Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David Saunders is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David Saunders.


Consciousness and Cognition | 2016

Lucid dreaming incidence: A quality effects meta-analysis of 50 years of research

David Saunders; Chris A Roe; Graham Smith; Helen Clegg

We report a quality effects meta-analysis on studies from the period 1966-2016 measuring either (a) lucid dreaming prevalence (one or more lucid dreams in a lifetime); (b) frequent lucid dreaming (one or more lucid dreams in a month) or both. A quality effects meta-analysis allows for the minimisation of the influence of study methodological quality on overall model estimates. Following sensitivity analysis, a heterogeneous lucid dreaming prevalence data set of 34 studies yielded a mean estimate of 55%, 95% C. I. [49%, 62%] for which moderator analysis showed no systematic bias for suspected sources of variability. A heterogeneous lucid dreaming frequency data set of 25 studies yielded a mean estimate of 23%, 95% C. I. [20%, 25%], moderator analysis revealed no suspected sources of variability. These findings are consistent with earlier estimates of lucid dreaming prevalence and frequent lucid dreaming in the population but are based on more robust evidence.


Dreaming | 2017

Exploring the role of need for cognition, field independence and locus of control on the incidence of lucid dreams during a 12 week induction study

David Saunders; Helen Clegg; Chris A Roe; Graham Smith

This article reports an investigation of 2 proposed theories, the predispositional and experiential, regarding the association of personality variables to lucid dreaming incidence during a 12-week lucid dreaming induction program. The study found no differences between those who did and did not report lucid dreams during the program on baseline measures of field independence, locus of control or need for cognition. There was an observed significant change toward a field independent orientation between baseline and posttests for those successful at inducing a lucid dream; with no statistically significant differences for either Locus of Control or Need for Cognition. Results suggest that field independence may not be a predispositional characteristic for the successful induction of lucid dreaming, but an experiential result of having lucid dream experiences. The authors conclude that experiences within a dream state may have appreciable effects on waking cognition.


Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing | 2018

Remote viewing of concealed target pictures under light and dark conditions

Stanley Krippner; David Saunders; Angel Morgan; Alan Quan

Context: The belief that performing a nonlocal task in darkness plays a facilitating role in remote viewing and other psi‐related phenomena is well established in esoteric and traditional beliefs (Grim, 1983; Hallowell, 1942; Lyon, 2012). However, the role of darkness in RV success is unclear beyond these esoteric explanations. Objective: This study explored the differential effect of darkness/light on remote viewing ability alongside the effect of time and their potential interaction. Design: From an initial sample of twenty, seven remote viewers contributed a total of nineteen sessions each (nine light/ten dark) which utilised randomized target selection, free‐response descriptions, and ratings by both participants and an independent judge. Results: The usable data gave the edge to dark condition performance; the difference was not statistically significant. A statistically significant difference between remote viewer and independent judge raw scores attributed to the target image was identified (t (132) = 4.56, p <.001 (two‐tailed) Mdiff = 14.21 [8.05, 20.4]) with a medium effect size (d = 0.40 [0.21, 0.57]). Exploratory post‐hoc analyses concerning the numinosity of target images were conducted, to determine if this characteristic was associated with success. For numinosity ratings of target images, a mean difference of 11.24, 95% CI [0.12, 22.3] was shown as significant, with the target images of participant ‘hit’ sessions containing higher numinosity ratings than unsuccessful ‘miss’ sessions (t (11.47) = 2.22, p (two‐tailed) = .048) with a large effect size (d = 1.02, [0.01, 1.99]). Conclusion: The findings may have implications for the use of participant judgments in future remote viewing research. Furthermore, because there are several advantages to what parapsychologists refer to as “free response” targets as opposed to “forced choice” targets (Honorton, 1975), the findings for target numinosity may have implications for the future selection of target material.


Archive | 2017

Sensory isolation in floatation tanks as a method for promoting psi-conducive imagery

Callum E Cooper; David Saunders


Archive | 2017

A pilot study of floatation tanks and sensory isolation in producing psi conducive imagery

Callum E Cooper; David Saunders


Archive | 2016

Making things happen: The Society for Psychical Research 69th Study Day

Callum E Cooper; David Saunders


Archive | 2015

Hidden gems: lessons learned and benefits gained from the preservation and proliferation of historical documents

Callum E Cooper; David Saunders


Archive | 2015

Dreaming of the dead: evidence of survival?

David Saunders; Callum E Cooper


Archive | 2015

Establishing the CSAPP archives and survival case collections from the Eileen J. Garrett library

David Saunders; Rachel Evenden; Callum E Cooper


Archive | 2015

In defence of inferential statistics

Peter E. Morris; Catherine O. Fritz; Graham Smith; Amar Cherchar; Robin G M Crockett; Chris A Roe; Roz Collings; Kimberley M Hill; David Saunders; Martin Anderson; Lucy Atkinson

Collaboration


Dive into the David Saunders's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris A Roe

University of Northampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graham Smith

University of Northampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen Clegg

University of Northampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachel Evenden

University of Northampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan Quan

California State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge