David S. Foster
United States Geological Survey
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David S. Foster.
Journal of Paleolimnology | 1990
Steven M. Colman; Glenn A. Jones; Richard M. Forester; David S. Foster
Preliminary results of a multidisciplinary study of cores in southwestern Lake Michigan suggest that the materials in these cores can be interpreted in terms of both isostatically and climatically induced changes in lake level. Ostracodes and mollusks are well preserved in the Holocene sediments, and they provide paleolimnologic and paleoclimatic data, as well as biogenic carbonate for stable-isotope studies and radiocarbon dating. Pollen and diatom preservation in the cores is poor, which prevents comparison with regional vegetation records. New accelerator-mass spectrometer 14C ages, from both carbon and carbonate fractions, provide basin-wide correlations and appear to resolve the longstanding problem of anomalously old ages that result from detrital organic matter in Great Lakes sediments.Several cores contain a distinct unconformity associated with the abrupt fall in lake level that occurred about 10.3 ka when the isostatically depressed North Bay outlet was uncovered by the retreating Laurentide Ice Sheet. Below the unconformity, ostracode assemblages imply deep, cold water with very low total dissolved solids (TDS), and bivalves have δ 18O (PDB) values as light as — 10 per mil. Samples from just above the unconformity contain littoral to sublittoral ostracode species that imply warmer, higher-TDS (though still dilute) water than that inferred below the unconformity. Above this zone, another interval with δ 18O values more negative than — 10 occurs. The isotopic data suggest that two influxes of cold, isotopically light meltwater from Laurentide ice entered the lake, one shortly before 10.3 ka and the other about 9 ka. These influxes were separated by a period during which the lake was warmer, shallower, but still very low in dissolved solids. One or both of the meltwater influxes may be related to discharge from Lake Agassiz into the Great Lakes.Sedimentation rates appear to have been constant from about 10 ka to 5 ka. Bivalve shells formed between about 8 and 5 ka have δ 18O values that range from-2.3 to-3.3 per mil and appear to decrease toward the end of the interval. The ostracode assemblages and the stable isotopes suggest changes that are climatically controlled, including fluctuating water levels and increasing dissolved solids, although the water remained relatively dilute (TDS < 300 mg/l).A dramatic decrease in sedimentation rates occurred at about 5 ka, about the time of the peak of the Nippissing high lake stage. This decrease in sedimentation rate may be associated with a large increase in effective wave base as the lake approached its present size and fetch. A dramatic reduction in ostracode and mollusk abundances during the late Holocene is probably due to this decrease in sedimentation rates, which would result in increased carbonate dissolution. Ostracode productivity may also have declined due to a reduction in bottom-water oxygen caused by increased epilimnion algal productivity.
Geological Society of America Bulletin | 1990
Steven M. Colman; Jeffrey P. Halka; Carl H. Hobbs Iii; Robert B. Mixon; David S. Foster
Three generations of the ancestral Susquehanna River system have been mapped beneath Chesapeake Bay and the southern Delmarva Peninsula. Closely spaced seismic reflection profiles in the bay and boreholes in the bay and on the southern Delmarva Peninsula allow detailed reconstruction of each paleochannel system. The channel systems were formed during glacial low sea-level stands, and each contains a channel-fill sequence that records the subsequent transgression. The trunk channels of each system are 2 to 4 km wide and are incised 30 to 50 m into underlying strata; they have irregular longitudinal profiles and very low gradients within the Chesapeake Bay area. The three main-stem channels diverge from the head of the bay toward the southeast. The channels are rarely coincident, although they commonly intersect. All three main channels pass beneath the southern Delmarva Peninsula, forming an age progression from north (oldest) to south (youngest) beneath the Peninsula, and from east (oldest) to west (youngest) beneath Chesapeake Bay. Southward progradation of the tip of the Delmarva Peninsula during interglacial high sea-level stands caused southward migration of the mouth of the bay, so that the next generation of channels were incised progressively further towards the southwest. The youngest paleochannel is clearly of late Wisconsinan age, about 18 ka, and the intermediate one appears to be late Illinoian in age, or about 150 ka. The age of the oldest paleochannel is not well constrained, but it is in the range of about 200 to 400 ka. The three paleochannel systems imply a dynamic coastal-plain environment and at least two previous generations of the Chesapeake Bay. Both the Chesapeake Bay and the southern Delmarva Peninsula have changed considerably in the past half million years.
Journal of Great Lakes Research | 1994
Steven M. Colman; David S. Foster
Abstract We have constructed a sediment budget for the southern Lake Michigan basin for sand and for mud during three time periods: the past 100, 5,000, and 10,000 years. For the modern (100-year) sediment budget, accountable sediment sources add up to 93 percent of the calculated sinks. The mud budget has a source deficit of about 40%, probably due to errors in mud:sand ratios and (or) to other sources not included in our model, especially erosion of the lake floor, which accompanies bluff recession. Two terms dominate the modern sediment-budget equation: (1) bluff erosion, which is an order of magnitude larger than either rivers or aerosols as a source, and (2) deposition in the deep basin, which is more than two orders of magnitude greater as a sink than suspended sediment transport out of the basin. About half of the sand derived from bluff erosion is deposited in the deep lake; the other half must be deposited in nearshore sand bodies, beaches, and dunes. Despite the uncertainties in our estimates of sediment sources and sinks, the attempt to reconstruct sediment budgets for time intervals of 100, 5,000, and 10,000 years leads to important insights about erosion and sedimentation processes. Bluff erosion is the dominant source of both sand and mud in the basin. The deep lake floor is the primary sink for mud, whereas both the deep lake and nearshore areas are important sinks for sand. On a long-term basis, rates of bluff erosion have progressively decreased and are apparently independent of anthropogenic effects. Rates of sediment accumulation in the lake basin mirror the decrease in rates of bluff erosion for prehistoric time, but have increased markedly since human settlement, probably because of anthropogenic effects on river and aerosolic inputs.
Journal of Great Lakes Research | 1994
David S. Foster; David W. Folger
This part of the project was carried out with geophysical and geological sampling techniques to determine in more detail the geology of southwestern Lake Michigan and thereby provide the essential framework on which to base subsequent lake level, process, and sediment budget studies. The bathymetry of southwestern Lake Michigan is controlled by the underlying bedrock, which dips northeast toward the center of the Michigan basin. Bedrock comprises Silurian dolomite and Devonian limestone and shale. Quaternary sediment, 10 to 40 m thick, overlies bedrock. From Waukegan, Illinois, south to Indiana Harbor, the bottom is floored by till, sand, pebbles, and cobbles. Sand, more common within 1 to 2 km of shore, thins lakeward to a patchy veneer. The lake floor is erosional or nondepositional where till or gravel-cobble pavement is exposed. In contrast, north of Waukegan and east of Indiana Harbor, fine sand covers much of the bottom and grades offshore to muddy sand, which is part of the modern, lacustrine Lake Michigan Formation. The complex surficial bottom sediment distribution between Waukegan and Michigan City, Indiana, could be mapped in detail only where we have sidescan sonar mosaics. In those areas, the till, or coarse lag sand-gravel surface, is covered intermittently with a layer of fine sand most often about 0.5 to 1.0 m thick. The sand appears to be mobile, covering and uncovering the substrate in response to storm-driven waves and currents. Thus, sand, important for protecting the substrate from erosion and for maintaining beaches, is not abundant throughout much of the area.
Archive | 2017
Elizabeth A. Pendleton; Edward Sweeney; E.R. Thieler; David S. Foster
These data are a qualitatively derived interpretive polygon shapefile defining surficial sediment type and distribution, and geomorphology, for nearly 1,400 square kilometers of sea floor on the inner-continental shelf from Fenwick Island, Maryland to Fisherman s Island, Virginia, USA. These data are classified according to Barnhardt and others (1998) bottom-type classification system, which was modified to highlight changes in secondary sediment-types such as mud and gravel across this primarily sandy shelf. Most of the geophysical and sample data used to create this interpretive layer were collected as part of the Linking Coastal Processes and Vulnerability: Assateague Island Regional Study project (GS2-2C), supported by the U.S. Department of the Interior Hurricane Sandy Recovery program. Additional sample data were provided by the Maryland Geological Survey and the Virginia Division of Geology and Mineral Resources. Additional hydrographic data were available through the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration s National Ocean Service surveys collected between 2006 and 2014. The primary objective of the Hurricane Sandy Recovery program is to provide science for coastal resilience, and these interpretive data support the program goal by supplying regional geologic framework information for the management of coastal and marine resources. Accurate data and maps of seafloor geology are important first steps toward protecting fish habitat, delineating marine resources on the inner-shelf, understanding sediment transport pathways, and assessing environmental changes because of natural or human effects. The Assateague Island Regional Study project is focused on the inner-continental shelf of Maryland and Virginia, north of Chesapeake Bay entrance. Data collected during the mapping portion of this study have been released in a series of USGS data releases (https://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/project-pages/delmarva/). A combination of geophysical and sample data including high resolution bathymetry, acoustic-backscatter intensity, bottom photographs, and sediment samples are used to create this seafloor interpretation.
USGS open file report 2015-1153 Physiographic Zones from Nahant to NH. The zip file contains a shapefile (Nahant_NH_pzones), a browse graphic (pzones_browse.png) and FGDC CSDGM metadata files in four standard formats. | 2015
Elizabeth E. Pendleton; Walter A. Barnhardt; Wayne E. Baldwin; David S. Foster; William C. Schwab; Brian D. Andrews; Seth D. Ackerman
These data are qualitatively derived interpretive polygon shapefiles defining sediment type and distribution, and physiographic zones of the sea floor from Nahant to Salisbury, Massachusetts. Many of the geophysical data used to create the interpretive layers were collected under a cooperative agreement among the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Initiated in 2003, the primary objective of this program is to develop regional geologic framework information for the management of coastal and marine resources. Accurate data and maps of seafloor-geology are important first steps toward protecting fish habitat, delineating marine resources, and assessing environmental changes because of natural or human effects. The project is focused on the inshore waters of coastal Massachusetts. Data collected during the mapping cooperative involving the USGS have been released in a series of USGS Open-File Reports (https://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/project-pages/coastal_mass/geophydata.html). The interpretations released in this study are for an area extending from the southern tip of Nahant north to Salisbury, Massachusetts. A combination of geophysical and sample data including high-resolution bathymetry and lidar, acoustic-backscatter intensity, seismic-reflection profiles, bottom photographs, and sediment samples was used to create the data interpretations. Most of the nearshore geophysical and sample data (including the bottom photographs) were collected during several cruises between 2000 and 2008. More information about the cruises and the data collected can be found at the Geologic Mapping of the Massachusetts Sea Floor Web page: https://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/project-pages/coastal_mass/.
Open-File Report | 2000
Jenna C. Hill; William C. Schwab; David S. Foster
This DVD-ROM contains digital high resolution seismic reflection data collected during the USGS SEAX 96004 cruise. The coverage is the nearshore of the New York and New Jersey Apex. The seismic-reflection data are stored as SEG-Y standard format that can be read and manipulated by most seismic-processing software. Much of the information specific to the data are contained in the headers of the SEG-Y format files. The file system format is UDF (Universal Disc Format--ISO 9660 equivalent) which can be read with DOS, Unix, and MAC operating systems with the appropriate DVD-ROM driver software installed.
Journal of Coastal Research | 2000
William C. Schwab; E. Robert Thieler; James R. Allen; David S. Foster; B. Ann Swift; Jane F. Denny
Marine Geology | 2005
David J. Mallinson; Stan Riggs; E. Robert Thieler; Stephen J. Culver; Kathleen M. Farrell; David S. Foster; D. Reide Corbett; Benjamin P. Horton; John F. Wehmiller
Marine Geology | 2010
David J. Mallinson; Stephen J. Culver; Stanley R. Riggs; E. Robert Thieler; David S. Foster; John F. Wehmiller; Kathleen M. Farrell; Jessica Pierson