Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David P. Hill is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David P. Hill.


Nature Genetics | 2000

Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Michael Ashburner; Catherine A. Ball; Judith A. Blake; David Botstein; Heather L. Butler; J. Michael Cherry; Allan Peter Davis; Kara Dolinski; Selina S. Dwight; Janan T. Eppig; Midori A. Harris; David P. Hill; Laurie Issel-Tarver; Andrew Kasarskis; Suzanna E. Lewis; John C. Matese; Joel E. Richardson; Martin Ringwald; Gerald M. Rubin; Gavin Sherlock

Genomic sequencing has made it clear that a large fraction of the genes specifying the core biological functions are shared by all eukaryotes. Knowledge of the biological role of such shared proteins in one organism can often be transferred to other organisms. The goal of the Gene Ontology Consortium is to produce a dynamic, controlled vocabulary that can be applied to all eukaryotes even as knowledge of gene and protein roles in cells is accumulating and changing. To this end, three independent ontologies accessible on the World-Wide Web (http://www.geneontology.org) are being constructed: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2004

The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

Midori A. Harris; Jennifer I. Clark; Amelia Ireland; Jane Lomax; Michael Ashburner; R. Foulger; K. Eilbeck; Suzanna E. Lewis; B. Marshall; Christopher J. Mungall; John Richter; Gerald M. Rubin; Judith A. Blake; Mary E. Dolan; Harold J. Drabkin; Janan T. Eppig; David P. Hill; Li Ni; Martin Ringwald; Rama Balakrishnan; J. M. Cherry; Karen R. Christie; Maria C. Costanzo; Selina S. Dwight; Stacia R. Engel; Dianna G. Fisk; Jodi E. Hirschman; Eurie L. Hong; Robert S. Nash; Anand Sethuraman

The Gene Ontology (GO) project (http://www. geneontology.org/) provides structured, controlled vocabularies and classifications that cover several domains of molecular and cellular biology and are freely available for community use in the annotation of genes, gene products and sequences. Many model organism databases and genome annotation groups use the GO and contribute their annotation sets to the GO resource. The GO database integrates the vocabularies and contributed annotations and provides full access to this information in several formats. Members of the GO Consortium continually work collectively, involving outside experts as needed, to expand and update the GO vocabularies. The GO Web resource also provides access to extensive documentation about the GO project and links to applications that use GO data for functional analyses.


Nature | 2008

Big data: The future of biocuration.

Doug Howe; Maria Costanzo; Petra Fey; Takashi Gojobori; Linda Hannick; Winston Hide; David P. Hill; Renate Kania; Mary Schaeffer; Susan St Pierre; Simon N. Twigger; Owen R. White; Seung Y. Rhee

To thrive, the field that links biologists and their data urgently needs structure, recognition and support.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2008

The Gene Ontology project in 2008

Midori A. Harris; Jennifer I. Deegan; Amelia Ireland; Jane Lomax; Michael Ashburner; Susan Tweedie; Seth Carbon; Suzanna E. Lewis; Christopher J. Mungall; John Richter; Karen Eilbeck; Judith A. Blake; Alexander D. Diehl; Mary E. Dolan; Harold Drabkin; Janan T. Eppig; David P. Hill; Ni Li; Martin Ringwald; Rama Balakrishnan; Gail Binkley; J. Michael Cherry; Karen R. Christie; Maria C. Costanzo; Qing Dong; Stacia R. Engel; Dianna G. Fisk; Jodi E. Hirschman; Benjamin C. Hitz; Eurie L. Hong

The Gene Ontology (GO) project (http://www.geneontology.org/) provides a set of structured, controlled vocabularies for community use in annotating genes, gene products and sequences (also see http://www.sequenceontology.org/). The ontologies have been extended and refined for several biological areas, and improvements to the structure of the ontologies have been implemented. To improve the quantity and quality of gene product annotations available from its public repository, the GO Consortium has launched a focused effort to provide comprehensive and detailed annotation of orthologous genes across a number of ‘reference’ genomes, including human and several key model organisms. Software developments include two releases of the ontology-editing tool OBO-Edit, and improvements to the AmiGO browser interface.


Genome Biology | 2008

A critical assessment of Mus musculus gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence

Lourdes Peña-Castillo; Murat Tasan; Chad L. Myers; Hyunju Lee; Trupti Joshi; Chao Zhang; Yuanfang Guan; Michele Leone; Andrea Pagnani; Wan-Kyu Kim; Chase Krumpelman; Weidong Tian; Guillaume Obozinski; Yanjun Qi; Guan Ning Lin; Gabriel F. Berriz; Francis D. Gibbons; Gert R. G. Lanckriet; Jian-Ge Qiu; Charles E. Grant; Zafer Barutcuoglu; David P. Hill; David Warde-Farley; Chris Grouios; Debajyoti Ray; Judith A. Blake; Minghua Deng; Michael I. Jordan; William Stafford Noble; Quaid Morris

Background:Several years after sequencing the human genome and the mouse genome, much remains to be discovered about the functions of most human and mouse genes. Computational prediction of gene function promises to help focus limited experimental resources on the most likely hypotheses. Several algorithms using diverse genomic data have been applied to this task in model organisms; however, the performance of such approaches in mammals has not yet been evaluated.Results:In this study, a standardized collection of mouse functional genomic data was assembled; nine bioinformatics teams used this data set to independently train classifiers and generate predictions of function, as defined by Gene Ontology (GO) terms, for 21,603 mouse genes; and the best performing submissions were combined in a single set of predictions. We identified strengths and weaknesses of current functional genomic data sets and compared the performance of function prediction algorithms. This analysis inferred functions for 76% of mouse genes, including 5,000 currently uncharacterized genes. At a recall rate of 20%, a unified set of predictions averaged 41% precision, with 26% of GO terms achieving a precision better than 90%.Conclusion:We performed a systematic evaluation of diverse, independently developed computational approaches for predicting gene function from heterogeneous data sources in mammals. The results show that currently available data for mammals allows predictions with both breadth and accuracy. Importantly, many highly novel predictions emerge for the 38% of mouse genes that remain uncharacterized.


PLOS Computational Biology | 2009

The Gene Ontology's Reference Genome Project: A Unified Framework for Functional Annotation across Species

Pascale Gaudet; Rex L. Chisholm; Tanya Z. Berardini; Emily Dimmer; Stacia R. Engel; Petra Fey; David P. Hill; Doug Howe; James C. Hu; Rachael P. Huntley; Varsha K. Khodiyar; Ranjana Kishore; Donghui Li; Ruth C. Lovering; Fiona M. McCarthy; Li Ni; Victoria Petri; Deborah A. Siegele; Susan Tweedie; Kimberly Van Auken; Valerie Wood; Siddhartha Basu; Seth Carbon; Mary E. Dolan; Christopher J. Mungall; Kara Dolinski; Paul D. Thomas; Michael Ashburner; Judith A. Blake; J. Michael Cherry

The Gene Ontology (GO) is a collaborative effort that provides structured vocabularies for annotating the molecular function, biological role, and cellular location of gene products in a highly systematic way and in a species-neutral manner with the aim of unifying the representation of gene function across different organisms. Each contributing member of the GO Consortium independently associates GO terms to gene products from the organism(s) they are annotating. Here we introduce the Reference Genome project, which brings together those independent efforts into a unified framework based on the evolutionary relationships between genes in these different organisms. The Reference Genome project has two primary goals: to increase the depth and breadth of annotations for genes in each of the organisms in the project, and to create data sets and tools that enable other genome annotation efforts to infer GO annotations for homologous genes in their organisms. In addition, the project has several important incidental benefits, such as increasing annotation consistency across genome databases, and providing important improvements to the GOs logical structure and biological content.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2001

The mouse gene expression database GXD.

