandronate led to response rates of 44%, 52%, and 67%, respectively. Significantly more patients in group C responded than in group A (P = .0276). Of the various parameters examined, only the initial serum calcium level (P < .0001; odds ratio, 0.083) and the dose of ibandronate (P = .0162; odds ratio, 2.094) correlated with response. One hundred ninety-five adverse events (AEs) were reported, 99 classified as serious and 96 as nonserious. Three serious and sixteen nonserious AEs were considered related to ibandronate treatment. The three serious AEs were one case with thrombocytopenia, one with nausea, and one with fever. CONCLUSION Ibandronate therapy led to a dose-dependent reduction in serum calcium levels. The response to ibandronate treatment correlated negatively with the initial serum calcium level and positively with the dose administered. A dose of 2 mg was necessary to achieve a response rate comparable to that in previous studies with the bisphosphonates pamidronate and clodronate. Because the incidence of drug-associated AEs was low, a dose escalation of ibandronate can be recommended for further clinical trials.

A single infusion of the bisphosphonate AHPrBP (APD) as treatment of Paget's disease of bone

PURPOSE Disabling pain, skeletal deformity, or risk of joint involvement characterize Pagets disease of bone. Because the disease often affects the elderly, for whom compliance is a problem, we investigated therapy with a single intravenous infusion of amino-hydroxypropylidene bisphosphonate (AHPrBP, previously APD). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eleven patients with mild but symptomatic Pagets disease and one patient with very severe disease were treated with AHPrBP administered as a single intravenous infusion of 60 mg over 24 hours. Follow-up with clinical and biochemical evaluations was performed over six months for all patients, and over one year for seven patients. RESULTS Clinical improvement and normalization of biochemical parameters were observed in all patients except one with extremely severe disease. On average, plasma alkaline phosphatase activity fell progressively and significantly from 256 +/- 29 U/liter (mean +/- SEM) to 97 +/- 6 U/liter after six months, and to 102 +/- 11 U/liter after one year (normal: less than 120 U/liter). Urinary excretion of hydroxyproline decreased within seven days to normal (from 4.3 +/- 0.5 mumol/liter of glomerular filtrate [lGF] to 1.7 +/- 0.2 mumol/lGF; normal: 2.2 mumol/lGF). Thereafter, it remained within the normal range until one year (1.8 +/- 0.2 mumol/lGF after six months and 1.9 +/- 0.3 mumol/lGF after one year). Side effects were negligible. Two patients noted only a transient increase in body temperature. When bone scintigraphy was repeated after six months, it revealed a marked decrease of the activity of the disease. CONCLUSION Due to the important and sustained inhibition of bone resorption induced by AHPrBP, a single infusion of 60 mg of the bisphosphonate leads to a rapid decline in activity and a long-standing remission of moderate Pagets disease, without significant side effects.

Dose-response in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy by a single infusion of the bisphosphonate AHPrBP.

Fifty-two patients with malignant hypercalcemia were treated with a single dose of 3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene-1,1- bisphosphonate (AHPrBP, previously APD), a potent inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. In order to establish a dose-response in humans, patients were divided into four groups receiving 30 mg, 45 mg, 60 mg, or 90 mg, respectively, as a 24-hour infusion. Initial plasma calcium was similar in all groups, except in the group receiving 90 mg, of which some patients had higher initial values. All patients responded to AHPrBP with a rapid decrease of plasma calcium concentration from 3.47 +/- 0.10 mmol/L at day 0 to 2.43 +/- 0.06 at day 6 (P less than .001). Plasma calcium became normal within four to six days in 43 patients. Eight of the nine patients whose calcium did not become normal were in the low-dose (30 and 45 mg of AHPrBP) groups. Slight and asymptomatic hypocalcemia occurred in only tow of the 26 patients in the low-dose groups, but in six of the 26 patients in the high-dose groups. A follow-up study in 40 patients showed that hypercalcemia recurred within 1 month in five of ten patients in the group receiving 30 mg, in three of ten patients in the group receiving 45 mg, and in one of 20 patients in the groups receiving 60 and 90 mg, whereas mortality was almost identical in all four groups. In all groups, plasma phosphate, plasma creatinine, urinary calcium, and hydroxyproline excretion decreased significantly. In conclusion, when administered as a single-day infusion in the treatment of tumor hypercalcemia, AHPrBP leads to a dose-dependent decrease in plasma calcium. To prevent transient hypocalcemia and early relapse, the optimal dose should be adapted to the degree of severity of hypercalcemia.

Treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer and myeloma with pamidronate

28 patients with progressing painful bone metastases (18 breast cancer, 9 myeloma and 1 low grade lymphoma) received pamidronate 60 mg by 24 h continuous infusion for at least 2 courses (range 2-12). In patients urinary calcium and hydroxyproline excretion significantly decreased in relation to diminution of bone resorption. 9 of 18 breast cancer patients and 8 of 9 evaluable patients with myeloma had symptomatic improvement. Sclerotic areas of previously lytic lesions appeared in 8 breast cancer patients and in 1 myeloma patient. Transient fever developed in 1 patient and local phlebitis in 2. Among the 28 patients, 15 did not receive any anticancer treatment or have any change of the anticancer therapy during pamidronate administration. Of 7 with breast cancer, 4 had an improvement of symptoms and 4 sclerosis on radiographs. Impressive control of symptoms was the major feature of 8 myeloma patients, but only 1 had radiographic sclerosis.

Body composition by X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance in chronic respiratory insufficiency patients

Nutrition assessment is important during chronic respiratory insufficiency to evaluate the level of malnutrition or obesity and should include body composition measurements. The appreciation of fat-free and fat reserves in patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency can aid in designing an adapted nutritional support, e.g., nutritional support in malnutrition and food restriction in obesity. The purpose of the present study was to cross-validate fat-free and fat mass obtained by various bioelectric impedance (BIA) formulas with the fat-free and fat mass measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and determine the formulas that are best suited to predict the fat-free and fat mass for a group of patients with severe chronic respiratory insufficiency. Seventy-five patients (15 women and 60 men) with chronic obstructive and restrictive respiratory insufficiency aged 45-86 y were included in this study. Body composition was calculated according to 13 different BIA formulas for women and 12 for men and compared with DXA. Because of the variability, calculated as 2 standard deviations, of +/- 5.0 kg fat-free mass for women and +/- 6.4 kg for men for the best predictive formula, the use of the various existing BIA formulas was considered not clinically relevant. Therefore disease-specific formulas for patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency should be developed to improve the prediction of fat-free and fat mass by BIA in these patients.

Effect of First Treatment with Aminobisphosphonates Pamidronate and Ibandronate on Circulating Lymphocyte Subpopulations

Up to 60% of patients receiving their first infusion of the bisphosphonate pamidronate experience an acute‐phase reaction. In this study, we used flow cytometry to determine the effects of pamidronate treatment on circulating lymphocyte subpopulations, and we investigated whether pamidronate and ibandronate treatment affect lymphocyte subpopulations differently. Twenty patients received a pamidronate infusion, 20 patients received intravenously injected ibandronate, and 10 controls received a clodronate infusion. Pamidronate treatment was followed by a significant increase in median body temperature at the 10‐hour measurement and a significant decrease in counts of circulating lymphocytes, natural killer cells, T cells, and CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell subsets. Ibandronate treatment did not affect median body temperature, and it was associated at the 10‐hour measurement with maximum increases in total lymphocyte count, B cells, T cells, and CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cell subsets. Thus, there is a substantial difference in the hematologic response to initial treatments with pamidronate and ibandronate. Clodronate treatment did not induce changes in body temperature or significantly affect the number of circulating T cells and NK cells. The reduction in lymphocyte subsets after initial pamidronate therapy might be mediated by the release of tumor necrosis factor α, whose source in the acute‐phase reaction could be T cells.

