David Dolling
Institute of Cancer Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David Dolling.
Nature | 2018
Arianna Calcinotto; Clarissa Spataro; Elena Zagato; Diletta Di Mitri; Veronica Gil; Mateus Crespo; Gaston De Bernardis; Marco Losa; Michela Mirenda; Emiliano Pasquini; Andrea Rinaldi; Semini Sumanasuriya; Maryou B. Lambros; Antje Neeb; Roberta Lucianò; Carlo Andrea Bravi; Daniel Nava-Rodrigues; David Dolling; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Ana Ferreira; Alberto Briganti; Antonio Esposito; Simon T. Barry; Wei Yuan; Adam Sharp; Johann S. de Bono; Andrea Alimonti
Patients with prostate cancer frequently show resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy, a condition known as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Acquiring a better understanding of the mechanisms that control the development of CRPC remains an unmet clinical need. The well-established dependency of cancer cells on the tumour microenvironment indicates that the microenvironment might control the emergence of CRPC. Here we identify IL-23 produced by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) as a driver of CRPC in mice and patients with CRPC. Mechanistically, IL-23 secreted by MDSCs can activate the androgen receptor pathway in prostate tumour cells, promoting cell survival and proliferation in androgen-deprived conditions. Intra-tumour MDSC infiltration and IL-23 concentration are increased in blood and tumour samples from patients with CRPC. Antibody-mediated inactivation of IL-23 restored sensitivity to androgen-deprivation therapy in mice. Taken together, these results reveal that MDSCs promote CRPC by acting in a non-cell autonomous manner. Treatments that block IL-23 can oppose MDSC-mediated resistance to castration in prostate cancer and synergize with standard therapies.IL-23 produced by myeloid-derived suppressor cells regulates castration resistance in prostate cancer by sustaining androgen receptor signalling.
European Urology | 2018
Joaquin Mateo; Heather H. Cheng; Himisha Beltran; David Dolling; Wen Xu; Colin C. Pritchard; Helen Mossop; Pasquale Rescigno; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Verena Sailer; Michael Kolinsky; Ada Balasopoulou; Claudia Bertan; David M. Nanus; Scott T. Tagawa; Heather Thorne; Bruce Montgomery; Suzanne Carreira; Shahneen Sandhu; Mark A. Rubin; Peter S. Nelson; Johann S. de Bono
Background: Germline DNA damage repair gene mutation (gDDRm) is found in >10% of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC). Their prognostic and predictive impact relating to standard therapies is unclear. Objective: To determine whether gDDRm status impacts benefit from established therapies in mPC. Design, setting, and participants: This is a retrospective, international, observational study. Medical records were reviewed for 390 mPC patients with known gDDRm status. All 372 patients from Royal Marsden (UK), Weill-Cornell (NY), and University of Washington (WA) were previously included in a prevalence study (Pritchard, NEJM 2016); the remaining 18 were gBRCA1/2m carriers, from the kConFab consortium, Australia. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) data were collected. To account for potential differences between cohorts, a mixed-effect model (Weibull distribution) with random intercept per cohort was used. Results and limitations: The gDDRm status was known for all 390 patients (60 carriers of gDDRm [gDDRm +], including 37 gBRCA2m, and 330 cases not found to carry gDDRm [gDDRm–]); 74% and 69% were treated with docetaxel and abiraterone/enzalutamide, respectively, and 36% received PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum. Median OS from castration resistance was similar among groups (3.2vs 3.0 yr, p = 0.73). Median docetaxel PFS for gDDRm+ (6.8 mo) was not significantly different from that for gDDRm- (5.1 mo), and RRs were similar (gDDRm+ = 61%; gDDRm- = 54%). There were no significant differences in median PFS and RR on first-line abiraterone/enzalutamide (gDDRm+ = 8.3 mo, gDDRm- = 8.3 mo; gDDRm+ = 46%, gDDRm- = 56%). Interaction test for PARPi/platinum and gDDRm+ resulted in an OS adjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.28–1.25; p = 0.17). Results are limited by the retrospective nature of the analysis. Conclusions: mPC patients with gDDRm appeared to benefit from standard therapies similarly to the overall population; prospective studies are ongoing to investigate the impact of PARPi/platinum. Patient summary: Patients with inherited DNA repair mutations benefit from standard therapies similarly to other metastatic prostate cancer patients.
