David L. Ciraulo

Selective hepatic arterial embolization of grade IV and V blunt hepatic injuries: an extension of resuscitation in the nonoperative management of traumatic hepatic injuries.

BACKGROUND Recognizing the significant mortality and complications inherent in the operative management of blunt hepatic injuries, hepatic arterial embolization was evaluated as a bridge between operative and nonoperative interventions in patients defined as hemodynamically stable only with continuous resuscitation. METHODS Seven of 11 patients with grade IV or V hepatic injuries identified by computed tomography underwent hepatic arterial embolization. A prospective evaluation of hepatic embolization based on subsequent hemodynamic parameters was assessed by matched-pair analysis. A summary of this study populations demographic data and outcomes is presented, including age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, computed tomography grade, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, transfusion requirements, complications, and mortality. RESULTS No statistical difference was demonstrated between pre-embolization and postembolization hemodynamics and volume requirements. After embolization, however, continuous resuscitation was successfully reduced to maintenance fluids. Hepatic embolization was the definitive therapy for all seven patients who underwent embolization. CONCLUSION Results of this preliminary investigation suggest that hepatic arterial embolization is a viable alternative bridging the therapeutic options of operative and nonoperative intervention for a subpopulation of patients with hepatic injury.

Routine prophylactic vena cava filtration is not indicated after acute spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating problem, with over 10,000 new cases annually. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a well-recognized risk in SCI patients, although no clear recommendations for prophylaxis exist. We therefore evaluated whether routine placement of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters is indicated in SCI patients. METHODS The trauma registry of a regional trauma center was used to identify patients sustaining acute SCI resulting in tetraplegia or paraplegia after blunt or penetrating trauma for a 5-year period beginning in January 1995. Patients were analyzed for demographics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, associated long bone or pelvic fracture, severe closed-head injury, type of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, level of SCI, and incidence of DVT and PE. DVT prophylaxis was performed in all patients with sequential compression devices (SCDs) when extremity fracture status permitted. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD and analyzed using Fishers exact test. RESULTS There were 8,269 admissions during the study period, with an overall incidence of DVT and PE of 11.8% and 0.9%, respectively. There were 111 (1.3%) patients who sustained SCI, with an incidence of DVT and PE of 9.0% and 1.8%, respectively, and no deaths. Of these 111 patients, 41.4% were paraplegics and 58.6% were tetraplegics, and 17.1% of patients had severe closed-head injury. Mean hospital length of stay was 23 +/- 20 days for SCI patients. Surveillance duplex ultrasound was performed an average of 2.3 +/- 2.1 times during each hospitalization. Mean Injury Severity Score was 30.0 +/- 12.2. The incidence of DVT and PE in those patients with SCDs alone was 7.1% and 2.3%; for SCDs plus subcutaneous heparin, the incidence was 11.1% and 2.8%; and for SCDs plus low-molecular-weight heparin, the incidence was 7.4% and 0%, respectively, with no statistical difference between groups. The incidence of DVT in SCI patients with long bone fractures was 37.5%, which was significantly greater than the total SCI population (p < 0.02). CONCLUSION The incidence of DVT and PE in SCI patients was similar to that of the overall trauma population when appropriate DVT prophylaxis was used. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that SCI associated with long bone fracture significantly increases the incidence of DVT. On the basis of the low incidence of PE in the present study, routine placement of prophylactic caval filters does not appear warranted in all SCI patients. However, SCI patients with long bone fractures, patients with DVT formation despite prophylactic anticoagulation, or patients with contraindications to anticoagulation may be appropriate candidates for prophylactic caval filtration.

Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma has suggested triage criteria for the immediate attendance of a trauma surgeon to an injured patient in the emergency department. This study validates the accuracy of these criteria in identifying high-risk trauma patients and assesses the impact of trauma surgeon response time. METHODS A study group of trauma patients with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mm Hg, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 8, airway compromise managed with endotracheal intubation (ETI) or surgical airway, or gunshot wound (GSW) to the neck or torso were compared with a control group of patients meeting none of these criteria. Outcome measurements included Injury Severity Score (ISS), duration of hospitalization (length of stay [LOS]), intensive care unit (ICU) days, direct transfer to the ICU or operating room, and mortality. For the study group, trauma surgeon response times, < or = 15 minutes and > 15 minutes, were compared for age, ISS, LOS, ICU days, mortality, and direct transfer to the ICU or operating room. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test and the Yates-corrected chi(2) test (p < 0.05), with odds ratios calculated on the basis of trauma activation criteria and outcome measures. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the relation between the independent variables SBP, GCS, ETI, and GSW with direct transfer to the ICU or operating room and mortality. RESULTS A total of 4,910 patients were identified, including 791 study group patients. The mean ISS, LOS, ICU days, and mortality were significantly higher in the study group (p < 0.01). Odds ratios of the study group for direct transfer to the ICU or operating room were 91 and 2 for ETI, 23 and 1.4 for GCS score < 8, 8 and 2.2 for GSW, and 7 and 1.6 for SBP < 90 mm Hg, respectively. The odds ratios for mortality were 39 for ETI, 104 for GCS score < 8, 12 for GSW, and 74 for SBP < 90 mm Hg. Regression analysis demonstrated that GSW, SBP < 90 mm Hg, and ETI predicted ICU admission; GSW, SBP < 90 mm Hg, and ETI predicted operative intervention; and GCS score < 8, SBP < 90 mm Hg, and ETI were associated with mortality. Trauma surgeon response times were available for 658 (83%) of the study group patients. No significant differences were found between the two response groups. CONCLUSION Trauma patients meeting the triage criteria proposed by the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma have more severe injuries, a higher mortality rate, and longer hospital and ICU stays than control patients. SBP < 90 mm Hg, ETI, and GSW are predictive of urgent operating room use and ICU admission. A significantly higher mortality rate is associated with SBP < 90 mm Hg, ETI, and GCS score < 8. Incorporating these criteria into trauma center triage rules to identify high-risk injured patients is warranted. However, trauma surgeon response time < or = 15 minutes was not associated with improved patient outcome, and optimal response time remains uncertain.

