Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where David W. Severson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by David W. Severson.


Science | 2007

Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector

Vishvanath Nene; Jennifer R. Wortman; Daniel John Lawson; Brian J. Haas; Chinnappa D. Kodira; Zhijian Jake Tu; Brendan J. Loftus; Zhiyong Xi; Karyn Megy; Manfred Grabherr; Quinghu Ren; Evgeny M. Zdobnov; Neil F. Lobo; Kathryn S. Campbell; Susan E. Brown; Maria F. Bonaldo; Jingsong Zhu; Steven P. Sinkins; David G. Hogenkamp; Paolo Amedeo; Peter Arensburger; Peter W. Atkinson; Shelby Bidwell; Jim Biedler; Ewan Birney; Robert V. Bruggner; Javier Costas; Monique R. Coy; Jonathan Crabtree; Matt Crawford

We present a draft sequence of the genome of Aedes aegypti, the primary vector for yellow fever and dengue fever, which at ∼1376 million base pairs is about 5 times the size of the genome of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Nearly 50% of the Ae. aegypti genome consists of transposable elements. These contribute to a factor of ∼4 to 6 increase in average gene length and in sizes of intergenic regions relative to An. gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster. Nonetheless, chromosomal synteny is generally maintained among all three insects, although conservation of orthologous gene order is higher (by a factor of ∼2) between the mosquito species than between either of them and the fruit fly. An increase in genes encoding odorant binding, cytochrome P450, and cuticle domains relative to An. gambiae suggests that members of these protein families underpin some of the biological differences between the two mosquito species.


Science | 2007

Evolutionary dynamics of immune-related genes and pathways in disease-vector mosquitoes

Robert M. Waterhouse; Evgenia V. Kriventseva; Stephan Meister; Zhiyong Xi; Kanwal S. Alvarez; Lyric C. Bartholomay; Carolina Barillas-Mury; Guowu Bian; Stéphanie Blandin; Bruce M. Christensen; Yuemei Dong; Haobo Jiang; Michael R. Kanost; Anastasios C. Koutsos; Elena A. Levashina; Jianyong Li; Petros Ligoxygakis; Robert M. MacCallum; George F. Mayhew; Antonio M. Mendes; Kristin Michel; Mike A. Osta; Susan M. Paskewitz; Sang Woon Shin; Dina Vlachou; Lihui Wang; Weiqi Wei; Liangbiao Zheng; Zhen Zou; David W. Severson

Mosquitoes are vectors of parasitic and viral diseases of immense importance for public health. The acquisition of the genome sequence of the yellow fever and Dengue vector, Aedes aegypti (Aa), has enabled a comparative phylogenomic analysis of the insect immune repertoire: in Aa, the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae (Ag), and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Dm). Analysis of immune signaling pathways and response modules reveals both conservative and rapidly evolving features associated with different functional gene categories and particular aspects of immune reactions. These dynamics reflect in part continuous readjustment between accommodation and rejection of pathogens and suggest how innate immunity may have evolved.


Science | 2010

Sequencing of Culex quinquefasciatus establishes a platform for mosquito comparative genomics.

Peter Arensburger; Karine Megy; Robert M. Waterhouse; Jenica Abrudan; Paolo Amedeo; Beatriz García Antelo; Lyric C. Bartholomay; Shelby Bidwell; Elisabet Caler; Francisco Camara; Corey L. Campbell; Kathryn S. Campbell; Claudio Casola; Marta T. Castro; Ishwar Chandramouliswaran; Sinéad B. Chapman; Scott Christley; Javier Costas; Eric Eisenstadt; Cédric Feschotte; Claire M. Fraser-Liggett; Roderic Guigó; Brian J. Haas; Martin Hammond; Bill S. Hansson; Janet Hemingway; Sharon R. Hill; Clint Howarth; Rickard Ignell; Ryan C. Kennedy

Closing the Vector Circle The genome sequence of Culex quinquefasciatus offers a representative of the third major genus of mosquito disease vectors for comparative analysis. In a major international effort, Arensburger et al. (p. 86) uncovered divergences in the C. quinquefasciatus genome compared with the representatives of the other two genera Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae. The main difference noted is the expansion of numbers of genes, particularly for immunity, oxidoreductive functions, and digestive enzymes, which may reflect specific aspects of the Culex life cycle. Bartholomay et al. (p. 88) explored infection-response genes in Culex in more depth and uncovered 500 immune response-related genes, similar to the numbers seen in Aedes, but fewer than seen in Anopheles or the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. The higher numbers of genes were attributed partly to expansions in those encoding serpins, C-type lectins, and fibrinogen-related proteins, consistent with greater immune surveillance and associated signaling needed to monitor the dangers of breeding in polluted, urbanized environments. Transcriptome analysis confirmed that inoculation with unfamiliar bacteria prompted strong immune responses in Culex. The worm and virus pathogens that the mosquitoes transmit naturally provoked little immune activation, however, suggesting that tolerance has evolved to any damage caused by replication of the pathogens in the insects. The genome of a third mosquito species reveals distinctions related to vector capacities and habitat preferences. Culex quinquefasciatus (the southern house mosquito) is an important mosquito vector of viruses such as West Nile virus and St. Louis encephalitis virus, as well as of nematodes that cause lymphatic filariasis. C. quinquefasciatus is one species within the Culex pipiens species complex and can be found throughout tropical and temperate climates of the world. The ability of C. quinquefasciatus to take blood meals from birds, livestock, and humans contributes to its ability to vector pathogens between species. Here, we describe the genomic sequence of C. quinquefasciatus: Its repertoire of 18,883 protein-coding genes is 22% larger than that of Aedes aegypti and 52% larger than that of Anopheles gambiae with multiple gene-family expansions, including olfactory and gustatory receptors, salivary gland genes, and genes associated with xenobiotic detoxification.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2009

VectorBase: A Data Resource for Invertebrate Vector Genomics

Daniel John Lawson; Peter Arensburger; Peter W. Atkinson; Nora J. Besansky; Robert V. Bruggner; Ryan Butler; Kathryn S. Campbell; George K. Christophides; Scott Christley; Emmanuel Dialynas; Martin Hammond; Catherine A. Hill; Nathan Konopinski; Neil F. Lobo; Robert M. MacCallum; Gregory R. Madey; Karine Megy; Jason M. Meyer; Seth Redmond; David W. Severson; Eric O. Stinson; Pantelis Topalis; Ewan Birney; William M. Gelbart; Fotis C. Kafatos; Christos Louis; Frank H. Collins

VectorBase (http://www.vectorbase.org) is an NIAID-funded Bioinformatic Resource Center focused on invertebrate vectors of human pathogens. VectorBase annotates and curates vector genomes providing a web accessible integrated resource for the research community. Currently, VectorBase contains genome information for three mosquito species: Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus, a body louse Pediculus humanus and a tick species Ixodes scapularis. Since our last report VectorBase has initiated a community annotation system, a microarray and gene expression repository and controlled vocabularies for anatomy and insecticide resistance. We have continued to develop both the software infrastructure and tools for interrogating the stored data.


Nucleic Acids Research | 2007

VectorBase: a home for invertebrate vectors of human pathogens

Daniel John Lawson; Peter Arensburger; Peter W. Atkinson; Nora J. Besansky; Robert V. Bruggner; Ryan Butler; Kathryn S. Campbell; George K. Christophides; Scott Christley; Emmanuel Dialynas; David B. Emmert; Martin Hammond; Catherine A. Hill; Ryan C. Kennedy; Neil F. Lobo; Robert M. MacCallum; Gregory R. Madey; Karine Megy; Seth Redmond; Susan Russo; David W. Severson; Eric O. Stinson; Pantelis Topalis; Evgeni M. Zdobnov; Ewan Birney; William M. Gelbart; Fotis C. Kafatos; Christos Louis; Frank H. Collins

VectorBase () is a web-accessible data repository for information about invertebrate vectors of human pathogens. VectorBase annotates and maintains vector genomes providing an integrated resource for the research community. Currently, VectorBase contains genome information for two organisms: Anopheles gambiae, a vector for the Plasmodium protozoan agent causing malaria, and Aedes aegypti, a vector for the flaviviral agents causing Yellow fever and Dengue fever.


