Danielle Botta-Fridlund

Safety and efficacy of protease inhibitors to treat hepatitis C after liver transplantation: A multicenter experience

BACKGROUND & AIMS Protease inhibitors (PI) with peginterferon/ribavirin have significantly improved SVR rates in HCV G1 patients. Their use to treat HCV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is a challenge. METHODS This cohort study included 37 liver transplant recipients (male, 92%, age 57 ± 11 years), treated with boceprevir (n=18) or telaprevir (n=19). The indication for therapy was HCV recurrence (fibrosis stage ≥F2 (n=31, 83%) or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (n=6, 16%). RESULTS Eighteen patients were treatment-naive, five were relapsers and fourteen were non-responders to dual therapy after LT. Twenty-two patients received cyclosporine and fifteen tacrolimus. After 12 weeks of PI therapy, a complete virological response was obtained in 89% of patients treated with boceprevir, and 58% with telaprevir (p=0.06). The end of treatment virological response rate was 72% (13/18) in the boceprevir group and 40% (4/10) in the telaprevir group (p=0.125). A sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation was observed in 20% (1/5) and 71% (5/7) of patients in the telaprevir and boceprevir groups, respectively (p=0.24). Treatment was discontinued in sixteen patients (treatment failures (n=11), adverse events (n=5)). Infections occurred in ten patients (27%), with three fatal outcomes (8%). The most common adverse effect was anemia (n=34, 92%), treated with erythropoietin and/or a ribavirin dose reduction; thirteen patients (35%) received red blood cell transfusions. The cyclosporine dose was reduced by 1.8 ± 1.1-fold and 3.4 ± 1.0-fold with boceprevir and telaprevir, respectively. The tacrolimus dose was reduced by 5.2 ± 1.5-fold with boceprevir and 23.8±18.2-fold with telaprevir. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that triple therapy is effective in LT recipients, particularly those experiencing a severe recurrence. The occurrence of anemia and drug-drug interactions, and the risk of infections require close monitoring.

Independent Prospective Multicenter Validation of Biochemical Markers (Fibrotest-Actitest) for the Prediction of Liver Fibrosis and Activity in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: The Fibropaca Study

OBJECTIVES:Fibrotest (FT) and Actitest (AT) are biochemical markers of fibrosis and activity for use as a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to perform an external validation of FT and AT and to study the discordances between FT/AT and liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C.METHODS:A total of 519 consecutive patients with chronic HCV were prospectively included in five centers, with liver biopsy and biochemical markers taken at the same day. Fifteen patients were excluded because their biopsies could not be interpreted. Diagnostic accuracies were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.RESULTS:Median biopsy size was 15 mm (range: 2–58), with 9 portal tracts (1–37) and 1 fragment (1–12). 46% (230/504) were classified F2–F4 in fibrosis and 39% A2–A3 in activity. FT area under ROC curve for diagnosis of activity (A2–A3), significant fibrosis (F2–F4), and severe fibrosis (F3–F4) were 0.73 [0.69–0.77], 0.79 [0.75–0.82], and 0.80 [0.76–0.83], respectively. Among the 92 patients (18%) with 2 fibrosis stages of discordance between FT and biopsy, the discordance was attributable to FT in 5% of cases, to biopsy in 4%, and undetermined in 9%.CONCLUSIONS:This prospective independent and multicenter study confirms the diagnostic value of FT and AT found in the princeps study and suggests that FT and AT can be an alternative to biopsy in most patients with chronic HCV.

Accuracy of hyaluronic acid level for predicting liver fibrosis stages in patients with hepatitis C virus.

