David D. R. Kohler
Florida Environmental Research Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David D. R. Kohler.
Applied Optics | 2005
Curtis D. Mobley; Lydia K. Sundman; Curtiss O. Davis; Jeffrey H. Bowles; Trijntje Valerie Downes; Robert A. Leathers; Marcos J. Montes; William Paul Bissett; David D. R. Kohler; R. P. Reid; Eric M. Louchard; Arthur C. R. Gleason
A spectrum-matching and look-up-table (LUT) methodology has been developed and evaluated to extract environmental information from remotely sensed hyperspectral imagery. The LUT methodology works as follows. First, a database of remote-sensing reflectance (Rrs) spectra corresponding to various water depths, bottom reflectance spectra, and water-column inherent optical properties (IOPs) is constructed using a special version of the HydroLight radiative transfer numerical model. Second, the measured Rrs spectrum for a particular image pixel is compared with each spectrum in the database, and the closest match to the image spectrum is found using a least-squares minimization. The environmental conditions in nature are then assumed to be the same as the input conditions that generated the closest matching HydroLight-generated database spectrum. The LUT methodology has been evaluated by application to an Ocean Portable Hyperspectral Imaging Low-Light Spectrometer image acquired near Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas, on 17 May 2000. The LUT-retrieved bottom depths were on average within 5% and 0.5 m of independently obtained acoustic depths. The LUT-retrieved bottom classification was in qualitative agreement with diver and video spot classification of bottom types, and the LUT-retrieved IOPs were consistent with IOPs measured at nearby times and locations.
Optics Express | 2004
David D. R. Kohler; W. Paul Bissett; Robert G. Steward; Curtiss O. Davis
The calibration of multispectral and hyperspectral imaging systems is typically done in the laboratory using an integrating sphere, which usually produces a signal that is red rich. Using such a source to calibrate environmental monitoring systems presents some difficulties. Not only is much of the calibration data outside the range and spectral quality of data values that are expected to be captured in the field, using these measurements alone may exaggerate the optical flaws found within the system. Left unaccounted for, these flaws will become embedded in to the calibration, and thus, they will be passed on to the field data when the calibration is applied. To address these issues, we used a series of well-characterized spectral filters within our calibration. It provided us with a set us stable spectral standards to test and account for inadequacies in the spectral and radiometric integrity of the optical imager.
Proceedings of SPIE | 2007
Curtiss O. Davis; Maria T. Kavanaugh; Ricardo M. Letelier; W. Paul Bissett; David D. R. Kohler
Current ocean color sensors, for example SeaWiFS and MODIS, are well suited for sampling the open ocean. However, coastal environments are spatially and optically more complex and require more frequent sampling and higher spatial resolution sensors with additional spectral channels. We have conducted experiments with data from Hyperion and airborne hyperspectral imagers to evaluate these needs for a variety of coastal environments. Here we present results from an analysis of airborne hyperspectral data for a Harmful Algal Bloom in Monterey Bay. Based on these results and earlier studies we recommend increased frequency of sampling, increased spatial sampling and additional spectral channels for ocean color sensors for coastal environments.
Proceedings of SPIE: Remote Sensing of Submerged Threats | 2005
Paul Bissett; Heidi M. Dierssen; David D. R. Kohler; Mark A. Moline; James L. Mueller; Richard E. Pieper; Michael S. Twardowski; J. Ronald V. Zaneveld
Diver visibility analyses and predictions, and water transparency in general, are of significant military and commercial interest. This is especially true in our current state, where ports and harbors are vulnerable to terrorist attacks from a variety of platforms both on and below the water (swimmers, divers, AUVs, ships, submarines, etc.). Aircraft hyperspectral imagery has been previously used successfully to classify coastal bottom types and map bathymetry and it is time to transition this observational tool to harbor and port security. Hyperspectral imagery is ideally suited for monitoring small-scale features and processes in these optically complex waters, because of its enhanced spectral (1-3 nm) and spatial (1-3 meters) resolutions. Under an existing NOAA project (CICORE), a field experiment was carried out (November 2004) in coordination with airborne hyperspectral ocean color overflights to develop methods and models for relating hyperspectral remote sensing reflectances to water transparency and diver visibility in San Pedro and San Diego Bays. These bays were focused areas because: (1) San Pedro harbor, with its ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, is the busiest port in the U.S. and ranks 3rd in the world and (2) San Diego Harbor is one of the largest Naval ports, serving a diverse mix of commercial, recreational and military traffic, including more than 190 cruise ships annual. Maintaining harbor and port security has added complexity for these Southern California bays, because of the close proximity to the Mexican border. We will present in situ optical data and hyperspectral aircraft ocean color imagery from these two bays and compare and contrast the differences and similarities. This preliminary data will then be used to discuss how water transparency and diver visibility predictions improve harbor and port security.
Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2005
W. Paul Bissett; Sharon DeBra; Mubin Kadiwala; David D. R. Kohler; Curtis D. Mobley; Robert G. Steward; Alan Weidemann; Curtiss O. Davis; Jeff Lillycrop; Robert Pope
HyperSpectral Imagery (HSI) of the coastal zone often focuses on the estimation of bathymetry. However, the estimation of bathymetry requires knowledge, or the simultaneous solution, of water column Inherent Optical Properties (IOPs) and bottom reflectance. The numerical solution to the simultaneous set of equations for bathymetry, IOPs, and bottom reflectance places high demands on the spectral quality, calibration, atmospheric correction, and Signal-to-Noise (SNR) of the HSI data stream. In October of 2002, a joint FERI/NRL/NAVO/USACE HSI/LIDAR experiment was conducted off of Looe Key, FL. This experiment yielded high quality HSI data at a 2 m resolution and bathymetric LIDAR data at a 4 m resolution. The joint data set allowed for the advancement and validation of a previously generated Look-Up-Table (LUT) approach to the simultaneous retrieval of bathymetry, IOPs, and bottom type. Bathymetric differences between the two techniques were normally distributed around a 0 mean, with the exception of two peaks. One peak related to a mechanical problem in the LIDAR detector mirrors that causes errors on the edges of the LIDAR flight lines. The other significant difference occurred in a single geographic area (Hawk Channel) suggesting an incomplete IOP or bottom reflectance description in the LUT data base. In addition, benthic habitat data from NOAA’s National Ocean Service (NOS) and the Florida Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI) provided validation data for the estimation of bottom type. Preliminary analyses of the bottom type estimation suggest that the best retrievals are for seagrass bottoms. One source of the potential difficulties may be that the LUT database was generated from a more pristine location (Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas). It is expected that fusing the HSI/LIDAR data streams should reduce the errors in bottom typing and IOP estimation.
Fourier Transform Spectroscopy/ Hyperspectral Imaging and Sounding of the Environment (2007), paper JWA19 | 2007
David D. R. Kohler; W. Paul Bissett; Robert G. Steward; Mubin Kadiwala; Robert Banfield
Paper details the construction of a new hyperspectral sensor focused on the coastal environment. This sensor follows the same basic design strategy as its predecessor, the NRL developed PHILLS sensor.
Oceanography | 2004
Grace Chang; Kevin Mahoney; Amanda Briggs-Whitmire; David D. R. Kohler; Curtis D. Mobley; Marlon R. Lewis; Mark A. Moline; Emmanuel Boss; Minsu Kim; William Philpot; Tommy D. Dickey
Oceanography | 2004
W. Paul Bissett; Robert A. Arnone; Curtiss O. Davis; Tommy D. Dickey; Daniel Dye; David D. R. Kohler; Richard W. Gould
Oceanography | 2004
William Philpot; Curtiss O. Davis; W. Paul Bissett; Curtis D. Mobley; David D. R. Kohler; Zhongping Lee; Jeffrey H. Bowles; Robert G. Steward; Yogesh Agrawal; John H. Trowbridge; Richard W. Gould; Robert A. Arnone
Estuaries and Coasts | 2014
Victoria Hill; Richard C. Zimmerman; W. Paul Bissett; Heidi M. Dierssen; David D. R. Kohler