Evolution | 1997

COSTS AND BENEFITS OF MOSQUITO REFRACTORINESS TO MALARIA PARASITES: IMPLICATIONS FOR GENETIC VARIABILITY OF MOSQUITOES AND GENETIC CONTROL OF MALARIA

Guiyun Yan; David W. Severson; Bruce M. Christensen

The problem of fitness costs associated with host resistance to parasitism is related to the evolution of parasite virulence, population genetic diversity and the dynamics of host‐parasite relationships, and proposed strategies for disease control through the genetic manipulation of mosquito vectors. Two Aedes aegypti populations, refractory and susceptible to Plasmodium gallinaceum, were previously selected from the Moyo‐In‐Dry strain (MOYO) through inbreeding (F = 0.5). Reproductive success and survivorship of the two populations were compared, and the influence of the parasite on mosquito fitness also was evaluated. Fitness components studied include fecundity, adult survivorship and egg‐to‐adult developmental time, blood‐meal size, and adult body size. The refractory population has a significantly shorter egg‐to‐adult developmental time and a smaller body size, takes a smaller blood meal, and subsequently lays fewer eggs than the susceptible population. The mean longevity of the refractory population is significantly shorter than the susceptible population. Exposure to the parasite exhibited little effect on the survivorship and fecundity of either population. Several factors may contribute to the lower fitness of the refractory population, including founder effect, inbreeding depression, the effect of other uncharacterized genes linked to genes conferring refractoriness, and pleiotropic effects associated with these genes. The results are discussed in relation to the genetic diversity of natural mosquito populations and their implications for the genetic control of malaria.


PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases | 2011

Global Cross-Talk of Genes of the Mosquito Aedes aegypti in Response to Dengue Virus Infection

Susanta K. Behura; Consuelo Gomez-Machorro; Brent W. Harker; Becky deBruyn; Diane D. Lovin; Akio Mori; Jeanne Romero-Severson; David W. Severson

Background The mosquito Aedes aegypti is the primary vector of dengue virus (DENV) infection in humans, and DENV is the most important arbovirus across most of the subtropics and tropics worldwide. The early time periods after infection with DENV define critical cellular processes that determine ultimate success or failure of the virus to establish infection in the mosquito. Methods and Results To identify genes involved in these processes, we performed genome-wide transcriptome profiling between susceptible and refractory A. aegypti strains at two critical early periods after challenging them with DENV. Genes that responded coordinately to DENV infection in the susceptible strain were largely clustered in one specific expression module, whereas in the refractory strain they were distributed in four distinct modules. The susceptible response module in the global transcriptional network showed significant biased representation with genes related to energy metabolism and DNA replication, whereas the refractory response modules showed biased representation across different metabolism pathway genes including cytochrome P450 and DDT [1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2-bis(4-chlorophenyl) ethane] degradation genes, and genes associated with cell growth and death. A common core set of coordinately expressed genes was observed in both the susceptible and refractory mosquitoes and included genes related to the Wnt (Wnt: wingless [wg] and integration 1 [int1] pathway), MAPK (Mitogen-activated protein kinase), mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) and JAK-STAT (Janus Kinase - Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription) pathways. Conclusions Our data revealed extensive transcriptional networks of mosquito genes that are expressed in modular manners in response to DENV infection, and indicated that successfully defending against viral infection requires more elaborate gene networks than hosting the virus. These likely play important roles in the global-cross talk among the mosquito host factors during the critical early DENV infection periods that trigger the appropriate host action in susceptible vs. refractory mosquitoes.