Posttraumatic Carotid Cavernous Fistula: Frequency Analysis of Signs, Symptoms, and Disability Outcomes after Angiographic Embolization

OBJECTIVE To increase awareness and understanding of posttraumatic carotid cavernous fistula (PTCCF) with the intent to expedite diagnosis and treatment of this disabling injury, a 14-year retrospective review of patients with angiographically identified PTCCF was conducted at this Level I trauma center. A frequency analysis of signs, symptoms, and disability was performed. The impact on disability of demographics, number of embolization attempts required for closure of the PTCCF, and time from injury to diagnosis was assessed by t test for independent samples. RESULTS Nine patients were diagnosed with 10 PTCCFs. Mean patient age was 41.5 years. All patients with PTCCF had basilar skull fracture, loss of consciousness, bruit, and chemosis; 90% had exophthalmos; 70% had visual changes; 50% complained of headache; and 80% had some lasting disability. Mean age of patients with partial to total disability was 47 years, while the mean age of patients without lasting disability was 19.5 years (p = 0.013). No statistical correlation could be found between disability and sex, blunt versus penetrating injury, days to diagnosis, or number of embolization attempts. CONCLUSION Patients sustaining head trauma with basilar skull fractures and presenting with the described signs and symptoms should be evaluated for PTCCF. Risk of disability does not appear to be influenced by number of attempts at embolization or time to diagnosis. However, age may have a significant impact on outcome.

Preliminary experience with airway pressure release ventilation in a trauma/surgical intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND Airway pressure-release ventilation (APRV) is a pressure-limited, time-cycled mode of mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our initial experience with the use of APRV in acutely injured, ventilated patients. METHODS Since March 2003, APRV has been used selectively in adult trauma patients with or at risk for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Data were obtained before and during the 72 hours after switching to APRV. A retrospective analysis of these data was then performed. RESULTS Complete data were available on 46 of 60 patients (77%) for the first 72 hours of APRV. Before APRV, the average Pao2/Fio2 ratio was 243 and the average peak airway pressure was 28 cm H2O. Peak airway pressure decreased 19% (p = 0.001), Pao2/Fio2 improved by 23% (p = 0.017) and release tidal volumes improved by 13% (p = 0.020) over the course of the analysis. CONCLUSION APRV significantly improved oxygenation by alveolar recruitment and allowed for a reduction in peak airway pressures. This relatively new modality had favorable results and appears to be an effective alternative for lung recruitment in traumatically injured patients at risk for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Management of Destructive Bowel Injury in the Open Abdomen

BACKGROUND Little attention has been focused on destructive injuries of the bowel in patients requiring open abdominal management. We therefore reviewed our institutional experience for destructive bowel injury requiring open abdominal management with the vacuum pack technique (vac). METHODS The trauma registry at a Level I trauma center was used to identify patients sustaining destructive bowel injury for an 11-year period beginning in May 1990. Patients were assessed for pertinent clinical and demographic information, and individuals requiring open abdominal management were compared with those who did not. RESULTS One hundred four patients required bowel resection and constitute the study population. Twenty-nine patients had vacs placed, with 22 (75.9%) of the total eventually obtaining delayed fascial closure. Nineteen (183%) patients had resection and primary repair (PR) of large and/or small bowel in conjunction with a vac, 10 (9.6%) patients had stoma formation in conjunction with a vac, 62 (59.6%) patients had resection and PR of small and/or large bowel in conjunction with primary fascial closure, and 13 (12.5%) patients had stoma formation and primary fascial closure. There were no differences in abdominal abscess or leak rates between groups. There were four deaths, none of which was secondary to failure of an anastomosis. CONCLUSION Bowel resection with PR appears to be a safe alternative after destructive bowel injury and results in acceptable morbidity when performed in conjunction with open abdominal management.

Maximizing tolerance of enteral nutrition in severely injured trauma patients: a comparison of enteral feedings by means of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy.

