Donald E. Barker

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: Report of 141 cases

Tracheostomy is indicated frequently in the treatment of critically ill patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate our initial experience with 141 cases of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) performed over a 2-year period. One hundred twenty PDTs (85%) were placed at the bedside, and 21 (15%) were performed in the operating room in conjunction with other procedures. The procedural complication rate was 11% (16 of 141). Most complications were easily recognized and did not preclude the completion of PDT. One death occurred secondary to severe bronchospasm. The postoperative complication rate was 8% (11 of 141). The most frequent complication was peristomal oozing. The average duration of follow-up after decannulation for patients discharged alive and decannulated was 36 +/- 27 weeks. There were 3 recognized cases of clinically symptomatic tracheal stenosis. We conclude that PDT is comparable with the open method and can be performed rapidly and safely at the patients bedside.

Brachial plexus injury : association with subclavian and axillary vascular trauma

Proximal upper extremity (subclavian and axillary) vascular injury (SAVI) and brachial plexus injury (BPI) occur uncommonly. However, BPI may be associated with SAVI and frequently is an important determinant of long-term disability. The medical records of patients with traumatic SAVI, BPI, or both over a 5-year period were reviewed. A total of 31 patients were identified. The group was predominantly male (28 men/3 women) with a mean age of 30.5 +/- 1.8 years (range, 15-63 years). Blunt trauma accounted for 43.5% of SAVI cases and 77.8% of BPI cases. Thirteen patients (41.9%) sustained SAVI alone (group I), 10 patients (32.2%) had combined SAVI and BPI (group II), and 8 patients (25.9%) had BPI alone (group III). Subclavian and axilliary vascular injury occurred in 10 of 18 patients (55.6%) with a BPI. Brachial plexus injury occurred in 10 of 23 patients (43.5%) with a SAVI. Patients with SAVI from blunt trauma were significantly more likely to have an associated complete BPI than patients with penetrating trauma. All patients with a complete BPI (6 patients) had an associated SAVI regardless of mechanism of injury. Only one patient with a partial BPI from blunt trauma had an associated SAVI. The Injury Severity Score was significantly higher for patients in group II. An average of 2.8 and 3.3 associated injuries were observed in patients with SAVI (groups I and II) versus patients without SAVI (group III), respectively. No patient who had a complete BPI showed an improvement in neurologic status during a mean follow-up of 7.2 months. No late vascular sequelae occurred in group-III patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Use of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of traumatic aortic injury.

Indications for aortography following blunt chest trauma are broad and ill-defined. This study prospectively assessed the role of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the evaluation of suspected aortic injury. We used both TEE and aortography to evaluate 69 patients with suspected thoracic aortic injury. The studies were performed and interpreted by staff radiologists and cardiologists. The mean study time for TEE was 27 minutes, whereas the mean study time for aortography was 76 minutes (p < 0.05). No complications occurred with either procedure. Both TEE and aortography revealed no evidence of aortic injury in 61 patients. There was one false-positive aortogram. TEE identified seven aortic injuries; four were confirmed by aortography. One patient underwent thoracotomy and aortic repair based on TEE findings alone. Aortograms yielded false-negative results for two patients; one injury was confirmed at thoracotomy, the other at autopsy. TEE accurately predicted the presence or absence of aortic injury in each case, for a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100%. TEE can be performed safely and efficiently on the multiple-injury patient. We conclude that TEE is useful in the evaluation of suspected aortic injury.

Routine prophylactic vena cava filtration is not indicated after acute spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUNDnAcute spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating problem, with over 10,000 new cases annually. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a well-recognized risk in SCI patients, although no clear recommendations for prophylaxis exist. We therefore evaluated whether routine placement of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters is indicated in SCI patients.nnnMETHODSnThe trauma registry of a regional trauma center was used to identify patients sustaining acute SCI resulting in tetraplegia or paraplegia after blunt or penetrating trauma for a 5-year period beginning in January 1995. Patients were analyzed for demographics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, associated long bone or pelvic fracture, severe closed-head injury, type of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, level of SCI, and incidence of DVT and PE. DVT prophylaxis was performed in all patients with sequential compression devices (SCDs) when extremity fracture status permitted. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD and analyzed using Fishers exact test.nnnRESULTSnThere were 8,269 admissions during the study period, with an overall incidence of DVT and PE of 11.8% and 0.9%, respectively. There were 111 (1.3%) patients who sustained SCI, with an incidence of DVT and PE of 9.0% and 1.8%, respectively, and no deaths. Of these 111 patients, 41.4% were paraplegics and 58.6% were tetraplegics, and 17.1% of patients had severe closed-head injury. Mean hospital length of stay was 23 +/- 20 days for SCI patients. Surveillance duplex ultrasound was performed an average of 2.3 +/- 2.1 times during each hospitalization. Mean Injury Severity Score was 30.0 +/- 12.2. The incidence of DVT and PE in those patients with SCDs alone was 7.1% and 2.3%; for SCDs plus subcutaneous heparin, the incidence was 11.1% and 2.8%; and for SCDs plus low-molecular-weight heparin, the incidence was 7.4% and 0%, respectively, with no statistical difference between groups. The incidence of DVT in SCI patients with long bone fractures was 37.5%, which was significantly greater than the total SCI population (p < 0.02).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe incidence of DVT and PE in SCI patients was similar to that of the overall trauma population when appropriate DVT prophylaxis was used. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that SCI associated with long bone fracture significantly increases the incidence of DVT. On the basis of the low incidence of PE in the present study, routine placement of prophylactic caval filters does not appear warranted in all SCI patients. However, SCI patients with long bone fractures, patients with DVT formation despite prophylactic anticoagulation, or patients with contraindications to anticoagulation may be appropriate candidates for prophylactic caval filtration.

