Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David M. Palmer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David M. Palmer.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1993

BATSE observations of gamma-ray burst spectra. I: Spectral diversity

J. L. Matteson; L. A. Ford; Bradley E. Schaefer; David M. Palmer; B. J. Teegarden; T. L. Cline; M. S. Briggs; W. S. Paciesas; Geoffrey N. Pendleton; G. Fishman; C. Kouveliotou; Charles A. Meegan; Richard Wilson; P. Lestrade

We studied the time-averaged gamma-ray burst spectra accumulated by the spectroscopy detectors of the Burst and Transient Source Experiment. The spectra are described well at low energy by a power-law continuum with an exponential cutoff and by a steeper power law at high energy. However, the spectral parameters vary from burst to burst with no universal values. The break in the spectrum ranges from below 100 keV to more than 1 MeV, but peaks below 200 keV with only a small fraction of the spectra breaking above 400 keV; it is therefore unlikely that a majority of the burst spectra are shaped directly by pair processes, unless bursts originate from a broad redshift range. The correlations among burst parameters do not fulfill the predictions of the cosmological models of burst origin. No correlations with burst morphology or the spatial distribution were found. We demonstrate the importance of using a complete spectral description even if a partial description (e.g., a model without a high-energy tail) is statistically satisfactory.


Space Science Reviews | 2005

The Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) on the SWIFT Midex Mission

S. D. Barthelmy; Louis M. Barbier; J. R. Cummings; E. E. Fenimore; Neil Gehrels; Derek D. Hullinger; Hans A. Krimm; Craig B. Markwardt; David M. Palmer; Ann Marie Parsons; G. Sato; Masaya Suzuki; Tadayuki Takahashi; Makota Tashiro; J. Tueller

Abstracthe burst alert telescope (BAT) is one of three instruments on the Swift MIDEX spacecraft to study gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The BAT first detects the GRB and localizes the burst direction to an accuracy of 1–4 arcmin within 20 s after the start of the event. The GRB trigger initiates an autonomous spacecraft slew to point the two narrow field-of-view (FOV) instruments at the burst location within 20–70 s so to make follow-up X-ray and optical observations. The BAT is a wide-FOV, coded-aperture instrument with a CdZnTe detector plane. The detector plane is composed of 32,768 pieces of CdZnTe (4×4×2 mm), and the coded-aperture mask is composed of ∼52,000 pieces of lead (5×5×1 mm) with a 1-m separation between mask and detector plane. The BAT operates over the 15–150 keV energy range with ∼7 keV resolution, a sensitivity of ∼10−8 erg s−1 cm−2, and a 1.4 sr (half-coded) FOV. We expect to detect > 100 GRBs/year for a 2-year mission. The BAT also performs an all-sky hard X-ray survey with a sensitivity of ∼2 m Crab (systematic limit) and it serves as a hard X-ray transient monitor.


Nature | 2005

A short γ-ray burst apparently associated with an elliptical galaxy at redshift z = 0.225

Neil Gehrels; Craig L. Sarazin; Paul T. O'Brien; Bing Zhang; Loius M. Barbier; S. D. Barthelmy; Alexander J. Blustin; David N. Burrows; J. Cannizzo; J. R. Cummings; Michael R. Goad; Stephen T. Holland; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Andrew J. Levan; Craig B. Markwardt; K. O. Mason; P. Meszaros; M. J. Page; David M. Palmer; E. Rol; Takanori Sakamoto; R. Willingale; Lorella Angelini; Andrew P. Beardmore; Patricia T. Boyd; Alice A. Breeveld; Sergio Campana; Margaret Chester; Guido Chincarini

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) come in two classes: long (> 2 s), soft-spectrum bursts and short, hard events. Most progress has been made on understanding the long GRBs, which are typically observed at high redshift (z ≈ 1) and found in subluminous star-forming host galaxies. They are likely to be produced in core-collapse explosions of massive stars. In contrast, no short GRB had been accurately (< 10″) and rapidly (minutes) located. Here we report the detection of the X-ray afterglow from—and the localization of—the short burst GRB 050509B. Its position on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225, which is the location one would expect if the origin of this GRB is through the merger of neutron-star or black-hole binaries. The X-ray afterglow was weak and faded below the detection limit within a few hours; no optical afterglow was detected to stringent limits, explaining the past difficulty in localizing short GRBs.


Nature | 2005

A giant γ-ray flare from the magnetar SGR 1806-20

David M. Palmer; S. D. Barthelmy; Neil Gehrels; R. M. Kippen; T. Cayton; C. Kouveliotou; David Eichler; R. A. M. J. Wijers; Peter M. Woods; Jonathan Granot; Yuri Lyubarsky; E. Ramirez-Ruiz; Louis M. Barbier; Margaret Chester; J. R. Cummings; E. E. Fenimore; Mark H. Finger; B. M. Gaensler; Derek D. Hullinger; Hans A. Krimm; Craig B. Markwardt; John A. Nousek; Ann Marie Parsons; S.K. Patel; T. Sakamoto; G. Sato; M. Suzuki; J. Tueller

Two classes of rotating neutron stars—soft γ-ray repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars—are magnetars, whose X-ray emission is powered by a very strong magnetic field (B ≈ 1015 G). SGRs occasionally become ‘active’, producing many short X-ray bursts. Extremely rarely, an SGR emits a giant flare with a total energy about a thousand times higher than in a typical burst. Here we report that SGR 1806–20 emitted a giant flare on 27 December 2004. The total (isotropic) flare energy is 2 × 1046 erg, which is about a hundred times higher than the other two previously observed giant flares. The energy release probably occurred during a catastrophic reconfiguration of the neutron stars magnetic field. If the event had occurred at a larger distance, but within 40 megaparsecs, it would have resembled a short, hard γ-ray burst, suggesting that flares from extragalactic SGRs may form a subclass of such bursts.1 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA 2 NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, 20771, USA 3 NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center, NSSTC, XD-12, 320 Sparkman Dr., Huntsville, AL 35805, USA 4 Department of Physics, Ben Gurion University, POB 653, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel 5 Astronomical Institute “Anton Pannekoek”, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ, Amster-


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2010

The 22-Month Swift-BAT All-Sky Hard X-ray Survey

J. Tueller; W. H. Baumgartner; Craig B. Markwardt; G. K. Skinner; R. F. Mushotzky; M. Ajello; S. D. Barthelmy; A. P. Beardmore; W. N. Brandt; D. N. Burrows; Guido Chincarini; Sergio Campana; J. R. Cummings; G. Cusumano; P. A. Evans; E. E. Fenimore; N. Gehrels; Olivier Godet; Dirk Grupe; S. T. Holland; J. A. Kennea; Hans A. Krimm; M. Koss; A. Moretti; Koji Mukai; J. P. Osborne; Takashi Okajima; Claudio Pagani; Kim L. Page; David M. Palmer

We present the catalog of sources detected in the first 22 months of data from the hard X-ray survey (14-195 keV) conducted with the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) coded mask imager on the Swift satellite. The catalog contains 461 sources detected above the 4.8σ level with BAT. High angular resolution X-ray data for every source from Swift-XRT or archival data have allowed associations to be made with known counterparts in other wavelength bands for over 97% of the detections, including the discovery of ~30 galaxies previously unknown as active galactic nuclei and several new Galactic sources. A total of 266 of the sources are associated with Seyfert galaxies (median redshift z ~ 0.03) or blazars, with the majority of the remaining sources associated with X-ray binaries in our Galaxy. This ongoing survey is the first uniform all-sky hard X-ray survey since HEAO-1 in 1977. Since the publication of the nine-month BAT survey we have increased the number of energy channels from four to eight and have substantially increased the number of sources with accurate average spectra. The BAT 22 month catalog is the product of the most sensitive all-sky survey in the hard X-ray band, with a detection sensitivity (4.8σ) of 2.2 × 10–11 erg cm–2 s–1 (1 mCrab) over most of the sky in the 14-195 keV band.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2013

The Swift-BAT Hard X-Ray Transient Monitor

Hans A. Krimm; Stephen T. Holland; R. H. D. Corbet; Aaron B. Pearlman; Patrizia Romano; J. A. Kennea; Joshua S. Bloom; S. D. Barthelmy; W. H. Baumgartner; James R. Cummings; Neil Gehrels; Amy Lien; Craig B. Markwardt; David M. Palmer; T. Sakamoto; M. Stamatikos; T. N. Ukwatta

The Swift/Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) hard X-ray transient monitor provides near real-time coverage of the X-ray sky in the energy range 15-50 keV. The BAT observes 88% of the sky each day with a detection sensitivity of 5.3 mCrab for a full-day observation and a time resolution as fine as 64 s. The three main purposes of the monitor are (1) the discovery of new transient X-ray sources, (2) the detection of outbursts or other changes in the flux of known X-ray sources, and (3) the generation of light curves of more than 900 sources spanning over eight years. The primary interface for the BAT transient monitor is a public Web site. Between 2005 February 12 and 2013 April 30, 245 sources have been detected in the monitor, 146 of them persistent and 99 detected only in outburst. Among these sources, 17 were previously unknown and were discovered in the transient monitor. In this paper, we discuss the methodology and the data processing and filtering for the BAT transient monitor and review its sensitivity and exposure. We provide a summary of the source detections and classify them according to the variability of their light curves. Finally, we review all new BAT monitor discoveries. For the new sources that are previously unpublished, we present basic data analysis and interpretations.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1995

BATSE observations of gamma-ray burst spectra. 2: Peak energy evolution in bright, long bursts

L. A. Ford; David L. Band; J. L. Matteson; M. S. Briggs; Geoffrey N. Pendleton; Robert D. Preece; W. S. Paciesas; B. J. Teegarden; David M. Palmer; Bradley E. Schaefer

We investigate spectral evolution in 37 bright, long gamma-ray bursts observed with the Burst and Transient Source Experiment (BATSE) spectroscopy detectors. High-resolution spectra are chracterized by the energy of the peak of nu F(sub nu), and the evolution of this quantity is examined relative to the emission intensity. In most cases it is found that this peak energy either rises with or slightly precedes major intensity increases and softens for the remainder of the pulse. Interpulse emission is generally harder early in the burst. For bursts with multiple intensity pulses, later spikes tend to be softer than earlier ones, indicating that the energy of the peak of nu F(sub nu) is bounded by an envelope which decays with time. Evidence is found that bursts in which the bulk of the flux comes well after the event which triggers the instrument tend to show less peak energy variability and are not as hard as several bursts in which the emission occurs promptly after the trigger. Several recently proposed burst models are examined in light of these results and no qualitative conflicts with the observations presented here are found.


Nature | 2006

A new γ-ray burst classification scheme from GRB 060614

N. Gehrels; Jay P. Norris; S. D. Barthelmy; Jonathan Granot; Yuki Kaneko; C. Kouveliotou; Craig B. Markwardt; P. Meszaros; Ehud Nakar; Ja Nousek; Paul T. O'Brien; M. J. Page; David M. Palmer; A. M. Parsons; P. W. A. Roming; Takanori Sakamoto; Craig L. Sarazin; Patricia Schady; M. Stamatikos; S. E. Woosley

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are known to come in two duration classes, separated at ∼2 s. Long-duration bursts originate from star-forming regions in galaxies, have accompanying supernovae when these are near enough to observe and are probably caused by massive-star collapsars. Recent observations show that short-duration bursts originate in regions within their host galaxies that have lower star-formation rates, consistent with binary neutron star or neutron star–black hole mergers. Moreover, although their hosts are predominantly nearby galaxies, no supernovae have been so far associated with short-duration GRBs. Here we report that the bright, nearby GRB 060614 does not fit into either class. Its ∼102-s duration groups it with long-duration GRBs, while its temporal lag and peak luminosity fall entirely within the short-duration GRB subclass. Moreover, very deep optical observations exclude an accompanying supernova, similar to short-duration GRBs. This combination of a long-duration event without an accompanying supernova poses a challenge to both the collapsar and the merging-neutron-star interpretations and opens the door to a new GRB classification scheme that straddles both long- and short-duration bursts.Gamma ray bursts (GRBs) are known to come in two duration classes, separated at {approx}2 s. Long bursts originate from star forming regions in galaxies, have accompanying supernovae (SNe) when near enough to observe and are likely caused by massive-star collapsars. Recent observations show that short bursts originate in regions within their host galaxies with lower star formation rates, consistent with binary neutron star (NS) or NS - black hole (BH) mergers. Moreover, although their hosts are predominantly nearby galaxies, no SNe have been so far associated with short GRBs. We report here on the bright, nearby GRB 060614 that does not fit in either class. Its {approx}102 s duration groups it with long GRBs, while its temporal lag and peak luminosity fall entirely within the short GRB subclass. Moreover, very deep optical observations exclude an accompanying supernova, similar to short GRBs. This combination of a long duration event without accompanying SN poses a challenge to both a collapsar and merging NS interpretation and opens the door on a new GRB classification scheme that straddles both long and short bursts.


Nature | 2005

A link between prompt optical and prompt γ-ray emission in γ-ray bursts

W. T. Vestrand; Przemyslaw Remigiusz Wozniak; J. Wren; E. E. Fenimore; Takanori Sakamoto; R. R. White; D. Casperson; H. Davis; S. M. Evans; Mark Corrado Galassi; K. E. McGowan; J.A. Schier; J. W. Asa; S. D. Barthelmy; J. R. Cummings; N. Gehrels; Derek D. Hullinger; Hans A. Krimm; Craig B. Markwardt; K. McLean; David M. Palmer; Ann Marie Parsons; J. Tueller

The prompt optical emission that arrives with the γ-rays from a cosmic γ-ray burst (GRB) is a signature of the engine powering the burst, the properties of the ultra-relativistic ejecta of the explosion, and the ejectas interactions with the surroundings. Until now, only GRB 990123 had been detected at optical wavelengths during the burst phase. Its prompt optical emission was variable and uncorrelated with the prompt γ-ray emission, suggesting that the optical emission was generated by a reverse shock arising from the ejectas collision with surrounding material. Here we report prompt optical emission from GRB 041219a. It is variable and correlated with the prompt γ-rays, indicating a common origin for the optical light and the γ-rays. Within the context of the standard fireball model of GRBs, we attribute this new optical component to internal shocks driven into the burst ejecta by variations of the inner engine. The correlated optical emission is a direct probe of the jet isolated from the medium. The timing of the uncorrelated optical emission is strongly dependent on the nature of the medium.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

SWIFT OBSERVATIONS OF THE X-RAY-BRIGHT GRB 050315

S. Vaughan; Mike R. Goad; A. P. Beardmore; P. T. O’Brien; Julian P. Osborne; Kim L. Page; S. D. Barthelmy; David N. Burrows; Sergio Campana; John K. Cannizzo; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; J. R. Cummings; G. Cusumano; P. Giommi; Olivier Godet; J. E. Hill; Shiho Kobayashi; Pawan Kumar; V. La Parola; Andrew J. Levan; Vanessa Mangano; P. Meszaros; A. Moretti; David C. Morris; John A. Nousek; Claudio Pagani; David M. Palmer; Judith Lea Racusin; Patrizia Romano

This paper discusses Swift observations of the � -ray burst GRB 050315 (z ¼ 1:949) from 80 s to 10 days after the onset of the burst. The X-ray light curve displayed a steep early decay (t � 5 ) for � 200 s and several breaks. However, both the prompt hard X-ray/� -ray emission (observed by the BAT) and the first � 300 s of X-ray emission (observed bytheXRT)canbeexplainedbyexponentialdecays,withsimilardecayconstants.ExtrapolatingtheBATlightcurve into the XRT band suggests that the rapidly decaying, early X-ray emission was simply a continuation of the fading promptemission;thisstrongsimilaritybetweentheprompt � -rayandearlyX-rayemissionmayberelatedtothesimple temporal and spectral character of this X-ray–rich GRB. Theprompt (BAT) spectrum was steep down to � 15keVand appeared to continue through the XRT bandpass, implying a low peak energy, inconsistent with the Amati relation. Following the initial steep decline, the X-ray afterglow did not fade for � 1:2 ; 10 4 s, after which time it decayed with at emporal index of� � 0:7, followed by a second break at � 2:5 ; 10 5 s to a slope of � � 2. The apparent ‘‘plateau’’ in the X-raylight curve, after the early rapid decay, makes this one of the most extreme examples of the steep-flat-steep X-ray light curves revealed by Swift. If the second afterglow break is identified with a jet break, then the jet opening

Collaboration


Dive into the David M. Palmer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. D. Barthelmy

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hans A. Krimm

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. Gehrels

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. R. Cummings

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. E. Fenimore

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Tueller

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. N. Burrows

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil Gehrels

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. Kennea

Pennsylvania State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Takanori Sakamoto

Tokyo Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge