David Snead

Analysis of 1-Year Clinical Outcomes in the SIRIUS Trial A Randomized Trial of a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus a Standard Stent in Patients at High Risk for Coronary Restenosis

Background—This study evaluated a large group of patients enrolled in a double-blind randomized trial of the sirolimus-eluting stent to document whether the initial clinical improvement seen in previous smaller series is maintained out to 12 months and to study the potential treatment effect in patient subsets known to be at increased risk of restenosis. Methods and Results—A total of 1058 patients with de novo native coronary stenosis undergoing clinically indicated percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to sirolimus-eluting stent (533) or control bare stent (525). Procedural success and in-hospital outcomes were excellent and did not differ between the 2 groups. At 9 months, clinical restenosis, defined as target-lesion revascularization, was 4.1% in the sirolimus limb versus 16.6% in the control limb (P <0.001). At 12 months, the absolute difference in target-lesion revascularization continued to increase and was 4.9% versus 20% (P <0.001). There were no differences in death or myocardial infarction rates. In high-risk patient subsets, defined by vessel size, lesion length, and presence of diabetes mellitus, there was a 70% to 80% reduction in clinical restenosis at 1 year. Conclusions—Placement of the sirolimus-eluting stent results in continued clinical improvement at 1 year after initial implantation, with significant reduction in clinical restenosis as defined by target-lesion revascularization. Between 9 and 12 months, the absolute reduction of clinical restenosis continues to increase. Even in high-risk subsets of patients, there is a 70% to 80% relative reduction in clinical restenosis at 12 months with this drug-eluting stent.

Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial.

Background— Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have shown promise in improving the outcomes for patients with peripheral artery disease. We compared a paclitaxel-coated balloon with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of symptomatic superficial femoral and popliteal artery disease. Methods and Results— The IN.PACT SFA Trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, randomized trial in which 331 patients with intermittent claudication or ischemic rest pain attributable to superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with DCB or PTA. The primary efficacy end point was primary patency, defined as freedom from restenosis or clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Mean lesion length and the percentage of total occlusions for the DCB and PTA arms were 8.94±4.89 and 8.81±5.12 cm (P=0.82) and 25.8% and 19.5% (P=0.22), respectively. DCB resulted in higher primary patency versus PTA (82.2% versus 52.4%; P<0.001). The rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 2.4% in the DCB arm in comparison with 20.6% in the PTA arm (P<0.001). There was a low rate of vessel thrombosis in both arms (1.4% after DCB and 3.7% after PTA [P=0.10]). There were no device- or procedure-related deaths and no major amputations. Conclusions— In this prospective, multicenter, randomized trial, DCB was superior to PTA and had a favorable safety profile for the treatment of patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique Identifiers: NCT01175850 and NCT01566461.

Drug-Eluting Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Arterial Revascularization in Critical Limb Ischemia 12-Month Results From the IN.PACT DEEP Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND Drug-eluting balloons (DEB) may reduce infrapopliteal restenosis and reintervention rates versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and improve wound healing/limb preservation. OBJECTIVES The goal of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of IN.PACT Amphirion drug-eluting balloons (IA-DEB) compared to PTA for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS Within a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial with independent clinical event adjudication and angiographic and wound core laboratories 358 CLI patients were randomized 2:1 to IA-DEB or PTA. The 2 coprimary efficacy endpoints through 12 months were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and late lumen loss (LLL). The primary safety endpoint through 6 months was a composite of all-cause mortality, major amputation, and CD-TLR. RESULTS Clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Significant baseline differences between the IA-DEB and PTA arms included mean lesion length (10.2 cm vs. 12.9 cm; p = 0.002), impaired inflow (40.7% vs. 28.8%; p = 0.035), and previous target limb revascularization (32.2% vs. 21.8%; p = 0.047). Primary efficacy results of IA-DEB versus PTA were CD-TLR of 9.2% versus 13.1% (p = 0.291) and LLL of 0.61 ± 0.78 mm versus 0.62 ± 0.78 mm (p = 0.950). Primary safety endpoints were 17.7% versus 15.8% (p = 0.021) and met the noninferiority hypothesis. A safety signal driven by major amputations through 12 months was observed in the IA-DEB arm versus the PTA arm (8.8% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.080). CONCLUSIONS In patients with CLI, IA-DEB had comparable efficacy to PTA. While primary safety was met, there was a trend towards an increased major amputation rate through 12 months compared to PTA. (Study of IN.PACT Amphirion™ Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA for the Treatment of Below the Knee Critical Limb Ischemia [INPACT-DEEP]; NCT00941733).

The Nitinol SMART stent vs Wallstent for suboptimal iliac artery angioplasty: CRISP-US trial results.

PURPOSE The Cordis Randomized Iliac Stent Project-US (CRISP-US) trial evaluated, with an equivalence design, the performance of the shape memory alloy recoverable technology (SMART) nitinol self-expanding stent and the stainless steel Wallstent for treating iliac artery disease after suboptimal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS This multicenter, prospective, randomized trial comprised 203 patients with chronic limb ischemia who received either the SMART stent (n = 102) or the Wallstent (n = 101) after suboptimal PTA. The primary equivalence end point was a composite of 9-month restenosis, 30-day death, and 9-month target vessel revascularization. Functional, clinical, and hemodynamic assessments were made at hospital discharge and at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS The 9-month composite end point rate was equivalent for the SMART stent and Wallstent (6.9% vs 5.9%), with low rates of restenosis (3.5% vs 2.7%), death (2.0% vs 0.0%), and revascularization (2.0% vs 4.0%) in the two groups. Primary patency at 12 months was 94.7% and 91.1% with the SMART stent and Wallstent, respectively. Functional and hemodynamic improvement was also comparable between the groups. The acute procedural success rate was higher in the SMART stent group (98.2% vs 87.5%; P =.002). The frequency of major adverse events was similar at 1 year (4.9% vs 5.9%). CONCLUSIONS The performance of the SMART stent was equivalent to that of the Wallstent for treating iliac artery stenosis. The design characteristics of the SMART stent may contribute to greater procedural success and more accurate stent deployment.

Sirolimus PK trial: A pharmacokinetic study of the sirolimus-eluting Bx Velocity stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions

This study was conducted to assess the systemic drug release and distribution of sirolimus‐eluting stents. Early results with sirolimus‐eluting stents have demonstrated a favorable outcome for reducing restenosis post coronary intervention. However, the clinical systemic pharmacokinetics of sirolimus released from these stents has not been investigated. Sirolimus‐eluting stents (150–178 mcg/18 mm stent) were implanted in 19 patients with coronary artery disease using standard techniques. Blood samples were obtained at multiple times to determine the kinetics of sirolimus release and elimination. Non‐compartmental analysis showed that the maximum blood concentration of sirolimus occurred between 3 and 4 hr after implantation, with a peak concentration of 0.57 ± 0.12 ng/mL (mean ± SD) and 1.05 ± 0.39 ng/mL in patients receiving one or two stents, respectively. Terminal‐phase elimination half‐life was independent of the number of stents and averaged at 213 hr, a value longer than that seen in patients following oral dosing. The apparent clearance was 1.46 ± 0.45 L/hr with an apparent volume of distribution in the terminal phase of 407 ± 111 L (data for both stent doses pooled). Minimal measurable blood levels were detectable at 7 days. Peak whole blood level following sirolimus stent implantation in humans is proportional to the number of stents implanted. The prolonged terminal half‐life may reflect kinetics of blood clearance combined with continued drug elution and secondary local tissue release.