Molecular Ecology | 1999

Population genetics of the yellow fever mosquito in Trinidad: comparisons of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers

Guiyun Yan; Jeanne Romero-Severson; M. Walton; Dave D. Chadee; David W. Severson

Recent development of DNA markers provides powerful tools for population genetic analyses. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers result from a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐based DNA fingerprinting technique that can detect multiple restriction fragments in a single polyacrylamide gel, and thus are potentially useful for population genetic studies. Because AFLP markers have to be analysed as dominant loci in order to estimate population genetic diversity and genetic structure parameters, one must assume that dominant (amplified) alleles are identical in state, recessive (unamplified) alleles are identical in state, AFLP fragments segregate according to Mendelian expectations and that the genotypes of an AFLP locus are in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The HWE assumption is untestable for natural populations using dominant markers. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers segregate as codominant alleles, and can therefore be used to test the HWE assumption that is critical for analysing AFLP data. This study examined whether the dominant AFLP markers could provide accurate estimates of genetic variability for the Aedes aegypti mosquito populations of Trinidad, West Indies, by comparing genetic structure parameters using AFLP and RFLP markers. For AFLP markers, we tested a total of five primer combinations and scored 137 putative loci. For RFLP, we examined a total of eight mapped markers that provide a broad coverage of mosquito genome. The estimated average heterozygosity with AFLP markers was similar among the populations (0.39), and the observed average heterozygosity with RFLP markers varied from 0.44 to 0.58. The average FST (standardized among‐population genetic variance) estimates were 0.033 for AFLP and 0.063 for RFLP markers. The genotypes at several RFLP loci were not in HWE, suggesting that the assumption critical for analysing AFLP data was invalid for some loci of the mosquito populations in Trinidad. Therefore, the results suggest that, compared with dominant molecular markers, codominant DNA markers provide better estimates of population genetic variability, and offer more statistical power for detecting population genetic structure.


Biological Reviews | 2013

Codon usage bias: causative factors, quantification methods and genome‐wide patterns: with emphasis on insect genomes

Susanta K. Behura; David W. Severson

Codon usage bias refers to the phenomenon where specific codons are used more often than other synonymous codons during translation of genes, the extent of which varies within and among species. Molecular evolutionary investigations suggest that codon bias is manifested as a result of balance between mutational and translational selection of such genes and that this phenomenon is widespread across species and may contribute to genome evolution in a significant manner. With the advent of whole‐genome sequencing of numerous species, both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, genome‐wide patterns of codon bias are emerging in different organisms. Various factors such as expression level, GC content, recombination rates, RNA stability, codon position, gene length and others (including environmental stress and population size) can influence codon usage bias within and among species. Moreover, there has been a continuous quest towards developing new concepts and tools to measure the extent of codon usage bias of genes. In this review, we outline the fundamental concepts of evolution of the genetic code, discuss various factors that may influence biased usage of synonymous codons and then outline different principles and methods of measurement of codon usage bias. Finally, we discuss selected studies performed using whole‐genome sequences of different insect species to show how codon bias patterns vary within and among genomes. We conclude with generalized remarks on specific emerging aspects of codon bias studies and highlight the recent explosion of genome‐sequencing efforts on arthropods (such as twelve Drosophila species, species of ants, honeybee, Nasonia and Anopheles mosquitoes as well as the recent launch of a genome‐sequencing project involving 5000 insects and other arthropods) that may help us to understand better the evolution of codon bias and its biological significance.


Journal of Parasitology | 1994

REINTERPRETATION OF THE GENETICS OF SUSCEPTIBILITY OF AEDES AEGYPTI TO PLASMODIUM GALLINACEUM

Vandana Thathy; David W. Severson; Bruce M. Christensen

Several studies have demonstrated a genetic basis for variation in susceptibility of Aedes aegypti to Plasmodium gallinaceum. Although 25 yr ago it was reported that P. gallinaceum susceptibility in Ae. aegypti is determined primarily by a single autosomal dominant gene, evidence for additional genetic factors has emerged. Two sublines, 1 refractory and 1 of intermediate susceptibility to P. gallinaceum, have been selected from the Moyo-In-Dry strain (MOYO) of Ae. aegypti. Prior to selection, the MOYO population was 20.3% refractory. Genetic crosses of the highly susceptible Rockefeller strain (ROCK) and the 2 selected sublines of the MOYO strain provide evidence for a complex mode of inheritance of Plasmodium susceptibility in Ae. aegypti.

Collaboration


Dive into the David W. Severson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Akio Mori

University of Notre Dame

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Diane D. Lovin

University of Notre Dame

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Becky deBruyn

University of Notre Dame

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bruce M. Christensen

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ellen Flannery

University of Notre Dame

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil F. Lobo

University of Notre Dame

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge