Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where J. A. Kennea is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by J. A. Kennea.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2009

Methods and results of an automatic analysis of a complete sample of Swift-XRT observations of GRBs

P. A. Evans; A. P. Beardmore; Kim L. Page; J. P. Osborne; Paul T. O'Brien; R. Willingale; Rhaana L. C. Starling; D. N. Burrows; Olivier Godet; L. Vetere; Judith Lea Racusin; Mike R. Goad; K. Wiersema; L. Angelini; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; Neil Gehrels; J. A. Kennea; Raffaella Margutti; D. C. Morris; C. J. Mountford; C. Pagani; Matteo Perri; Patrizia Romano; Nial R. Tanvir

We present a homogeneous X-ray analysis of all 318 gamma-ray bursts detected by the X-ray telescope (XRT) on the Swift satellite up to 2008 July 23; this represents the largest sample of X-ray GRB data published to date. In Sections 2-3, we detail the methods which the Swift-XRT team has developed to produce the enhanced positions, light curves, hardness ratios and spectra presented in this paper. Software using these methods continues to create such products for all new GRBs observed by the Swift-XRT. We also detail web-based tools allowing users to create these products for any object observed by the XRT, not just GRBs. In Sections 4-6, we present the results of our analysis of GRBs, including probability distribution functions of the temporal and spectral properties of the sample. We demonstrate evidence for a consistent underlying behaviour which can produce a range of light-curve morphologies, and attempt to interpret this behaviour in the framework of external forward shock emission. We find several difficulties, in particular that reconciliation of our data with the forward shock model requires energy injection to continue for days to weeks.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2005

Evidence for a canonical GRB afterglow light curve in the Swift/XRT data

Ja Nousek; Vanessa Mangano; Paul T. O'Brien; P. Giommi; Olivier Godet; S. D. Barthelmy; Mike R. Goad; Sergio Campana; G. Cusumano; J. P. Osborne; A. P. Beardmore; A. Falcone; Jonathan Granot; G. Tagliaferri; Milvia Capalbi; David N. Burrows; Patrizia Romano; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Guido Chincarini; Dirk Grupe; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; Sandy Patel; Kim L. Page; Alan A. Wells; Chryssa Kouveliotou; A. Moretti; N. Gehrels

We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected with the Swift X-ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power law segments. These power law segments are separated by two corresponding break times. On top of this canonical behavior of the early X-ray light curve, many events have superimposed X-ray flares, which are most likely caused by internal shocks due to long lasting sporadx activity of the central engine, up to several hours after the GRB. We find that the initial steep decay is consistent with it being the tail of the prompt emission: from photons that are radiated at large angles relative to our line of sight. The first break in the light curve takes place when the forward shock emission becomes dominant, with the intermediate shallow flux decay likely caused by the continuous energy injection into the external shock. When this energy injection stops, a second break is then observed in the light curve. This energy injection increases the energy of the afterglow shock by at least a factor of f greater than or approx. equal to 4, and augments the already severe requirements for the efficiency of the prompt gamma-ray emission.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

Evidence for a canonical gamma-ray burst afterglow light curve in the Swift XRT data

John A. Nousek; C. Kouveliotou; Dirk Grupe; Kim L. Page; Jonathan Granot; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; Sandeep K. Patel; D. N. Burrows; Vanessa Mangano; S. D. Barthelmy; A. P. Beardmore; Sergio Campana; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; G. Cusumano; A. Falcone; N. Gehrels; P. Giommi; Mike R. Goad; Olivier Godet; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; A. Moretti; P. T. O’Brien; J. P. Osborne; Patrizia Romano; G. Tagliaferri; Alan A. Wells

