David J. Roush

Advances in Primary Recovery: Centrifugation and Membrane Technology

Significant and continual improvements in upstream processing for biologics have resulted in challenges for downstream processing, both primary recovery and purification ( 1 ). Given the high cell densities achievable in both microbial and mammalian cell culture processes, primary recovery can be a significant bottleneck in both clinical and commercial manufacturing. The combination of increased product titer and low viability leads to significant relative increases in the levels of process impurities such as lipids, intracellular proteins and nucleic acid versus the product. In addition, cell culture media components such as soy and yeast hydrolysates have been widely applied to achieve the cell culture densities needed for higher titers ( 2 , 3 ). Many of the process impurities can be negatively charged at harvest pH and can form colloids during the cell culture and harvest processes. The wide size distribution of these particles and the potential for additional particles to be generated by shear forces within a centrifuge may result in insufficient clarification to prevent fouling of subsequent filters. The other residual process impurities can lead to precipitation and increased turbidity during processing and even interference with the performance of the capturing chromatographic step. Primary recovery also poses significant challenges owing to the necessity to execute in an expedient manner to minimize both product degradation and bioburden concerns. Both microfiltration and centrifugation coupled with depth filtration have been employed successfully as primary recovery processing steps. Advances in the design and application of membrane technology for microfiltration and dead‐end filtration have contributed to significant improvements in process performance and integration, in some cases allowing for a combination of multiple unit operations in a given step. Although these advances have increased productivity and reliability, the net result is that optimization of primary recovery processes has become substantially more complicated. Ironically, the application of classical chemical engineering approaches to overcome issues in primary recovery and purification (e.g., turbidity and trace impurity removal) are just recently gaining attention ( 4 ). Some of these techniques (e.g., membrane cascades, pretreatment, precipitation, and the use of affinity tags) are now seen almost as disruptive technologies ( 5 ). This paper will review the current and potential future state of research on primary recovery, including relevant papers presented at the 234th American Chemical Society (ACS) National Meeting in Boston.

A practical strategy for using miniature chromatography columns in a standardized high-throughput workflow for purification development of monoclonal antibodies

The emergence of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies has created a need for faster and more efficient bioprocess development strategies in order to meet timeline and material demands. In this work, a high‐throughput process development (HTPD) strategy implementing several high‐throughput chromatography purification techniques is described. Namely, batch incubations are used to scout feasible operating conditions, miniature columns are then used to determine separation of impurities, and, finally, a limited number of lab scale columns are tested to confirm the conditions identified using high‐throughput techniques and to provide a path toward large scale processing. This multistep approach builds upon previous HTPD work by combining, in a unique sequential fashion, the flexibility and throughput of batch incubations with the increased separation characteristics for the packed bed format of miniature columns. Additionally, in order to assess the applicability of using miniature columns in this workflow, transport considerations were compared with traditional lab scale columns, and performances were mapped for the two techniques. The high‐throughput strategy was utilized to determine optimal operating conditions with two different types of resins for a difficult separation of a mAb monomer from aggregates. Other more detailed prediction models are cited, but the intent of this work was to use high‐throughput strategies as a general guide for scaling and assessing operating space rather than as a precise model to exactly predict performance.

Virus filtration of high‐concentration monoclonal antibody solutions

The ability to process high‐concentration monoclonal antibody solutions (> 10 g/L) through small‐pore membranes typically used for virus removal can improve current antibody purification processes by eliminating the need for feed stream dilution, and by reducing filter area, cycle‐time, and costs. In this work, we present the screening of virus filters of varying configurations and materials of construction using MAb solutions with a concentration range of 4–20 g/L. For our MAbs of interest—two different humanized IgG1s—flux decay was not observed up to a filter loading of 200 L/m2 with a regenerated cellulose hollow fiber virus removal filter. In contrast, PVDF and PES flat sheet disc membranes were plugged by solutions of these same MAbs with concentrations >4 g/L well before 50 L/m2. These results were obtained with purified feed streams containing <2% aggregates, as measured by size exclusion chromatography, where the majority of the aggregate likely was composed of dimers. Differences in filtration flux performance between the two MAbs under similar operating conditions indicate the sensitivity of the system to small differences in protein structure, presumably due to the impact of these differences on nonspecific interactions between the protein and the membrane; these differences cannot be anticipated based on protein pI alone. Virus clearance data with two model viruses (XMuLV and MMV) confirm the ability of hollow fiber membranes with 19 ± 2 nm pore size to achieve at least 3–4 LRV, independent of MAb concentration, over the range examined.

Preparative high-performance liquid chromatography of echinocandins

Abstract The isolation of fermentation derived small bioactive molecules remains extremely challenging due to the presence of many analogues with similar physicochemical behavior. Removal of analogue impurities typically involves crystallization and/or preparative HPLC. The normal-phase preparative HPLC for the purification of fermentation derived echinocandins is described. Resolution of key impurities from the product of interest, pneumocandin B o , is accomplished using a ternary ethyl acetate–methanol–water mobile phase with silica gel as the sorbent. Plate counts, measured with small molecules, show that the column efficiency is excellent under the operating conditions despite the use of an irregular silica and unusually high levels (greater than 6%) of water in the mobile phase. The results of optimization studies indicate the product solubility, retention and resolution of key analogue impurities are strong functions of the ternary mobile phase composition. The normal-phase HPLC process was optimized by carrying out eluent flow-rate (linear velocity) and column loading studies. The results of these experimental studies indicate that both yield and productivity are a function of linear velocity and product loading and that a tradeoff exists between these two parameters.

Targeted purification development enabled by computational biophysical modeling

Chromatographic and non‐chromatographic purification of biopharmaceuticals depend on the interactions between protein molecules and a solid–liquid interface. These interactions are dominated by the protein–surface properties, which are a function of protein sequence, structure, and dynamics. In addition, protein–surface properties are critical for in vivo recognition and activation, thus, purification strategies should strive to preserve structural integrity and retain desired pharmacological efficacy. Other factors such as surface diffusion, pore diffusion, and film mass transfer can impact chromatographic separation and resin design. The key factors that impact non‐chromatographic separations (e.g., solubility, ligand affinity, charges and hydrophobic clusters, and molecular dynamics) are readily amenable to computational modeling and can enhance the understanding of protein chromatographic. Previously published studies have used computational methods such as quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) or quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) to identify and rank order affinity ligands based on their potential to effectively bind and separate a desired biopharmaceutical from host cell protein (HCP) and other impurities. The challenge in the application of such an approach is to discern key yet subtle differences in ligands and proteins that influence biologics purification. Using a relatively small molecular weight protein (insulin), this research overcame limitations of previous modeling efforts by utilizing atomic level detail for the modeling of protein–ligand interactions, effectively leveraging and extending previous research on drug target discovery. These principles were applied to the purification of different commercially available insulin variants. The ability of these computational models to correlate directionally with empirical observation is demonstrated for several insulin systems over a range of purification challenges including resolution of subtle product variants (amino acid misincorporations). Broader application of this methodology in bioprocess development may enhance and speed the development of a robust purification platform.

Limits in virus filtration capability? Impact of virus quality and spike level on virus removal with xenotropic murine leukemia virus

Virus filtration (VF) is a key step in an overall viral clearance process since it has been demonstrated to effectively clear a wide range of mammalian viruses with a log reduction value (LRV) > 4. The potential to achieve higher LRV from virus retentive filters has historically been examined using bacteriophage surrogates, which commonly demonstrated a potential of > 9 LRV when using high titer spikes (e.g. 1010 PFU/mL). However, as the filter loading increases, one typically experiences significant decreases in performance and LRV. The 9 LRV value is markedly higher than the current expected range of 4‐5 LRV when utilizing mammalian retroviruses on virus removal filters (Miesegaes et al., Dev Biol (Basel) 2010;133:3‐101). Recent values have been reported in the literature (Stuckey et al., Biotech Progr 2014;30:79‐85) of LRV in excess of 6 for PPV and XMuLV although this result appears to be atypical. LRV for VF with therapeutic proteins could be limited by several factors including process limits (flux decay, load matrix), virus spike level and the analytical methods used for virus detection (i.e. the Limits of Quantitation), as well as the virus spike quality. Research was conducted using the Xenotropic‐Murine Leukemia Virus (XMuLV) for its direct relevance to the most commonly cited document, the International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) Q5A (International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999) for viral safety evaluations. A unique aspect of this work is the independent evaluation of the impact of retrovirus quality and virus spike level on VF performance and LRV. The VF studies used XMuLV preparations purified by either ultracentrifugation (Ultra 1) or by chromatographic processes that yielded a more highly purified virus stock (Ultra 2). Two monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) with markedly different filtration characteristics and with similar levels of aggregate (<1.5%) were evaluated with the Ultra 1 and Ultra 2 virus preparations utilizing the Planova 20 N, a small virus removal filter. Impurities in the virus preparation ultimately limited filter loading as measured by determining the volumetric loading condition where 75% flux decay is observed versus initial conditions (V75). This observation occurred with both Mabs with the difference in virus purity more pronounced when very high spike levels were used (>5 vol/vol %). Significant differences were seen for the process performance over a number of lots of the less‐pure Ultra 1 virus preparations. Experiments utilizing a developmental lot of the chromatographic purified XMuLV (Ultra 2 Development lot) that had elevated levels of host cell residuals (vs. the final Ultra 2 preparations) suggest that these contaminant residuals can impact virus filter fouling, even if the virus prep is essentially monodisperse. Process studies utilizing an Ultra 2 virus with substantially less host cell residuals and highly monodispersed virus particles demonstrated superior performance and an LRV in excess of 7.7 log10. A model was constructed demonstrating the linear dependence of filtration flux versus filter loading which can be used to predict the V75 for a range of virus spike levels conditions using this highly purified virus. Fine tuning the virus spike level with this model can ultimately maximize the LRV for the virus filter step, essentially adding the LRV equivalent of another process step (i.e. protein A or CEX chromatography).

Resolution of heterogeneous charged antibody aggregates via multimodal chromatography: A comparison to conventional approaches

Clearance of aggregates during protein purification is increasingly paramount as protein aggregates represent one of the major impurities in biopharmaceutical products. Aggregates, especially dimer species, represent a significant challenge for purification processing since aggregate separation coupled with high purity protein recovery can be difficult to accomplish. Biochemical characterization of the aggregate species from the hydrophobic interaction and cation exchange chromatography elution peaks revealed two different charged populations, i.e. heterogeneous charged aggregates, which led to further challenges for chromatographic removal. This paper compares multimodal versus conventional cation exchange or hydrophobic chromatography methodologies to remove heterogeneous aggregates. A full, mixed level factorial design of experiment strategy together with high throughput experimentation was employed to rapidly evaluate chromatographic parameters such as pH, conductivity, and loading. A variety of operating conditions were identified for the multimodal chromatography step, which lead to effective removal of two different charged populations of aggregate species. This multimodal chromatography step was incorporated into a monoclonal antibody purification process and successfully implemented at commercial manufacturing scale.

A step‐wise approach to define binding mechanisms of surrogate viral particles to multi‐modal anion exchange resin in a single solute system

Multi‐modal anion exchange resins combine properties of both anion exchange and hydrophobic interaction chromatography for commercial protein polishing and may provide some viral clearance as well. From a regulatory viral clearance claim standpoint, it is unclear if multi‐modal resins are truly orthogonal to either single‐mode anion exchange or hydrophobic interaction columns. To answer this, a strategy of solute surface assays and High Throughput Screening of resin in concert with a scale‐down model of large scale chromatography purification was employed to determine the predominant binding mechanisms of a panel of bacteriophage (i.e., PR772, PP7, and ϕX174) to multi‐modal and single mode resins under various buffer conditions. The buffer conditions were restricted to buffer environments suggested by the manufacturer for the multi‐modal resin. Each phage was examined for estimated net charge expression and relative hydrophobicity using chromatographic based methods. Overall, PP7 and PR772 bound to the multimodal resin via both anionic and hydrophobic moieties, while ϕX174 bound predominantly by the anionic moiety. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 1487–1494.

High-throughput techniques to evaluate the effect of ligand density for impurity separations with multimodal cation exchange resins

Scale‐down, high‐throughput screening techniques are well on their way to becoming a commodity in downstream bioprocess development, especially for the rapid development of chromatography process steps. This work used both resin slurry plate and miniature column high‐throughput screening methodologies to identify the best resin properties for mAb separations utilizing a multimodal chromatography ligand interaction. A ligand with both cation exchange and hydrophobic interaction properties was studied at several ligand densities and compared to a commercially available multimodal resin with a larger particle size at high ligand density. The resins were screened with mAbs containing distinct process impurities (aggregates and a hydrophobic variant), and optimized conditions provided more than a log of clearance of both types of impurities for the different resins screened. These studies reveal that while a smaller particle size is generally preferable, optimal ligand densities can be different depending on the properties of both the mAb and impurity studied.

The step-wise framework to design a chromatography-based hydrophobicity assay for viral particles

A high-salt, hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) method was developed to measure the relative hydrophobicity of a diverse set of solutes. Through the careful control of buffer pH and salt concentration, this assay was then used to ascertain for the first time the relative hydrophobicity values of three different bacteriophage, four mammalian viruses, and a range of biotech medicinal proteins as benchmarked to protein standards previously characterized for hydrophobicity.