A randomized prospective trial of airway pressure release ventilation and low tidal volume ventilation in adult trauma patients with acute respiratory failure

BACKGROUNDnAirway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a mode of mechanical ventilation, which has demonstrated potential benefits in trauma patients. We therefore sought to compare relevant pulmonary data and safety outcomes of this modality to the recommendations of the Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network.nnnMETHODSnPatients admitted after traumatic injury requiring mechanical ventilation were randomized under a 72-hour waiver of consent to a respiratory protocol for APRV or low tidal volume ventilation (LOVT). Data were collected regarding demographics, Injury Severity Score, oxygenation, ventilation, airway pressure, failure of modality, tracheostomy, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator days, length of stay (LOS), pneumothorax, and mortality.nnnRESULTSnSixty-three patients were enrolled during a 21-month period ending in February 2006. Thirty-one patients were assigned to APRV and 32 to LOVT. Patients were well matched for demographic variables with no differences between groups. Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was higher for APRV than LOVT (20.5 ± 5.35 vs. 16.9 ± 7.17) with a p value = 0.027. Outcome variables showed no differences between APRV and LOVT for ventilator days (10.49 days ± 7.23 days vs. 8.00 days ± 4.01 days), ICU LOS (16.47 days ± 12.83 days vs. 14.18 days ± 13.26 days), pneumothorax (0% vs. 3.1%), ventilator-associated pneumonia per patient (1.00 ± 0.86 vs. 0.56 ± 0.67), percent receiving tracheostomy (61.3% vs. 65.6%), percent failure of modality (12.9% vs. 15.6%), or percent mortality (6.45% vs. 6.25%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnFor patients sustaining significant trauma requiring mechanical ventilation for greater than 72 hours, APRV seems to have a similar safety profile as the LOVT. Trends for APRV patients to have increased ventilator days, ICU LOS, and ventilator-associated pneumonia may be explained by initial worse physiologic derangement demonstrated by higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores.

Posttraumatic Carotid Cavernous Fistula: Frequency Analysis of Signs, Symptoms, and Disability Outcomes after Angiographic Embolization

OBJECTIVEnTo increase awareness and understanding of posttraumatic carotid cavernous fistula (PTCCF) with the intent to expedite diagnosis and treatment of this disabling injury, a 14-year retrospective review of patients with angiographically identified PTCCF was conducted at this Level I trauma center. A frequency analysis of signs, symptoms, and disability was performed. The impact on disability of demographics, number of embolization attempts required for closure of the PTCCF, and time from injury to diagnosis was assessed by t test for independent samples.nnnRESULTSnNine patients were diagnosed with 10 PTCCFs. Mean patient age was 41.5 years. All patients with PTCCF had basilar skull fracture, loss of consciousness, bruit, and chemosis; 90% had exophthalmos; 70% had visual changes; 50% complained of headache; and 80% had some lasting disability. Mean age of patients with partial to total disability was 47 years, while the mean age of patients without lasting disability was 19.5 years (p = 0.013). No statistical correlation could be found between disability and sex, blunt versus penetrating injury, days to diagnosis, or number of embolization attempts.nnnCONCLUSIONnPatients sustaining head trauma with basilar skull fractures and presenting with the described signs and symptoms should be evaluated for PTCCF. Risk of disability does not appear to be influenced by number of attempts at embolization or time to diagnosis. However, age may have a significant impact on outcome.

Preliminary experience with airway pressure release ventilation in a trauma/surgical intensive care unit.

BACKGROUNDnAirway pressure-release ventilation (APRV) is a pressure-limited, time-cycled mode of mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our initial experience with the use of APRV in acutely injured, ventilated patients.nnnMETHODSnSince March 2003, APRV has been used selectively in adult trauma patients with or at risk for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Data were obtained before and during the 72 hours after switching to APRV. A retrospective analysis of these data was then performed.nnnRESULTSnComplete data were available on 46 of 60 patients (77%) for the first 72 hours of APRV. Before APRV, the average Pao2/Fio2 ratio was 243 and the average peak airway pressure was 28 cm H2O. Peak airway pressure decreased 19% (p = 0.001), Pao2/Fio2 improved by 23% (p = 0.017) and release tidal volumes improved by 13% (p = 0.020) over the course of the analysis.nnnCONCLUSIONnAPRV significantly improved oxygenation by alveolar recruitment and allowed for a reduction in peak airway pressures. This relatively new modality had favorable results and appears to be an effective alternative for lung recruitment in traumatically injured patients at risk for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome.

A prospective assessment of diagnostic efficacy of blind protective bronchial brushings compared to bronchoscope-assisted lavage, bronchoscope-directed brushings, and blind endotracheal aspirates in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

BACKGROUNDnThe purpose of this study is to compare techniques for the diagnosis of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia in the trauma patient. Per the literature, bronchoscope protected brushings and bronchoalveolar lavage were set as the standards for comparison because of their high specificity and sensitivity. We hypothesized that blind protected brushings were equivalent to bronchoscope-directed techniques and that endotracheal aspirates (ETA) were not.nnnMETHODSnWith informed consent, 90 trauma patients with two or more of the following were accepted into the study: 48 hours or more on the ventilator, new or increasing infiltrate on chest radiograph, excess or purulent secretions, suspected aspiration, temperature of 38.5 degrees C or above, white blood cell count greater than or equal to 12,000/mm3, and respiratory distress. Four samplings were performed on each patient using bronchoscope-assisted and nonbronchoscopic techniques. Each patient had cultures obtained by and significances quantified as follows: ETA, moderate/many/abundant; bronchoscope-directed protected brushings (BDPB), 103 colony-forming units [CFU]/mL; blind protected brushing via endotracheal tube (BPB), 103 CFU/mL; and bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), 104 CFU/mL. Quantitative cultures were obtained and compared for the following pathogens: gram-positive cocci, gram-positive rods, gram-negative cocci, gram-negative rods, anaerobic bacteria, and yeast. An assessment of agreement for cultured pathogens between the sampling modalities was completed using kappa (kappa) analysis, and significance was set at p < or = 0.05.nnnRESULTSnWith patients used as their own controls, Grams stain and pathogens cultured from the various sampling techniques were compared for agreement by kappa analysis. BDPB and BAL were set as the gold standards for comparison against each other and against the BPB and ETA. Kappa analysis was used to measure the strength of agreement for these findings; individual values from the comparisons of Grams stain were then averaged for descriptive purposes of the data. Most kappa values were associated with a statistically significant value of p < 0.05. The greatest strength of agreement was found to be moderate comparing Grams stain results of BPB and BDPB (kappa = 0.467), ETA and BAL (kappa = 0.535), and BPB and BAL (kappa = 0.547). Fair kappa values were shown in comparing Grams stain results of ETA and BDPB (kappa = 0.382) and BAL and BDPB (kappa = 0.390).nnnCONCLUSIONnA quantitative analysis of bacteriologic cultures obtained by four standard sampling techniques has demonstrated with statistical significance that no difference exists between modality of sampling in reliability or in obtaining clinically significant pathogens. In reviewing the literature, this study is the first assessment of agreement for cultured pathogens between the four different sampling modalities and the largest to assess the efficacy of the blind protected brush technique.

Management of Destructive Bowel Injury in the Open Abdomen

BACKGROUNDnLittle attention has been focused on destructive injuries of the bowel in patients requiring open abdominal management. We therefore reviewed our institutional experience for destructive bowel injury requiring open abdominal management with the vacuum pack technique (vac).nnnMETHODSnThe trauma registry at a Level I trauma center was used to identify patients sustaining destructive bowel injury for an 11-year period beginning in May 1990. Patients were assessed for pertinent clinical and demographic information, and individuals requiring open abdominal management were compared with those who did not.nnnRESULTSnOne hundred four patients required bowel resection and constitute the study population. Twenty-nine patients had vacs placed, with 22 (75.9%) of the total eventually obtaining delayed fascial closure. Nineteen (183%) patients had resection and primary repair (PR) of large and/or small bowel in conjunction with a vac, 10 (9.6%) patients had stoma formation in conjunction with a vac, 62 (59.6%) patients had resection and PR of small and/or large bowel in conjunction with primary fascial closure, and 13 (12.5%) patients had stoma formation and primary fascial closure. There were no differences in abdominal abscess or leak rates between groups. There were four deaths, none of which was secondary to failure of an anastomosis.nnnCONCLUSIONnBowel resection with PR appears to be a safe alternative after destructive bowel injury and results in acceptable morbidity when performed in conjunction with open abdominal management.

Early criteria predictive of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

This study was performed to determine if prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) could be predicted by objective clinical variables present at 48 hours after MV was instituted. During a 3-month period, 49 (54%) of 91 mechanically ventilated surgical intensive care unit patients required MV for 2 or more days. Twelve (24%) of these patients died. Patients requiring 2-13 days of MV had significantly lower alveolar-arterial oxygen gradients (PAO2 - PAO2), PEEP, and FIO2 on MV day 2 compared with patients with MV greater than or equal to 14 days. PAO2 - PAO2 greater than or equal to 175 mm Hg on day 2 in patients without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was 60% sensitive and 91% specific for MV greater than or equal to 14 days. In survivors, a day-2 PAO2 - PAO2 greater than or equal to 175 mm Hg (without COPD) or a GCS score less than or equal to 9 had a 91% positive predictive value and a 96% negative predictive value for MV greater than or equal to 14 days. We conclude that mechanical ventilation for 14 or more days can be accurately predicted at 48 hours after the institution of ventilatory support by these objective criteria.