Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David K. Gifford is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David K. Gifford.


Cell | 2005

Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells.

Laurie A. Boyer; Tong Ihn Lee; Megan F. Cole; Sarah E. Johnstone; Stuart S. Levine; Jacob P. Zucker; Matthew G. Guenther; Roshan M. Kumar; Heather L. Murray; Richard G. Jenner; David K. Gifford; Douglas A. Melton; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A. Young

The transcription factors OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG have essential roles in early development and are required for the propagation of undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells in culture. To gain insights into transcriptional regulation of human ES cells, we have identified OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG target genes using genome-scale location analysis. We found, surprisingly, that OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG co-occupy a substantial portion of their target genes. These target genes frequently encode transcription factors, many of which are developmentally important homeodomain proteins. Our data also indicate that OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG collaborate to form regulatory circuitry consisting of autoregulatory and feedforward loops. These results provide new insights into the transcriptional regulation of stem cells and reveal how OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG contribute to pluripotency and self-renewal.


Nature | 2006

Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells.

Laurie A. Boyer; Kathrin Plath; Julia Zeitlinger; Tobias Brambrink; Lea Ann Medeiros; Tong Ihn Lee; Stuart S. Levine; Marius Wernig; Adriana Tajonar; Mridula K. Ray; George W. Bell; Arie P. Otte; Miguel Vidal; David K. Gifford; Richard A. Young; Rudolf Jaenisch

The mechanisms by which embryonic stem (ES) cells self-renew while maintaining the ability to differentiate into virtually all adult cell types are not well understood. Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are transcriptional repressors that help to maintain cellular identity during metazoan development by epigenetic modification of chromatin structure. PcG proteins have essential roles in early embryonic development and have been implicated in ES cell pluripotency, but few of their target genes are known in mammals. Here we show that PcG proteins directly repress a large cohort of developmental regulators in murine ES cells, the expression of which would otherwise promote differentiation. Using genome-wide location analysis in murine ES cells, we found that the Polycomb repressive complexes PRC1 and PRC2 co-occupied 512 genes, many of which encode transcription factors with important roles in development. All of the co-occupied genes contained modified nucleosomes (trimethylated Lys 27 on histone H3). Consistent with a causal role in gene silencing in ES cells, PcG target genes were de-repressed in cells deficient for the PRC2 component Eed, and were preferentially activated on induction of differentiation. Our results indicate that dynamic repression of developmental pathways by Polycomb complexes may be required for maintaining ES cell pluripotency and plasticity during embryonic development.


Nature | 2004

Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome

Christopher T. Harbison; D. Benjamin Gordon; Tong Ihn Lee; Nicola J. Rinaldi; Kenzie D. MacIsaac; Timothy Danford; Nancy M. Hannett; Jean-Bosco Tagne; David B. Reynolds; Jane Yoo; Ezra G. Jennings; Julia Zeitlinger; Dmitry K. Pokholok; Manolis Kellis; P. Alex Rolfe; Ken T. Takusagawa; Eric S. Lander; David K. Gifford; Ernest Fraenkel; Richard A. Young

DNA-binding transcriptional regulators interpret the genomes regulatory code by binding to specific sequences to induce or repress gene expression. Comparative genomics has recently been used to identify potential cis-regulatory sequences within the yeast genome on the basis of phylogenetic conservation, but this information alone does not reveal if or when transcriptional regulators occupy these binding sites. We have constructed an initial map of yeasts transcriptional regulatory code by identifying the sequence elements that are bound by regulators under various conditions and that are conserved among Saccharomyces species. The organization of regulatory elements in promoters and the environment-dependent use of these elements by regulators are discussed. We find that environment-specific use of regulatory elements predicts mechanistic models for the function of a large population of yeasts transcriptional regulators.


Cell | 2006

Control of Developmental Regulators by Polycomb in Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Tong Ihn Lee; Richard G. Jenner; Laurie A. Boyer; Matthew G. Guenther; Stuart S. Levine; Roshan M. Kumar; Brett Chevalier; Sarah E. Johnstone; Megan F. Cole; Kyoichi Isono; Haruhiko Koseki; Takuya Fuchikami; Kuniya Abe; Heather L. Murray; Jacob P. Zucker; Bingbing Yuan; George W. Bell; Elizabeth Herbolsheimer; Nancy M. Hannett; Kaiming Sun; Duncan T. Odom; Arie P. Otte; Thomas L. Volkert; David P. Bartel; Douglas A. Melton; David K. Gifford; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A. Young

Polycomb group proteins are essential for early development in metazoans, but their contributions to human development are not well understood. We have mapped the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) subunit SUZ12 across the entire nonrepeat portion of the genome in human embryonic stem (ES) cells. We found that SUZ12 is distributed across large portions of over two hundred genes encoding key developmental regulators. These genes are occupied by nucleosomes trimethylated at histone H3K27, are transcriptionally repressed, and contain some of the most highly conserved noncoding elements in the genome. We found that PRC2 target genes are preferentially activated during ES cell differentiation and that the ES cell regulators OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG cooccupy a significant subset of these genes. These results indicate that PRC2 occupies a special set of developmental genes in ES cells that must be repressed to maintain pluripotency and that are poised for activation during ES cell differentiation.


Cell | 2005

Genome-wide Map of Nucleosome Acetylation and Methylation in Yeast

Dmitry K. Pokholok; Christopher T. Harbison; Stuart S. Levine; Megan F. Cole; Nancy M. Hannett; Tong Ihn Lee; George W. Bell; Kimberly Walker; P. Alex Rolfe; Elizabeth Herbolsheimer; Julia Zeitlinger; Fran Lewitter; David K. Gifford; Richard A. Young

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged into nucleosomes whose position and chemical modification state can profoundly influence regulation of gene expression. We profiled nucleosome modifications across the yeast genome using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with DNA microarrays to produce high-resolution genome-wide maps of histone acetylation and methylation. These maps take into account changes in nucleosome occupancy at actively transcribed genes and, in doing so, revise previous assessments of the modifications associated with gene expression. Both acetylation and methylation of histones are associated with transcriptional activity, but the former occurs predominantly at the beginning of genes, whereas the latter can occur throughout transcribed regions. Most notably, specific methylation events are associated with the beginning, middle, and end of actively transcribed genes. These maps provide the foundation for further understanding the roles of chromatin in gene expression and genome maintenance.


Cell | 2001

Serial Regulation of Transcriptional Regulators in the Yeast Cell Cycle

Itamar Simon; John D. Barnett; Nancy M. Hannett; Christopher T. Harbison; Nicola J. Rinaldi; Thomas L. Volkert; John J. Wyrick; Julia Zeitlinger; David K. Gifford; Tommi S. Jaakkola; Richard A. Young

Genome-wide location analysis was used to determine how the yeast cell cycle gene expression program is regulated by each of the nine known cell cycle transcriptional activators. We found that cell cycle transcriptional activators that function during one stage of the cell cycle regulate transcriptional activators that function during the next stage. This serial regulation of transcriptional activators forms a connected regulatory network that is itself a cycle. Our results also reveal how the nine transcriptional regulators coordinately regulate global gene expression and diverse stage-specific functions to produce a continuous cycle of cellular events. This information forms the foundation for a complete map of the transcriptional regulatory network that controls the cell cycle.


Nature Genetics | 2007

Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation has diverged significantly between human and mouse

Duncan T. Odom; Robin D. Dowell; Elizabeth S. Jacobsen; William Gordon; Timothy Danford; Kenzie D. MacIsaac; P. Alexander Rolfe; Caitlin M. Conboy; David K. Gifford; Ernest Fraenkel

We demonstrate that the binding sites for highly conserved transcription factors vary extensively between human and mouse. We mapped the binding of four tissue-specific transcription factors (FOXA2, HNF1A, HNF4A and HNF6) to 4,000 orthologous gene pairs in hepatocytes purified from human and mouse livers. Despite the conserved function of these factors, from 41% to 89% of their binding events seem to be species specific. When the same protein binds the promoters of orthologous genes, approximately two-thirds of the binding sites do not align.


pacific symposium on biocomputing | 2000

Using graphical models and genomic expression data to statistically validate models of genetic regulatory networks.

Alexander J. Hartemink; David K. Gifford; Tommi S. Jaakkola; Richard A. Young

We propose a model-driven approach for analyzing genomic expression data that permits genetic regulatory networks to be represented in a biologically interpretable computational form. Our models permit latent variables capturing unobserved factors, describe arbitrarily complex (more than pair-wise) relationships at varying levels of refinement, and can be scored rigorously against observational data. The models that we use are based on Bayesian networks and their extensions. As a demonstration of this approach, we utilize 52 genomes worth of Affymetrix GeneChip expression data to correctly differentiate between alternative hypotheses of the galactose regulatory network in S. cerevisiae. When we extend the graph semantics to permit annotated edges, we are able to score models describing relationships at a finer degree of specification.


symposium on operating systems principles | 1995

Rover: a toolkit for mobile information access

Anthony D. Joseph; A. F. de Lespinasse; Joshua A. Tauber; David K. Gifford; M.F. Kaashoek

The Rover toolkit combines relocatable dynamic objects and queued remote procedure calls to provide unique services for roving mobile applications. A relocatable dynamic object is an object with a well-defined interface that can be dynamically loaded into a client computer from a server computer (or vice versa) to reduce client-server communication requirements. Queued remote procedure call is a communication system that permits applications to continue to make non-blocking remote procedure call requests even when a host is disconnected, with requests and responses being exchanged upon network reconnection. The challenges of mobile environments include intermittent connectivity, limited bandwidth, and channel-use optimization. Experimental results from a Rover-based mail reader, calendar program, and two non-blocking versions of World-Wide Web browsers show that Rovers services are a good match to these challenges. The Rover toolkit also offers advantages for workstation applications by providing a uniform distributed object architecture for code shipping, object caching, and asynchronous object invocation.


pacific symposium on biocomputing | 2001

Combining location and expression data for principled discovery of genetic regulatory network models.

Alexander J. Hartemink; David K. Gifford; Tommi S. Jaakkola; Richard A. Young

We develop principled methods for the automatic induction (discovery) of genetic regulatory network models from multiple data sources and data modalities. Models of regulatory networks are represented as Bayesian networks, allowing the models to compactly and robustly capture probabilistic multivariate statistical dependencies between the various cellular factors in these networks. We build on previous Bayesian network validation results by extending the validation framework to the context of model induction, leveraging heuristic simulated annealing search algorithms and posterior model averaging. Using expression data in isolation yields results inconsistent with location data so we incorporate genomic location data to guide the model induction process. We combine these two data modalities by allowing location data to influence the model prior and expression data to influence the model likelihood. We demonstrate the utility of this approach by discovering genetic regulatory models of thirty-three variables involved in S. cerevisiae pheromone response. The models we automatically generate are consistent with the current understanding regarding this regulatory network, but also suggest new directions for future experimental investigation.

Collaboration


Dive into the David K. Gifford's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tommi S. Jaakkola

Wilfrid Laurier University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard A. Young

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Georg K. Gerber

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shaun Mahony

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robin D. Dowell

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timothy Danford

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yuchun Guo

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ernest Fraenkel

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge