David W. Ferguson

Sympathoinhibitory responses to digitalis glycosides in heart failure patients. Direct evidence from sympathetic neural recordings.

Digitalis glycosides exert both excitatory and inhibitory autonomic actions in animals and produce vasoconstriction in normal humans but produce vasodilation in heart failure patients. To determine whether or not these contrasting vascular responses are due to differing autonomic actions of the drug, we compared the responses to intravenous administration of Cedilanid-D (0.02 mg/kg) in eight normal subjects (mean age, 23 +/- 1 years) and eight patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure (mean age, 52 +/- 5 years, NYHA Class III-IV). Hemodynamics and efferent sympathetic nerve activity to muscle (MSNA) were measured during 5-minute periods before (control) and 20 minutes after drug administration. In the heart failure patients, Cedilanid-D significantly increased systolic and pulse pressures, whereas mean arterial pressure was unchanged. There was a decrease in right atrial pressure and a tendency for a decrease in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure with a slowing of heart rate. Cardiac index increased by 24 +/- 7%. Short-term administration of digitalis in these heart failure patients produced a fall in forearm vascular resistance (from 37.6 +/- 8.2 to 31.8 +/- 8.1 units, p less than 0.05) and an early, profound, and sustained decrease in MSNA (from 831.0 +/- 118.4 to 474.4 +/- 103.6 units/100 heart beats, p less than 0.01). Digitalis glycosides produced different vascular and MSNA responses in the normal subjects. In the normal volunteers, the drug significantly increased systolic, mean, and pulse pressures and decreased central venous pressure and heart rate. Despite the significant increase in arterial pressure, there was no change in forearm vascular resistance (from 11.7 +/- 1.0 to 12.7 +/- 1.0 units, p = NS) or MSNA (from 494.8 +/- 88.5 to 369.1 +/- 60.5 units/100 heart beats, p = NS), suggesting a sympathoexcitatory response in normal subjects. To determine whether or not the digitalis-induced sympathoinhibition in the heart failure patients was simply due to an inotropic effect (stimulation of inhibitory cardiac mechanoreceptors), we studied the responses of seven additional patients with heart failure before and during administration of dobutamine (3.4 +/- 0.4 micrograms/kg/min). Dobutamine produced a 34 +/- 3% increase in cardiac index, no significant change in systemic arterial pressures, a decrease in pulmonary artery diastolic and right atrial pressures, and no change in heart rate or forearm vascular resistance (from 30.2 +/- 4.3 to 26.5 +/- 4.7 units, p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical and hemodynamic correlates of sympathetic nerve activity in normal humans and patients with heart failure: Evidence from direct micronenrographic recordings

Abstract To characterize the neural excitatory state of heart failure, simultaneous measurements of efferent sympathetic nerve activity to muscle (by microneurography) and rest hemodynamics were obtained in 10 normal subjects (age 25 ± 2 years, mean ± SEM) and 29 patients with heart failure (age 49 ± 2 years; New York Heart Association functional class II to IV; left ventricular ejection fraction 21 ± 1%; cardiac index = 2.16 ± 0.13 liters/min per m 2 ; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 23 ± 2 mm Hg). Sympathetic nerve activity was significantly higher in the patients with heart failure (54.7 ± 4.5 bursts/min) than in normal subjects (16.7 ± 2.2 bursts/min, p Multiple linear regression analyses indicated that sympathetic activity in these human subjects was most strongly and inversely correlated with left ventricular stroke work index (r = −0.86, p Direct measurements of sympathetic nerve activity correlated closely with plasma norepinephrine (r = 0.72, p

Clinical, hemodynamic and sympathetic neural correlates of heart rate variability in congestive heart failure

Heart rate (HR) variability has long been recognized as a sign of cardiac health. In the presence of heart disease, HR variability decreases, an observation that has been associated with poor prognosis in a number of recent studies. HR variability is particularly altered in congestive heart failure (CHF), a condition associated with a number of typical functional hemodynamic and neurohumoral alterations. The relation of measurements of HR variability to these abnormalities in patients with heart failure has not been carefully examined. Twenty-three patients (19 men, 4 women, mean age 49 years) with New York Heart Association class II to IV CHF were studied prospectively without cardiac medications; radionuclide ventriculography, right-sided heart catheterization, peroneal microneurography, plasma norepinephrine and 24- to 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiography were performed. Average RR interval and its standard deviation, and HR power spectrum (0 to 0.5, 0.05 to 0.15 and 0.2 to 0.5 Hz) were derived from the ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings and compared with left ventricular ejection fraction, thermodilution cardiac output, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, New York Heart Association class, age, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (peroneal nerve) and norepinephrine level by linear regression. None of the measures of HR variability were significantly related to age, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac output or functional classification, whereas the 0.05 to 0.15 and 0.20 to 0.50 Hz components were weakly but significantly related to cardiac output (r = 0.49 and 0.42, p = 0.02 and 0.045, respectively). In contrast, a generally stronger and negative relation was demonstrated between spectral and nonspectral measurements of HR variability, and indicators of sympathoexcitation, muscle sympathetic nerve activity and plasma norepinephrine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Selective impairment of baroreflex-mediated vasoconstrictor responses in patients with ventricular dysfunction.

Cardiac dysfunction in animals has been associated with impairment of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of the circulation. Chronic heart failure in human beings is associated with neurohumoral excitation, which could result in part from impairment in the inhibitory influence of baroreflexes. We postulated that (1) patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) have impaired baroreflex modulation of vascular resistance and (2) administration of a digitalis glycoside would immediately restore baroreflex sensitivity. Eleven patients with LVD (NYHA class, 2.8 +/- 0.2, mean +/- SEM; baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, 18 +/- 2%; cardiac index, 2.4 +/- 0.21/min/m2; and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 26.0 +/- 3.2 mm Hg) were compared with 17 normal control subjects. We measured forearm vasoconstrictor responses to simulated orthostatic stress with use of lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -10 and -40 mm Hg to unload cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptors. Baseline forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was higher in patients with LVD than in normal subjects: FVRLVD, 68.8 +/- 15.3 U; FVRN, 23.2 +/- 2.1 U (p less than .001). During unloading of baroreceptors with LBNP -10 mm Hg, normal subjects developed vasoconstriction (delta VRN at LBNP -10 mm Hg, +5.7 +/- 1.6 U) but patients with LVD failed to have vasoconstriction and tended to develop vasodilation (delta FVRLVD at LBNP -10 mm Hg, -8.6 +/- 8.5 U) (p = .05, normals vs patients with LVD at LBNP -10 mm Hg). A more marked disparity in response was seen during unloading of baroreceptors of LBNP -40 mm Hg: delta FVRN at LBNP -40 mm Hg, +16.6 +/- 1.5 U; delta FVRLVD at LBNP -40 mm Hg, -10.3 +/- 9.6 U (p less than .001, normals vs patients with LVD). Despite high baseline values for FVR, patients with LVD developed vasoconstriction during intra-arterial infusions of norepinephrine, thereby excluding a nonspecific depression of vascular reactivity as the mechanism for abnormal responses to LBNP in patients with LVD. We also studied the short-term effects of administration of a digitalis glycoside, ouabain 0.0075 mg/kg (seven patients) or lanatoside C (Cedilanid-D) 0.02 mg/kg (three patients), on baroreflex-mediated vasoconstrictor responses to LBNP in the patients with LVD. Digitalis glycoside reduced baseline FVR from 71.8 +/- 16.6 to 48.6 +/- 12.0 U (p less than .02). Responses to LBNP tended to be normalized after administration of digitalis glycoside: delta FVR during LBNP -40 mm Hg, -11.1 +/- 10.5 U before and +7.8 +/- 5.6 U after the drug (p less than .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effects of heart failure on baroreflex control of sympathetic neural activity

