Daniel V. Boguszewski

Investigating the effects of anterior tibial translation on anterior knee force in the porcine model: Is the porcine knee ACL dependent?

This study sought to determine anterior force in the porcine knee during simulated 6‐degree‐of‐freedom (DOF) motion to establish the role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Using a 6‐DOF robot, a simulated ovine motion was applied to porcine hind limbs while recording the corresponding forces. Since the porcine knee is more lax than the ovine knee, anterior tibial translations were superimposed on the simulated motion in 2 mm increments from 0 mm to 10 mm to find a condition that would load the ACL. Increments through 8 mm increased anterior knee force, while the 10 mm increment decreased the force. Beyond 4 mm, anterior force increases were non‐linear and less than the increases at 2 and 4 mm, which may indicate early structural damage. At 4 mm, the average anterior force was 76.9 ± 10.6 N (mean ± SEM; p < 0.025). The ACL was the primary restraint, accounting for 80–125% of anterior force throughout the range of motion. These results demonstrate the ACL dependence of the porcine knee for the simulated motion, suggesting this model as a candidate for studying ACL function. With reproducible testing conditions that challenge the ACL, this model could be used in developing and screening possible reconstruction strategies.

Applying Simulated In Vivo Motions to Measure Human Knee and ACL Kinetics

Patients frequently experience anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries but current ACL reconstruction strategies do not restore the native biomechanics of the knee, which can contribute to the early onset of osteoarthritis in the long term. To design more effective treatments, investigators must first understand normal in vivo knee function for multiple activities of daily living (ADLs). While the 3D kinematics of the human knee have been measured for various ADLs, the 3D kinetics cannot be directly measured in vivo. Alternatively, the 3D kinetics of the knee and its structures can be measured in an animal model by simulating and applying subject-specific in vivo joint motions to a joint using robotics. However, a suitable biomechanical surrogate should first be established. This study was designed to apply a simulated human in vivo motion to human knees to measure the kinetics of the human knee and ACL. In pursuit of establishing a viable biomechanical surrogate, a simulated in vivo ovine motion was also applied to human knees to compare the loads produced by the human and ovine motions. The motions from the two species produced similar kinetics in the human knee and ACL. The only significant difference was the intact knee compression force produced by the two input motions.

Effect of Perturbing a Simulated Motion on Knee and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Kinetics

Current surgical treatments for common knee injuries do not restore the normal biomechanics. Among other factors, the abnormal biomechanics increases the susceptibility to the early onset of osteoarthritis. In pursuit of improving long term outcome, investigators must understand normal knee kinematics and corresponding joint and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) kinetics during the activities of daily living. Our long term research goal is to measure in vivo joint motions for the ovine stifle model and later simulate these motions with a 6 degree of freedom (DOF) robot to measure the corresponding 3D kinetics of the knee and ACL-only joint. Unfortunately, the motion measurement and motion simulation technologies used for our project have associated errors. The objective of this study was to determine how motion measurement and motion recreation error affect knee and ACL-only joint kinetics by perturbing a simulated in vivo motion in each DOF and measuring the corresponding intact knee and ACL-only joint forces and moments. The normal starting position for the motion was perturbed in each degree of freedom by four levels (-0.50, -0.25, 0.25, and 0.50 mm or degrees). Only translational perturbations significantly affected the intact knee and ACL-only joint kinetics. The compression-distraction perturbation had the largest effect on intact knee forces and the anterior-posterior perturbation had the largest effect on the ACL forces. Small translational perturbations can significantly alter intact knee and ACL-only joint forces. Thus, translational motion measurement errors must be reduced to provide a more accurate representation of the intact knee and ACL kinetics. To account for the remaining motion measurement and recreation errors, an envelope of forces and moments should be reported. These force and moment ranges will provide valuable functional tissue engineering parameters (FTEPs) that can be used to design more effective ACL treatments.

