David H. Sohn

Contributions of neural excitability and voluntary activation to quadriceps muscle strength following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND Persistent quadriceps weakness is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr). Alterations in spinal-reflexive excitability, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation have been hypothesized as underlying mechanisms contributing to quadriceps weakness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive capabilities of spinal-reflexive excitability, corticospinal excitability and voluntary activation on quadriceps strength in healthy and ACLr participants. METHODS Quadriceps strength was measured using maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC). Voluntary activation was quantified via the central activation ratio (CAR). Corticospinal and spinal-reflexive excitability were measured using active motor thresholds (AMT) and Hoffmann reflexes normalized to maximal muscle responses (H:M), respectively. ACLr individuals were also split into high and low strength subsets based on MVIC. RESULTS CAR was the only significant predictor in the healthy group. In the ACLr group, CAR and H:M significantly predicted 47% of the variance in MVIC. ACLr individuals in the high strength subset demonstrated significantly higher CAR and H:M than those in the low strength subset. CONCLUSION Increased quadriceps voluntary activation, spinal-reflexive excitability and corticospinal excitability relates to increased quadriceps strength in participants following ACLr. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Rehabilitation strategies used to target neural alterations may be beneficial for the restoration of muscle strength following ACLr.

Quadriceps neural alterations in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients: A 6-month longitudinal investigation

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate differences in quadriceps corticospinal excitability, spinal‐reflexive excitability, strength, and voluntary activation before, 2 weeks post and 6 months post‐anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr). This longitudinal, case‐control investigation examined 20 patients scheduled for ACLr (11 females, 9 males; age: 20.9 ± 4.4 years; height:172.4 ± 7.5 cm; weight:76.2 ± 11.8 kg) and 20 healthy controls (11 females, 9 males; age:21.7 ± 3.7 years; height: 173.7 ± 9.9 cm; weight: 76.1 ± 19.7 kg). Maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC), central activation ratio (CAR), normalized Hoffmann spinal reflexes, active motor threshold (AMT), and normalized motor‐evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes at 120% of AMT were measured in the quadriceps muscle at the specific time points. ACLr patients demonstrated bilateral reductions in spinal‐reflexive excitability compared with controls before surgery (P = 0.02) and 2 weeks post‐surgery (P ≤ 0.001). ACLr patients demonstrated higher AMT at 6 months post‐surgery (P ≤ 0.001) in both limbs. No MEP differences were detected. Quadriceps MVIC and CAR were lower in both limbs of the ACLr group before surgery and 6 months post‐surgery (P ≤ 0.05) compared with controls. Diminished excitability of spinal‐reflexive and corticospinal pathways are present at different times following ACLr and occur in combination with clinical deficits in quadriceps strength and activation. Early rehabilitation strategies targeting spinal‐reflexive excitability may help improve postoperative outcomes, while later‐stage rehabilitation may benefit from therapeutic techniques aimed at improving corticospinal excitability.