Martin Ringwald; Janan T. Eppig; Dale A. Begley; John P. Corradi; Ingeborg J. McCright; Terry F. Hayamizu; David P. Hill; James A. Kadin; Joel E. Richardson

The Gene Expression Database (GXD) is a community resource of gene expression information for the laboratory mouse. By combining the different types of expression data, GXD aims to provide increasingly complete information about the expression profiles of genes in different mouse strains and mutants, thus enabling valuable insights into the molecular networks that underlie normal development and disease. GXD is integrated with the Mouse Genome Database (MGD). Extensive interconnections with sequence databases and with databases from other species, and the development and use of shared controlled vocabularies extend GXDs utility for the analysis of gene expression information. GXD is accessible through the Mouse Genome Informatics web site at http://www.informatics.jax.org/ or directly at http://www.informatics.jax.org/menus/expression_menu. shtml.


Journal of Biomedical Informatics | 2011

Cross-product extensions of the Gene Ontology

Christopher J. Mungall; Michael Bada; Tanya Z. Berardini; Jennifer I. Deegan; Amelia Ireland; Midori A. Harris; David P. Hill; Jane Lomax

The Gene Ontology (GO) consists of nearly 30,000 classes for describing the activities and locations of gene products. Manual maintenance of ontology of this size is a considerable effort, and errors and inconsistencies inevitably arise. Reasoners can be used to assist with ontology development, automatically placing classes in a subsumption hierarchy based on their properties. However, the historic lack of computable definitions within the GO has prevented the user of these tools. In this paper, we present preliminary results of an ongoing effort to normalize the GO by explicitly stating the definitions of compositional classes in a form that can be used by reasoners. These definitions are partitioned into mutually exclusive cross-product sets, many of which reference other OBO Foundry candidate ontologies for chemical entities, proteins, biological qualities and anatomical entities. Using these logical definitions we are gradually beginning to automate many aspects of ontology development, detecting errors and filling in missing relationships. These definitions also enhance the GO by weaving it into the fabric of a wider collection of interoperating ontologies, increasing opportunities for data integration and enhancing genomic analyses.


BMC Bioinformatics | 2008

Gene Ontology annotations: what they mean and where they come from

David P. Hill; Barry Smith; Monica S. McAndrews-Hill; Judith A. Blake

To address the challenges of information integration and retrieval, the computational genomics community increasingly has come to rely on the methodology of creating annotations of scientific literature using terms from controlled structured vocabularies such as the Gene Ontology (GO). Here we address the question of what such annotations signify and of how they are created by working biologists. Our goal is to promote a better understanding of how the results of experiments are captured in annotations, in the hope that this will lead both to better representations of biological reality through annotation and ontology development and to more informed use of GO resources by experimental scientists.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2004

The mouse Gene Expression Database (GXD): updates and enhancements

David P. Hill; Dale A. Begley; Jacqueline H. Finger; Terry F. Hayamizu; Ingeborg J. McCright; Constance M. Smith; Jon S. Beal; Lori E. Corbani; Judith A. Blake; Janan T. Eppig; James A. Kadin; Joel E. Richardson; Martin Ringwald

The Gene Expression Database (GXD) is a community resource for gene expression information in the laboratory mouse. By collecting and integrating different types of expression data, GXD provides information about expression profiles in different mouse strains and mutants. Participation in the Gene Ontology (GO) project classifies genes and gene products with regard to molecular functions, biological processes, and cellular components. Integration with other Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) databases places the gene expression information in the context of mouse genetic, genomic and phenotypic information. The integration of these types of information enables valuable insights into the molecular biology that underlies development and disease. The utility of GXD has been improved by the daily addition of new data and through the implementation of new query and display features. These improvements make it easier for users to interrogate and visualize expression data in the context of their specific needs. GXD is accessible through the MGI website at http://www.informatics.jax.org/ or directly at http://www. informatics.jax.org/menus/expression_menu.shtml.

Collaboration


Dive into the David P. Hill's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher J. Mungall

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tanya Z. Berardini

Carnegie Institution for Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harold J. Drabkin

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janan T. Eppig

Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jane Lomax

European Bioinformatics Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joel E. Richardson

Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge