David N. Sundwall
University of Utah
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David N. Sundwall.
American Journal of Public Health | 2012
Leslie A. Lenert; David N. Sundwall
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act is intended to enhance reimbursement of health care providers for meaningful use of electronic health records systems. This presents both opportunities and challenges for public health departments. To earn incentive payments, clinical providers must exchange specified types of data with the public health system, such as immunization and syndromic surveillance data and notifiable disease reporting. However, a crisis looms because public healths information technology systems largely lack the capabilities to accept the types of data proposed for exchange. Cloud computing may be a solution for public health information systems. Through shared computing resources, public health departments could reap the benefits of electronic reporting within federal funding constraints.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics | 2017
Michael Feehan; M. Walsh; J. Godin; David N. Sundwall; Mark A. Munger
In order to improve public health, it is necessary to facilitate patients’ easy access to affordable high‐quality primary health care, and one enhanced approach to do so may be to provide primary healthcare services in the community pharmacy setting. Discrete choice experiments to evaluate patient demand for services in pharmacy are relatively limited and have been hampered by a focus on only a few service alternatives, most focusing on changes in more traditional pharmacy services. The study aim was to gauge patient preferences explicitly for primary healthcare services that could be delivered through community pharmacy settings in the USA, using a very large sample to accommodate multiple service delivery options.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2002
Ronald L. Weiss; David N. Sundwall; John M. Matsen
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Academy of Sciences was commissioned by Congress to study the current system for the payment of diagnostic clinical laboratory services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. The current system was established in 1984 and has grown in complexity and is of diminishing contemporary relevance. The IOM recommended that a single, rational, nationalfee schedule be established and that it be initially based on the National Limitation Amount (NLA) currently mandated as the national fee cap. To estimate the potential budgetary impact of this recommendation, we merged the 1999 Part B Extract and Summary System and the 1999 Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Fee Schedule (CLFS). By using an estimated 193 million allowed services from this data set and the current mean fee of
American Journal of Public Health | 2017
David N. Sundwall
9.14 per test, current spending is approximately
The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education | 2017
Mark A. Munger; David N. Sundwall; Michael Feehan
1,768 million. The impact of raising the CLFS to the NLA will be approximately
Primary Care | 2016
Jessica L. Jones; David N. Sundwall
1,792 million, or
American Journal of Public Health | 2012
Leslie A. Lenert; David N. Sundwall
9.26 per test. The estimated cumulative budgetary effect, factoring in the current forecast for the Consumer Price Index, is an increase of approximately
American Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2015
Camille Broadwater-Hollifield; Troy Madsen; Christina A. Porucznik; David N. Sundwall; Scott Youngquist; Kajsa Vlasic; Lisa H. Gren
993 million over 5 years and
American Journal of Public Health | 2018
David N. Sundwall
2,359 million over 10 years.
American Journal of Public Health | 2017
David N. Sundwall
The author reflects on various aspects of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) as of 2016, and it mentions public health practices and principles in America, as well as political polarization in the country and efforts to improve the health of everyone in the U.S. According to the article, the primary purpose of the ACA is to increase the number of Americans with health insurance. The 2016 U.S. presidential election and ACA-related amendments are assessed.