Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Daniela Lup is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Daniela Lup.


Organization Science | 2006

Stages of the Recruitment Process and the Referrer's Performance Effect

Valery Yakubovich; Daniela Lup

Although the existing theory predicts that a referrals chances of being hired increase with the job performance of the referrer, no empirical evidence is available to support this claim. To address this discrepancy, we decompose the recruitment process into objective selection, subjective selection, and self-selection and theorize that the likelihood of passing a particular recruitment stage increases with the performance of the referrer under objective selection and self-selection, but remains undetermined at a stage of subjective selection. Our analysis of unique comprehensive data on online recruitment of sales agents in a virtual call center supports these arguments. The effectiveness of personnel as a recruitment channel varies with the type of the recruitment stage and performance of the referrer. When the firm evaluates candidates by an objective criterion, the advantage of a referral increases with the performance of his or her referrer; those referred by relatively high-performing workers are significantly better than the applicants who learned about the job from Internet ads. When job candidates self-select into the next stage of the online application process, the referral of any agent is more likely to continue than a nonreferral, and this likelihood increases with the performance of the referrer. On a subjective stage, the outcome is contingent on the intricacies of the recruitment process. In our case, an applicants chances of being hired increase with the performance of his or her referrer because the firm rejects the referrals of low-performing workers at a higher rate than it does nonreferrals, while it treats equally the referrals of high-performing workers and nonreferrals. The studys contributions to the literature on social networks in labor markets are discussed.


Strategic Organization | 2014

When does brokerage matter? Citation impact of research teams in an emerging academic field:

Francois Herve Collet; Duncan Robertson; Daniela Lup

Through exposure to heterogeneous sources of knowledge, actors who broker between unconnected contacts are more likely to generate valuable output. We contribute to the theory of social capital of brokerage by considering the impact of field maturity. Using longitudinal data from the field of strategic management we find that the benefits of network brokerage are stronger during the early stages of field development and diminish as the field matures. The results of our study call for further research on the interplay between network structures and processes of field emergence.


Work, Employment & Society | 2018

Something to Celebrate (or not): The Differing Impact of Promotion to Manager on the Job Satisfaction of Women and Men:

Daniela Lup

The literatures on gender status stereotyping and the ‘glass-ceiling’ have shown that women managers have more difficult job experiences than men, but whether these experiences result in lower job satisfaction is still an open question. Using fixed-effects models in a longitudinal national sample, this study examines differences in job satisfaction between women and men promoted into lower and higher-level management, after controlling for key determinants of job satisfaction. Results indicate that promotions to management are accompanied by an increase in job satisfaction for men but not for women, and that the differing effect lasts beyond the promotion year. Moreover, following promotion, the job satisfaction of women promoted to higher-level management even starts declining. The type of promotion (internal or lateral) does not modify this effect. By clarifying the relationship between gender, promotion to managerial position and job satisfaction, the study contributes to the literature on the gender gap in managerial representation.


Work, Employment & Society | 2018

The Many Faces of Gender Inequality at Work

Daniela Lup; T. Alexandra Beauregard; Maria Adamson

The collection of articles included in this first thematic issue addresses gender inequalities, a theme that has featured intensively in the public sphere in these past months, including high profile revelations about gender pay discrimination such as those at the BBC and others in the UK, the #MeToo and #TimesUp campaigns, and ongoing debates about gender inequalities in the global labour market. Our assembling of this particular issue also coincides with UK employers’ compulsory reporting, for the first time, on the gender pay gap and the solutions they envision for closing this gap, including plans around increasing the number of women in the upper echelons of organisations. In our view, all the articles in this issue have a link to this pressing problem, in that they highlight how solutions to gender gaps depend on factors that reside not only within the organisation, but also at family and societal levels. Moreover, these factors are constantly reshaped by changing economic contexts and national policies. The articles we present in this issue cover not only a variety of factors and contexts, but also document the sources and outcomes of gender inequalities across six countries from four continents, including a cross-country analysis. Together, they provide a snapshot of the rich empirical evidence available to researchers interested in further developing our theoretical understanding of gender inequalities.


Industrial and Labor Relations Review | 2017

Union Membership and Charitable Giving in the United States

Jonathan E. Booth; Daniela Lup; Mark Williams

Using U.S. panel data from 2001–2011, the authors examine general differences in charitable giving between union members, free-riders, and the nonunionized. Results indicate that union members are more likely to give and to give more to charity relative to the nonunionized, whereas free-riders are the least generous. Similar effects are found when examining the question of who joins a union or who becomes a free-rider: joining a union positively affects charitable giving, while becoming a free-rider makes individuals’ behavior less charitable. Evidence also suggests that the positive effect of union membership on giving does not diminish over time. Taken together, these results provide new evidence that union membership generates civic engagement in the form of charitable behavior; results also suggest the need to further investigate the civic behavior of free-riders.


Economic Development and Cultural Change | 2005

What Makes Small Firms Grow? Finance, Human Capital, Technical Assistance, and the Business Environment in Romania

J. David Brown; John S. Earle; Daniela Lup


Archive | 2004

Finance, Human Capital, Technical Assistance, and the Business Environment in Romania

J. David Brown; John S. Earle; Daniela Lup


Archive | 2018

Work and volunteering: longitudinal relationships between work-related experiences and volunteering behaviour

Daniela Lup; Jonathan E. Booth


British Journal of Industrial Relations | 2018

Work and Volunteering: Longitudinal Relationships between Work-Related Experiences and Volunteering Behaviour: Work and Volunteering

Daniela Lup; Jonathan E. Booth


Archive | 2017

Becoming a manager increases men’s job satisfaction, but not women’s

Daniela Lup

Collaboration


Dive into the Daniela Lup's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan E. Booth

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander Gloss

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Beth Ritter

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul W. Mulvey

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amanda Shantz

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge