Mark A. Munger

2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS* Stephan D. Fihn, MD, MPH, Chair†; Julius M. Gardin, MD, Vice Chair*‡; Jonathan Abrams, MD‡; Kathleen Berra, MSN, ANP*§; James C. Blankenship, MD*\; Apostolos P. Dallas, MD*†; Pamela S. Douglas, MD*‡; JoAnne M. Foody, MD*‡; Thomas C. Gerber, MD, PhD‡; Alan L. Hinderliter, MD‡; Spencer B. King III, MD*‡; Paul D. Kligfield, MD‡; Harlan M. Krumholz, MD‡; Raymond Y.K. Kwong, MD‡; Michael J. Lim, MD*\; Jane A. Linderbaum, MS, CNP-BC¶; Michael J. Mack, MD*#; Mark A. Munger, PharmD*‡; Richard L. Prager, MD#; Joseph F. Sabik, MD***; Leslee J. Shaw, PhD*‡; Joanna D. Sikkema, MSN, ANP-BC*§; Craig R. Smith, Jr, MD**; Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD*††; John A. Spertus, MD, MPH*‡‡; Sankey V. Williams, MD*†

Antihypertensive Efficacy of the Oral Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren as Add‐On Therapy in Patients Not Responding to Amlodipine Monotherapy

This study investigated the addition of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren to amlodipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension that was inadequately controlled with amlodipine alone. Following once‐daily treatment with amlodipine 5 mg for 4 weeks, patients whose hypertension responded inadequately to therapy (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90–109 mm Hg) (n=545) were randomized to 6 weeks of double‐blind treatment with amlodipine 5 mg plus aliskiren 150 mg, amlodipine 5 mg, or amlodipine 10 mg. At the studys end, mean systolic blood pressure and DBP reductions with the combination of aliskiren 150 mg and amlodipine 5 mg (11.0/8.5 mm Hg) were significantly greater (P<.0001) than with amlodipine 5 mg (5.0/4.8 mm Hg)—the comparator group—but similar to amlodipine 10 mg (9.6/8.0 mm Hg). All treatments were well tolerated. Edema occurred more frequently with amlodipine 10 mg (11.2%) than with combination therapy (2.1%) or amlodipine 5 mg (3.4%). In conclusion, aliskiren 150 mg plus amlodipine 5 mg shows similar but not better blood pressure‐lowering efficacy when compared with amlodipine 10 mg in patients not completely responsive to amlodipine 5 mg; less edema was noted with combination therapy.

In vivo human time-exposure study of orally dosed commercial silver nanoparticles.

UNLABELLED Human biodistribution, bioprocessing and possible toxicity of nanoscale silver receive increasing health assessment. We prospectively studied commercial 10- and 32-ppm nanoscale silver particle solutions in a single-blind, controlled, cross-over, intent-to-treat, design. Healthy subjects (n=60) underwent metabolic, blood counts, urinalysis, sputum induction, and chest and abdomen magnetic resonance imaging. Silver serum and urine content were determined. No clinically important changes in metabolic, hematologic, or urinalysis measures were identified. No morphological changes were detected in the lungs, heart or abdominal organs. No significant changes were noted in pulmonary reactive oxygen species or pro-inflammatory cytokine generation. In vivo oral exposure to these commercial nanoscale silver particle solutions does not prompt clinically important changes in human metabolic, hematologic, urine, physical findings or imaging morphology. Further study of increasing time exposure and dosing of silver nanoparticulate silver, and observation of additional organ systems are warranted to assert human toxicity thresholds. FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR In this study, the effects of commercially available nanoparticles were studied in healthy volunteers, concluding no detectable toxicity with the utilized comprehensive assays and tests. As the authors rightfully state, further studies are definitely warranted. Studies like this are much needed for the more widespread application of nanomedicine.

