Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dave Bacon is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dave Bacon.


Nature | 2000

Universal quantum computation with the exchange interaction

Dave Bacon; Julia Kempe; Guido Burkard; K. B. Whaley

Various physical implementations of quantum computers are being investigated, although the requirements that must be met to make such devices a reality in the laboratory at present involve capabilities well beyond the state of the art. Recent solid-state approaches have used quantum dots, donor-atom nuclear spins or electron spins; in these architectures, the basic two-qubit quantum gate is generated by a tunable exchange interaction between spins (a Heisenberg interaction), whereas the one-qubit gates require control over a local magnetic field. Compared to the Heisenberg operation, the one-qubit operations are significantly slower, requiring substantially greater materials and device complexity—potentially contributing to a detrimental increase in the decoherence rate. Here we introduced an explicit scheme in which the Heisenberg interaction alone suffices to implement exactly any quantum computer circuit. This capability comes at a price of a factor of three in additional qubits, and about a factor of ten in additional two-qubit operations. Even at this cost, the ability to eliminate the complexity of one-qubit operations should accelerate progress towards solid-state implementations of quantum computation.


Physical Review A | 2001

Theory of decoherence-free fault-tolerant universal quantum computation

Julia Kempe; Dave Bacon; Daniel A. Lidar; K. B. Whaley

Universal quantum computation on decoherence-free subspaces and subsystems ~DFSs! is examined with particular emphasis on using only physically relevant interactions. A necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of decoherence-free ~noiseless! subsystems in the Markovian regime is derived here for the first time. A stabilizer formalism for DFSs is then developed which allows for the explicit understanding of these in their dual role as quantum error correcting codes. Conditions for the existence of Hamiltonians whose induced evolution always preserves a DFS are derived within this stabilizer formalism. Two possible collective decoherence mechanisms arising from permutation symmetries of the system-bath coupling are examined within this framework. It is shown that in both cases universal quantum computation which always preserves the DFS ~natural fault-tolerant computation! can be performed using only two-body interactions. This is in marked contrast to standard error correcting codes, where all known constructions using one- or two-body interactions must leave the code space during the on-time of the fault-tolerant gates. A further consequence of our universality construction is that a single exchange Hamiltonian can be used to perform universal quantum computation on an encoded space whose asymptotic coding efficiency is unity. The exchange Hamiltonian, which is naturally present in many quantum systems, is thus asymptotically universal.


Physical Review A | 2006

Operator quantum error-correcting subsystems for self-correcting quantum memories

Dave Bacon

The most general method for encoding quantum information is not to encode the information into a subspace of a Hilbert space, but to encode information into a subsystem of a Hilbert space. Recently this notion has led to a more general notion of quantum error correction known as operator quantum error correction. In standard quantum error-correcting codes, one requires the ability to apply a procedure which exactly reverses on the error-correcting subspace any correctable error. In contrast, for operator error-correcting subsystems, the correction procedure need not undo the error which has occurred, but instead one must perform corrections only modulo the subsystem structure. This does not lead to codes which differ from subspace codes, but does lead to recovery routines which explicitly make use of the subsystem structure. Here we present two examples of such operator error-correcting subsystems. These examples are motivated by simple spatially local Hamiltonians on square and cubic lattices. In three dimensions we provide evidence, in the form a simple mean field theory, that our Hamiltonian gives rise to a system which is self-correcting. Such a system will be a natural high-temperature quantum memory, robust to noise without external intervening quantum error-correction procedures.


Physical Review Letters | 2000

Universal Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation on Decoherence-Free Subspaces

Dave Bacon; Julia Kempe; Daniel A. Lidar; K. B. Whaley

A general scheme to perform universal, fault-tolerant quantum computation within decoherence-free subspaces (DFSs) is presented. At most two-qubit interactions are required, and the system remains within the DFS throughout the entire implementation of a quantum gate. We show explicitly how to perform universal computation on clusters of the four-qubit DFS encoding one logical qubit each under spatially symmetric (collective) decoherence. Our results have immediate relevance to quantum computer implementations in which quantum logic is implemented through exchange interactions, such as the recently proposed spin-spin coupled quantum dot arrays and donor-atom arrays.


Physical Review Letters | 1999

Concatenating Decoherence-Free Subspaces with Quantum Error Correcting Codes

Daniel A. Lidar; Dave Bacon; K. B. Whaley

An operator sum representation is derived for a decoherence-free subspace (DFS) and used to (i) show that DFS’s are the class of quantum error correcting codes (QECC’s) with fixed, unitary recovery operators and (ii) find explicit representations for the Kraus operators of collective decoherence. We demonstrate how this can be used to construct a concatenated DFS-QECC code which protects against collective decoherence perturbed by independent decoherence. The code yields an error threshold which depends only on the perturbing independent decoherence rate. [S0031-9007(99)09301-1]


Physical Review Letters | 2003

Communication cost of simulating Bell correlations.

B. F. Toner; Dave Bacon

What classical resources are required to simulate quantum correlations? For the simplest and most important case of local projective measurements on an entangled Bell pair state, we show that exact simulation is possible using local hidden variables augmented by just one bit of classical communication. Certain quantum teleportation experiments, which teleport a single qubit, therefore admit a local hidden variables model.


foundations of computer science | 2005

From optimal measurement to efficient quantum algorithms for the hidden subgroup problem over semidirect product groups

Dave Bacon; Andrew M. Childs; W. van Dam

We approach the hidden subgroup problem by performing the so-called pretty good measurement on hidden subgroup states. For various groups that can be expressed as the semidirect product of an abelian group and a cyclic group, we show that the pretty good measurement is optimal and that its probability of success and unitary implementation are closely related to an average-case algebraic problem. By solving this problem, we find efficient quantum algorithms for a number of nonabelian hidden subgroup problems, including some for which no efficient algorithm was previously known: certain metacyclic groups as well as all groups of the form /spl Zopf//sub p/ /sup r/ /spl times/ /spl Zopf//sub p/ fixed r (including the Heisenberg group, r = 2). In particular our results show that entangled measurements across multiple copies of hidden subgroup states can be useful for efficiently solving the nonabelian HSP.


Chicago Journal of Theoretical Computer Science | 2006

Optimal measurements for the dihedral hidden subgroup problem.

Dave Bacon; Andrew M. Childs; Wim van Dam

We consider the dihedral hidden subgroup problem as the problem of distinguishing hidden subgroup states. We show that the optimal measurement for solving this problem is the so-called pretty good measurement. We then prove that the success probability of this measurement exhibits a sharp threshold as a function of the density nu=k/log N, where k is the number of copies of the hidden subgroup state and 2N is the order of the dihedral group. In particular, for nu 1 the optimal measurement identifies the hidden subgroup with a probability of order unity. Thus the dihedral group provides an example of a group G for which Omega(log|G|) hidden subgroup states are necessary to solve the hidden subgroup problem. We also consider the optimal measurement for determining a single bit of the answer, and show that it exhibits the same threshold. Finally, we consider implementing the optimal measurement by a quantum circuit, and thereby establish further connections between the dihedral hidden subgroup problem and average case subset sum problems. In particular, we show that an efficient quantum algorithm for a restricted version of the optimal measurement would imply an efficient quantum algorithm for the subset sum problem, and conversely, that the ability to quantum sample from subset sum solutions allows one to implement the optimal measurement.


Communications of The ACM | 2010

Recent progress in quantum algorithms

Dave Bacon; Wim van Dam

What quantum algorithms outperform classical computation and how do they do it?


Physical Review A | 1999

Robustness of Decoherence-Free Subspaces for Quantum Computation

Dave Bacon; Daniel A. Lidar; K. B. Whaley

It was shown recently [D.A. Lidar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998)] that within the framework of the semigroup Markovian master equation, decoherence-free (DF) subspaces exist which are stable to first order in time to a perturbation. Here this result is extended to the non-Markovian regime and generalized. In particular, it is shown that within both the semigroup and the non-Markovian operator sum representation, DF subspaces are stable to all orders in time to a symmetry-breaking perturbation. DF subspaces are thus ideal for quantum memory applications. For quantum computation, however, the stability result does not extend beyond the first order. Thus, to perform robust quantum computation in DF subspaces, they must be supplemented with quantum error correcting codes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dave Bacon's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. B. Whaley

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel A. Lidar

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aram Wettroth Harrow

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Isaac L. Chuang

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew J. Landahl

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. F. Toner

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge