David D. Savin

Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States

BACKGROUND CONTEXT There is a lack of agreement among spine surgeons as to the best surgical treatment modality for many degenerative lumbar diseases. Although there are many studies examining trends in spinal surgery, specific studies reporting the variations in surgical treatment in the United States for these diseases are lacking. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to analyze trends in lumbar spinal fusion methods for common lumbar pathologies in the United States. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING National insurance database review: 2004-2009. PATIENT SAMPLE Data is taken from United Healthcare and represents more than 25 million patients. OUTCOME MEASURES No outcomes were measured in this study. METHODS Using a private insurance database, we identified patients who underwent one of five types of instrumented single-level lumbar spinal fusion for the 10 most common primary diagnoses. Surgery rates were reviewed from 2004 to 2009 and were stratified according to patient age, patient gender, and region in the United States. Poisson regression analysis was performed to determine regional and demographic differences in treatment modality. The authors received no funds in support of this work. RESULTS A total of 23,986 patients met our search criteria. Of the five fusion types, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with posterolateral fusion (PLF) was the most common (45%), followed by PLF (19%), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF, 16%), PLIF (10%), and ALIF with PLF (9%). There was a significant increase in PLIF with PLF (p<.0001), PLIF (p<.0001), PLF (p=.012), ALIF (p<.0001), and ALIF with PLF (p<.0001) from 2004 to 2009. After controlling for gender, there were significant differences between regions for all fusion types (p<.0001). The likelihood of a posterior fusion increased with age. Anterior fusions were more common in the 30- to 49-year-old age range than in patents older than 50. For patients in age groups older than 30, there was an increased number who underwent a circumferential fusion or an ALIF (p<.022). Fusion types were significantly different between genders (p<.026). Both genders had an overall increase in the number of fusions (p<.001) over the time period studied. CONCLUSIONS There are large differences in the United States for surgical treatment methods for lumbar spine pathology. These differences are likely multifactorial, with both patient and surgeon traits playing a role. Illustrating these differences will hopefully lead to outcomes research to determine the indications, efficacy, and appropriateness of these surgical methods, an important step on the path toward standardization of care.

Scapular Winging: Evaluation and Treatment: AAOS Exhibit Selection.

Scapular winging is a rare, underreported, and debilitating disorder that produces abnormal scapulothoracic kinematics, which can lead to shoulder weakness, decreased range of motion, and substantial pain. Although there are numerous underlying etiologies, injuries to the long thoracic nerve or spinal accessory nerve are the most common, with resultant neuromuscular imbalance in the scapulothoracic stabilizing muscles. Early diagnosis followed by initiation of a treatment algorithm is important for successful outcomes. Most cases resolve with nonsurgical management. However, in patients with persistent symptoms despite nonsurgical management, appropriate dynamic muscle transfers can effectively treat the scapular winging, with good clinical outcomes.

When Is It Safe to Return to Driving After Spinal Surgery

Study Design Prospective study. Objective Surgeons’ recommendations for a safe return to driving following cervical and lumbar surgery vary and are based on empirical data. Driver reaction time (DRT) is an objective measure of the ability to drive safely. There are limited data about the effect of cervical and lumbar surgery on DRT. The purpose of our study was to use the DRT to determine when the patients undergoing a spinal surgery may safely return to driving. Methods We tested 37 patients’ DRT using computer software. Twenty-three patients (mean 50.5 ± 17.7 years) received lumbar surgery, and 14 patients had cervical surgery (mean 56.7 ± 10.9 years). Patients were compared with 14 healthy male controls (mean 32 ± 5.19 years). The patients having cervical surgery were subdivided into the anterior versus posterior approach and myelopathic versus nonmyelopathic groups. Patients having lumbar spinal surgery were subdivided by decompression versus fusion with or without decompression and single-level versus multilevel surgery. The patients were tested preoperatively and at 2 to 3, 6, and 12 weeks following the surgery. The use of opioids was noted. Results Overall, the patients having cervical and lumbar surgery showed no significant differences between pre- and postoperative DRT (cervical p = 0.49, lumbar p = 0.196). Only the patients having single-level procedures had a significant improvement from a preoperative DRT of 0.951 seconds (standard deviation 0.255) to 0.794 seconds (standard deviation 0.152) at 2 to 3 weeks (p = 0.012). None of the other subgroups had a difference in the DRT. Conclusions Based on these findings, it may be acceptable to allow patients having a single-level lumbar fusion who are not taking opioids to return to driving as early as 2 weeks following the spinal surgery.

Surgical Management of Acute Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures

Acute distal biceps tendon ruptures are uncommon injuries that often affect young active males and typically result from an eccentric load on the dominant upper extremity.Surgical treatment may be indicated to prevent substantial weakness in supination and flexion that can occur with nonoperative tr