BackgroundIn patients with chronic hepatitis C virus, liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessing liver disease stage; nevertheless, it is prone to complications, some of them serious. Non-invasive methods have been proposed as surrogate markers for liver fibrosis. It was shown that serum hyaluronic acid (HA) level increases with the development for liver fibrosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of HA as well as to determine the HA level cut-off for predicting the presence or absence of fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis.Results405 patients with chronic hepatitis C were prospectively included with biomarker measurement and liver biopsy done the same day: 151 in the training set (only biopsy lengths of 25 mm or more) and 254 in the validation set. For the discrimination of significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis in the training set, the areas under curve (AUCs) were 0.75 ± 0.03, 0.82 ± 0.02, and 0.89 ± 0.03, respectively. Absence of significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis can be predicted by HA levels of 16, 25, and 50 μg/l, respectively (with negative predictive values of 82%, 89%, and 100%, in the same order). Presence of significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis can be predicted by HA levels of 121, 160, and 237 μg/l, respectively (with positive predictive values of 94%, 100%, and 57%, in the same order).ConclusionIn the validation set, HA was accurate in predicting significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis with AUCs of 0.73, 0.77, and 0.97, respectively. Moreover, accurate HA level cut-offs were defined for predicting significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Thus, the study supports that HA level may be clinically useful as a non-invasive marker for liver fibrosis and/or cirrhosis.

Validation and comparison of indexes for fibrosis and cirrhosis prediction in chronic hepatitis C patients: proposal for a pragmatic approach classification without liver biopsies.

Summary.  Noninvasive indexes have been developed to predict fibrosis staging. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these indexes in comparison with liver histology in hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected patients. A total of 235 consecutive patients with HCV infection from the Fibropaca multicentre independent study were included in this paper. FibroTest (FT), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and Forns score were assessed in the cohort and compared with liver histology performed on the same day. The main end point was the area under characteristic curves (AUCs) for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2–F4) and cirrhosis (F4) by the METAVIR classification. Mean age was 46 (±11) years, 55% were males, 42% (n = 99) had significant fibrosis (F2–F4) and 7% (n = 16) had cirrhosis (F4). For the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, respective AUCs of FT, APRI and Forns score were 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.76–0.86), 0.71 (0.67–0.79) and 0.76 (0.70–0.82); for cirrhosis prognosis, AUCs of FT and APRI were 0.82 (0.77–0.87) and 0.81 (0.76–0.86) (AUCs not significantly different). Using each index independently, all patients were classified by FT, 214 (91%) patients were classified by APRI and 129 (55%) by Forns score. There were significantly more cases of discordances between APRI and liver biopsy than between FT or Forns score and liver biopsy (P < 0.05). Performing all scores (FT, Forns and APRI) without liver biopsy allowed fibrosis to be well evaluated in 191 patients (81.3%), including patients with FT failure. Liver biopsy remained mandatory to evaluate fibrosis in 44 patients (18.7%). Our study shows that performing all the tests and liver biopsy improves the diagnostic accuracy for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients without patent comorbidities. The combination of all tests with liver biopsy allowed 225/235 (96%) patients to be correctly classified. The combination of all tests without liver biopsy allowed 191/235 (81.3%) patients to be correctly classified; liver biopsy remained mandatory in some patients (18.7%).

Multicentre experience using daclatasvir and sofosbuvir to treat hepatitis C recurrence – The ANRS CUPILT study

BACKGROUND & AIMS HCV recurrence remains a major issue in the liver transplant field, as it has a negative impact on both graft and patient survival. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of treating HCV recurrence with sofosbuvir (SOF) and daclatasvir (DCV) combination therapy. METHODS From October 2013 to March 2015, 559 liver recipients were enrolled in the prospective multicentre France REcherche Nord&Sud Sida-hiv Hépatites (ANRS) Compassionate use of Protease Inhibitors in viral C Liver Transplantation cohort. We selected 137 patients with an HCV recurrence receiving SOF and DCV, whatever the genotype or fibrosis stage. The use of ribavirin and the duration of therapy were at the investigators discretion. The primary efficacy end point was a sustained virological response (SVR) 12weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS The SVR rate 12weeks after completing treatment was 96% under the intention-to treat analysis and 99% when excluding non-virological failures. Only two patients experienced a virological failure. The serious adverse event (SAE) rate reached 17.5%. Four patients (3%) stopped their treatment prematurely because of SAEs. Anaemia was the most common AE, with significantly more cases in the ribavirin group (56% vs. 18%; p<0.0001). A slight but significant reduction in creatinine clearance was reported. No clinically relevant drug-drug interactions were noted, but 52% of patients required a change to the dosage of immunosuppressive drugs. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with SOF plus DCV was associated with a high SVR12 and low rates of serious adverse events among liver recipients with HCV recurrence. LAY SUMMARY The recurrence of hepatitis C used to be the first cause of graft failure in infected liver transplanted recipients. Our study demonstrates the great efficacy of one combination of new all-oral direct-acting antiviral, sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, to treat the recurrence of hepatitis C on the graft. Ninety-six per cent of recipients were cured. The safety profile of this combination seemed to be good, especially no relevant drug-drug interaction with immunosuppressive drugs.

The antibody response to hepatitis B virus vaccination is negatively influenced by the hepatitis C virus viral load in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a case-control study.

The purpose of this work was to evaluate in a case–control study the immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Seventy-seven patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C without cirrhosis were included in a prospective trial and matched for sex and age to 231 healthy adult subjects. Recombinant HBV vaccine was administered at a dose of 20 μg at months 0, 1 and 2. The definition of ‘responder to vaccination’ was anti-HBs titre > 10 mIU/ml after the three injections. Forty-nine (63.6%) chronic hepatitis C patients were responders to vaccination, compared with 217 (93.9%) controls (P < 0.0001). After the three injections, anti-HBs titres were 156 ± 260 and 615 ± 435 mIU/ml (P < 0.0001), respectively. Chronic hepatitis C patients who were non-responders to vaccination had significantly higher viral load than responders to vaccination. Moreover, a negative correlation was observed between viral load and anti-HBs concentration (r = –0.36, P = 0.003). No significant side effects were observed. There was no effect of vaccination on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load during or after vaccination. In multivariate analysis, the main predictive factors of response to HBV vaccine were absence of anti-HCV antibodies (OR = 7.65, P < 0.0001), weight < 75 kg (OR = 1.99, P < 0.035), and age < 50 years (OR = 1.58, P < 0.082). Our results suggest that viral load seems to negatively influence the response to HBV vaccine.

Treatment of recurrent HCV infection following liver transplantation: results of a multicenter, randomized, versus placebo, trial of ribavirin alone as maintenance therapy after one year of PegIFNα-2a plus ribavirin.

BACKGROUND & AIMS We aimed at determining the effect of maintenance therapy with ribavirin alone, after a year of combined peginterferon-alfa 2a (PegIFNα-2a) and ribavirin therapy, on viral response and liver histology after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS Hundred and one patients with recurrent HCV and a minimum of stage 1 fibrosis (METAVIR scoring), 1-5years after LT, were enrolled. PegIFNα-2a and ribavirin were initiated at 90 μg/wk and 600 mg/d, respectively, then increased or adjusted as a function of tolerance. At 12 months, combination therapy was discontinued and patients were randomized to ribavirin or placebo for a further 12 months. Growth factor use was permitted. RESULTS At 18 months, a sustained virological response (SVR) was obtained in 47.9% of patients in Per Protocol (PP) analysis, and was higher in patients with genotype 2 or 3 than in patients with genotype 1 or 4, in patients with genotypes 1+4 receiving ciclosporine than in those receiving tacrolimus, in patients with worse renal function, in those having received EPO, in patients with lower weight, and in those with lower viral load at 3 months. Using logistic regression, only the early viral response, recipient weight and renal function were independently associated with better SVR. SVR, viral load, activity, and fibrosis scores were similar, at M18 and M30, in patients randomized to ribavirin, or to placebo. CONCLUSIONS A PP SVR was achieved in 47.9% of patients with established recurrent hepatitis C after LT. Maintenance therapy with ribavirin alone does not improve the virological response or the histological parameters.

Multicenter Experience with Boceprevir or Telaprevir to Treat Hepatitis C Recurrence after Liver Transplantation: When Present Becomes Past, What Lessons for Future?

Background and aims First generation protease inhibitors (PI) with peg-interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) have been the only therapy available for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in most countries for 3 years. We have investigated the efficacy and tolerance of this triple therapy in transplanted patients experiencing a recurrence of HCV infection on the liver graft. Patients This cohort study enrolled 81 liver transplant patients (Male: 76%, mean age: 55.8±9.7 years) with severe HCV recurrence (F3 or F4: n = 34 (42%), treatment experienced: n = 44 (54%)), treated with boceprevir (n = 36; 44%) or telaprevir (n = 45; 56%). We assessed the percentages of patients with sustained virological responses 24 weeks after therapy (SVR24), and safety. Results The SVR24 rate was 47% (telaprevir: 42%; boceprevir: 53%, P = ns). At baseline, a normal bilirubin level (p = 0.0145) and albumin level >35g/L (p = 0.0372) and an initial RBV dosage of ≥800 mg/day (p = 0.0033) predicted SVR24. During treatment, achieving an early virological response after 12 weeks was the strongest independent factor to predict SVR24 (p<0.0001). A premature discontinuation of anti-HCV therapy due to a serious adverse event (SAE) was observed in 22 patients (27%). Hematological toxicity, infections and deaths were observed in 95%, 28% and 7% of patients, respectively. A history of post-LT antiviral therapy and thrombocytopenia (<50G/L) during treatment were both independent predictors of the occurrence of infections or SAE (p = 0.0169 and p = 0.011). Conclusions The use of first generation PI after liver transplantation enabled an SVR24 rate of 47% in genotype 1 patients, but induced a high rate of SAE. The identification of predictive factors for a response to treatment, and the occurrence of SAE, have enabled us to establish limits for the use of this anti-HCV therapy in the transplant setting.

Liver transplantation for acute liver failure related to autochthonous genotype 3 hepatitis E virus infection.

Hepatitis E virus of genotype 3 (HEV-3) is an emerging cause of sporadic autochthonous acute hepatitis in Europe. Although spontaneous outcome of hepatitis E is usually favorable, fulminant liver failure has been described worldwide. In Europe, autochthonous hepatitis E associated with fulminant hepatic failure and leading to liver transplantation has been exceptionally reported. We report here four cases of fulminant and sub-fulminant hepatitis E proposed for liver transplantation in Marseille University hospitals between July 2006 and March 2010. HEV diagnosis relied on detection of anti-HEV IgM antibodies and HEV RNA in serum samples. All cases were men, with no travel history in hyperendemic areas. HEV sequence analyses revealed genotype 3 HEV in the four patients. Liver histology indicated severe acute hepatitis in all of them, pre-existing fibrosis being found in two cases. Two patients underwent liver transplantation, and the two other patients could not be transplanted due to septic complications and died. HEV testing should be performed for the initial evaluation of every acute liver failure regardless of the epidemiological and clinical context. With respect to the potentially fulminant evolution of HEV genotype 3 infections, treatment with ribavirin of severe acute hepatitis E should be considered.

Effect of Ischemia–Reperfusion on Bile Canalicular F-Actin Microfilaments in Hepatocytes of Human Liver Allograft

We studied and quantified the effect of ischemia–reperfusion on hepatic F-actin on bile canalicular and basolateral membranes in human liver allografts by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy imaging. The phalloidin–FITC staining of F-actin was normal in liver hepatocytes before reperfusion but decreased significantly after reperfusion (by 25% of controls). These results indicate that hepatic F-actin alteration is produced during the reperfusion phase. This modification, probably induced by reactive oxygen species, could impair bile canalicular contraction and tight junction permeability and consequently bile secretion in the postoperative period.