BACKGROUND Intolerance of enteral nutrition interrupts caloric balance and increases hospital costs. This study proposes that enteral feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEGJ) provides continuous uninterrupted nutrition with greater consistency than percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). METHODS This prospective nonrandomly assigned study was conducted at a Level I trauma center from December of 1997 through October of 1998. All feeding tubes were placed by trauma/critical care surgeons for nutritional support. Feeding course was monitored for 14 days from time of tube placement. Demographic data and outcome variables compared were age, sex, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Score, hospital length of stay, number of days to reach nutritional goal feedings, caloric goal, protein goal, cc/hr at goal, total parenteral nutrition usage, complications, and hospital charges. Statistical analyses used the independent samples t test, Cox regression, and Pearson chi2 with significance level set at 0.05. RESULTS Patients receiving enteral nutrition by PEGJ reached nutritional goal sooner than patients who received enteral nutrition by PEG (p = 0.02). Thirty-seven of 46 PEGJ patients (80%) were at goal rate at day 3, whereas 28 of 43 PEG patients (65%) were at goal on day 3. Nine of 43 PEG patients (21%) and 3 of 46 PEGJ patients (7%) failed to reach goal within 14 days. CONCLUSION This study suggests that enteral nutrition delivered by means of PEGJ is better tolerated than enteral nutrition delivered by means of PEG in trauma patients with no abdominal conditions that preclude percutaneous feeding tube placement.

Prehospital blood transfusion versus crystalloid alone in the air medical transport of trauma patients.

INTRODUCTION Differences in prehospital resuscitation measures and outcomes of trauma patients transported by two air medical programs were assessed comparing the prehospital administration of crystalloid only (Group A) with the administration of 2 liters of crystalloid followed by blood (Group B). METHODS A 1-year retrospective review of flight and hospital records of patients taken to Level I trauma centers by two separate air medical programs was completed. Physiologic variables, total fluids infused, and flight times were compared. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (Group A) received crystalloids in flight, and 17 patients received in-flight blood (Group B). No statistical differences were found between the two groups when comparing age, ISS, PS, RTS, GCS, survival, and total fluid volume. Group B had statistically greater mean flight times compared with Group A (P < .05). A difference was demonstrated between groups A and B in pH and HCO3 measurements (P < .05), with Group B presenting in a more acidotic state on admission to the hospital. CONCLUSION Patients with lengthy flight times, despite the administration of blood products, presented to the trauma center more acidotic than trauma patients receiving only crystalloid. The true impact of blood products on outcome could not be demonstrated because of statistical differences in flight times between the groups. A multicenter study matching flight times, head injury status, and flight type of assess benefit of prehospital utilization of blood products is warranted.

Outcome assessment of physiologic and clinical predictors of survival in patients after traumatic injury with a trauma score less than 5.

OBJECTIVE To define those physiologic and clinical variables that have a positive or negative predictive value in discriminating survivors from nonsurvivors with traumatic injuries and a Trauma Score of 5 or less. METHODS A retrospective review of 2,622 trauma patients transported by an air medical service from the scene of injury to a Level I trauma center was performed. Demographic, physiologic, and clinical variables were evaluated. RESULTS One hundred thirty-six patients were studied; 14 patients survived trauma resuscitation. Survivors had statistically significant improvement in the Glasgow Coma Scale from the field to arrival in the emergency room. Revised Trauma Score, probability of survival, pulse, respiratory rate, cardiac rhythm, central nervous system activity, and signs of life were statistically more favorable in survivors. CONCLUSION In patients who survived to discharge, signs of central nervous system activity in the field was a positive predictor of survival, and severe head injury served as a negative predictor of survival.

Trauma 24-Hour Observation Critical Path

BACKGROUND The 24-hour observation critical pathway for trauma is a clinical tool developed to expedite health care delivery to minimally injured patients. The use of patient care, BS, guidelines and physician-approved standing orders was implemented in a Level I trauma center. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed of 122 patients admitted via the emergency department between December 1, 1993, and May 31, 1994. All patients were evaluated in the emergency department by emergency medicine and trauma physicians and deemed appropriate for 24-hour observation. The information collected included patient demographics, hospital charges, injuries, length of stay, diagnostic tests, consultations, and variances from the critical pathway. RESULTS During the 6-month study period, there were 600 trauma admissions. Of those admissions, 122 patients (20%) were evaluated in the emergency department and deemed appropriate for enrollment in the 24-hour observation pathway. The charts of these patients were reviewed. Fourteen admissions were determined inappropriate for the critical pathway because of the severity of injuries or discharge against medical advice. One hundred eight charts were evaluated further. Eighty-nine patients (80%) completed the critical pathway with a length of stay of 24 hours. CONCLUSION The 24-hour observation critical pathway was designed and used appropriately as exemplified by an overall 80% completion rate. The critical pathway offers a mechanism to streamline care of the minimally injured trauma patient. It also serves as a quality-improvement tool for increasing efficiency, decreasing utilization of resources, and decreasing length of stay.