David J. Lindstrom
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David J. Lindstrom.
Space | 1998
Carlton C. Allen; Karen M. Jager; Richard V. Morris; David J. Lindstrom; Marilyn M. Lindstrom; John P. Lockwood
We have developed a simulant for the oxidized soil of Mars to support scientific research, engineering studies and education. JSC Mars-1 is the <1 mm size fraction of altered volcanic ash from a Hawaiian cinder cone. The simulant closely matches the reflectance spectrum and approximates the mineralogy, chemical composition, grain size, density, porosity and magnetic properties of Martian soil. JSC Mars-1 is currently available to qualified investigators and educators.
Astrobiology | 2009
David W. Beaty; Carlton C. Allen; Deborah S. Bass; Karen L. Buxbaum; James K. Campbell; David J. Lindstrom; Sylvia L. Miller; Dimitri A. Papanastassiou
It has been widely understood for many years that an essential component of a Mars Sample Return mission is a Sample Receiving Facility (SRF). The purpose of such a facility would be to take delivery of the flight hardware that lands on Earth, open the spacecraft and extract the sample container and samples, and conduct an agreed-upon test protocol, while ensuring strict containment and contamination control of the samples while in the SRF. Any samples that are found to be non-hazardous (or are rendered non-hazardous by sterilization) would then be transferred to long-term curation. Although the general concept of an SRF is relatively straightforward, there has been considerable discussion about implementation planning. The Mars Exploration Program carried out an analysis of the attributes of an SRF to establish its scope, including minimum size and functionality, budgetary requirements (capital cost, operating costs, cost profile), and development schedule. The approach was to arrange for three independent design studies, each led by an architectural design firm, and compare the results. While there were many design elements in common identified by each study team, there were significant differences in the way human operators were to interact with the systems. In aggregate, the design studies provided insight into the attributes of a future SRF and the complex factors to consider for future programmatic planning.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1986
Marilyn M. Lindstrom; David J. Lindstrom
Archive | 1998
Carlton C. Allen; Richard V. Morris; Karen M. Jager; D. C. Golden; David J. Lindstrom; Marilyn M. Lindstrom; John P. Lockwood
Archive | 1997
Carlton C. Allen; Richard V. Morris; David J. Lindstrom; Marilyn M. Lindstrom; John P. Lockwood
Meteoritics & Planetary Science | 1999
David W. Mittlefehldt; David J. Lindstrom; Marilyn M. Lindstrom; R. R. Martinez
Geophysical Research Letters | 1983
Randy L. Korotev; Marilyn M. Lindstrom; David J. Lindstrom; Larry A. Haskin
Archive | 1992
Michael E. Zolensky; David J. Lindstrom
Memoirs of National Institute of Polar Research. Special issue | 1986
Marilyn M. Lindstrom; David J. Lindstrom; Randy L. Korotev; Larry A. Haskin
Archive | 1992
Larry A. Haskin; Russell O. Colson; David J. Lindstrom; Robert H. Lewis; Krystyna W. Semkow