We present new observations of the early X-ray afterglows of the first 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) well observed by the Swift X-Ray Telescope (XRT). The early X-ray afterglows show a canonical behavior, where the light curve broadly consists of three distinct power-law segments: (1) an initial very steep decay (/t � � with 3P � 1 P5), followed by (2) a very shallow decay (0:5P � 2 P1:0), and finally (3) a somewhat steeper decay (1P � 3 P1:5). These power-law segments are separated by two corresponding break times, tbreak;1 P500 s and 10 3 sPtbreak;2P 10 4 s. On top of this canonical behavior, many events have superimposed X-ray flares, which are most likely caused by internal shocks due to long-lasting sporadic activity of the central engine, up to several hours after the GRB. We find that the initial steep decay is consistent with it being the tail of the prompt emission, from photons that are radiated at large angles relative to our line of sight. The first break in the light curve (tbreak;1) takes place when the forward shock emission becomes dominant, with the intermediate shallow flux decay (� 2) likely caused by the continuous energy injection into the external shock. When this energy injection stops, a second break is then observed in the light curve (tbreak;2). This energy injection increases the energy of the afterglow shock by at least a factor of f k4 and augments the already severe requirements for the efficiency of the prompt gamma-ray emission. Subject headingg gamma rays: bursts — radiation mechanisms: nonthermal


Nature | 2006

The association of GRB 060218 with a supernova and the evolution of the shock wave.

Sergio Campana; Vanessa Mangano; Alexander J. Blustin; Peter J. Brown; David N. Burrows; Guido Chincarini; J. R. Cummings; G. Cusumano; M. Della Valle; Daniele Malesani; P. Meszaros; John A. Nousek; M. J. Page; Takanori Sakamoto; Eli Waxman; Bing Zhang; Z. G. Dai; Neil Gehrels; Stefan Immler; F. E. Marshall; K. Mason; A. Moretti; Paul T. O'Brien; Julian P. Osborne; Kim L. Page; Patrizia Romano; Pwa Roming; Gianpiero Tagliaferri; L. R. Cominsky; P. Giommi

Although the link between long Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) and supernovae (SNe) has been established, hitherto there have been no observations of the beginning of a supernova explosion and its intimate link to a GRB. In particular, we do not know however how a GRB jet emerges from the star surface nor how a GRB progenitor explodes. Here we report on observations of the close GRB060218 and its connection to SN2006aj. In addition to the classical non-thermal emission, GRB060218 shows a thermal component in its X-ray spectrum, which cools and shifts into the optical/UV band as time passes. We interpret these features as arising from the break out of a shock driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the progenitor. Our observations allow us for the first time to catch a SN in the act of exploding, to directly observe the shock break-out and to provide strong evidence that the GRB progenitor was a Wolf-Rayet star.Although the link between long γ-ray bursts (GRBs) and supernovae has been established, hitherto there have been no observations of the beginning of a supernova explosion and its intimate link to a GRB. In particular, we do not know how the jet that defines a γ-ray burst emerges from the stars surface, nor how a GRB progenitor explodes. Here we report observations of the relatively nearby GRB 060218 (ref. 5) and its connection to supernova SN 2006aj (ref. 6). In addition to the classical non-thermal emission, GRB 060218 shows a thermal component in its X-ray spectrum, which cools and shifts into the optical/ultraviolet band as time passes. We interpret these features as arising from the break-out of a shock wave driven by a mildly relativistic shell into the dense wind surrounding the progenitor. We have caught a supernova in the act of exploding, directly observing the shock break-out, which indicates that the GRB progenitor was a Wolf–Rayet star.


Science | 2005

Bright X-ray Flares in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

David N. Burrows; Patrizia Romano; A. Falcone; Shiho Kobayashi; Bing Zhang; A. Moretti; Paul T. O'Brien; Michael R. Goad; Sergio Campana; Kim L. Page; Lorella Angelini; S. D. Barthelmy; Andrew P. Beardmore; Milvia Capalbi; Guido Chincarini; J. R. Cummings; G. Cusumano; Derek B. Fox; Paolo Giommi; J. E. Hill; J. A. Kennea; Hans A. Krimm; Vanessa Mangano; Francis E. Marshall; P. Meszaros; David C. Morris; John A. Nousek; Julian P. Osborne; Claudio Pagani; Matteo Perri

Gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows have provided important clues to the nature of these massive explosive events, providing direct information on the nearby environment and indirect information on the central engine that powers the burst. We report the discovery of two bright x-ray flares in GRB afterglows, including a giant flare comparable in total energy to the burst itself, each peaking minutes after the burst. These strong, rapid x-ray flares imply that the central engines of the bursts have long periods of activity, with strong internal shocks continuing for hundreds of seconds after the gamma-ray emission has ended.


Nature | 2005

A short γ-ray burst apparently associated with an elliptical galaxy at redshift z = 0.225

Neil Gehrels; Craig L. Sarazin; Paul T. O'Brien; Bing Zhang; Loius M. Barbier; S. D. Barthelmy; Alexander J. Blustin; David N. Burrows; J. Cannizzo; J. R. Cummings; Michael R. Goad; Stephen T. Holland; C. P. Hurkett; J. A. Kennea; Andrew J. Levan; Craig B. Markwardt; K. O. Mason; P. Meszaros; M. J. Page; David M. Palmer; E. Rol; Takanori Sakamoto; R. Willingale; Lorella Angelini; Andrew P. Beardmore; Patricia T. Boyd; Alice A. Breeveld; Sergio Campana; Margaret Chester; Guido Chincarini

Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) come in two classes: long (> 2 s), soft-spectrum bursts and short, hard events. Most progress has been made on understanding the long GRBs, which are typically observed at high redshift (z ≈ 1) and found in subluminous star-forming host galaxies. They are likely to be produced in core-collapse explosions of massive stars. In contrast, no short GRB had been accurately (< 10″) and rapidly (minutes) located. Here we report the detection of the X-ray afterglow from—and the localization of—the short burst GRB 050509B. Its position on the sky is near a luminous, non-star-forming elliptical galaxy at a redshift of 0.225, which is the location one would expect if the origin of this GRB is through the merger of neutron-star or black-hole binaries. The X-ray afterglow was weak and faded below the detection limit within a few hours; no optical afterglow was detected to stringent limits, explaining the past difficulty in localizing short GRBs.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

The early x-ray emission from grbs

P. T. O’Brien; R. Willingale; Julian P. Osborne; Mike R. Goad; Kim L. Page; S. Vaughan; E. Rol; A. P. Beardmore; Olivier Godet; C. P. Hurkett; Alan A. Wells; Bing Zhang; Shiho Kobayashi; David N. Burrows; John A. Nousek; J. A. Kennea; A. Falcone; Dirk Grupe; Neil Gehrels; S. D. Barthelmy; John K. Cannizzo; J. R. Cummings; J. E. Hill; Hans A. Krimm; Guido Chincarini; Gianpiero Tagliaferri; Sergio Campana; A. Moretti; P. Giommi; Matteo Perri

We present observations of the early X-ray emission for a sample of 40 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) obtained using the Swift satellite, for which the narrow-field instruments were pointed at the burst within 10 minutes of the trigger. Using data from the Burst Alert Telescope and the X-Ray Telescope, we show that the X-ray light curve can be well described by an exponential that relaxes into a power law, often with flares superimposed. The transition time between the exponential and the power law provides a physically defined timescale for the burst duration. In most bursts, the power law breaks to a shallower decay within the first hour, and a late emission hump is observed, which can last for many hours. In other GRBs the hump is weak or absent. The observed variety in the shape of the early X-ray light curve can be explained as a combination of three components: prompt emission from the central engine, afterglow, and the late hump. In this scenario, afterglow emission begins during or soon after the burst, and the observed shape of the X-ray light curve depends on the relative strengths of the emission due to the central engine and that of the afterglow. There is a strong correlation such that those GRBs with stronger afterglow components have brighter early optical emission. The late emission hump can have a total fluence equivalent to that of the prompt phase. GRBs with the strongest late humps have weak or no X-ray flares.


Nature | 2011

Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole

David N. Burrows; J. A. Kennea; G. Ghisellini; Vanessa Mangano; Bing Zhang; Kim L. Page; M. Eracleous; Patrizia Romano; T. Sakamoto; A. Falcone; J. P. Osborne; Sergio Campana; A. P. Beardmore; Alice A. Breeveld; M. M. Chester; R. Corbet; S. Covino; J. R. Cummings; Paolo D'Avanzo; Valerio D'Elia; P. Esposito; P. A. Evans; Dino Fugazza; Jonathan Mark Gelbord; Kazuo Hiroi; S. T. Holland; Kuiyun Huang; Myungshin Im; G. L. Israel; Young-Beom Jeon

Supermassive black holes have powerful gravitational fields with strong gradients that can destroy stars that get too close, producing a bright flare in ultraviolet and X-ray spectral regions from stellar debris that forms an accretion disk around the black hole. The aftermath of this process may have been seen several times over the past two decades in the form of sparsely sampled, slowly fading emission from distant galaxies, but the onset of the stellar disruption event has not hitherto been observed. Here we report observations of a bright X-ray flare from the extragalactic transient Swift J164449.3+573451. This source increased in brightness in the X-ray band by a factor of at least 10,000 since 1990 and by a factor of at least 100 since early 2010. We conclude that we have captured the onset of relativistic jet activity from a supermassive black hole. A companion paper comes to similar conclusions on the basis of radio observations. This event is probably due to the tidal disruption of a star falling into a supermassive black hole, but the detailed behaviour differs from current theoretical models of such events.D. N. Burrows , J. A. Kennea , G. Ghisellini , V. Mangano , B. Zhang , K. L. Page , M. Eracleous , P. Romano , T. Sakamoto , A. D. Falcone , J. P. Osborne , S. Campana , A. P. Beardmore , A. A. Breeveld , M. M. Chester , R. Corbet , S. Covino , J. R. Cummings , P. D’Avanzo , V. D’Elia , P. Esposito , P. A. Evans , D. Fugazza, J. M. Gelbord , K. Hiroi , S. T. Holland , K. Y. Huang , M. Im, G. Israel , Y. Jeon , Y.-B. Jeon , N. Kawai , H. A. Krimm , P. Mészáros , H. Negoro , N. Omodei , W.K. Park , J. S. Perkins , M. Sugizaki , H.-I. Sung , G. Tagliaferri , E. Troja , Y. Ueda, Y. Urata, R. Usui , L. A. Antonelli , S. D. Barthelmy , G. Cusumano , P. Giommi , F. E. Marshall , A. Melandri , M. Perri , J. L. Racusin , B. Sbarufatti , M. H. Siegel , & N. Gehrels 21


Nature | 2011

Relativistic jet activity from the tidal disruption of a star by a massive black hole [Discovery of the onset of rapid accretion by a dormant massive black hole]

D. N. Burrows; J. A. Kennea; G. Ghisellini; Vanessa Mangano; Bin-Bin Zhang; Kim L. Page; M. Eracleous; Patrizia Romano; T. Sakamoto; A. Falcone; J. P. Osborne; S. Campana; A. P. Beardmore; Alice A. Breeveld; M. M. Chester; R. Corbet; S. Covino; J. R. Cummings; Paolo D'Avanzo; Valerio D'Elia; P. Esposito; P. A. Evans; Dino Fugazza; Jonathan Mark Gelbord; Kazuo Hiroi; S. T. Holland; Kuiyun Huang; Myungshin Im; G. L. Israel; Young-Beom Jeon

Supermassive black holes have powerful gravitational fields with strong gradients that can destroy stars that get too close, producing a bright flare in ultraviolet and X-ray spectral regions from stellar debris that forms an accretion disk around the black hole. The aftermath of this process may have been seen several times over the past two decades in the form of sparsely sampled, slowly fading emission from distant galaxies, but the onset of the stellar disruption event has not hitherto been observed. Here we report observations of a bright X-ray flare from the extragalactic transient Swift J164449.3+573451. This source increased in brightness in the X-ray band by a factor of at least 10,000 since 1990 and by a factor of at least 100 since early 2010. We conclude that we have captured the onset of relativistic jet activity from a supermassive black hole. A companion paper comes to similar conclusions on the basis of radio observations. This event is probably due to the tidal disruption of a star falling into a supermassive black hole, but the detailed behaviour differs from current theoretical models of such events.D. N. Burrows , J. A. Kennea , G. Ghisellini , V. Mangano , B. Zhang , K. L. Page , M. Eracleous , P. Romano , T. Sakamoto , A. D. Falcone , J. P. Osborne , S. Campana , A. P. Beardmore , A. A. Breeveld , M. M. Chester , R. Corbet , S. Covino , J. R. Cummings , P. D’Avanzo , V. D’Elia , P. Esposito , P. A. Evans , D. Fugazza, J. M. Gelbord , K. Hiroi , S. T. Holland , K. Y. Huang , M. Im, G. Israel , Y. Jeon , Y.-B. Jeon , N. Kawai , H. A. Krimm , P. Mészáros , H. Negoro , N. Omodei , W.K. Park , J. S. Perkins , M. Sugizaki , H.-I. Sung , G. Tagliaferri , E. Troja , Y. Ueda, Y. Urata, R. Usui , L. A. Antonelli , S. D. Barthelmy , G. Cusumano , P. Giommi , F. E. Marshall , A. Melandri , M. Perri , J. L. Racusin , B. Sbarufatti , M. H. Siegel , & N. Gehrels 21