Male-Female Differences in Knee Laxity and Stiffness A Cadaveric Study

Background: It has been reported that over 70% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries occur in noncontact situations and that females are at 2 to 8 times greater risk of ACL injury than males. Increased joint laxity and reduced knee stiffness in female knees have been suggested as possible explanations for the higher ACL injury rates in females. Hypothesis: Compared with male knees, female knees will demonstrate increased laxity and reduced stiffness along the anterior-posterior (AP), internal-external (IE), and varus-valgus (VV) directions. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Forty-seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested (22 male and 25 female) by use of a robotic system. Mean ages were 34.6 years (range, 19-45 years) for males and 28.4 years (range, 16-42 years) for females. Joint laxity and stiffness were measured from force-vs-displacement or torque-vs-rotation curves recorded for 3 modes of testing: ±134 N AP force, ±5 N·m IE torque, and ±10 N·m VV moment. Results: Compared with male knees, female knees had greater internal laxity from 0° to 50° flexion (P < .01; maximum difference of 8.3° at 50° of flexion) and greater valgus laxity from 0° to 50° of flexion (P < .05; maximum difference of 1.6° at 50° of flexion). However, female knees exhibited greater anterior laxity only at 50° of flexion (P < .03; difference of 1.3 mm). No significant male-female differences in anterior or posterior stiffness were found. Male knees had 42% greater internal stiffness from 0° to 30° of flexion (P < .03), 35% greater valgus stiffness at 10° of flexion (P < .03), and 19% greater varus stiffness at 50° of flexion (P < .03). Conclusion: Female knees demonstrated significantly increased laxity and reduced stiffness compared with males. This finding was not uniform but was dependent on the direction tested and the knee flexion angle. Clinical Relevance: Understanding the risk factors for noncontact ACL injury is important for injury prevention. In combination with other female-specific risk factors, increased knee laxity may be a contributing factor associated with the higher rate of female ACL injuries.

Plate Versus Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Anterior Tibial Stress Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

Background: Anterior midtibial stress fractures are an important clinical problem for patients engaged in high-intensity military activities or athletic training activities. When nonoperative treatment has failed, intramedullary (IM) nail and plate fixation are 2 surgical options used to arrest the progression of a fatigue fracture and allow bone healing. Hypothesis: A plate will be more effective than an IM nail in preventing the opening of a simulated anterior midtibial stress fracture from tibial bending. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fresh-frozen human tibias were loaded by applying a pure bending moment in the sagittal plane. Thin transverse saw cuts, 50% and 75% of the depth of the anterior tibial cortex, were created at the midtibia to simulate a fatigue fracture. An extensometer spanning the defect was used to measure the fracture opening displacement (FOD) before and after the application of IM nail and plate fixation constructs. IM nails were tested without locking screws, with a proximal screw only, and with proximal and distal screws. Plates were tested with unlocked bicortical screws (standard compression plate) and locked bicortical screws; both plate constructs were tested with the plate edge placed 1 mm from the anterior tibial crest (anterior location) and 5 mm posterior to the crest. Results: For the 75% saw cut depth, the mean FOD values for all IM nail constructs were 13% to 17% less than those for the saw cut alone; the use of locking screws had no significant effect on the FOD. The mean FOD values for all plate constructs were significantly less than those for all IM nail constructs. The mean FOD values for all plates were 28% to 46% less than those for the saw cut alone. Anterior plate placement significantly decreased mean FOD values for both compression and locked plate constructs, but the mean percentage reductions for locked and unlocked plates were not significantly different from each other for either plate placement. The percentage FOD reductions for all plate constructs and the unlocked IM nail were significantly less with a 50% saw cut depth. Conclusion: Plate fixation was superior to IM nail fixation in limiting the opening of a simulated midtibial stress fracture, and anterior-posterior placement of the plate was an important variable for this construct. Clinical Relevance: Results from these tests can help guide the selection of fixation hardware for patients requiring surgical treatment for a midtibial stress fracture.

Biomechanical Comparison of Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair Materials

Complications following abdominal hernia repair include infection, mechanical failure, adhesion, and hernia recurrence [1,2]. Mesh materials require less revision surgery and reduce patient morbidity compared to when fascia is harvested [1,3]. Biologic meshes have lower infection rates and less adhesion than synthetic materials, but are more expensive [1]. In order to determine how these materials will function in vivo, it is important to simulate aspects of the actual conditions to which the material might be subjected after surgery. Previous studies have examined how different types of fascia, synthetic materials, and extracellular matrix materials responded to tests that mimic the in vivo state [3–6]. Suture retention testing has been used to compare the performance of human fascia versus possible substitutes [4]. Ball burst testing has been instrumental in understanding the biomechanical properties of different soft tissues and replacement materials by simulating biaxial forces associated with physiological loading conditions [5–7]. This objective of this was to determine which material might be most optimal for use in hernia repair. We hypothesize that biologic mesh materials will exhibit more optimal mechanical properties than synthetic materials when exposed to these test procedures.Copyright

Anatomic Factors that May Predispose Female Athletes to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Female athletes are 2 to 10 times more likely to injure their anterior cruciate ligaments (ACL) than male athletes. There has been greater recognition of this gender discrepancy because female participation in competitive athletics has increased. Previous investigators have divided risk factors into hormonal, neuromuscular response, and anatomic subgroups. Gender variation within these groups may help explain the higher incidence of ACL injury in women. The purpose of this article is to review research examining female-specific anatomy that may predispose women to ACL injury. Specifically, we discuss how women may have increased tibial and meniscal slopes, narrower femoral notches, and smaller ACL, which may place the ACL at risk from injury. These anatomic factors, combined with other female-specific risk factors, may help physicians and researchers better understand why women appear to be more prone to ACL injury.

