Dariusz R. Kutyna
Australian Wine Research Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dariusz R. Kutyna.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2012
Cristian Varela; Dariusz R. Kutyna; Mark Solomon; C. A. Black; Anthony R. Borneman; Paul A. Henschke; Isak S. Pretorius; Paul J. Chambers
ABSTRACT Saccharomyces cerevisiae has evolved a highly efficient strategy for energy generation which maximizes ATP energy production from sugar. This adaptation enables efficient energy generation under anaerobic conditions and limits competition from other microorganisms by producing toxic metabolites, such as ethanol and CO2. Yeast fermentative and flavor capacity forms the biotechnological basis of a wide range of alcohol-containing beverages. Largely as a result of consumer demand for improved flavor, the alcohol content of some beverages like wine has increased. However, a global trend has recently emerged toward lowering the ethanol content of alcoholic beverages. One option for decreasing ethanol concentration is to use yeast strains able to divert some carbon away from ethanol production. In the case of wine, we have generated and evaluated a large number of gene modifications that were predicted, or known, to impact ethanol formation. Using the same yeast genetic background, 41 modifications were assessed. Enhancing glycerol production by increasing expression of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene, GPD1, was the most efficient strategy to lower ethanol concentration. However, additional modifications were needed to avoid negatively affecting wine quality. Two strains carrying several stable, chromosomally integrated modifications showed significantly lower ethanol production in fermenting grape juice. Strain AWRI2531 was able to decrease ethanol concentrations from 15.6% (vol/vol) to 13.2% (vol/vol), whereas AWRI2532 lowered ethanol content from 15.6% (vol/vol) to 12% (vol/vol) in both Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon juices. Both strains, however, produced high concentrations of acetaldehyde and acetoin, which negatively affect wine flavor. Further modifications of these strains allowed reduction of these metabolites.
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology | 2012
Dariusz R. Kutyna; Cristian Varela; Grant A. Stanley; Anthony R. Borneman; Paul A. Henschke; Paul J. Chambers
The development of new wine yeast strains with improved characteristics is critical in the highly competitive wine market, which faces the demand of ever-changing consumer preferences. Although new strains can be constructed using recombinant DNA technologies, consumer concerns about genetically modified (GM) organisms strongly limit their use in food and beverage production. We have applied a non-GM approach, adaptive evolution with sulfite at alkaline pH as a selective agent, to create a stable yeast strain with enhanced glycerol production; a desirable characteristic for wine palate. A mutant isolated using this approach produced 41% more glycerol than the parental strain it was derived from, and had enhanced sulfite tolerance. Backcrossing to produce heterozygous diploids revealed that the high-glycerol phenotype is recessive, while tolerance to sulfite was partially dominant, and these traits, at least in part, segregated from each other. This work demonstrates the potential of adaptive evolution for development of novel non-GM yeast strains, and highlights the complexity of adaptive responses to sulfite selection.
GigaScience | 2017
Peter R. Sternes; Danna Lee; Dariusz R. Kutyna; Anthony R. Borneman
Abstract Wine is a complex beverage, comprising hundreds of metabolites produced through the action of yeasts and bacteria in fermenting grape must. Commercially, there is now a growing trend away from using wine yeast (Saccharomyces) starter cultures, toward the historic practice of uninoculated or “wild” fermentation, where the yeasts and bacteria associated with the grapes and/or winery perform the fermentation. It is the varied metabolic contributions of these numerous non-Saccharomyces species that are thought to impart complexity and desirable taste and aroma attributes to wild ferments in comparison to their inoculated counterparts. To map the microflora of spontaneous fermentation, metagenomic techniques were employed to characterize and monitor the progression of fungal species in 5 different wild fermentations. Both amplicon-based ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) phylotyping and shotgun metagenomics were used to assess community structure across different stages of fermentation. While providing a sensitive and highly accurate means of characterizing the wine microbiome, the shotgun metagenomic data also uncovered a significant overabundance bias in the ITS phylotyping abundance estimations for the common non-Saccharomyces wine yeast genus Metschnikowia. By identifying biases such as that observed for Metschnikowia, abundance measurements from future ITS phylotyping datasets can be corrected to provide more accurate species representation. Ultimately, as more shotgun metagenomic and single-strain de novo assemblies for key wine species become available, the accuracy of both ITS-amplicon and shotgun studies will greatly increase, providing a powerful methodology for deciphering the influence of the microbial community on the wine flavor and aroma.
Genome Announcements | 2016
Peter R. Sternes; Danna Lee; Dariusz R. Kutyna; Anthony R. Borneman
ABSTRACT Members of the genus Hanseniaspora represent a significant proportion of the normal flora of grape berries and play a significant role in wine fermentation. Here, we present genome sequences for three species of Hanseniaspora, H. opuntiae, H. osmophila, and H. uvarum, which were isolated from spontaneous Chardonnay wine fermentation.
Methods of Molecular Biology | 2014
Dariusz R. Kutyna; Antonio G. Cordente; Cristian Varela
Gene modification of laboratory yeast strains is currently a very straightforward task thanks to the availability of the entire yeast genome sequence and the high frequency with which yeast can incorporate exogenous DNA into its genome. Unfortunately, laboratory strains do not perform well in industrial settings, indicating the need for strategies to modify industrial strains to enable strain development for industrial applications. Here we describe approaches we have used to genetically modify industrial strains used in winemaking.
Microbiology Australia | 2007
Eveline J. Bartowsky; Jenny Bellon; Anthony R. Borneman; Paul J. Chambers; Antonio G. Cordente; Peter J. Costello; Chris Curtin; Angus H. Forgan; Paul A. Henschke; Dariusz R. Kutyna; Jane M. McCarthy; Oenone Macintyre; Simon A. Schmidt; Tina Tran; Hentie Swiegers; Maurizio Ugliano
It may come as a surprise to learn that there are over 200 commercial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae available for winemakers to work their magic on grape juice. Why so many? Surely one or two reliable workhorse strains should suffice; after all, don?t they just make ethanol from sugar? The answer to this is an emphatic no; the more we look at the role(s) of yeast in winemaking, the more we are learning about their influences on appearance, aroma, flavour, mouthfeel and final ethanol concentration. And different yeast are more or less robust and efficient in converting the hostile environment of grape juice into wine. Indeed, not all wine yeasts are equal.
Genes | 2018
Dariusz R. Kutyna; Anthony R. Borneman
Over the last two decades, rapid progress in the field of synthetic biology has opened several avenues for the heterologous de novo production of complex biological compounds, such as biofuels, pharmaceuticals, and food additives in microbial hosts. This minireview addresses the usage of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a microbial cell factory for the production of flavour and aroma compounds, thereby providing a path towards a sustainable and efficient means of producing what are normally rare, and often expensive plant-derived chemicals.
Trends in Food Science and Technology | 2010
Dariusz R. Kutyna; Cristian Varela; Paul A. Henschke; Paul J. Chambers; Grant A. Stanley
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research | 2015
Cristian Varela; Peter R. Dry; Dariusz R. Kutyna; I.L. Francis; Paul A. Henschke; Chris Curtin; Paul J. Chambers
Archive | 2008
Cristian Varela; Dariusz R. Kutyna; Paul A. Henschke; Paul J. Chambers; Markus Herderich; Isak S. Pretorius