David Weise
University of Arizona
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by David Weise.
Psychological Science | 2008
David Weise; Tom Pyszczynski; Cathy R. Cox; Jamie Arndt; Jeff Greenberg; Sheldon Solomon; Spee Kosloff
Research on terror management theory (TMT) indicates that reminders of death affect political attitudes, but political orientation only sometimes moderates these effects. We propose that secure relationships are associated with values of tolerance and compassion, thus orienting people toward liberalism; insecure attachments are associated with more rigid and absolutist values that orient people toward conservatism. Given that attachment relationships become especially active when security needs are heightened, we predicted that mortality salience would be an important factor in understanding the relationship between attachment processes and political orientation. Supporting these ideas, Study 1 showed that after a mortality-salience manipulation, securely attached participants increased their support for a liberal presidential candidate, and less securely attached participants increased their support for a conservative presidential candidate. In Study 2, a secure-relationship prime following a mortality-salience manipulation engendered a less violent approach to the problem of terrorism than did a neutral-relationship prime. We discuss the interaction of TMT processes and individual differences in attachment in shaping political preferences.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin | 2010
Spee Kosloff; Jeff Greenberg; Daniel Sullivan; David Weise
Prior terror management research shows that mortality salience (MS) motivates both self-esteem striving and worldview bolstering. The present research examined these processes in the context of dating preferences. It was hypothesized that in short-term romantic contexts, MS-induced self-esteem striving motivates interest in dating a physically attractive other, whereas in long-term romantic contexts, MS-induced motives for worldview validation heighten interest in dating a same-religion other. Study 1 showed that in a short-term dating context, MS increased preference for an attractive but religiously dissimilar person, whereas in a long-term dating context, MS increased preference for a religiously similar, less attractive person. Study 2 clarified that MS motivates preference for attractive short-term partners for their self-enhancing properties rather than their potential sexual availability. Study 3 supported the theorized processes, showing that under MS, self-esteem-relevant constructs became spontaneously accessible in short-term dating contexts, whereas worldview-relevant constructs became spontaneously accessible in long-term dating contexts.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General | 2010
Spee Kosloff; Jeff Greenberg; Toni Schmader; Mark Dechesne; David Weise
Four studies investigated whether political allegiance and salience of outgroup membership contribute to the phenomenon of acceptance of false, stigmatizing information (smears) about political candidates. Studies 1-3 were conducted in the month prior to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election and together demonstrated that pre-standing opposition to John McCain or Barack Obama, as well as the situational salience of differentiating social categories (i.e., for Obama, race; for McCain, age), contributed to the implicit activation and explicit endorsement of smearing labels (i.e., Obama is Muslim; McCain is senile). The influence of salient differentiating categories on smear acceptance was particularly pronounced among politically undecided individuals. Study 4 clarified that social category differences heighten smear acceptance, even if the salient category is semantically unrelated to the smearing label, showing that, approximately 1 year after the election, the salience of race amplified belief that Obama is a socialist among undecided people and McCain supporters. Taken together, these findings suggest that, at both implicit and explicit cognitive levels, social category differences and political allegiance contribute to acceptance of smears against political candidates.
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin | 2006
Tom Pyszczynski; Abdolhossein Abdollahi; Sheldon Solomon; Jeff Greenberg; Florette Cohen; David Weise
Psychology and Aging | 2007
Molly Maxfield; Tom Pyszczynski; Benjamin Kluck; Cathy R. Cox; Jeff Greenberg; Sheldon Solomon; David Weise
European Journal of Social Psychology | 2007
Cathy R. Cox; Jamie L. Goldenberg; Tom Pyszczynski; David Weise
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | 2011
Matt Motyl; Joshua Hart; Tom Pyszczynski; David Weise; Molly Maxfield; Angelika Siedel
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | 2010
Spee Kosloff; Jeff Greenberg; David Weise; Sheldon Solomon
European Psychologist | 2012
David Weise; Thomas Arciszewski; Jean François Verlhiac; Tom Pyszczynski; Jeff Greenberg
International Journal of Aging & Human Development | 2014
Molly Maxfield; Jeff Greenberg; Tom Pyszczynski; David Weise; Spee Kosloff; Melissa Soenke; Andrew A. Abeyta; Jamin Blatter