Rebecca Chmielowski
Merck & Co.
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Rebecca Chmielowski.
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry | 2013
Haihong Zhou; Maarten Hoek; Pan Yi; Rory J. Rohm; Ablatt Mahsut; Patricia Brown; Jason Saunders; Rebecca Chmielowski; Ning Ren; Dan Shuster; Katie Southwick; Gulesi Ayanoglu; Dan Gorman; Drake LaFace; Salvatore Santino; James P. Conway; Zhong Liu; Doris F. Cully; Michele A. Cleary; Thomas P. Roddy; Daniel Blom
RATIONALE Human genetics studies in African Americans have shown a strong correlation between polymorphisms in the ApoL1 gene and chronic kidney disease (CKD). To gain further insight into the etiology of ApoL1-associated kidney diseases, the determination of circulating levels of both wild type as well as ApoL1 variants could be of significant use. To date, antibodies that discriminate between all three ApoL1 variant forms (wild type, G1 and G2) are not available. We aimed to develop a rapid method for detecting and quantifying ApoL1 variants and total levels in plasma. METHODS Ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) in multiple-reaction monitoring acquisition mode was used to quantify ApoL1. RESULTS We demonstrated that it is feasible to detect and quantify ApoL1 variants (wild type, G1 and G2), and total ApoL1 concentrations in plasma. ApoL1 genotypes determined by LC/MS agreed perfectly with the traditional method DNA sequencing for 74 human subjects. The method exhibited at least three orders of linearity with a lower limit of quantification of 10 nM. Moreover, the method can readily be multiplexed for the quantification of a panel of protein markers in a single sample. CONCLUSIONS The method reported herein obviates the need to perform DNA genotyping of ApoL1 variants, which is of significant value in cases where stored samples are unsuitable for DNA analysis. More importantly, the method could potentially be of use in the early identification of individuals at risk of developing CKD, and for the stratification of patients for treatment with future ApoL1-modifying therapies.
Biotechnology Progress | 2014
Rebecca Chmielowski; Sandra Meissner; David J. Roush; Thomas O. Linden; Edward Glowacki; Janelle Konietzko; Joseph Nti-Gyabaah
Clearance of aggregates during protein purification is increasingly paramount as protein aggregates represent one of the major impurities in biopharmaceutical products. Aggregates, especially dimer species, represent a significant challenge for purification processing since aggregate separation coupled with high purity protein recovery can be difficult to accomplish. Biochemical characterization of the aggregate species from the hydrophobic interaction and cation exchange chromatography elution peaks revealed two different charged populations, i.e. heterogeneous charged aggregates, which led to further challenges for chromatographic removal. This paper compares multimodal versus conventional cation exchange or hydrophobic chromatography methodologies to remove heterogeneous aggregates. A full, mixed level factorial design of experiment strategy together with high throughput experimentation was employed to rapidly evaluate chromatographic parameters such as pH, conductivity, and loading. A variety of operating conditions were identified for the multimodal chromatography step, which lead to effective removal of two different charged populations of aggregate species. This multimodal chromatography step was incorporated into a monoclonal antibody purification process and successfully implemented at commercial manufacturing scale.
Journal of Chromatography A | 2017
Rebecca Chmielowski; Linda Mathiasson; Hans Blom; Daniel Go; Hanno Ehring; Heera Khan; Hong Li; Collette Cutler; Karol Lacki; Nihal Tugcu; David J. Roush
Advances in cell culture technology have enabled the production of antibody titers upwards of 30g/L. These highly productive cell culture systems can potentially lead to productivity bottlenecks in downstream purification due to lower column loadings, especially in the primary capture chromatography step. Alternative chromatography solutions to help remedy this bottleneck include the utilization of continuous processing systems such as periodic counter-current chromatography (PCC). Recent studies have provided methods to optimize and improve the design of PCC for cell culture titers up to about 3g/L. This paper defines a continuous loading strategy for PCC that is independent of cell culture background and encompasses cell culture titers up to about 31g/L. Initial experimentation showed a challenge with determining a difference in change in UV280nm signal (ie. ΔUV) between cell culture feed and monoclonal antibody (mAb) concentration. Further investigation revealed UV280nm absorbance of the cell culture feedstock without antibody was outside of the linear range of detection for a given cell pathlength. Additional experimentation showed the difference in ΔUV for various cell culture feeds can be either theoretically predicted by Beers Law given a known absorbance of the media background and impurities or experimentally determined using various UV280nm cell pathlengths. Based on these results, a 0.35mm pathlength at UV280nm was chosen for dynamic control to overcome the background signal. The pore diffusion model showed good agreement with the experimental frontal analysis data, which resulted in definition of a ΔUV setpoint range between 20 and 70% for 3C-PCC experiments. Product quality of the elution pools was acceptable between various cell culture feeds and titers up to about 41g/L. Results indicated the following ΔUV setpoints to achieve robust dynamic control and maintain 3C-PCC yield: ∼20-45% for titers greater than 10g/L depending on UV absorbance of the HCCF and ∼45-70% for titers of up to 10g/L independent of UV absorbance of the HCCF. The strategy and results presented in this paper show column loading in a continuous chromatography step can be dynamically controlled independent of the cell culture feedstock and titer, and allow for enhanced process control built into the downstream continuous operations.
Biotechnology Progress | 2018
Sri R. Madabhushi; John Gavin; Sen Xu; Collette Cutler; Rebecca Chmielowski; William J. Rayfield; Nihal Tugcu; Hao Chen
Process mass intensity (PMI) is a benchmarking metric to evaluate the efficiency of a manufacturing process, which is indicative of the environmental impact of the process. Although this metric is commonly applied for small molecule manufacturing processes, it is less commonly applied to biologics. In this study, an Excel based tool developed by the ACS GCI Pharmaceutical Roundtable was used to calculate PMI of different manufacturing processes for a monoclonal antibody (mAb). For the upstream process, three different versions were compared: fed‐batch, fed‐batch with N‐1 perfusion, and perfusion in the N‐stage bioreactor. For each upstream process version, an appropriate downstream operational mode was evaluated from the following: a column chromatography process utilizing Protein A and anion exchange (AEX) resin, a Protein A column and an AEX membrane, and a three‐column periodic counter‐current (3C PCC) chromatography process for Protein A and an AEX membrane. The impact of these different process variations on PMI was evaluated. Of all the process inputs, water contributes about 92–94% of the overall PMI. Additionally, the upstream processes and the chromatography steps account for 32–47 and 34–54% of the overall PMI, respectively. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify opportunities for further reducing PMI. These data indicate that a semicontinuous manufacturing process (perfusion, 3C PCC, and AEX membrane) is the most efficient process, resulting in a 23% reduction of PMI when compared with the fed batch and two‐column chromatography process. Together, PMI can be used to guide the development of efficient and environmentally sustainable mAb manufacturing processes.
Archive | 2012
Joseph Nti-Gyabaah; Sandra Meissner; Rebecca Chmielowski; Janelle Konietzko
Archive | 2009
Rebecca Chmielowski; Erin Green-Trexler; David J. Roush
Archive | 2015
Darshini Shah; Rebecca Chmielowski; Colette Cutler; Hong Li; David J. Roush; Nihal Tugcu
Archive | 2013
Rebecca Chmielowski; Collette Cutler; Hong Li; Thomas O. Linden
Archive | 2012
Joseph Nti-Gyabaah; Sandra Meissner; Rebecca Chmielowski; Janelle Konietzko
Archive | 2012
Joseph Nti-Gyabaah; Sandra Meissner; Rebecca Chmielowski; Janelle Konietzko