Neural Excitability Alterations After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT Neuromuscular dysfunction is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R). However, little is known about quadriceps spinal-reflex and descending corticomotor excitability after ACL-R. Understanding the effects of ACL-R on spinal-reflex and corticomotor excitability will help elucidate the origins of neuromuscular dysfunction. OBJECTIVE To determine whether spinal-reflex excitability and corticomotor excitability differed between the injured and uninjured limbs of patients with unilateral ACL-R and between these limbs and the matched limbs of healthy participants. DESIGN Case-control study. SETTING Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS A total of 28 patients with unilateral ACL-R (9 men, 19 women; age = 21.28 ± 3.79 years, height = 170.95 ± 10.04 cm, mass = 73.18 ± 18.02 kg, time after surgery = 48.10 ± 36.17 months) and 29 participants serving as healthy controls (9 men, 20 women; age = 21.55 ± 2.70 years, height = 170.59 ± 8.93 cm, mass = 71.89 ± 12.70 kg) volunteered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Active motor thresholds (AMTs) were collected from the vastus medialis (VM) using transcranial magnetic stimulation. We evaluated VM spinal reflexes using the Hoffmann reflex normalized to maximal muscle responses (H : M ratio). Voluntary quadriceps activation was measured with the superimposed-burst technique and calculated using the central activation ratio (CAR). We also evaluated whether ACL-R patients with high or low voluntary activation had different outcomes. RESULTS The AMT was higher in the injured than in the uninjured limb in the ACL-R group (t27 = 3.32, P = .003) and in the matched limb of the control group (t55 = 2.05, P = .04). The H : M ratio was bilaterally higher in the ACL-R than the control group (F1,55 = 5.17, P = .03). The quadriceps CAR was bilaterally lower in the ACL-R compared with the control group (F1,55 = 10.5, P = .002). The ACL-R group with low voluntary activation (CAR < 0.95) had higher AMT than the control group (P = .02), whereas the ACL-R group with high voluntary activation (CAR ≥ 0.95) demonstrated higher H : M ratios than the control group (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS The higher VM AMT in the injured limbs of ACL-R patients suggested that corticomotor deficits were present after surgery. Higher bilateral H : M ratios in ACL-R patients may be a strategy to reflexively increase excitability to maintain voluntary activation.

Quadriceps Strength Predicts Self-reported Function Post-ACL Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE Quadriceps strength is a useful clinical predictor of self-reported function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, it remains unknown if quadriceps strength normalized to body mass (QBM) or quadriceps strength limb symmetry index (QLSI) is the best predictor of self-reported function in individuals with ACLR. We sought to determine whether QBM and QLSI are able to predict individuals with ACLR who self-report high function (≥90% on the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) index). METHODS Ninety-six individuals with a history of a primary unilateral ACLR were recruited for a multisite cross-sectional descriptive laboratory experiment. Bilateral isometric quadriceps strength was collected at 90° of knee flexion to calculate QBM and QLSI (ratio of the ACLR limb to the contralateral limb). Area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses to determine the capacity of QBM and QLSI to predict individuals with high self-reported function on the IKDC index. RESULTS QBM displayed high accuracy (AUC = 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.86) for identifying participants with an IKDC index ≥90%. A QBM cutoff score of 3.10 N·m·kg was found to maximize sensitivity (0.61) and specificity (0.84), and displayed 8.15 (3.09-21.55) times higher odds of reporting high function. QLSI displayed a moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.62, 0.50-0.73) for identifying participants with an IKDC index ≥90%. A QLSI cutoff score of 96.5% maximized sensitivity (0.55) and specificity (0.70), and represented 2.78 (1.16-6.64) times higher odds reporting high function. CONCLUSION QBM is a stronger predictor of high self-reported function compared with QLSI in individuals with ACLR. Rehabilitation guidelines may benefit from incorporating the use of QBM measurements for the purpose of predicting participants that may maintain high self-reported function.

Negligence, genuine error, and litigation.

Not all medical injuries are the result of negligence. In fact, most medical injuries are the result either of the inherent risk in the practice of medicine, or due to system errors, which cannot be prevented simply through fear of disciplinary action. This paper will discuss the differences between adverse events, negligence, and system errors; the current medical malpractice tort system in the United States; and review current and future solutions, including medical malpractice reform, alternative dispute resolution, health courts, and no-fault compensation systems. The current political environment favors investigation of non-cap tort reform remedies; investment into more rational oversight systems, such as health courts or no-fault systems may reap both quantitative and qualitative benefits for a less costly and safer health system.

Hip abductor strength in people with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study of reliability and association with function☆

BACKGROUND To investigate the clinical importance of hip abductor (HA) strength in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA), the purposes of this study were to 1) compare the association of HA strength and physical function to that of knee extensor (KE) strength and physical function, and 2) determine the reliability of the assessment of HA strength using a hand-held dynamometer. METHODS Thirty-five individuals [58 years standard deviation 10 years old] with knee osteoarthritis participated. Physical function was assessed with performance-based [Get-Up and Go (GUG), stair climb and descent (SC), and five times chair rise (CR)] and self-reported (WOMAC function) measures. The relationship between strength and function was assessed using bivariate correlation and hierarchical multiple regression models. Reliability across sessions was assessed in 25 subjects. RESULTS In the bivariate models, both KE and HA strength were both significantly associated with performance-based measures of function, but not WOMAC function. After controlling for anthropometric factors and KE strength in the hierarchical models, HA made significant independent contributions to the prediction of GUG and SC, but not CR or WOMAC function. The reliability of HA strength was excellent (ICC2, 3=0.94; 95% CI=0.86-0.97), while the minimum detectable change (MDC95) was 0.29Nm/kg (95% CI=0.23-0.41). CONCLUSION HA strength can be reliably measured and is closely associated with functional performance in people with knee OA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These results provide preliminary evidence suggesting that HA strength may be an important rehabilitation target for the conservative management of knee OA.

Longitudinal Evaluation of Stair Walking Biomechanics in Patients with Acl Injury

PURPOSE After anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction, abnormal biomechanics during daily tasks may have prominent and detrimental long-term consequences on knee joint health. The purpose of this study was to longitudinally evaluate hip and knee joint biomechanics during stair ascent and descent in patients with acute ACL injury and at return to activity after ACL reconstruction. METHODS Twenty individuals with unilateral ACL injury (age, 20.9 ± 4.4 yr; height, 172.4 ± 7.5 cm; mass, 76.2 ± 12.2 kg) that were scheduled to undergo surgical reconstruction were compared with 20 healthy matched controls (age, 21.7 ± 3.7 yr; height, 173.7 ± 9.9 cm; mass, 76.1 ± 19.7 kg). Lower extremity biomechanics were recorded using three-dimensional motion analysis during stair ascent and descent at two testing sessions (before surgery and at approximately 6 months after surgery or when they were allowed to return to unrestricted physical activity). Time between sessions for healthy participants was matched on the basis of the ACL group. Peak sagittal and frontal plane knee and hip joint angles and moments, joint angles at initial contact, and joint excursions across stance phase were evaluated. RESULTS The ACL-injured limb of patients experienced smaller knee extension moments than the uninjured limb and healthy controls during stair ascent and descent (P < 0.05) before and 6 months after ACL reconstruction. During stair ascent, ACL patients experienced more extended knee joint positions and less sagittal plane knee joint excursions, coupled with greater frontal plane hip joint excursions (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with ACL injury experience reductions in knee flexion angle and knee extension moments during stair walking. These alterations were observed both before and after reconstruction, suggesting that early gait retraining interventions may be beneficial in these patients.

The contribution of leg press and knee extension strength and power to physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study

The purposes of this study were to 1) determine the additional contributions of leg press and knee extensor power, over and above that of strength, to the performance of physical function tasks in people with knee osteoarthritis, and 2) compare the ability of bilateral leg press to unilateral knee extensor strength and power to predict functional task performance. METHODS A cross-sectional, exploratory study of 40 individuals with tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis resulting in moderate impairments in physical function was conducted. Physical function (Get-up and Go, timed stair climb and descent, and five time chair rise) and muscle performance (leg press and knee extension strength and power) were assessed. RESULTS After controlling for covariates and strength, leg press, but not knee extensor, power explained additional variance in physical function (11% and 21%). Conversely, adding strength to regression models including covariates and power did not consistently improve the prediction of physical function. Additionally, leg press power consistently explained more variance in physical function (44 to 57%) than involved (24 to 34%) or uninvolved (28 to 48%) knee extension power. CONCLUSIONS Leg press power may be a more functionally relevant measure of muscle performance than knee extension strength in this population. Future studies should investigate the effectiveness of interventions specifically designed to improve leg press power in people with knee osteoarthritis.