Effect of raloxifene on clinical fractures in Asian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is becoming a major public health problem in Asian countries, with a rapid increase in osteoporotic fractures projected as urbanization increases, particularly in China. The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to assess the effects of 12 months of treatment with raloxifene on the incidence of clinical fractures in postmenopausal Asian women, compared to a placebo, by combining two independently designed studies (one Japanese study and one Chinese study). A total of 488 women, 284 in Japan and 204 in China were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics (mean ± SD) for the Japanese and Chinese women were: age, 64.8 ± 6.3 years and 65.3 ± 6.0 years; body mass index, 21.8 ± 2.8 kg/m2 and 23.0 ± 2.9 kg/m2; and prevalent vertebral fractures, 26.4% and 13.7%, respectively. In both studies, the clinical vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were confirmed by radiographs or clinical reports at a central research facility. From the two combined studies, the incidence of new clinical vertebral fractures was significantly lower in the raloxifene 60 mg/day (RLX60) group (0 out of 194, P = 0.01) and in the pooled raloxifene group (those taking 60 mg/day and those taking 120 mg/day) (0 out of 289, P = 0.002), compared with the placebo group (7 out of 199, 3.5%). The pooled raloxifene group, as well as the RLX60 group, also had a significantly lower incidence of any new clinical fracture (P = 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively) compared to the placebo group. In conclusion, raloxifene treatment at 60 mg/day for 1 year resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of new clinical vertebral fractures and any new clinical fracture in postmenopausal Asian women with osteoporosis.

Effect of teriparatide on bone mineral density and biochemical markers in Japanese women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a 6-month dose-response study

The dose-response efficacy and safety with three doses of teriparatide and placebo was assessed, using oncedaily subcutaneous injections for 24 weeks, in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture for reasons of preexisting fracture(s), advanced age, and/or low bone mineral density (BMD). In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 159 subjects were randomized and 154 subjects were included for analysis. Teriparatide (10-μg, 20-μg, and 40-μg doses) showed a statistically significant increase with increasing treatment dose as assessed by the percent change of lumbar spine BMD from baseline to endpoint using Williams’ test when compared with placebo (P < 0.001). The mean (±SD) percent change in lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip BMD with the 20-μg dose from baseline to endpoint was 6.40% ± 4.76%, 1.83% ± 7.13%, and 1.91% ± 3.60%, respectively. Rapid and sustained increases in bone formation markers [type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide (PINP), type I procollagen C-terminal propeptide (PICP), and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP)], followed by late increases in a bone resorption marker [type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX)], were observed for the teriparatide treatment groups (20-μg, 40-μg), suggesting a persistent, positive, balanced anabolic effect of teriparatide. Optimal adherence was achieved by this daily self-injection treatment. Regarding safety, most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. No study drug-or study procedure-related serious adverse events were reported during the treatment period. These results observed in Japanese patients may support the observation that teriparatide stimulates bone formation in patients with osteoporosis at a high risk of fracture.

The effect of raloxifene therapy on the risk of new clinical vertebral fractures at three and six months: a secondary analysis of the MORE trial

ABSTRACT Objective: Raloxifene treatment (60 mg/day) significantly decreases the risk of new clinical vertebral fractures by 68% at 1 year compared with placebo. The objective of the present analysis is to evaluate the effects of raloxifene on the incidence of new clinical vertebral fractures at 3 and 6 months after initiation of treatment. Research design and methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 4‐year Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial was conducted in 180 study centers. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (N = 7705) were randomized to placebo, or raloxifene at 60 or 120 mg/day. Main outcome measures: Vertebral radiographs were obtained when patients reported symptoms suggestive of vertebral fracture at or between clinic visits, which were held at 3 and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. If a new adjudicated fracture was found, this was considered as a clinical vertebral fracture. The analyses included all randomized patients with a baseline and at least one follow-up radiograph (n = 6828). Results: One woman treated with raloxifene 60 mg/day (n = 2259) and 10 in the placebo group (n = 2292) had a clinical vertebral fracture in the first 6 months, resulting in a 90% relative risk (RR) reduction [RR 0.10 (95% CI 0.01, 0.63)] and a 0.39% absolute risk reduction (ARR). Similar results were observed with raloxifene 120 mg/day at 6 months. When the raloxifene groups were pooled, a significant ( p = 0.034) decrease in clinical vertebral fracture risk [RR 0.20 (95% CI 0.03, 0.90), ARR 0.17%] was seen as early as 3 months. Conclusion: The risk of new clinical vertebral fractures was reduced after 3 or 6 months of raloxifene.