Nature | 2009

A γ-ray burst at a redshift of z ≈ 8.2

Nial R. Tanvir; Derek B. Fox; Andrew J. Levan; Edo Berger; K. Wiersema; J. P. U. Fynbo; A. Cucchiara; T. Krühler; N. Gehrels; J. S. Bloom; J. Greiner; P. A. Evans; E. Rol; F. E. Olivares; J. Hjorth; P. Jakobsson; J. Farihi; R. Willingale; Rhaana L. C. Starling; S. B. Cenko; Daniel A. Perley; Justyn R. Maund; J. Duke; R. A. M. J. Wijers; Andrew J. Adamson; A. Allan; M. N. Bremer; D. N. Burrows; A. J. Castro-Tirado; B. Cavanagh

Long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are thought to result from the explosions of certain massive stars, and some are bright enough that they should be observable out to redshifts of z > 20 using current technology. Hitherto, the highest redshift measured for any object was z = 6.96, for a Lyman-alpha emitting galaxy. Here we report that GRB 090423 lies at a redshift of z approximately 8.2, implying that massive stars were being produced and dying as GRBs approximately 630 Myr after the Big Bang. The burst also pinpoints the location of its host galaxy.It is thought that the first generations of massive stars in the Universe were an important, and quite possibly dominant, source of the ultra-violet radiation that reionized the hydrogen gas in the intergalactic medium (IGM); a state in which it has remained to the present day. Measurements of cosmic microwave background anisotropies suggest that this phase-change largely took place in the redshift range z=10.8 +/- 1.4, while observations of quasars and Lyman-alpha galaxies have shown that the process was essentially completed by z=6. However, the detailed history of reionization, and characteristics of the stars and proto-galaxies that drove it, remain unknown. Further progress in understanding requires direct observations of the sources of ultra-violet radiation in the era of reionization, and mapping the evolution of the neutral hydrogen fraction through time. The detection of galaxies at such redshifts is highly challenging, due to their intrinsic faintness and high luminosity distance, whilst bright quasars appear to be rare beyond z~7. Here we report the discovery of a gamma-ray burst, GRB 090423, at redshift z=8.26 -0.08 +0.07. This is well beyond the redshift of the most distant spectroscopically confirmed galaxy (z=6.96) and quasar (z=6.43). It establishes that massive stars were being produced, and dying as GRBs, ~625 million years after the Big Bang. In addition, the accurate position of the burst pinpoints the location of the most distant galaxy known to date. Larger samples of GRBs beyond z~7 will constrain the evolving rate of star formation in the early universe, while rapid spectroscopy of their afterglows will allow direct exploration of the progress of reionization with cosmic time.Long-duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are thought to result from the explosions of certain massive stars, and some are bright enough that they should be observable out to redshifts of z > 20 using current technology. Hitherto, the highest redshift measured for any object was z = 6.96, for a Lyman-α emitting galaxy. Here we report that GRB 090423 lies at a redshift of z ≈ 8.2, implying that massive stars were being produced and dying as GRBs ∼630 Myr after the Big Bang. The burst also pinpoints the location of its host galaxy.

Collaboration


Dive into the J. A. Kennea's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. Gehrels

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. D. Barthelmy

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. M. Palmer

Universities Space Research Association

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kim L. Page

University of Leicester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. T. Holland

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hans A. Krimm

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. B. Markwardt

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge