Dario Benelli

Cis-acting signals controlling translational initiation in the thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus

In this work, we have studied the in vitro translational features of a bicistronic mRNA of the extremely thermophilic Archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus, with the aim of determining the nature of the cis‐acting signals controlling the recognition of the translation initiation sites in the Archaea. We found that the most important feature for efficient initiation was the presence of a Shine–Dalgarno (SD)‐like ribosome‐binding motif, whose disruption entirely abolished the translation of the corresponding cistron. The influence of other features, such as the type of initiation codon, was variable and depended upon the gene and its position in the mRNA. However, the translational block caused by the disruption of the SD sequences could be removed by deleting the 5′ untranslated region altogether, thereby creating a ‘leaderless’ mRNA. This suggests that ‘leaderless’ initiation operates by a default mechanism that does not require a specific mRNA–rRNA interaction and may be common to all three primary domains of life.

Two different mechanisms for ribosome/mRNA interaction in archaeal translation initiation

In this study, we have analysed the features of mRNA/ribosome interaction in the thermophilic archeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. Leadered mRNAs endowed with Shine–Dalgarno (SD) motifs formed stable binary complexes with 30S subunits, optimally at high temperature (65–70°C) and without the aid of initiator tRNA (tRNAi) or any factor. ‘Toeprinting’ assays revealed that the SD motifs were necessary and sufficient to direct the 30S subunit to the translation initiation region. Leaderless mRNAs, i.e. mRNAs entirely lacking a 5′‐untranslated region (UTR), did not interact directly with 30S subunits but required the presence of tRNAi, indicating that codon–anticodon pairing was required for positioning the ribosome on the initiation codon. The data suggest that archaea such as Sulfolobus routinely use two distinct mechanisms for translational initiation. SD‐dependent initiation, resembling the pathway prevalent in present‐day bacteria, would operate on distal cistrons of polycistronic mRNAs, whereas ‘leaderless’ initiation, reminiscent of the eukaryotic pathway, would operate on monocistronic mRNAs and on opening cistrons of polycistronic mRNAs.

Translation initiation in Archaea: conserved and domain-specific features

Initiation is a critical step in translation, during which the ribosome lands on the start codon and sets the correct reading frame for mRNA decoding. The rate and efficiency of translation are largely determined by initiation, which is therefore the preferred target of translation regulation mechanisms. Initiation has incurred an extensive evolutionary divergence among the primary domains of cell descent. The Archaea, albeit prokaryotes, have an initiation mechanism and apparatus more complex than those of the Bacteria; the molecular details of archaeal initiation are just beginning to be unravelled. The most notable aspects of archaeal initiation are the presence of two, perhaps three, distinct mechanisms for mRNA-ribosome interaction and the presence of a relatively large set of IFs (initiation factors), several of which are shared exclusively with the Eukarya. Among these, the protein termed a/eIF2 (archaeal/eukaryotic IF2) and aIF6 (archaeal IF6) are of special interest, since they appear to play key regulatory roles in the Eukarya. Studies of the function of these factors in Archaea have uncovered new features that will help to elucidate their conserved and domain-specific functions.

Function and ribosomal localization of aIF6, a translational regulator shared by archaea and eukarya

The translation factor IF6 is shared by the Archaea and the Eukarya, but is not found in Bacteria. The properties of eukaryal IF6 (eIF6) have been extensively studied, but remain somewhat elusive. eIF6 behaves as a ribosome-anti-association factor and is involved in miRNA-mediated gene silencing; however, it also seems to participate in ribosome synthesis and export. Here we have determined the function and ribosomal localization of the archaeal (Sulfolobus solfataricus) IF6 homologue (aIF6). We find that aIF6 binds specifically to the 50S ribosomal subunits, hindering the formation of 70S ribosomes and strongly inhibiting translation. aIF6 is uniformly expressed along the cell cycle, but it is upregulated following both cold- and heat shock. The aIF6 ribosomal binding site lies in the middle of the 30-S interacting surface of the 50S subunit, including a number of critical RNA and protein determinants involved in subunit association. The data suggest that the IF6 protein evolved in the archaeal–eukaryal lineage to modulate translational efficiency under unfavourable environmental conditions, perhaps acquiring additional functions during eukaryotic evolution.

Begin at the beginning: evolution of translational initiation

Initiation of protein synthesis, entailing ribosomal recognition of the mRNA start codon and setting of the correct reading frame, is the rate-limiting step in translation and the main target of translation regulation in all modern cells. As efficient selection of the translation start site is vital for survival of extant cells, a mechanism for ensuring this may already have been in existence in the last universal common ancestor of present-day cells. This article reviews known features of the molecular machinery for initiation in the primary domains of life, Bacteria, Archaea and Eukarya, and attempts to identify conserved features that may be useful for reconstructing a model of the ancestral initiation apparatus.

Functional analysis of the translation factor aIF2/5B in the thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus

The protein IF2/eIF5B is one of the few translation initiation factors shared by all three primary domains of life (bacteria, archaea, eukarya). Despite its phylogenetic conservation, the factor is known to present marked functional divergences in the bacteria and the eukarya. In this work, the function in translation of the archaeal homologue (aIF2/5B) has been analysed in detail for the first time using a variety of in vitro assays. The results revealed that the protein is a ribosome‐dependent GTPase which strongly stimulates the binding of initiator tRNA to the ribosomes even in the absence of other factors. In agreement with this finding, aIF2/5B enhances the translation of both leadered and leaderless mRNAs when expressed in a cell‐free protein‐synthesizing system. Moreover, the degree of functional conservation of the IF2‐like factors in the archaeal and bacterial lineages was investigated by analysing the behaviour of ‘chimeric’ proteins produced by swapping domains between the Sulfolobus solfataricus aIF2/5B factor and the IF2 protein of the thermophilic bacterium Bacillus stearothermophilus. Beside evidencing similarities and differences between the archaeal and bacterial factors, these experiments have provided insight into the common role played by the IF2/5B proteins in all extant cells.

The gene of an archaeal α-l-fucosidase is expressed by translational frameshifting

The standard rules of genetic translational decoding are altered in specific genes by different events that are globally termed recoding. In Archaea recoding has been unequivocally determined so far only for termination codon readthrough events. We study here the mechanism of expression of a gene encoding for a α-l-fucosidase from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus (fucA1), which is split in two open reading frames separated by a −1 frameshifting. The expression in Escherichia coli of the wild-type split gene led to the production by frameshifting of full-length polypeptides with an efficiency of 5%. Mutations in the regulatory site where the shift takes place demonstrate that the expression in vivo occurs in a programmed way. Further, we identify a full-length product of fucA1 in S.solfataricus extracts, which translate this gene in vitro by following programmed −1 frameshifting. This is the first experimental demonstration that this kind of recoding is present in Archaea.

An HflX-Type GTPase from Sulfolobus solfataricus Binds to the 50S Ribosomal Subunit in All Nucleotide-Bound States

HflX GTPases are found in all three domains of life, the Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya. HflX from Escherichia coli has been shown to bind to the 50S ribosomal subunit in a nucleotide-dependent manner, and this interaction strongly stimulates its GTPase activity. We recently determined the structure of an HflX ortholog from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus (SsoHflX). It revealed the presence of a novel HflX domain that might function in RNA binding and is linked to a canonical G domain. This domain arrangement is common to all archaeal, bacterial, and eukaryotic HflX GTPases. This paper shows that the archaeal SsoHflX, like its bacterial orthologs, binds to the 50S ribosomal subunit. This interaction does not depend on the presence of guanine nucleotides. The HflX domain is sufficient for ribosome interaction. Binding appears to be restricted to free 50S ribosomal subunits and does not occur with 70S ribosomes engaged in translation. The fingerprint (1)H-(15)N heteronuclear correlation nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum of SsoHflX reveals a large number of well-resolved resonances that are broadened upon binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit. The GTPase activity of SsoHflX is stimulated by crude fractions of 50S ribosomal subunits, but this effect is lost with further high-salt purification of the 50S ribosomal subunits, suggesting that the stimulation depends on an extrinsic factor bound to the 50S ribosomal subunit. Our results reveal common properties but also marked differences between archaeal and bacterial HflX proteins.

Functional characterization and high-throughput proteomic analysis of interrupted genes in the archaeon sulfolobus solfataricus

Sequenced genomes often reveal interrupted coding sequences that complicate the annotation process and the subsequent functional characterization of the genes. In the past, interrupted genes were generally considered to be the result of sequencing errors or pseudogenes, that is, gene remnants with little or no biological importance. However, recent lines of evidence support the hypothesis that these coding sequences can be functional; thus, it is crucial to understand whether interrupted genes are expressed in vivo. We addressed this issue by experimentally demonstrating the existence of functional disrupted genes in archaeal genomes. We discovered previously unknown disrupted genes that have interrupted homologues in distantly related species of archaea. The combination of a RT-PCR strategy with shotgun proteomics demonstrates that interrupted genes in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus are expressed in vivo. In addition, the sequence of the peptides determined by LCMSMS and experiments of in vitro translation allows us to identify a gene expressed by programmed -1 frameshifting. Our findings will enable an accurate reinterpretation of archaeal interrupted genes shedding light on their function and on archaeal genome evolution.

The translation factor eIF6 is a notch-dependent regulator of cell migration and invasion

A growing body of evidence indicates that protein factors controlling translation play an important role in tumorigenesis. The protein known as eIF6 is a ribosome anti-association factor that has been implicated in translational initiation and in ribosome synthesis. Over-expression of eIF6 is observed in many natural tumours, and causes developmental and differentiation defects in certain animal models. Here we show that the transcription of the gene encoding eIF6 is modulated by the receptor Notch-1, a protein involved in embryonic development and cell differentiation, as well as in many neoplasms. Inhibition of Notch-1 signalling by γ-secretase inhibitors slowed down cell-cycle progression and reduced the amount of eIF6 in lymphoblastoid and ovarian cancer cell lines. Cultured ovarian cancer cell lines engineered to stably over-expressing eIF6 did not show significant changes in proliferation rate, but displayed an enhanced motility and invasive capacity. Inhibition of Notch-1 signalling in the cells over-expressing eIF6 was effective in slowing down the cell cycle, but did not reduce cell migration and invasion. On the whole, the results suggest that eIF6 is one of the downstream effectors of Notch-1 in the pathway that controls cell motility and invasiveness.