Pauline Houssel-Debry

Multicentre experience using daclatasvir and sofosbuvir to treat hepatitis C recurrence – The ANRS CUPILT study

BACKGROUND & AIMS HCV recurrence remains a major issue in the liver transplant field, as it has a negative impact on both graft and patient survival. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of treating HCV recurrence with sofosbuvir (SOF) and daclatasvir (DCV) combination therapy. METHODS From October 2013 to March 2015, 559 liver recipients were enrolled in the prospective multicentre France REcherche Nord&Sud Sida-hiv Hépatites (ANRS) Compassionate use of Protease Inhibitors in viral C Liver Transplantation cohort. We selected 137 patients with an HCV recurrence receiving SOF and DCV, whatever the genotype or fibrosis stage. The use of ribavirin and the duration of therapy were at the investigators discretion. The primary efficacy end point was a sustained virological response (SVR) 12weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS The SVR rate 12weeks after completing treatment was 96% under the intention-to treat analysis and 99% when excluding non-virological failures. Only two patients experienced a virological failure. The serious adverse event (SAE) rate reached 17.5%. Four patients (3%) stopped their treatment prematurely because of SAEs. Anaemia was the most common AE, with significantly more cases in the ribavirin group (56% vs. 18%; p<0.0001). A slight but significant reduction in creatinine clearance was reported. No clinically relevant drug-drug interactions were noted, but 52% of patients required a change to the dosage of immunosuppressive drugs. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with SOF plus DCV was associated with a high SVR12 and low rates of serious adverse events among liver recipients with HCV recurrence. LAY SUMMARY The recurrence of hepatitis C used to be the first cause of graft failure in infected liver transplanted recipients. Our study demonstrates the great efficacy of one combination of new all-oral direct-acting antiviral, sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, to treat the recurrence of hepatitis C on the graft. Ninety-six per cent of recipients were cured. The safety profile of this combination seemed to be good, especially no relevant drug-drug interaction with immunosuppressive drugs.

Liver transplantation normalizes serum hepcidin level and cures iron metabolism alterations in HFE hemochromatosis.

Defects in human hemochromatosis protein (HFE) cause iron overload due to reduced hepatic hepcidin secretion. Liver transplantation (LT) is a key treatment for potential complications from HFE‐related hereditary hemochromatosis (HH). This study evaluated hepcidin secretion and iron burden after LT to elucidate HH pathophysiology. Patients (n = 18) homozygous for the p.Cys282Tyr mutation in the HFE gene underwent LT between 1999 and 2008. Serum iron, serum hepcidin, and hepatic iron concentrations were determined before LT and at the end of follow‐up (median 57 months). Mortality and causes of death were determined. Survival was compared to that of the overall patient population that received LT. Before LT, serum hepcidin levels were low (0.54 ± 2.5 nmol/L; normal range: 4‐30 nmol/L). After LT, 11 patients had iron evaluations; none received iron depletion therapy; all had normal transferrin saturation. The mean serum ferritin was 185 (±99) μg/L. Magnetic resonance imaging showed that iron overload was absent in nine patients, mild in one patient with metabolic syndrome, and high (180 μmol/g) in one patient with hereditary spherocytosis discovered after LT. At the end of follow‐up, serum hepcidin was normal in 10 patients (11.12 ± 7.6 nmol/L; P < 0.05) and low in one patient with iron deficiency anemia. Survival was 83% and 67% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Survival was similar for patients with HH and patients that received LT for other causes. Conclusion: In HH, LT normalized hepcidin secretion and prevented recurrence of hepatic iron overload. Survival was similar to that of patients who received LTs for other liver diseases. (Hepatology 2014;59:839–847)

Sofosbuvir-based treatment of hepatitis C with severe fibrosis (METAVIR F3/F4) after liver transplantation

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) can rapidly lead to liver graft cirrhosis and, therefore, graft failure and retransplantation or death. The aim of the present study was to assess efficacy and tolerance of sofosbuvir (SOF)–based regimens for the treatment of HCV recurrence in patients with severe fibrosis after LT. The Compassionate Use of Protease Inhibitors in Viral C Liver Transplantation (CULPIT) study is a prospective multicenter cohort including patients with HCV recurrence following LT treated with second generation direct antivirals. The present study focused on patients included between October 2013 and November 2014 and diagnosed with HCV recurrence and liver graft extensive fibrosis (METAVIR F3/F4). A SOF‐based regimen was administered to 125 patients fulfilling inclusion criteria. The median delay from LT was 95.9 ± 69.6 months. The characteristics of patients were as follows: mean age, 59.4 ± 9.0 years; 78.4% male; infected by HCV genotype 1: 78.2%, mean HCV RNA: 6.1 ± 1.0 log10 IU/mL. Eighty patients had failed previous post‐LT antiviral therapy (64.0%) including triple therapy with first generation protease inhibitors in 19 (15.2%) patients. The main combination regimen was SOF/daclatasvir (73.6%). Ribavirin was used in 60 patients. Sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment was 92.8% (on an intention‐to‐treat basis); 7 patients with virological failure were observed. Serious adverse events occurred in 25.6% of the patients during antiviral treatment. During antiviral treatment and follow‐up, 3 patients were retransplanted and 4 patients died. In conclusion, SOF‐based antiviral treatment shows very promising results in patients with HCV recurrence and severe fibrosis after LT. Liver Transplantation 22 1367–1378 2016 AASLD.

Once‐daily prolonged release tacrolimus in liver transplantation: Experts' literature review and recommendations

The efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (Tac) twice daily (bid) and once a day (qd) formulations are considered to be similar. However, the available information regarding initiation of Tac qd is sparse, and practical information is lacking. On the basis of a literature review, clinical efficacy, and safety trials, French experts in the liver transplantation field were asked to highlight pharmacokinetic (PK) differences between both formulations to assess efficacy and safety of the qd formulation in the context of de novo initiation or conversion and to provide their recommendations for initiation and day‐to‐day management of Tac qd. The same efficacy and safety profile is found for both immediate‐release and prolonged‐release Tac. PK differences carry on absorption because of the difference in formulations but not on metabolism or excretion. Tac qd offers a better reproducibility in exposure than Tac bid but is associated with an increased risk of disturbed absorption in case of a change in intestinal motility. The same therapeutic drug monitoring with Tac qd and bid could be applied, based on minimal concentration (trough level; Cmin), as there is a similar strong correlation between Cmin and the area under the curve (AUC) for both formulations. Different protocols for Tac qd initiation were described through numerous studies, except for early conversion: initiation on day 0, using 0.10 to 0.20 mg/kg/day as monotherapy, or lower dosages in case of concomitant immunosuppressant treatment or poor graft quality; early conversion from day 5 to 6 months, preferably before hospital discharge, using a 1 to 1.3 mg/kg/day schedule and with first Cmin assessment 48 hours after the conversion; and later conversion (>6 months posttransplantation) using a milligram‐to‐milligram dosage schedule, and with dose adjustment based on weekly Cmin measurement. Experts underline that an increase in treatment adherence was expected using Tac qd in liver recipients. In conclusion, Tac qd has the same efficacy and safety profile as Tac bid. De novo introduction or later conversion are well documented but could differ from day‐to‐day practice. Liver Transpl 21:1312‐1321, 2015.

Pretransplant renal function according to CKD‐EPI cystatin C equation is a prognostic factor of death after liver transplantation

In patients with cirrhosis, cystatin C (CystC) based equations may be more accurate indicators of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than creatinine (Pcr) based equations. Renal function before liver transplantation (LT) is thought to impact survival after LT. We aimed at assessing pretransplant creatinine and CystC based equations with respect to their predictive value on long‐term survival after LT.

Use of temporary porto‐caval shunt during liver transplantation with inferior vena cava conservation: An effective method to enhance use of octogenarian graft?

We read with great interest the study of Ghinolfi et al. and wanted to congratulate them for their work. The authors reported their series of 123 liver transplantations (LTs), which were performed with the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC) replacement technique and venovenous bypass, using octogenarian grafts, and they found that donor hemodynamic instability, diabetes mellitus, and donor age–Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (D-MELD) were predictive of higher incidence of ischemic-type biliary lesion incidence in the multivariate analysis. In our center, we routinely perform LTs with retrohepatic IVC preservation and side-to-side cavocaval anastomosis. According to surgeon preference, a temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) is performed or not. From January 2007 to December 2014, 816 transplantations were performed in our institution, and using the same selection criteria as Ghinolfi et al., we identified 48 LTs performed using octogenarian donors. TPCS was performed in 31 patients and absent in 17 patients. We found that octogenarian graft survival was significantly improved when a TPCS was performed (P 5 0.02; Fig. 1A).We also observed a significant reduction of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels in the early postoperative days (PODs), whereas bilirubin levels were similar (Fig. 1B-D). The IVC preservation technique is currently preferred to the IVC replacement technique. In this situation, we found that use of TPCS improves octogenarian graft outcome and biliary biological parameters in the early PODs. Interest of TPCS has been previously shown, and some authors also reported improvement of longterm graft survival. However, these results were not specifically focused on octogenarian grafts. The beneficial effects of TPCS might be explained by the improvement of the recipient’s intraoperative hemodynamic status, a decrease of postreperfusion syndrome incidence, or prevention of splanchnic congestion. In conclusion, we agree with Ghinolfi et al. regarding the safety of octogenarian grafts, and we think that TPCS should be recommended when vena cava preservation is performed, in order to improve outcomes and biliary function in this situation.

Multimodal therapy including yttrium-90 radioembolization as a bridging therapy to liver transplantation for a huge and locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains a major challenge. For an unresectable lesion without extrahepatic spread, liver transplantation could be a potential solution but it is still associated with poor oncologic results owing to the absence of effective neoadjuvant treatment. We report the case of a young man with locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma presenting with multiple intrahepatic metastases and vascular structure involvement. The lesion was significantly downstaged by a multimodal therapy including intra-arterial Yttrium-90 radioembolization, systemic chemotherapy and external radiotherapy, allowing liver transplantation. Three years after the procedure, oncologic outcome is excellent with no sign of recurrence. Multimodal therapy including Yttrium-90 radioembolization could be relevant as neoadjuvant treatment before liver transplantation for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Oral pulmonary vasoactive drugs achieve hemodynamic eligibility for liver transplantation in portopulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) hampers survival of patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension and may preclude liver transplantation (LT). Management of such patients with oral pulmonary vasoactive drugs (PVD) has not been standardized. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of oral PVD for management of POPH. METHODS All patients treated by oral PVD (bosentan, ambrisentan, sildenafil, tadalafil) for POPH were retrospectively studied. Significant response was defined for the patients who reached the following LT eligibility criteria: mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) <35mmHg or MPAP between 35 and 50mmHg with pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <250dynscm-5. RESULTS 20 patients were followed for 38 (19-57) months. Oral PVD improved MPAP (-8 [-19, +2]mmHg), PVR (-201 [-344, -68]dynscm-5) and 6-min walk distance (+52 [-51, +112] m). Fifty-three percent of evaluable patients reached eligibility to LT criteria, of whom 5 were transplanted. Baseline MPAP>51mmHg and/or PVR>536dynscm-5 predicted non response to treatment. Five-years survival was 53%. No worsening of cirrhosis or serious adverse effect was recorded. CONCLUSION Oral pulmonary vasoactive drugs are safe in cirrhotic patients with POPH. These treatments improved hemodynamic conditions allowing patients access to liver transplantation eligibility.

Sofosbuvir-Based Regimens in HIV/HCV Coinfected Patients after Liver Transplantation: Results from the ANRS CO23 CUPILT Study

Background A recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation affects survival in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfected patients. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in HIV/HCV coinfected patients after liver transplantation. Methods Twenty-nine HIV/HCV coinfected transplanted patients receiving tacrolimus-, cyclosporine-, or everolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy were enrolled in the Compassionate Use of Protease Inhibitors in Viral C Liver Transplantation cohort. Their antiviral treatment combined SOF, daclatasvir with or without ribavirin (n = 10/n = 6), or SOF, ledipasvir with or without ribavirin (n = 2/n = 11). Results The median delay between liver transplantation and treatment initiation was 37.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 14.4-99.2). The breakdown of HCV genotypes was G1, 22 patients (75.9%); G3, 3 patients (10.3%); and G4, 4 patients (13.8%). The treatment indications were HCV recurrence (≥ F1 n = 23) or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (n = 6). Before starting SOF, the HCV viral load and CD4 count were 6.7 log10 IU/mL (IQR, 5.9-7.2) and 342 cells/mm3 (IQR, 172-483), respectively. At week 4, the HCV viral load was less than 15 IU/mL in 12 (42.9%) patients. The overall sustained virological response 12 was 96.6%. No significant drug-drug interactions were observed. Conclusions SOF-based treatment regimens produced excellent results in HIV/HCV coinfected patients after liver transplantation, suggesting an important change in their prognosis.

12 Weeks of a Ribavirin‐Free Sofosbuvir and Nonstructural Protein 5A Inhibitor Regimen Is Enough to Treat Recurrence of Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation

Sofosbuvir (SOF) combined with nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitors has demonstrated its efficacy in treating a recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT). However, the duration of treatment and need for ribavirin (RBV) remain unclear in this population. Our aim was to determine whether LT recipients could be treated with an SOF + NS5A inhibitor‐based regimen without RBV for 12 weeks post‐LT. Between October 2013 and December 2015, 699 LT recipients experiencing an HCV recurrence were enrolled in the multicenter ANRS CO23 CUPILT cohort. We selected patients receiving SOF and NS5A inhibitor ± RBV and followed for at least 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation. The primary efficacy endpoint was a sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Among these 699 patients, 512 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Their main characteristics were: 70.1% genotype 1, 18.2% genotype 3, 21.1% cirrhosis, and 34.4% previously treated patients. We identified four groups of patients according to their treatment and duration: SOF + NS5A without RBV for 12 (156 patients) or 24 (239 patients) weeks; SOF + NS5A + RBV for 12 (47 patients) or 24 (70 patients) weeks. SVR12 values reached 94.9%, 97.9%, 95.7%, and 92.9%, respectively (P = 0.14). Only 20 patients experienced a treatment failure. Under multivariate analysis, factors such as fibrosis stage, previous treatment, HCV genotype, and baseline HCV viral load did not influence SVR12 rates in the four groups (P = 0.21). Hematological adverse events (AEs) were more common in the RBV group: anemia (P < 0.0001) and blood transfusion (P = 0.0001). Conclusion: SOF + NS5A inhibitors without RBV for 12 weeks constituted reliable therapy for recurrent HCV post‐LT with an excellent SVR12 whatever the fibrosis stage, HCV genotype, and previous HCV treatment. (Hepatology 2018; 00:000‐000).