S L Hudson

Improved survival of primary cadaveric renal allografts in blacks with quadruple immunosuppression.

Black recipients of cadaveric kidneys have been shown to have a lower rate of allograft survival than whites. Data were reviewed from 642 primary cadaveric transplants: results in 276 patients (163 white and 113 black) (group 1) who had received triple therapy (azathioprine-CsA-prednisone, 1985–87) were compared with those in 366 patients (180 white and 186 black) (group 2) receiving quadruple immunosuppres-sion (MALG-azathioprine-CsA-prednisone, 1987–90). Blacks in group 2 had better patient (97% vs. 91%, P=0.03) and graft (77% vs. 55%, P=0.0002) survival at 1 year than in group 1. There was no difference in these parameters among whites in either group. Racial differences in graft survival noted in group 1 disappeared in group 2. While HLA BDR matching improved in group 2 patients (P=0.0001), whites received better matched kidneys than blacks in both groups (P=0.001). HLA matching was associated with improved graft survival only in white recipients of 4 BDR-matched kidneys. In group 1, more blacks than whites had at least one episode of acute rejection (76% vs. 57%, P=0.001); blacks also lost more grafts to acute and chronic rejection. In group 2, there were no racial differences in the number of rejection episodes or immunologic graft losses. Of 14 potential variables examined by parametric analysis, only quadruple therapy significantly reduced risk of graft loss in blacks. Quadruple immuno-suppression improved primary cadaveric renal allograft survival in black recipients, abrogating previously noted racial differences.

Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation

Background: Early immunologic and non‐immunologic injury of renal allografts adversely affects long‐term graft survival. Some degree of preservation injury is inevitable in cadaveric renal transplantation, and, with the reduction in early acute rejection, this non‐immunologic injury has assumed a greater relative importance. Optimal graft preservation will maximize the chances of early graft function and long‐term graft survival, but the best method of preservation – pulsatile perfusion (PP) versus cold storage (CS) – is debated. u2028Methods: Primary cadaveric kidney recipients from January 1990 through December 1995 were evaluated. The effects of implantation warm ischemic time (WIT) (≤20 min, 21–40 min, or >40 min) and total ischemic time (TIT) (< or ≥20 h) on death‐censored graft survival were compared between kidneys preserved by PP versus those preserved by CS. The effect of preservation method on delayed graft function (DGF) was also examined. u2028Results: There were 568 PP kidneys and 268 CS kidneys. Overall death‐censored graft survival was not significantly different between groups, despite worse donor and recipient characteristics in the PP group. CS kidneys with an implantation WIT >40 min had worse graft survival than those with <40 min (p=0.0004). Survival of PP kidneys and those transplanted into 2 DR‐matched recipients was not affected by longer implantation WIT. Longer TIT did not impact survival. DGF was more likely after CS preservation (20.2% versus 8.8%, p=0.001). u2028Conclusions: Preservation with PP improves early graft function and lessens the adverse effect of increased warm ischemia in cadaveric renal transplantation. This method is likely associated with less preservation injury and/or increases the threshold for injury from other sources and is superior to CS.

Experience with Mycophenolate Mofetil (RS61443) in Renal Transplantation at a Single Center.

OBJECTIVEnMycophenolate mofetil (MM) is a new immunosuppressive agent that reversibly inhibits guanine nucleotide synthesis and DNA replication. Its activity is highly selective for T and B lymphocytes. Two open-label multicenter trials of MM in renal transplantation have been performed. This report summarizes the results from one center involved in these two trials.nnnMETHODS AND RESULTSnThe initial trial of MM was an open-label dose-ranging trial in primary cadaveric renal transplantation. Mycophenolate mofetil was included in the maintenance immunosuppression regimen from the day after transplantation. Of the 21 patients enrolled in this trial, one (5%) was withdrawn for side effects. There was one graft loss due to recurrent renal disease and two patients were withdrawn for difficulty with follow-up. Mean follow-up is 26 months, and patient and graft survival at 2 years are 100 and 95% respectively. The second trial was designed to study the efficacy of mycophenolate in reversing refractory renal allograft rejection. Patients enrolled in the trial had biopsy-proven acute rejection and had previously received at least one course of high-dose corticosteroids and/or OKT3. Of the 26 patients enrolled in this trial, one (4%) was withdrawn for side effects. There were two deaths. Mean follow-up is 20 months, and patient and graft survival at 12 months was 91 and 54%. The incidence of infections in the two groups was 38% and there were no deaths in either group attributable to infection.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe results of these two studies indicate that mycophenolate mofetil could be administered safely to renal allograft recipients for periods up to 2 years. It appears to be effective in reversing acute rejection in a high percentage of patients refractory to other forms of therapy.