Baroreflex control of heart rate, vascular resistance and norepinephrine is impaired in patients with heart failure, but recent animal studies demonstrate preserved baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity in this disorder. Studies were therefore performed to compare baroreflex control of efferent sympathetic nerve activity to muscle in 10 normal subjects (age mean +/- SEM 21 +/- 1 years) and in 11 patients with moderate to severe heart failure (age 48 +/- 5 years, New York Heart Association class II to IV, left ventricular ejection fraction 19 +/- 2%, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 27 +/- 2 mm Hg, cardiac index 2.04 +/- 0.22 liters/min/m2). Baroreflex activation was produced by intravenous infusion of phenylephrine (0.5 to 2.0 micrograms/kg/min) and deactivation by infusion of nitroprusside (0.4 to 2.5 micrograms/kg/min). During phenylephrine infusion, comparable increases in mean arterial pressure were produced in normal subjects (89 +/- 2 to 99 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and in patients with heart failure (90 +/- 2 to 99 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.01). The patients with heart failure exhibited significantly attenuated (p less than 0.01 for normal vs heart failure) decreases in heart rate (93 +/- 5 to 90 +/- 6 beats/min, p = not significant [NS]) compared with normal subjects (67 +/- 3 to 58 +/- 4 beats/min, p less than 0.01) and tended to demonstrate attenuated sympathoinhibitory responses to this pressor stimulus. More strikingly, patients with heart failure demonstrated significant impairment of baroreflex responses during nitroprusside-induced baroreceptor deactivation. In normal subjects, nitroprusside produced a decrease in mean arterial (90 +/- 2 to 80 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.001) and right atrial (4 +/- 1 to 2 +/- 1 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) pressures with a resultant reflex increase in heart rate (68 +/- 3 to 81 +/- 4 beats/min, p less than 0.001) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (326 +/- 74 to 746 +/- 147 U/min, p less than 0.01). In patients with heart failure (n = 10), nitroprusside produced comparable (p = NS for normal vs heart failure) decreases in mean arterial (89 +/- 2 to 77 +/- 2 mm Hg, p less than 0.001) and right atrial (6 +/- 1 to 1 +/- 1 mm Hg, p less than 0.001) pressures, but did not significantly alter heart rate (91 +/- 6 to 97 +/- 4 beats/min, p = NS) or sympathetic nerve activity (936 +/- 155 to 1179 +/- 275 U/min, p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Self-adhesive preapplied electrode pads for defibrillation and cardioversion

The efficacy of self-adhesive electrode pads for defibrillation and cardioversion was assessed in 80 patients who received 267 shocks from self-adhesive pads. In all but two patients, defibrillation or cardioversion was achieved at least once. The pads were equally effective when used in the apex-anterior or apex-posterior position. The transthoracic impedance using self-adhesive pads was 75 +/- 21 ohms (mean +/- standard deviation), which is similar to previously reported transthoracic impedance in defibrillation, using standard hand-held electrode paddles of 67 +/- 36 ohms. It is concluded that self-adhesive electrode pads are effective for defibrillation and cardioversion.

Evidence for cholinergically mediated vasodilation at the beginning of isometric exercise in humans.

Vasodilation occurs in the nonexercising forearm at the beginning of isometric handgrip despite activation of sympathetic vasoconstrictor reflexes. The mechanism of this response remains unclear. In 33 normal humans, age 24 +/- 1 years (mean +/- SEM), we measured mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and forearm blood flow (plethysmography) in the nonexercising arm during sustained contralateral isometric handgrip at 30% maximal voluntary contraction. Sympathetic nerve activity to calf muscles (microneurography) was also measured in 15 subjects. Handgrip resulted in increases in arterial pressure from 86 +/- 2 to 97 +/- 3 mm Hg (p less than 0.05). Despite increases in nerve activity to calf muscles from 229 +/- 43 to 337 +/- 66 units (p less than 0.005), which would be expected to produce forearm vasoconstriction, forearm vascular resistance in the contralateral resting arm decreased from 20 +/- 3 to 18 +/- 2 units (p less than 0.05). To determine the mechanism of this vasodilatory influence, additional studies were performed with regional autonomic blockade with intra-arterial administration of atropine (0.8 mg, 10 subjects) or propranolol (2.0 mg, eight subjects) into the nonexercising forearm before contraction. Propranolol and vehicle had no effect on forearm vascular responses in the resting arm during SHG in the other arm. In contrast, atropine blocked the vasodilatory response in the resting arm during contraction (delta forearm vascular resistance during contraction, control = -2.1 +/- 0.6 units; postatropine = +0.2 +/- 0.9 units, p less than 0.05). Atropine did not attenuate the vasodilator response to isoproterenol or the vasoconstrictor response to norepinephrine. We conclude 1) a dissociation exists between sympathetic neural and forearm vascular responses to isometric exercise; 2) the vasodilatory response in the nonexercising forearm is not due to sympathetic withdrawal or beta 2-adrenergic-mediated vasodilation; and 3) this response is mediated primarily by cholinergic mechanisms. These studies provide the first direct evidence for active, cholinergically mediated vasodilation during exercise in humans.

Arterial baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity during elevation of blood pressure in normal man: dominance of aortic baroreflexes.

Arterial baroreceptors in the carotid sinus (CBR) and aortic arch (ABR) regions exert important control over heart rate and peripheral vascular responses to changes in arterial pressure. The relative roles of these two baroreflex pathways on control of sympathetic nerve activity during sustained elevation of arterial pressure in man is unknown. We therefore studied the relative contributions of the carotid versus the aortic baroreflexes on the control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during elevation of arterial pressure in normal human subjects. In eight normal men (group I), we measured MSNA (microneurography) during sustained elevation of arterial pressure produced by intravenous infusion of phenylephrine (PE) alone (combined ABR and CBR activation) versus during PE infusion with superimposed application of sustained external neck pressure (NP). NP was applied during sustained PE infusion to eliminate the increase in transmural carotid sinus pressure and thus remove CBR activation, thereby causing ABR stimulation alone. Mean arterial pressure was measured directly, central venous pressure was held constant during PE infusion, and MSNA was measured as total activity (burst frequency X amplitude) and expressed as units. Infusion of PE (ABR and CBR activation) increased mean arterial pressure from 87.2 +/- 2.8 to 94.9 +/- 2.9 mm Hg (+/- SE, p less than .001). This was accompanied by a decrease in heart rate from 65.8 +/- 3.4 to 56.1 +/- 3.3 beats/min (p less than .001) and a decrease in MSNA from 236.2 +/- 47.5 to 84.5 +/- 19.3 units (p less than .001). During infusion of PE with superimposed NP (ABR activation alone), mean arterial pressure increased further to 101.2 +/- 2.9 mm Hg (p less than .001 versus control or PE alone), and heart rate returned to control levels of 62.9 +/- 2.0 beats/min (p = NS vs control; p less than .01 PE vs PE plus NP), but MSNA remained reduced at 48.6 +/- 9.2 units (p less than .01 vs control; p = NS vs PE alone). Thus, combined activation of ABR and CBR resulted in a 65 +/- 5% attenution of MSNA, while activation of ABR alone resulted in a 73 +/- 7% attenuation of MSNA. In a separate series of experiments in seven subjects (group II) we used sustained external neck suction alone to activate the CBR (leaving the ABR either unchanged or minimally deactivated) and studied the MSNA responses to this CBR activation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Importance of aortic baroreflex in regulation of sympathetic responses during hypotension. Evidence from direct sympathetic nerve recordings in humans.

Arterial baroreceptors in the carotid sinus and aortic arch regions reflexly regulate heart rate and peripheral vascular responses during changes in arterial pressure. The relative influence of these two arterial baroreflex pathways on the control of these autonomic responses is debatable. Recent studies in our laboratory demonstrate that the aortic baroreflex produces substantial and sustained inhibition of efferent sympathetic nerve activity to muscle (MSNA) during increases in arterial pressure. The regulation of MSNA by these two baroreflexes in humans during hypotension, and particularly the role of the aortic baroreflex, remains undefined. We therefore performed a new series of studies to assess the relative influence of the aortic and carotid baroreflexes on MSNA responses during sustained decreases in arterial pressure. In eight normal male subjects, aged 23 +/- 1 years (mean +/- SEM), we directly measured mean arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure, and MSNA (microneurography) during hypotension (combined aortic and carotid baroreceptor deactivation) produced by intravenous infusion of sodium nitroprusside and during nitroprusside infusion with superimposed application of external neck suction. Neck suction was applied at levels sufficient to maintain transmural carotid sinus pressure above control levels (carotid baroreceptor activation) while the aortic baroreflexes remained deactivated. Central venous pressure was maintained constant with volume infusion. We also studied responses of these same subjects to direct carotid baroreceptor deactivation with the application of external neck pressure. During neck pressure alone, there was a reflex increase in mean arterial pressure; thus, during this portion of the protocol, we achieved carotid baroreceptor deactivation with some aortic baroreceptor activation. Nitroprusside infusion (combined aortic and carotid deactivation) decreased mean arterial pressure from 90.8 +/- 3.1 to 77.8 +/- 1.1 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) with concomitant increases in heart rate from 62.6 +/- 3.0 to 89.7 +/- 6.1 beats/min (p less than 0.001) and in MSNA from 273.8 +/- 43.0 to 950.6 +/- 133.5 units (p less than 0.001). During continued nitroprusside infusion with superimposed neck suction (aortic baroreceptor deactivation and carotid baroreceptor activation), mean arterial pressure decreased to 70.3 +/- 1.9 mm Hg (p less than 0.001 vs. control), heart rate decreased to 82.5 +/- 6.5 beats/min (p less than 0.01 vs. control or vs. nitroprusside alone), but MSNA remained markedly increased at 889.7 +/- 105.1 units (p less than 0.001 vs. control; p = NS vs. nitroprusside alone).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Profound sympathoinhibition complicating hypovolemia in humans

Excerpt Tachycardia, increased sympathetic activity, and peripheral vasoconstriction have been described as the principal reflex adjustments to hypovolemic shock. However, experiments in animals su...