Effect of ACL graft material on joint forces during a simulated in vivo motion in the porcine knee: Examining force during the initial cycles

This study compared three‐dimensional forces in knees containing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft materials versus the native porcine ACL. A six‐degree‐of‐freedom (DOF) robot simulated gait while recording the joint forces and moments. Knees were subjected to 10 cycles of simulated gait in intact, ACL‐deficient, and ACL‐reconstructed knee states to examine time zero biomechanical performance. Reconstruction was performed using bone‐patellar tendon‐bone allograft (BPTB), reconstructive porcine tissue matrix (RTM), and an RTM‐polymer hybrid (Hybrid). Forces and moments were examined about anatomic DOFs throughout the gait cycle and at three key points during gait: heel strike (HS), mid stance (MS), toe off (TO). Compared to native ACL, each graft restored antero‐posterior (A‐P) forces throughout gait. However, all failed to mimic normal joint forces in other DOFs. For example, each reconstructed knee showed greater compressive forces at HS and TO compared to the native ACL knee. Overall, the Hybrid graft restored more of the native ACL forces following reconstruction than did BPTB, while RTM grafts were the least successful. If early onset osteoarthritis is in part caused by altered knee kinematics, then understanding how reconstruction materials restore critical force generation during gait is an essential step in improving a patients long‐term prognosis.

Effect of ACL graft material on anterior knee force during simulated in vivo ovine motion applied to the porcine knee: An in vitro examination of force during 2000 cycles

This study determined how anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction affected the magnitude and temporal patterns of anterior knee force and internal knee moment during 2000 cycles of simulated gait. Porcine knees were tested using a six degree‐of‐freedom robot, examining three porcine allograft materials compared with the native ACL. Reconstructions were performed using: (1) bone‐patellar tendon‐bone allograft (BPTB), (2) reconstructive porcine tissue matrix (RTM), or (3) an RTM‐polymer hybrid construct (Hybrid). Forces and moments were measured over the entire gait cycle and contrasted at heel strike, mid stance, toe off, and peak flexion. The Hybrid construct performed the best, as magnitude and temporal changes in both anterior knee force and internal knee moment were not different from the native ACL knee. Conversely, the RTM knees showed greater loss in anterior knee force during 2000 cycles than the native ACL knee at heel strike and toe off, with an average force loss of 46%. BPTB knees performed the least favorably, with significant loss in anterior knee force at all key points and an average force loss of 61%. This is clinically relevant, as increases in post‐operative knee laxity are believed to play a role in graft failure and early onset osteoarthritis.

Prediction of ACL Force Produced by Tibiofemoral Compression During Controlled Knee Flexion: A New Robotic Testing Methodology

Tibiofemoral compression force (TCF) is an important component of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. A new robotic testing methodology was utilized to predict ACL forces generated by TCF without loading the ligament. We hypothesized that ACL force, directly recorded by a miniature load cell during an unconstrained test, could be predicted by measurements of anterior tibial restraining force (ARF) recorded during a constrained test. The knee was first flexed under load control with 25N TCF (tibia unconstrained) to record a baseline kinematic pathway. Tests were repeated with increasing levels of TCF, while recording ACL force and knee kinematics. Then tests with increasing TCF were performed under displacement control to reproduce the baseline kinematic pathway (tibia constrained), while recording ARF. This allowed testing to 1500N TCF since the ACL was not loaded. TCF generated ACL force for all knees (n=10) at 50° flexion, and for 8 knees at 30° flexion. ACL force and ARF had strong linear correlations with TCF at both flexion angles (R2 from 0.85 to 0.99), and ACL force was strongly correlated with ARF at both flexion angles (R2 from 0.76 to 0.99). Under 500N TCF the mean error between ACL force prediction from ARF regression and measured ACL force was 4.8 ± 7.3 N at 30° and 8.8 ± 27.5 N at 50° flexion. Our hypothesis was confirmed for TCF levels up to 500N, and ARF had a strong linear correlation with TCF up to 1500N TCF.