Oncotarget | 2018
Afroditi Nanou; F.A.W. Coumans; Guus van Dalum; Leonie L. Zeune; David Dolling; Wendy Onstenk; Mateus Crespo; Mariane Sousa Fontes; Pasquale Rescigno; Gemma Fowler; Penny Flohr; Christoph Brune; Stefan Sleijfer; Johann S. de Bono; Leon W.M.M. Terstappen
Purpose The presence of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) patients is associated with poor prognosis. In this study, we evaluated the association of clinical outcome in 129 CRPC patients with CTCs, tumor-derived Extracellular Vesicles (tdEVs) and plasma levels of total (CK18) and caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 (ccCK18). Experimental Design CTCs and tdEVs were isolated with the CellSearch system and automatically enumerated. Cut-off values dichotomizing patients into favorable and unfavorable groups of overall survival were set on a retrospective data set of 84 patients and validated on a prospective data set of 45 patients. Plasma levels of CK18 and ccCK18 were assessed by ELISAs. Results CTCs, tdEVs and both cytokeratin plasma levels were significantly increased in CRPC patients compared to healthy donors (HDs). All biomarkers except for ccCK18 were prognostic showing a decreased median overall survival for the unfavorable groups of 9.2 vs 21.1, 8.1 vs 23.0 and 10.0 vs 21.5 months respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, tdEVs remained significant. Conclusions Automated CTC and tdEV enumeration allows fast and reliable scoring eliminating inter- and intra- operator variability. tdEVs provide similar prognostic information to CTC counts.
Cell Reports | 2018
Xiangyi Li; Guem Hee Baek; Susmita G. Ramanand; Adam Sharp; Yunpeng Gao; Wei Yuan; Jon Welti; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; David Dolling; Ines Figueiredo; Semini Sumanasuriya; Mateus Crespo; Adam Aslam; Rui Li; Yi Yin; Bipasha Mukherjee; Mohammed Kanchwala; Ashley M. Hughes; Wendy S. Halsey; Cheng Ming Chiang; Chao Xing; Ganesh V. Raj; Sandeep Burma; Johann S. de Bono; Ram Shankar Mani
Summary BRD4 belongs to the bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) family of chromatin reader proteins that bind acetylated histones and regulate gene expression. Pharmacological inhibition of BRD4 by BET inhibitors (BETi) has indicated antitumor activity against multiple cancer types. We show that BRD4 is essential for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and mediates the formation of oncogenic gene rearrangements by engaging the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. Mechanistically, genome-wide DNA breaks are associated with enhanced acetylation of histone H4, leading to BRD4 recruitment, and stable establishment of the DNA repair complex. In support of this, we also show that, in clinical tumor samples, BRD4 protein levels are negatively associated with outcome after prostate cancer (PCa) radiation therapy. Thus, in addition to regulating gene expression, BRD4 is also a central player in the repair of DNA DSBs, with significant implications for cancer therapy.
eLife | 2017
Laura Cato; Antje Neeb; Adam Sharp; Victor Buzon; Scott B. Ficarro; Linxiao Yang; Claudia Muhle-Goll; Nane C. Kuznik; Ruth Riisnaes; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Olivier Armant; Victor Gourain; Guillaume Adelmant; Emmanuel A. Ntim; Thomas Westerling; David Dolling; Pasquale Rescigno; Ines Figueiredo; Friedrich Fauser; Jennifer Wu; Jaice T. Rottenberg; L. Shatkina; Claudia Ester; Burkhard Luy; Holger Puchta; Jakob Troppmair; Nicole Jung; Stefan Bräse; Uwe Strähle; Jarrod A. Marto
Targeting the activation function-1 (AF-1) domain located in the N-terminus of the androgen receptor (AR) is an attractive therapeutic alternative to the current approaches to inhibit AR action in prostate cancer (PCa). Here we show that the AR AF-1 is bound by the cochaperone Bag-1L. Mutations in the AR interaction domain or loss of Bag-1L abrogate AR signaling and reduce PCa growth. Clinically, Bag-1L protein levels increase with progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) and high levels of Bag-1L in primary PCa associate with a reduced clinical benefit from abiraterone when these tumors progress. Intriguingly, residues in Bag-1L important for its interaction with the AR AF-1 are within a potentially druggable pocket, implicating Bag-1L as a potential therapeutic target in PCa.
European Urology | 2018
Niven Mehra; David Dolling; Semini Sumanasuriya; Rossitza Christova; Lorna Pope; Suzanne Carreira; George Seed; Wei Yuan; Jane Goodall; Emma Hall; Penny Flohr; Gunther Boysen; Diletta Bianchini; Oliver Sartor; Mario A. Eisenberger; Karim Fizazi; Stéphane Oudard; Mustapha Chadjaa; Sandrine Macé; Johann S. de Bono
Background Noninvasive biomarkers are needed to guide metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment. Objective To clinically qualify baseline and on-treatment cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentrations as biomarkers of patient outcome following taxane chemotherapy. Design, setting, and participants Blood for cfDNA analyses was prospectively collected from 571 mCRPC patients participating in two phase III clinical trials, FIRSTANA (NCT01308567) and PROSELICA (NCT01308580). Patients received docetaxel (75 mg/m2) or cabazitaxel (20 or 25 mg/m2) as first-line chemotherapy (FIRSTANA), and cabazitaxel (20 or 25 mg/m2) as second-line chemotherapy (PROSELICA). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Associations between cfDNA concentration and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response were tested using logistic regression models. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods for cfDNA concentration grouped by quartile. Cox proportional hazard models, within each study, tested for associations with radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS), with multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline prognostic variables. Two-stage individual patient meta-analysis combined results for cfDNA concentrations for both studies. Results and limitations In 2502 samples, baseline log10 cfDNA concentration correlated with known prognostic factors, shorter rPFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15–2.08; p = 0.004), and shorter OS on taxane therapy (HR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.18–1.97; p = 0.001). In multivariable analyses, baseline cfDNA concentration was an independent prognostic variable for rPFS and OS in both first- and second-line chemotherapy settings. Patients with a PSA response experienced a decline in log10 cfDNA concentrations during the first four cycles of treatment (per cycle −0.03; 95% CI: −0.044 to −0.009; p = 0.003). Study limitations included the fact that blood sample collection was not mandated for all patients and the inability to specifically quantitate tumour-derived cfDNA fraction in cfDNA. Conclusions We report that changes in cfDNA concentrations correlate with both rPFS and OS in patients receiving first- and second-line taxane therapy, and may serve as independent prognostic biomarkers of response to taxanes. Patient summary In the past decade, several new therapies have been introduced for men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer. Although metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable, these novel agents have extended patient survival and improved their quality of life in comparison with the last decade. To further optimise treatment allocation and individualise patient care, better tests (biomarkers) are needed to guide the delivery of improved and more precise care. In this report, we assessed cfDNA in over 2500 blood samples from men with prostate cancer who were recruited to two separate international studies and received taxane chemotherapy. We quantified the concentration of cfDNA fragments in blood plasma, which partly originates from tumour. We identified that higher concentrations of circulating cfDNA fragments, prior to starting taxane chemotherapy, can be used to identify patients with aggressive prostate cancer. A decline in cfDNA concentration during the first 3–9 wk after initiation of taxane therapy was seen in patients deriving benefit from taxane chemotherapy. These results identified circulating cfDNA as a new biomarker of aggressive disease in metastatic prostate cancer and imply that the study of cfDNA has clinical utility, supporting further efforts to develop blood-based tests on this circulating tumour-derived DNA.
Clinical Cancer Research | 2018
Jonathan C. Welti; Adam Sharp; Wei Yuan; David Dolling; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Ines Figueiredo; Veronica Gil; Antje Neeb; Matthew Clarke; George Seed; Mateus Crespo; Semini Sumanasuriya; Jian Ning; Eleanor Knight; Jeffrey C. Francis; Ashley M. Hughes; Wendy S. Halsey; Alec Paschalis; Ram Shankar Mani; Ganesh V. Raj; Stephen R. Plymate; Suzanne Carreira; Gunther Boysen; Arul M. Chinnaiyan; Amanda Swain; Johann S. de Bono
Purpose: Persistent androgen receptor (AR) signaling drives castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and confers resistance to AR-targeting therapies. Novel therapeutic strategies to overcome this are urgently required. We evaluated how bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) protein inhibitors (BETi) abrogate aberrant AR signaling in CRPC. Experimental Design: We determined associations between BET expression, AR-driven transcription, and patient outcome; and the effect and mechanism by which chemical BETi (JQ1 and GSK1210151A; I-BET151) and BET family protein knockdown regulates AR-V7 expression and AR signaling in prostate cancer models. Results: Nuclear BRD4 protein expression increases significantly (P ≤ 0.01) with castration resistance in same patient treatment-naïve (median H-score; interquartile range: 100; 100–170) and CRPC (150; 110–200) biopsies, with higher expression at diagnosis associating with worse outcome (HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.50–7.01; P ≤ 0.001). BRD2, BRD3, and BRD4 RNA expression in CRPC biopsies correlates with AR-driven transcription (all P ≤ 0.001). Chemical BETi, and combined BET family protein knockdown, reduce AR-V7 expression and AR signaling. This was not recapitulated by C-MYC knockdown. In addition, we show that BETi regulates RNA processing thereby reducing alternative splicing and AR-V7 expression. Furthermore, BETi reduce growth of prostate cancer cells and patient-derived organoids with known AR mutations, AR amplification and AR-V7 expression. Finally, BETi, unlike enzalutamide, decreases persistent AR signaling and growth (P ≤ 0.001) of a patient-derived xenograft model of CRPC with AR amplification and AR-V7 expression. Conclusions: BETi merit clinical evaluation as inhibitors of AR splicing and function, with trials demonstrating their blockade in proof-of-mechanism pharmacodynamic studies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(13); 3149–62. ©2018 AACR.
Annals of Oncology | 2018
David Lorente; David Olmos; Joaquin Mateo; David Dolling; Diletta Bianchini; George Seed; Penny Flohr; Mateus Crespo; Ines Figueiredo; Susana Miranda; Howard I. Scher; Leon W.M.M. Terstappen; J. S. De Bono
Background The development of treatment response and surrogate biomarkers for advanced prostate cancer care is an unmet clinical need. Patients with baseline circulating tumour cell (BLCTCs) counts <5/7.5 mL represent a good prognosis subgroup but are non-evaluable for response assessment (decrease in CTCs). The aim of the study is to determine the value of any increase in CTCs (CTC progression) as an indicator of progression in prostate cancer patients with low pre-treatment CTCs (<5). Patients and methods We carried out a post hoc analysis of patients with BLCTCs < 5 treated in the COU-AA-301 (abiraterone or placebo + prednisone) and IMMC-38 (chemotherapy) trials. The association of CTC progression (increase in CTCs at 4, 8 or 12 weeks) with overall survival (OS) was evaluated in multi-variable Cox regression models. Performance of survival models with and without CTC progression was evaluated by calculating ROC curve area under the curves (AUCs) and weighted c-indices. Results Overall, 511 patients with CTCs < 5 (421 in COU-AA-301 and 90 in IMMC-38) were selected; 212 (41.7%) had CTC progression at 4, 8 or 12 weeks after treatment initiation. CTC progression was associated with significantly worse OS [27.1 versus 15.1 m; hazard ratio (HR) 3.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.5-4.5; P < 0.001)], independent of baseline CTCs and established clinical variables. Adding CTC progression to the OS model significantly improved ROC AUC (0.77 versus 0.66; P < 0.001). Models including CTC progression had superior ROC AUC (0.77 versus 0.69; P < 0.001) and weighted c-index [0.750 versus 0.705; delta c-index: 0.045 (95% CI 0.019-0.071)] values than those including CTC conversion (increase to CTCs ≥ 5). In COU-AA-301, the impact of CTC progression was independent of treatment arm. Conclusions Increasing CTCs during the first 12 weeks of treatment are independently associated with worse OS from advanced prostate cancer in patients with baseline CTCs < 5 treated with abiraterone or chemotherapy and improve models with established prognostic variables. These findings must be prospectively validated.
Clinical Colorectal Cancer | 2018
Raghav Sundar; Susana Miranda; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Maxime Chénard-Poirier; David Dolling; Matthew Clarke; Ines Figueiredo; Claudia Bertan; Wei Yuan; Ana Ferreira; Rossitza Chistova; Gunther Boysen; Desamparados Roda Perez; Nina Tunariu; Joaquin Mateo; Andrew Wotherspoon; Ian Chau; David Cunningham; Nicola Valeri; Suzanne Carreira; Johann S. de Bono
Micro‐Abstract Loss of ATM, a key protein regulating DNA repair increases sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as oxaliplatin chemotherapy. We describe the prevalence of ATM IHC loss in a large cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and its correlation with clinical parameters such as association with other key biomarkers in colon cancer and survival. Background Loss of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), a key protein regulating DNA repair signaling, has been suggested to increase sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. We conducted a study analyzing the loss of ATM protein expression in colorectal cancer and correlated this with clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods The clinical outcomes data and tumor samples from metastatic colorectal cancer patients referred to the Royal Marsden Hospital Drug Development Unit (United Kingdom) from 2012 to 2016 and providing consent for a molecular characterization study were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides were assessed by a pathologist for nuclear staining intensity of ATM and semiquantitatively scored. ATM loss was defined as a nuclear H‐score of ≤ 10. Results Of 223 colorectal cancer samples, ATM IHC loss was identified in 17 (8%). ATM loss was independent of the RAS and RAF mutational status. ATM loss was associated with superior overall survival after first‐line oxaliplatin‐based therapy (49 vs. 32 months; hazard ratio [HR], 2.52) but not with irinotecan‐based therapy (24 vs. 33 months; HR, 0.72). ATM loss was not prognostic for survival from the diagnosis (50 vs. 44 months; HR, 1.43). Conclusion ATM could be considered a biomarker for the development of novel DNA repair targeting agents and treatment of colorectal cancer.
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer | 2017
Niven Mehra; Adam Sharp; David Lorente; David Dolling; Semini Sumanasuriya; Bernadette Johnson; D. Dearnaley; Chris Parker; J. S. De Bono
Micro‐Abstract Concerns exist that low‐dose corticosteroids may adversely affect outcome in patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), due to its tumor‐promoting and immunosuppressive characteristics. In treatment‐naïve CRPC patients treated with low‐dose corticosteroids, the patients harboring an increased neutrophil to lymphocyte, an indirect measure of tumor‐inflammation, had a lower prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) > 50% response rate, shorter PSA progression‐free interval and a shorter overall survival. Background: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be highly prognostic across many tumor types, and predictive of treatment outcome in advanced prostate cancer, and has been postulated to be an indirect measure of tumor inflammation. We evaluated the effect of low‐dose steroids on NLR in men suffering from castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Patients and Methods: The NLR was evaluated in a prospective randomized phase II trial that compared prednisolone 5 mg twice daily and dexamethasone 0.5 mg daily administered to 75 chemotherapy and abiraterone/enzalutamide‐naive CRPC patients. NLR was examined at baseline (BL), after 6 and 12 weeks of corticosteroid treatment; associations with >50% prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response, duration of response (PSA progression‐free interval), and overall survival (OS) were tested using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis. Results: The median NLR for all evaluable patients was 2.6 at BL; 2.9 at 6 weeks; and 4.0 at 12 weeks. After low‐dose corticosteroid initiation, 46 patients had a decline in PSA with 24 confirmed responders. BL NLR (log10) associated with a PSA response (odds ratio, .029, 95% confidence interval [CI], .002‐.493; P = .014), and with the extent of the PSA decline (P = .009). A favorable BL NLR (less than median) associated with a 5.5‐fold higher odds of a PSA >50% response (95% CI, 1.3‐23.9; P = .02). Higher BL NLR (log10) associated with a shorter time to PSA progression (hazard ratio [HR], 9.5; 95% CI, 2.3‐39.9; P = .002). In multivariate analysis BL NLR as a discrete variable was independently associated with PSA progression (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5‐8.1; P = .003). NLR at 6 weeks was also associated with duration of benefit; in the favorable NLR category time to PSA progression was 10.8 months, for those who converted to an unfavorable (greater than median) category 4.5 months, and for those remaining in a unfavorable category only 1.5 months (95% CI, 0.5‐2.5; P = .003). OS was 33.1 months (95% CI, 24.2‐42.0) and 21.9 months (95% CI, 19.3‐24.4) for those with an favorable and unfavorable BL NLR, respectively. Conclusion: Treatment‐naive CRPC patients with a high BL or during‐treatment NLR appear not to benefit from low‐dose corticosteroids. The immunological implications of an unfavorable NLR, and whether corticosteroids might drive prostate cancer progression in patients harboring a high NLR, warrant further study.