Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David A. Laskow is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David A. Laskow.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1991

Rapid Loss of Vertebral Mineral Density after Renal Transplantation

Bruce A. Julian; David A. Laskow; Jiri Dubovsky; Eva V. Dubovsky; John J. Curtis; L. Darryl Quarles

BACKGROUND Osteopenia is a major complication of renal transplantation. Immunosuppressive regimens including cyclosporine, which permit the use of lower doses of glucocorticoids, may reduce glucocorticoid-induced osteopenia. METHODS We prospectively studied the magnitude, distribution, and mechanism of bone loss in 20 adults who received renal allografts from living related donors, who had good renal function, and who were treated with azathioprine, cyclosporine, and low doses of prednisone. We measured serum biochemical markers of bone metabolism, determined the bone mineral density of the second, third, and fourth lumbar vertebrae and the shaft of the radius, and analyzed the histomorphometric features of iliac bone at the time of transplantation and six months later. Measurements of vertebral mineral density were repeated 18 months after transplantation in 17 of the patients. RESULTS After transplantation, the mean serum concentrations of parathyroid hormone, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase decreased and the serum calcitriol concentration increased. The mean (+/- SD) bone mineral density of the vertebrae had decreased 6.8 +/- 5.6 percent 6 months after transplantation (P less than 0.05) and 8.8 +/- 7.0 percent 18 months after transplantation. In contrast, the bone mineral density of the radius had increased six months after transplantation (P less than 0.05). The histomorphometric studies showed that the rate of bone formation decreased from 50.5 +/- 44.8 to 23.1 +/- 13.8 microns3 per square micrometer per year (P less than 0.05), and the formation period lengthened from 70 +/- 42 to 146 +/- 144 days (P less than 0.05). Consequently, the amount of bone replaced during a remodeling cycle diminished. CONCLUSIONS Osteopenia associated with renal transplantation remains a problem in the cyclosporine era. The loss of vertebral bone in our subjects was due to an imbalance in bone remodeling consistent with a toxic effect of glucocorticoids.


Transplantation | 1991

Long-term results of a controlled prospective study with transfusion of donor-specific bone marrow in 57 cadaveric renal allograft recipients.

W. H. Barber; J. A. Mankin; David A. Laskow; Mark H. Deierhoi; Bruce A. Julian; John J. Curtis; Arnold G. Diethelm

Experimental studies have shown that antilymphocyte globulin combined with transfusion of donor-specific bone marrow cells can induce partial tolerance to allograft tissue. We have adapted these protocols to clinical use and present the results of 57 cadaveric renal allograft recipients who received Minnesota ALG followed by the transfusion of cryopreserved donor-specific bone marrow. A group of 54 patients received the contralateral kidney and similar immunosuppression without the marrow transfusion and serve as controls. Both groups received quadruple immunosuppression with MALG, cyclosporin, azathioprine, and prednisone. In the bone marrow group, after a 10-14 day induction course of ALG, cryopreserved marrow was transfused on the seventh day after the last dose of ALG. The median follow-up in both groups is 16 months, (range 2.5-33 months). Six grafts have been lost in the bone marrow group, (three rejections, 2 deaths [Cr 2.0, 2.3], 1 recurrent disease). In the control group 16 grafts have been lost (13 rejections, 3 deaths [Cr 1.7, 2.5, 3.0]). Five patients in the control group have biopsy-proved chronic rejection compared to one in the bone marrow group. 17 patients in the bone marrow group have been tapered off the prednisone, and three of these patients have had mild late rejection episodes without graft loss. The two groups were compared for differences in the number of rejection episodes, estimated renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, and urine protein. No differences were found. The allograft survival of the bone marrow group was significantly greater (P less than .01) than the control group. The graft survival rates for the bone marrow group at 12 and 18 months were 90% (confidence limits [CL] 85-94) and 85% (CL 78-90), respectively. In the the control group the 12 and 18 month allograft survival rates were 71% (CL 63-78) and 67% (CL 58-74), respectively. The survival in the control group was similar to our overall transplant experience with quadruple therapy. Mixed lymphocyte culture analysis shows a trend to diminished donor-specific responsiveness in the bone marrow group. The use of cryopreserved donor-specific bone marrow is associated with improved allograft survival in cadaveric kidney allograft recipients. However, a more effective induction protocol is needed to reduce the overall number of rejection episodes.


Transplantation | 1996

An open-label, concentration-ranging trial of FK506 in primary kidney transplantation : A report of the United States Multicenter FK506 Kidney Transplant group

David A. Laskow; Flavio Vincenti; John F. Neylan; Robert Mendez; Arthur J. Matas

This was a multicenter, open-label, concentration-ranging trial of FK506 and cyclosporine in 120 patients undergoing primary cadaveric kidney transplant. Patients were randomized to a cyclosporine-based regimen or to one of three FK506-based regimens designed to achieve low (5-14 ng/ml), medium (15-25 ng/ml), or high (26-40 ng/ml) trough whole blood levels. Corresponding initial doses of FK506 were 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mg/kg/day. Patients were evaluated at 42 days after transplant for the occurrence of the first episode of acute rejection or toxicity, necessitating a dosage reduction. There was no significant difference among the three FK506-based regimens and the cyclosporine-based regimen for rejection or toxicity at 42 days. However, the incidence of acute rejection was significantly lower (14% for FK506 and 32% for cyclosporine; P=0.048) for the aggregate of all FK506-treated patients versus cyclosporine. The incidence of neurotoxic and gastrointestinal events was higher among FK506-treated patients during the first month after transplant. A significant trend was observed for increasing toxicity with increasing maximum trough FK506 concentrations (P=0.01) and for decreasing rates of rejection with increasing minimum trough FK506 concentrations (P=0.021). FK506 was effective in preventing early rejection in kidney transplant recipients. The target range of whole blood levels that optimizes efficacy and minimizes toxicity seems to be 5-15 ng/ml. The corresponding recommended initial dose of FK506 for kidney transplant recipients seems to be 0.2 mg/kg/day.


Transplantation | 1996

A multicenter trial of FK506 (tacrolimus) therapy in refractory acute renal allograft rejection

E. Steve Woodle; J. Richard Thistlethwaite; John H. Gordon; David A. Laskow; Mark H. Deierhoi; James F. Burdick; John D. Pirsch; Hans W. Sollinger; Flavio Vincenti; Lewis Burrows; Beth Schwartz; Gabriel M. Danovitch; Alan H. Wilkinson; David Shaffer; Mary Ann Simpson; Richard B. Freeman; Richard J. Rohrer; Robert Mendez; Saleh Aswad; Stephen R. Munn; Russell H. Wiesner; Frank L. Delmonico; John F. Neylan; John D. Whelchel

A multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory renal allograft rejection. Renal transplant recipients experiencing biopsy-proven recurrent acute allograft rejection were eligible if the current rejection episode was refractory to corticosteroids. A total of 73 patients were enrolled, of whom 59 (81%) had previously received at least one course of antilymphocyte antibody as rejection therapy. One-year follow-up was available in 93% of patients. Median time to tacrolimus rescue therapy was 75 days after transplantation (range, 18-1448 days). Therapeutic responses to tacrolimus included improvement in 78% of patients, stabilization in 11%, and progressive deterioration in 11%. The risk of experiencing progressive deterioration was related to the pretacrolimus serum creatinine level: serum creatinine < or = mg/dl, 3%; 3.1-5 mg/dl, 16% (P < 0.04); > 5 mg/dl, 23% (P < 0.02). Twelve-month (from the time of initiation of tacrolimus therapy) actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 93% and 75%. Graft loss occurred in 19 patients (25%) at a median time of 108 days. Fourteen episodes of recurrent rejection were diagnosed in 10 patients (14%), at a median time of 101 days. Eleven episodes of recurrent rejection were treated (three patients underwent transplant nephrectomy), with resolution achieved in nine patients. Antilymphocyte antibody therapy was not used to treat recurrent rejection. Serum creatinine values improved during tacrolimus therapy: median serum creatinine level before tacrolimus, 3.2 mg/dl; median at 1 year after tacrolimus, 1.8 mg/dl. Twelve infections were documented in 11 patients (15%), including cytomegalovirus infection in three patients (4%). Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was diagnosed in a single patient. Tacrolimus whole blood levels averaged 15.0 +/- 9.9 ng/ml at day 7 of tacrolimus therapy and 9.4 +/- 5.1 ng/ml at 1 year, and were consistent among individual centers. Treatment outcome did not correlate with tacrolimus blood levels. The most commonly observed adverse events were neurological and gastrointestinal. Seventy-four percent of patients received tacrolimus for at least 1 year. Tacrolimus therapy was discontinued in 18% of patients for rejection (11% for progressive, unrelenting rejection, and 7% for recurrent rejection). Tacrolimus therapy was discontinued in 8% of patients due to adverse events. In conclusion, tacrolimus rescue therapy provides (1) prompt, effective reversal of refractory renal allograft rejection, (2) good long-term renal allograft function, (3) a low incidence of recurrent rejection, and (4) an acceptable safety profile in renal allograft recipients experiencing refractory rejection.


