David Robertson
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David Robertson.
Clinical Autonomic Research | 2011
Roy Freeman; Wouter Wieling; Felicia B. Axelrod; David G. Benditt; Eduardo E. Benarroch; Italo Biaggioni; William P. Cheshire; Thomas Chelimsky; Pietro Cortelli; Christopher H. Gibbons; David S. Goldstein; Roger Hainsworth; Max J. Hilz; Giris Jacob; Horacio Kaufmann; Jens Jordan; Lewis A. Lipsitz; Benjamin D. Levine; Phillip A. Low; Christopher Mathias; Satish R. Raj; David Robertson; Paola Sandroni; Irwin J. Schatz; Ron Schondorff; Julian M. Stewart; J. Gert van Dijk
Roy Freeman • Wouter Wieling • Felicia B. Axelrod • David G. Benditt • Eduardo Benarroch • Italo Biaggioni • William P. Cheshire • Thomas Chelimsky • Pietro Cortelli • Christopher H. Gibbons • David S. Goldstein • Roger Hainsworth • Max J. Hilz • Giris Jacob • Horacio Kaufmann • Jens Jordan • Lewis A. Lipsitz • Benjamin D. Levine • Phillip A. Low • Christopher Mathias • Satish R. Raj • David Robertson • Paola Sandroni • Irwin Schatz • Ron Schondorff • Julian M. Stewart • J. Gert van Dijk
Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical | 2011
Roy Freeman; Wouter Wieling; Felicia B. Axelrod; David G. Benditt; Eduardo E. Benarroch; Italo Biaggioni; William P. Cheshire; Thomas Chelimsky; Pietro Cortelli; Christopher H. Gibbons; David S. Goldstein; Roger Hainsworth; Max J. Hilz; Giris Jacob; Horacio Kaufmann; Jens Jordan; Lewis A. Lipsitz; Benjamin D. Levine; Phillip A. Low; Christopher Mathias; Satish R. Raj; David Robertson; Paola Sandroni; Irwin J. Schatz; Ron Schondorf; Julian M. Stewart; J. Gert van Dijk
Roy Freeman • Wouter Wieling • Felicia B. Axelrod • David G. Benditt • Eduardo Benarroch • Italo Biaggioni • William P. Cheshire • Thomas Chelimsky • Pietro Cortelli • Christopher H. Gibbons • David S. Goldstein • Roger Hainsworth • Max J. Hilz • Giris Jacob • Horacio Kaufmann • Jens Jordan • Lewis A. Lipsitz • Benjamin D. Levine • Phillip A. Low • Christopher Mathias • Satish R. Raj • David Robertson • Paola Sandroni • Irwin Schatz • Ron Schondorff • Julian M. Stewart • J. Gert van Dijk
Hypertension | 2000
Jens Jordan; John R. Shannon; André Diedrich; Bonnie K. Black; Fernando Costa; David Robertson; Italo Biaggioni
Recent studies suggest that activation of the sympathetic nervous system either directly or indirectly influences cerebrovascular tone in humans even within the autoregulatory range. In 6 healthy subjects (aged 29±4 years), we used transcranial Doppler sonography to determine cerebral blood flow velocity during sympathetic activation elicited through head-up tilt (HUT) and sympathetic deactivation through ganglionic blockade. Paco2 was manipulated through hyperventilation and CO2 breathing (5%). With subjects in the supine position and during HUT, mean arterial pressure was not influenced by Paco2. During ganglionic blockade, mean arterial pressure decreased markedly with hyperventilation (−13±1.9 mm Hg). Manipulation of sympathetic tone elicited only mild changes in cerebral blood flow (64±5.8 cm/s supine, 58±4.9 cm/s upright, and 66±6.2 cm/s during ganglionic blockade;P =0.07 by ANOVA). The slope of the regression between Paco2 and mean velocity was 1.6±0.18 cm/(s · mm Hg) supine, 1.3±0.14 cm/(s · mm Hg) during HUT, and 2.3±0.36 cm/(s · mm Hg) during ganglionic blockade (P <0.05). Spontaneous Paco2 and ventilatory response to hypercapnia were also modulated by the level of sympathetic activity. Changes in sympathetic tone have a limited effect on cerebral blood flow at normal Paco2 levels. However, the sympathetic nervous system seems to attenuate the CO2-induced increase in cerebral blood flow. This phenomenon may indicate a moderate direct effect of the sympathetic nervous system on the cerebral vasculature. Furthermore, sympathetic activation tends to increase ventilation and thus can indirectly increase cerebrovascular tone.
Circulation | 2004
Jens Jordan; John R. Shannon; André Diedrich; Bonnie K. Black; David Robertson; Italo Biaggioni
Background—The use of ephedra alkaloids in over-the-counter preparations has been associated with potentially serious cerebrovascular events. Because of its potential association with hemorrhagic strokes, phenylpropanolamine has been largely substituted for by pseudoephedrine, but it is not clear whether this is indeed a safer alternative. It would be important to understand the cardiovascular effects of ephedra alkaloids, but these are normally masked by baroreflex buffering mechanisms. We therefore investigated the effects of ephedra alkaloids in patients with autonomic impairment and explored their potential interaction with water ingestion. Methods and Results—The cardiovascular effects of phenylpropanolamine or pseudoephedrine, alone and in combination with water, were determined in 13 subjects with impairment of baroreflex function due to autonomic failure. Phenylpropanolamine, 12.5 to 25 mg PO, increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 21±14 mm Hg after 90 minutes. However, when ingested with 16 oz of room temperature tap water, phenylpropanolamine increased SBP by 82±2 mm Hg. Pseudoephedrine, 30 mg PO, increased SBP on average 52±9 mm Hg when taken with 16 oz of water and by as much as 88 mm Hg. Conclusions—Ephedra alkaloids increase blood pressure significantly in individuals with impaired baroreflex function.Concomitant ingestion of ephedra alkaloids and water produced a greater increase in blood pressure. If used cautiously, this interaction can be beneficial in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. On the other hand, it could contribute to the cardiovascular complications associated with the use of ephedra alkaloids, given that baroreflex function varies widely in normal individuals and is impaired in several medical conditions.
The American Journal of the Medical Sciences | 1999
Jens Jordan; John R. Shannon; Giris Jacob; Bojan Pohar; David Robertson
BACKGROUNDnThe hemodynamic and autonomic abnormalities in idiopathic orthostatic intolerance (IOI) have been studied extensively. However, the mechanisms underlying these abnormalities are not understood. If genetic predisposition were important in the pathogenesis of IOI, monozygotic twins of patients with IOI should have similar hemodynamic and autonomic abnormalities.nnnMETHODSnWe studied two patients with IOI and their identical twins. Both siblings in the first twin pair had orthostatic symptoms, significant orthostatic tachycardia, increased plasma norepinephrine levels with standing, and a greater than normal decrease in systolic blood pressure with trimethaphan infusion.nnnRESULTSnBoth siblings had a normal response of plasma renin activity to upright posture. In the second twin pair, only one sibling had symptoms of orthostatic intolerance, an orthostatic tachycardia, and raised plasma catecholamines with standing. The affected sibling had inappropriately low plasma renin activity with standing and was 8-fold more sensitive to the pressor effect of phenylephrine than the unaffected sibling.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWe conclude that in some patients, IOI seems to be strongly influenced by genetic factors. In others, however, IOI may be mainly caused by nongenetic factors. These findings suggest that IOI is heterogenous, and that both genetic and environmental factors contribute individually or collectively to create the IOI phenotype.
Primer on the Autonomic Nervous System (Third Edition) | 2012
David Robertson; Rose Marie Robertson
Publisher Summary nThis chapter focuses on the mechanism of effect of fludrocortisones along with its side effects and long-term effects. The cardiovascular response to fludrocortisone is a gradual rise in blood pressure in patients with orthostatic hypotension. This is initially related to sodium retention with an increase in plasma volume. There are several issues to consider in using fludrocortisone effectively. First, long-term studies of outcomes after fludrocortisone have not been undertaken, so there could be chronic untoward effects that have heretofore not been recognized. Fludrocortisone should not be used in patients who cannot tolerate increased fluid retention. For instance, patients with heart failure should not use. However, this is rarely an issue, since patients with pre-existing congestive heart failure rarely have autonomic failure. Fludrocortisone therapy commonly produces the side effect of headache, especially initially and particularly in younger, healthier patients. A theoretical concern with the long-term use of fludrocortisone has arisen in recent years with the description of novel effects of aldosterone. Aldosterone has additional, nonepithelial effects in the kidney and in vascular smooth muscle, involving activation of the sodium or hydrogen antiporter, and it is possible that this can produce cardiovascular damage independent of the level of blood pressure.
Hypertension (Second Edition)#R##N#A Companion to Brenner and Rector's The Kidney | 2005
Satish R. Raj; David Robertson
Archive | 2003
Andrew C. Ertl; André Diedrich; Sachin Y. Paranjape; Italo Biaggioni; Rose Marie Robertson; Lynda D. Lane; Richard Shiavi; David Robertson
Archive | 2015
Julian M. Stewart; Amy Weldon; William D. Dupont; David Robertson; Satish R; Vidya Raj; Bonnie K. Black; Italo Biaggioni; Philip L. Mar; Cyndya Shibao; Sachin Y; Andrew T. Del Pozzi; Akash Pandey; Marvin S. Medow; Zachary R. Messer; M Julian
Archive | 2015
Daniel W. Byrne; David Robertson; Matthew V. Dzurik; André Diedrich; Sachin Y. Paranjape; Satish R. Raj; Italo Biaggioni; Jessica K. Devin; Mias Pretorius; Hui Nian; Chang Yu; Frederic T. Billings; J Nancy