2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Executive Summary

A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Published by Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.012

Dose-related beneficial long-term hemodynamic and clinical efficacy of irbesartan in heart failure

OBJECTIVES The primary purpose of this study was to determine the acute and long-term hemodynamic and clinical effects of irbesartan in patients with heart failure. BACKGROUND Inhibition of angiotensin II production by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Irbesartan is an orally active antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor subtype with potential efficacy in heart failure. METHODS Two hundred eighteen patients with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II-IV) and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40% participated in the study. Serial hemodynamic measurements were made over 24 h following randomization to irbesartan 12.5 mg, 37.5 mg, 75 mg, 150 mg or placebo. After the first dose of study medication, patients receiving placebo were reallocated to one of the four irbesartan doses, treatment was continued for 12 weeks and hemodynamic measurements were repeated. RESULTS Irbesartan induced significant dose-related decreases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (average change -5.9+/-0.9 mm Hg and -5.3+/-0.9 mm Hg for irbesartan 75 mg and 150 mg, respectively) after 12 weeks of therapy without causing reflex tachycardia and without increasing plasma norepinephrine. The neurohormonal effects of irbesartan were highly variable and none of the changes was statistically significant. There was a significant dose-related decrease in the percentage of patients discontinuing study medication because of worsening heart failure. Irbesartan was well tolerated without evidence of dose-related cough or azotemia. CONCLUSIONS Irbesartan, at once-daily doses of 75 mg and 150 mg, induced sustained hemodynamic improvement and prevented worsening heart failure.

Atherothrombosis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Prevention

OBJECTIVES To review the pathophysiology of atherothrombosis (atherosclerosis with superimposed platelet-rich thrombus formation) and the measures that can be taken to prevent its clinical sequelae through lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy, with emphasis on the role of antiplatelet agents. DATA SOURCES Recent (1995-2003) published scientific literature, as identified by the authors through Medline searches using the terms atherothrombosis, pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, and reviews on treatment. STUDY SELECTION Recent systematic English-language review articles were screened for relevant material. DATA SYNTHESIS Atherothrombosis is a generalized and diffuse progressive process affecting multiple vascular beds; its clinical consequences, including acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death), ischemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease, are unpredictable in their time course and potentially life-threatening. Atherothrombosis rather than arterial stenosis appears to account for most of the acute ischemic manifestations of the atherosclerotic process. Interventions that can favorably influence atherosclerotic progression include lifestyle modifications (dietary control, exercise, and smoking cessation) and pharmacotherapy (lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, antiglycemic, and antiplatelet drugs). The pivotal role played by the platelet in thrombus formation provides the rationale for employing antiplatelet drugs with complementary modes of action (e.g., aspirin, clopidogrel) to prevent atherothrombosis. CONCLUSION Ischemic cerebrovascular, coronary, and peripheral arterial disease can be regarded as diverse manifestations of a common underlying systemic pathology, namely atherothrombosis. Secondary prevention of an ischemic event in an affected arterial bed confers the added benefit of primary prevention against potential ischemic events in other arterial beds.

High-dose versus standard-dose epinephrine treatment of cardiac arrest after failure of standard therapy

Study Objective. To assess the efficacy of high‐dose epinephrine (HDE) compared with standard‐dose epinephrine (SDE) in emergency department patients in cardiac arrest after SDE failed to improve asystole or ventricular fibrillation.

New Recommendations from the 1999 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Acute Myocardial Infarction Guidelines

OBJECTIVE: To review literature relating to significant changes in drug therapy recommendations in the 1999 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for treating patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DATA SOURCES: 1999 ACC/AHA AMI guidelines, English-language clinical trials, reviews, and editorials researching the role of drug therapy and primary angioplasty for AMI that were referenced in the guidelines were included. Additional data published in 2000 or unpublished were also included if relevant to interpretation of the guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: The articles selected influence AMI treatment recommendations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Many clinicians and health systems use the ACC/AHA AMI guidelines to develop treatment plans for AMI patients. This review highlights important changes in AMI drug therapy recommendations by reviewing the results of recent clinical trials. Insights into evolving drug therapy strategies that may impact future guideline development are also described. CONCLUSIONS: Several changes in drug therapy recommendations were included in the 1999 AMI ACC/AHA guidelines. There is emphasis on administering fibrin-specific thrombolytics secondary to enhanced efficacy. Selection between fibrin-specific agents is unclear at this time. Low response rates to thrombolytics have been noted in the elderly, women, patients with heart failure, and those showing left bundle-branch block on the electrocardiogram. These patient groups should be targeted for improved utilization programs. The use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in non-ST—segment elevation MI was emphasized. Small trials combining reduced doses of thrombolytics with GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have shown promise by increasing reperfusion rates without increasing bleeding risk, but firm conclusions cannot be made until the results of larger trials are known. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials suggest lower mortality rates for primary PCI when compared with thrombolysis alone. However, primary PCI, including coronary angioplasty, is only available at approximately 13% of US hospitals, making thrombolysis the preferred strategy for most patients. Clopidogrel has supplanted ticlopidine as the recommended antiplatelet agent for patients with aspirin allergy or intolerance following reports of a better safety profile. The recommended dose of unfractionated heparin is lower than previously recommended, necessitating a separate nomogram for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Routine use of warfarin, either alone or in combination with aspirin, is not supported by clinical trials; however, warfarin remains a choice for antithrombotic therapy in patients intolerant to aspirin. β -Adrenergic receptor blockers continue to be recommended, and emphasis is placed on improving rates of early administration (during hospitalization), even in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction. New recommendations for drug treatment of post-AMI patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and/or elevated triglycerides are included, with either niacin or gemfibrozil recommended as an option. Supplementary antioxidants are not recommended for either primary or secondary prevention of AMI, with new data demonstrating lack of efficacy for vitamin E in primary prevention. Estrogen replacement therapy or hormonal replacement therapy should not be initiated solely for prevention of cardiovascular disease, but can be continued in cardiovascular patients already taking long-term therapy for other reasons. Bupropion has been added as a new treatment option for smoking cessation. As drug therapy continues to evolve in treating AMI, more frequent updates of therapy guidelines will be necessary.

Antihypertensive Efficacy of Candesartan in Comparison to Losartan: The CLAIM Study

An 8‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, randomized, parallel‐group, forced‐titration study was conducted to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan vs. losartan in 654 hypertensive patients with a diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 114 mm Hg from 72 sites throughout the U.S. Eligible patients were randomized to candesartan cilexetil 16 mg once daily, or losartan 50 mg once daily. Two weeks following randomization, patients doubled the respective doses of their angiotensin receptor blockers for an additional 6 weeks. At week 8, candesartan cilexetil lowered trough systolic/diastolic blood pressure by a significantly greater amount than did losartan (13.3/10.9 mm Hg with candesartan cilexetil vs. 9.8/8.7 mm Hg with losartan; p< 0.001). At the same period, candesartan cilexetil also lowered peak blood pressure by a significantly greater amount than did losartan (15.2 to 11.6 mm Hg with candesartan cilexetil vs. 12.6 to 10.1 mm Hg with losartan; p< 0.05). There were statistically significantly (p< 0.05) higher proportions of responders and controlled patients in the candesartan cilexetil group (62.4% and 56.0%, respectively) than in the losartan group (54.0% and 46.9%, respectively). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated; 1.8% in the candesartan cilexetil group and 1.6% in the losartan group withdrew because of adverse events. In conclusion, this forced‐titration study confirms that candesartan cilexetil is more effective than losartan in lowering blood pressure when both are administered once daily at maximum doses. Both drugs were well tolerated.

ACE inhibitor effects on platelet function in stages I-II hypertension

Angiotensin II enhances platelet aggregation through activation of the G protein-linked pathway present in platelets. Studies of several angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have demonstrated marked differences on platelets. Therefore this prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover study compared the ex vivo effects of equivalent antihypertensive doses of captopril, enalapril, and fosinopril on platelet aggregation and thromboxane B2 (TxB2) formation in subjects with stage I-II essential hypertension. Nineteen male subjects with a baseline mean seated blood pressure of 141 +/- 3/100 +/- 1 mm Hg were enrolled. The decline in mean arterial pressure after 4 weeks of stable dosing was 10 +/- 1, 12 +/- 1, and 11 +/- 1 mm Hg for captopril, enalapril, and fosinopril, respectively (p = NS). There was no significant change in adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-, epinephrine-, or thrombin-stimulated platelet aggregation from baseline or between ACE inhibitors. Compared with baseline, fosinopril decreased TxB2 concentrations 27.5-67.6% with all stimuli after 1 and 5 min. Captopril also decreased TxB2 formation, but this effect was stimulus and time dependent. Enalapril consistently increased TxB2 concentrations, independent of stimuli or time. We conclude that different ACE inhibitors have distinct effects on platelet TxB2 formation without significant effects on platelet aggregation. Fosinopril may be a direct antagonist ofTxA2 synthase, suggesting benefit in syndromes of platelet activation or vascular occlusion.