Transplantation | 1996

One-year follow-up of an open-label trial of FK506 for primary kidney transplantation. A report of the U.S. Multicenter FK506 Kidney Transplant Group.

Flavio Vincenti; David A. Laskow; John F. Neylan; Robert Mendez; Arthur J. Matas

Patients undergoing primary cadaveric kidney transplantation were followed for 1 year as part of a phase II, multicenter, open-label concentration-ranging trial of FK506 and cyclosporine. One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned to a cyclosporine-based regimen or one of three FK506-based regimens designed to achieve low (5-14 ng/ml), medium (15-25 ng/ml), or high (26-40 ng/ml) trough whole blood levels. Corresponding initial doses of FK506 were 0.2, 0.3, or 0.4 mg(kg/day, respectively. Patients with toxicity to FK506 had their target concentration reduced by lowering the dose of FK506. Ninety-two patients completed a 1-year follow-up to determine patient and graft survival and long-term safety. At 1-year, the patient survival rate was 98% for FK506 and 92% for cyclosporine, and the graft survival rate was 93% and 89% in the FK506 and cyclosporine groups, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection was significantly lower (14% FK506, 32% cyclosporine, P=0.048) at day 42 after transplantation. However, the incidence of rejection episodes requiring treatment at 1 year was similar in both groups (33% for FK506 and 32% for cyclosporine). Nephrotoxicity occurred with a similar frequency with FK506 and cyclosporine, but the incidence of neurotoxic events and the incidence of new insulin use were higher among FK506-treated patients. The target range of whole blood levels that optimizes efficacy and minimizes toxicity seems to be 5-15 ng/ml. The corresponding recommended initial dose of FK506 for kidney transplant recipients is 0.2 mg/kg/day. These results indicate that the efficacy and safety of FK506 were comparable to that for cyclosporine for primary immunosuppression in patients undergoing cadaveric kidney transplantation.


Transplantation | 1992

Improved survival of primary cadaveric renal allografts in blacks with quadruple immunosuppression.

Robert S. Gaston; S L Hudson; Mark H. Deierhoi; W. H. Barber; David A. Laskow; Bruce A. Julian; John J. Curtis; Bruce O. Barger; Terrie W. Shroyer; Arnold G. Diethelm

Black recipients of cadaveric kidneys have been shown to have a lower rate of allograft survival than whites. Data were reviewed from 642 primary cadaveric transplants: results in 276 patients (163 white and 113 black) (group 1) who had received triple therapy (azathioprine-CsA-prednisone, 1985–87) were compared with those in 366 patients (180 white and 186 black) (group 2) receiving quadruple immunosuppres-sion (MALG-azathioprine-CsA-prednisone, 1987–90). Blacks in group 2 had better patient (97% vs. 91%, P=0.03) and graft (77% vs. 55%, P=0.0002) survival at 1 year than in group 1. There was no difference in these parameters among whites in either group. Racial differences in graft survival noted in group 1 disappeared in group 2. While HLA BDR matching improved in group 2 patients (P=0.0001), whites received better matched kidneys than blacks in both groups (P=0.001). HLA matching was associated with improved graft survival only in white recipients of 4 BDR-matched kidneys. In group 1, more blacks than whites had at least one episode of acute rejection (76% vs. 57%, P=0.001); blacks also lost more grafts to acute and chronic rejection. In group 2, there were no racial differences in the number of rejection episodes or immunologic graft losses. Of 14 potential variables examined by parametric analysis, only quadruple therapy significantly reduced risk of graft loss in blacks. Quadruple immuno-suppression improved primary cadaveric renal allograft survival in black recipients, abrogating previously noted racial differences.


Transplantation | 1996

Impact of donor/recipient size matching on outcomes in renal transplantation.

Robert S. Gaston; Sharon L. Hudson; Bruce A. Julian; David A. Laskow; Mark H. Deierhoi; Charles E. Sanders; Michael G. Phillips; Arnold G. Diethelm; John J. Curtis

Interest in nonimmunologic factors affecting longterm graft survival has focused on adequacy of nephron dosing. Body surface are (BSA) is a reliable surrogate for nephron mass. In a retrospective study of 378 primary recipients of paired kidneys from 189 cadaveric donors, we assessed the impact of matching donor and recipient BSA on outcome over 7 years. BSA of donors was 1.82 +/- 0.26 m2. Initially, paired recipients of kidneys from a single donor were divided into two groups. Group 1 included the recipient with the larger BSA of the pair (1.97 +/- 0.17 m2), while group 2 consisted of smaller BSA recipients (1.69 +/- 0.19 m2). Although early function was better in group 2 patients, graft survival at 1 year (77% vs. 79%) and 5 years (54% vs. 55%) was identical between groups, as were most recent serum creatinine levels (2.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.1 mg/dl). A second analysis divided patients with a functioning allograft at discharge from initial transplant hospitalization (n = 345) into three groups based solely on donor to recipient BSA ratio: the ratio of group A (n = 30) was < or = 0.8, that of group B (n = 255) was between 0.81 and 1.19, and that of group C (n = 51) was > or = 1.2. Graft survival and kidney function over 5 years did not differ among groups. In multivariate analysis of 17 variables, donor:recipient BSA, independent of other risk factors, did not affect risk allograft loss. These data indicate that including nephron mass as a criterion for cadaveric organ allocation is unlikely to improve long-term results in renal transplantation.


Transplantation | 1998

Long-term function and survival of elderly donor kidneys transplanted into young adults.

Mysore S. Anil Kumar; D. Panigrahi; Christopher M. Dezii; George M. Abouna; Robert Chvala; Joseph Brezin; A.M.S Kumar; Shiela M. Katz; Mary McSorley; David A. Laskow

BACKGROUND Traditionally, elderly donor kidneys have not been widely accepted for transplantation on the assumption of inferior performance. However, the United Network for Organ Sharing reports an increase in the number of elderly donors from less than 2% in 1982 to 24% in 1995. This trend is commensurate with the increase of older dialysis patients and an overall increase in the elderly population in the United States (1). Optimal utilization of these kidneys is essential to overcome the acute organ shortage. METHODS In this study, we transplanted 25 kidneys from elderly donors (ages 56-72 years) into young adult recipients (ages 20-50 years) (group 1) over a 4-year period. We compared the results with matched recipients of young adult donor kidneys (group 2) with regard to long-term kidney function and graft survival. A pretransplant biopsy of elderly donor kidneys was carried out and a frozen section report was obtained. Only those kidneys showing glomerulosclerosis of less than 20% were accepted for transplantation. All cadaveric kidneys were preserved in University of Wisconsin solution. RESULTS Pretransplant biopsies of elderly donor kidneys showed structural deficits, which included glomerulosclerosis in 85%, arteriolar and/or mesangial thickening in 75%, and interstitial lymphocyte infiltration in 30%. The mean serum creatinine was 2.4+/-0.74, 2.2+/-0.56, and 2.9+/-0.76 mg/100 ml in group 1 and 1.5+/-0.55, 2.3+/-2.24, and 1.7+/-0.62 in group 2 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The patient survival was 92%, 92%, and 88% in group 1, and 100%, 100%, and 100% in group 2 at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The graft survival was 80%, 64%, and 56% in group 1 and 100%, 96%, and 88% in group 2 at similar time intervals. The differences in the serum creatinine and graft survival between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Most of the elderly donor kidneys with structural deficits transplanted into young adults provided suboptimal function and inferior long-term graft survival. To maximize the utilization and optimize the survival of elderly donor kidneys, we propose transplantation of these kidneys into age-matched recipients with similar physiological requirements as those of donors, with regard to kidney function.


Annals of Surgery | 1993

Experience with Mycophenolate Mofetil (RS61443) in Renal Transplantation at a Single Center.

Mark H. Deierhoi; R S Kauffman; S L Hudson; William Howard Barber; John J. Curtis; Bruce A. Julian; Robert S. Gaston; David A. Laskow; Arnold G. Diethelm

OBJECTIVE Mycophenolate mofetil (MM) is a new immunosuppressive agent that reversibly inhibits guanine nucleotide synthesis and DNA replication. Its activity is highly selective for T and B lymphocytes. Two open-label multicenter trials of MM in renal transplantation have been performed. This report summarizes the results from one center involved in these two trials. METHODS AND RESULTS The initial trial of MM was an open-label dose-ranging trial in primary cadaveric renal transplantation. Mycophenolate mofetil was included in the maintenance immunosuppression regimen from the day after transplantation. Of the 21 patients enrolled in this trial, one (5%) was withdrawn for side effects. There was one graft loss due to recurrent renal disease and two patients were withdrawn for difficulty with follow-up. Mean follow-up is 26 months, and patient and graft survival at 2 years are 100 and 95% respectively. The second trial was designed to study the efficacy of mycophenolate in reversing refractory renal allograft rejection. Patients enrolled in the trial had biopsy-proven acute rejection and had previously received at least one course of high-dose corticosteroids and/or OKT3. Of the 26 patients enrolled in this trial, one (4%) was withdrawn for side effects. There were two deaths. Mean follow-up is 20 months, and patient and graft survival at 12 months was 91 and 54%. The incidence of infections in the two groups was 38% and there were no deaths in either group attributable to infection. CONCLUSIONS The results of these two studies indicate that mycophenolate mofetil could be administered safely to renal allograft recipients for periods up to 2 years. It appears to be effective in reversing acute rejection in a high percentage of patients refractory to other forms of therapy.


Annals of Surgery | 1995

Progress in Renal Transplantation a Single Center Study of 3359 Patients over 25 Years

Arnold G. Diethelm; Mark H. Deierhoi; S L Hudson; David A. Laskow; Bruce A. Julian; Robert S. Gaston; J. Stevenson Bynon; John J. Curtis

OBJECTIVE The study analyzed 3359 consecutive renal transplant operations for patient and graft survival, including living related, cadaveric, and living unrelated patients. The analysis was separated into three groups according to immunosuppression and date of transplant. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Improvements in renal transplantation in the past 25 years have been the result of better immunosuppression, organ preservation, and patient selection. METHODS A single transplant centers experience over a 25-year period was analyzed regarding patient and graft survival. Potential risk factors included patient demographics, tissue typing, donor characteristics, number of transplants, acute and chronic rejection, acute tubular necrosis, primary disease, and malignancy. RESULTS The primary cause of graft loss was rejection. Improvement in cadaveric graft survival since 1987 with quadruple therapy was not apparent in living donor patients. Race continued to be a negative factor in graft survival. Avoiding previous mismatched antigens and the use of flow cytometry improved allograft survival. The leading cause of death in the past 7 years in cadaveric recipients was cardiac (52%). CONCLUSIONS Improved graft survival in the past 25 years was related to 1) advances in immunosuppression, 2) better methods of cytotoxic antibody detection, and 3) human lymphocyte antigen match.

Collaboration


Dive into the David A. Laskow's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John J. Curtis

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark H. Deierhoi

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Arnold G. Diethelm

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce A. Julian

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert S. Gaston

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Henry Barber

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce O. Barger

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge