David H. Shull
Western Washington University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David H. Shull.
The Biological Bulletin | 2002
John P. Ludlam; David H. Shull; Robert N. Buchsbaum
Marsh plants may affect the structure of epibenthic communities in a variety of ways. They might reduce temperature stress on organisms by shading, provide refuge from predators, increase the rate of organic matter accumulation at the sediment surface, and serve as a food source. Thus, salt marsh plants might control the spatial distributions of epibenthic invertebrates within the marsh. An ongoing “experiment” on the impact of the periodic removal of plants has been carried out by New England farmers who have been haying some salt marshes for over 300 years. Earlier research by the Plum Island Estuary Long-Term Ecological Research project (PIE-LTER) has shown that haying causes a short-term increase in the growth of benthic algae (1), causes a shift in the diet of some marsh invertebrates to a greater percentage of algae (2), and results in a change in plant species composition (PIE-LTER, unpubl. results). To determine the shortand long-term effects of haying on the epibenthic community and to identify the principal variables controlling the distribution of epibenthic invertebrates, we carried out two sets of experiments: a marsh-grass-removal experiment to mimic the effects of haying and a survey of invertebrates in areas of the marsh subjected to different haying schedules. Our work was conducted in the Plum Island Sound estuary in Rowley, Massachusetts, from June to August 2002. For our marsh-grass-removal experiment, we clipped and removed the vegetation from three randomly selected circular sites of 3-m radius along a 50-m transect in a marsh that is hayed roughly every other year. Before clipping we counted organisms in four 0.25-m sampling areas, located 1.5 m from the center of the circle and equidistant from each other, within each of the three sites. We sampled the same four areas within each site immediately before clipping, and 1 and 4 days after clipping. Differences in abundances of organisms before and after clipping were evaluated by the Kruskal-Wallis test with time of sampling as treatment. Because differences among circular hayed sites were not significantly different, we pooled replicates from each site before our analysis. For our surveys of invertebrates in areas subjected to different intensities of haying, we examined randomly selected sites in recently hayed and reference marshes along 12 previously established transects for which GPS elevation data were available. We sampled 40 sites between 1 and 3 July, and 40 more between 16 and 18 July. At each site, we visually estimated percent cover of different plant species. A count of organisms was made after clipping all vegetation from 0.25-m plots. A 177-cm plant sample was collected, live biomass was separated from standing dead biomass and weighed separately to determine above-ground biomass. Commonly encountered plants included Spartina patens, Spartina alterniflora, Distichlis spicata, Salicornia europaea, and Juncus gerardi. To evaluate the effect of plant cover on predation rate, we tethered amphipods, Orchestia grillus, to thin-diameter line and deployed 5 per site at most sites for 24 h before clipping. We used stepwise multiple regression to describe the relationship between measured environmental variables and abundance of epifauna for the 16–18 July sampling period (criteria P 0.1 to accept, P 0.25 to reject). Environmental variables used in stepwise multiple regression were haying frequency, elevation, temperature, humidity, dried live plant biomass, dried standing dead, total dried weight, percent live, percent dead, percent bare, percent S. alterniflora, percent S. patens, percent D. spicata, percent S. europaea, percent Atriplex patula, percent Triglochin maritima, percent Iva frutescens, proportion tethered live amphipods, and proportion eaten tethered amphipods. Collinearity among environmental variables was assessed by examining the variance inflation factor for each included variable. All variance inflation factors were less than 2, which indicated that collinearity among independent variables did not significantly affect our results. A few sampling sites were omitted from the regression analysis due to missing data. Analyses were performed using SPSS software.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2018
Jennifer N. Apell; David H. Shull; Alison M. Hoyt; Philip M. Gschwend
Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) fluxes from contaminated sediments can be caused by mechanisms including diffusion, bioirrigation, and resuspension, but it is often unclear which mechanisms are important. In the Lower Duwamish Waterway (Seattle, Washington), the presence of abundant benthic macrofauna suggests that porewater bioirrigation may be an important mechanism for PCB transport from the bed into the overlying water column. In this field study, the fluxes of PCBs due to bioirrigation were quantified by using (a) polyethylene (PE) samplers to quantify in situ and ex situ (i.e., equilibrium) PCB porewater concentration profiles and (b) measurements of the geochemical tracer 222Rn to quantify the rate of porewater exchange with overlying water. The results showed that bioirrigation caused sorptive disequilibrium with the surrounding sediment, which led to lower in situ porewater concentrations than expected from sediment concentrations. The combined fluxes of seven PCB congeners (Σ7PCBs) were 1.6-26 ng/m2/day for the three field sites, similar in magnitude to the upper limit estimates of diffusive fluxes calculated assuming water-side boundary layer control (Σ7PCBs = 1.3-47 ng/m2/day). Moreover, the depleted in situ porewater concentrations imply lower diffusive flux estimates than if the ex situ porewater concentrations had been used to estimate fluxes (Σ7PCBs = 89-670 ng/m2/day). These results suggest that nondiffusive PCB fluxes from the sediment bed are occurring and that quantifying in situ porewater concentrations is crucial for accurately quantifying both diffusive and nondiffusive PCB fluxes.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017
Calvin W. Mordy; Allan H. Devol; Lisa B. Eisner; Nancy B. Kachel; Carol Ladd; Michael W. Lomas; Peter Proctor; Raymond N. Sambrotto; David H. Shull; Phyllis J. Stabeno; Eric Wisegarver
The nitrogen cycle on the inner shelf of the southeastern Bering Sea is complicated due to limited nutrient replenishment across this broad shelf, and substantial nitrogen loss through sedimentary processes. While diffusion at the inner front may periodically support new production, the shelf is generally hypothesized to be a regenerative system. This study uses a combination of hydrographic surveys, and measurements of nitrogen assimilation and benthic fluxes to examine nitrogen cycling on the inner shelf, and connectivity between the middle and inner shelves of the southern and central Bering Sea. Results establish the inner shelf as primarily a regenerative system even in spring, although new production can occur at the inner front. Results also identify key processes that influence nutrient supply to the inner shelf, and reveal coupling between the middle shelf nutrient pool and production on the inner shelf. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Marine Chemistry | 2006
Janina M. Benoit; David H. Shull; P. Robinson; L.R. Ucran
Environmental Science & Technology | 2009
Janina M. Benoit; David H. Shull; Rebecca M. Harvey; Samuel A. Beal
Marine Chemistry | 2010
Calvin W. Mordy; Lisa B. Eisner; Peter Proctor; Phyllis J. Stabeno; Allan H. Devol; David H. Shull; Jeffrey M. Napp; Terry E. Whitledge
Deep-sea Research Part Ii-topical Studies in Oceanography | 2013
Rachel E. A. Horak; Heather Whitney; David H. Shull; Calvin W. Mordy; Allan H. Devol
Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science | 2009
David H. Shull; Janina M. Benoit; C. Wojcik; J. R. Senning
Deep-sea Research Part Ii-topical Studies in Oceanography | 2012
Emily S. Davenport; David H. Shull; Allan H. Devol
Wetlands Ecology and Management | 2009
Robert N. Buchsbaum; Linda A. Deegan; Julie Horowitz; Robert H. Garritt; Anne E. Giblin; John P. Ludlam; David H. Shull