Progress in Renal Transplantation a Single Center Study of 3359 Patients over 25 Years

OBJECTIVEnThe study analyzed 3359 consecutive renal transplant operations for patient and graft survival, including living related, cadaveric, and living unrelated patients. The analysis was separated into three groups according to immunosuppression and date of transplant.nnnSUMMARY BACKGROUND DATAnImprovements in renal transplantation in the past 25 years have been the result of better immunosuppression, organ preservation, and patient selection.nnnMETHODSnA single transplant centers experience over a 25-year period was analyzed regarding patient and graft survival. Potential risk factors included patient demographics, tissue typing, donor characteristics, number of transplants, acute and chronic rejection, acute tubular necrosis, primary disease, and malignancy.nnnRESULTSnThe primary cause of graft loss was rejection. Improvement in cadaveric graft survival since 1987 with quadruple therapy was not apparent in living donor patients. Race continued to be a negative factor in graft survival. Avoiding previous mismatched antigens and the use of flow cytometry improved allograft survival. The leading cause of death in the past 7 years in cadaveric recipients was cardiac (52%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnImproved graft survival in the past 25 years was related to 1) advances in immunosuppression, 2) better methods of cytotoxic antibody detection, and 3) human lymphocyte antigen match.

Renal retransplantation : the role of race, quadruple immunosuppression, and the flow cytometry cross-match

To assess the impact of quadruple immunosuppression in black and white recipients of cadaver kidney retransplants, we reviewed data from 178 second or subsequent renal allografts performed at our center between 1985 and 1991. Sixty-six black and 102 white recipients were divided into 3 groups: groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) T cell cross-match, receiving triple drug therapy (CsA-AZA-prednisone) and quadruple immunosuppressive therapy (quad therapy; Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin-CsA-AZA-prednisone), respectively. Group 3 patients also received quad therapy, but, in addition to a negative CDC cross-match, had a negative T cell flow cytometry cross-match (FCXM). Black and white patients in groups 1 and 2 experienced similar graft survival at 1 year, ranging from 47% to 63% (P = NS). In group 3, 1-year graft survival in whites, but not blacks, improved to 82%, with fewer grafts lost to immunologic causes in the first 90 days after transplant. A parametric analysis of potential risk factors identified a significant effect of better HLA-DR matching (P = 0.0005) on improved graft survival, with previous mismatched antigens (P = 0.04), female donor (P = 0.002), and short duration of previous graft (P = 0.05) as risk factors for graft loss. Race and immunosuppressive protocol did not affect graft survival. In group 3, blacks received fewer well-matched kidneys than whites (P = 0.05), which may have contributed to poorer outcomes for black recipients. Nine of 10 patients undergoing retransplantation with a negative CDC cross-match and a positive T cell FCXM suffered graft loss at a median of 26 days after transplant. Thus, quad therapy did not enhance graft survival for either black or white patients undergoing cadaveric retransplantation. Immunologic considerations, including HLA-DR matching and the FCXM, continue to exert a strong influence on outcomes in these high-risk recipients.

Successful renal allografts in recipients with crossmatch-positive, dithioerythritol-treated negative sera. Race, transplant history, and HLA-DR1 phenotype.

Graft survival was examined in 15 renal allograft recipients from a group of 20 patients with IgM autolymphocytotoxic antibody that could be removed in a crossmatch assay using a reducing agent, dithioerythritol (DTE). The significant differences in this group of 20 patients compared with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients lacking autolymphocytotoxic antibodies included an increased frequency of black patients (P = 0.002), a lack of previous transplants (P = 0.003), and an increased frequency of the HLA-DR1 phenotype (P = 0.0001). Sex and the number of transfusions did not appear significant, whereas the cause of ESRD was primarily systemic lupus erythematosus. Fifteen of the 20 patients were transplanted against a positive donor crossmatch. Eleven were recipients of cadaveric kidneys, nine of which are still functioning for periods ranging from 0.5 to 40 months. Two fo the cadaveric recipients died with functional grafts. Four received living-related donor transplants, one of which was lost to acute rejection one month posttransplant, while the remaining three have survived 1.5, 9, and 21 months, respectively. Fourteen patients had immediate allograft function with no hyperacute rejection and only one case of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was found. In summary, a negative crossmatch using DTE-treated, autologous reactive recipient sera may identify a group of patients who can be transplanted with minimal concern for hyperacute rejection or ATN. In addition to cause of ESRD, race, transplant history, and HLA-DR phenotype may further define this group of transplant candidates having IgM autolymphocytotoxic antibody. Extrapolation of these conclusions to transplant candidates lacking autolymphocytotoxic antibodies is not warranted.

Benefits of Quadruple Immunosuppressive Therapy in Recipients of Living Related Donor Kidneys A Review of 855 Operations

Eight hundred fifty-five living related donor transplant recipients were analyzed according to 15 potential risk factors with regard to patient and graft survival according to immunosuppression. Group I, 1968 to 1983, (n = 440 patients) received azathioprine and prednisone; group II, 1984 to 1987, (n = 229 patients) received triple therapy--azathioprine, prednisone, and cyclosporine; and group III, 1988-1991, (n = 186 patients), quadruple therapy--azathioprine, prednisone, cyclosporine, and Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin. Three important risk factors included immunosuppression, tissue typing, and race. Groups II and III had improved allograft survival over group I (p = 0.03). Patients with two haplotype matches had similar survival in all three groups. Kidney survival in one-haplotype-matched recipients improved in group II and was equal to that of the two-haplotype-matched patients in group III. Cyclosporine improved allograft survival in both races when combined with azathioprine and prednisone. Quadruple therapy improved early survival in one-haplotype black patients, even though long-term results remained better in whites. Cyclosporine did not improve graft survival in two-haplotype recipients. The addition of cyclosporine and quadruple therapy did not increase morbidity and mortality rates.

IMPROVED OUTCOMES IN CADAVERIC RENAL ALLOGRAFTS WITH PULSATILE PRESERVATION.

BACKGROUNDnEarly immunologic and non-immunologic injury of renal allografts adversely affects long-term graft survival. Some degree of preservation injury is inevitable in cadaveric renal transplantation, and, with the reduction in early acute rejection, this non-immunologic injury has assumed a greater relative importance. Optimal graft preservation will maximize the chances of early graft function and long-term graft survival, but the best method of preservation pulsatile perfusion (PP) versus cold storage (CS) is debated.nnnMETHODSnPrimary cadaveric kidney recipients from January 1990 through December 1995 were evaluated. The effects of implantation warm ischemic time (WIT) ( < or = 20 min, 21-40 min, or > 40 min) and total ischemic time (TIT) ( < or > or = 20 h) on death-censored graft survival were compared between kidneys preserved by PP versus those preserved by CS. The effect of preservation method on delayed graft function (DGF) was also examined.nnnRESULTSnThere were 568 PP kidneys and 268 CS kidneys. Overall death-censored graft survival was not significantly different between groups, despite worse donor and recipient characteristics in the PP group. CS kidneys with an implantation WIT > 40 min had worse graft survival than those with < 40 min (p = 0.0004). Survival of PP kidneys and those transplanted into 2 DR-matched recipients was not affected by longer implantation WIT. Longer TIT did not impact survival. DGF was more likely after CS preservation (20.2% versus 8.8%, p = 0.001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnPreservation with PP improves early graft function and lessens the adverse effect of increased warm ischemia in cadaveric renal transplantation. This method is likely associated with less preservation injury and/or increases the threshold for injury from other sources and is superior to CS.