Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dawn Swancutt is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dawn Swancutt.


Health Economics | 2012

Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations

Joanna Coast; Hareth Al-Janabi; Eileen Sutton; Susan Horrocks; A. Jane Vosper; Dawn Swancutt; Terry N. Flynn

Attribute generation for discrete choice experiments (DCEs) is often poorly reported, and it is unclear whether this element of research is conducted rigorously. This paper explores issues associated with developing attributes for DCEs and contrasts different qualitative approaches. The paper draws on eight studies, four developed attributes for measures, and four developed attributes for more ad hoc policy questions. Issues that have become apparent through these studies include the following: the theoretical framework for random utility theory and the need for attributes that are neither too close to the latent construct nor too intrinsic to peoples personality; the need to think about attribute development as a two-stage process involving conceptual development followed by refinement of language to convey the intended meaning; and the difficulty in resolving tensions inherent in the reductiveness of condensing complex and nuanced qualitative findings into precise terms. The comparison of alternative qualitative approaches suggests that the nature of data collection will depend both on the characteristics of the question (its sensitivity, for example) and the availability of existing qualitative information. An iterative, constant comparative approach to analysis is recommended. Finally, the paper provides a series of recommendations for improving the reporting of this element of DCE studies.


BMJ Open | 2013

Factors affecting patients' trust and confidence in GPs: evidence from the English national GP patient survey.

Joanne E. Croker; Dawn Swancutt; Martin Roberts; Gary A. Abel; Martin Roland; John Campbell

Objectives Patients’ trust in general practitioners (GPs) is fundamental to effective clinical encounters. Associations between patients’ trust and their perceptions of communication within the consultation have been identified, but the influence of patients’ demographic characteristics on these associations is unknown. We aimed to investigate the relative contribution of the patients age, gender and ethnicity in any association between patients’ ratings of interpersonal aspects of the consultation and their confidence and trust in the doctor. Design Secondary analysis of English national GP patient survey data (2009). Setting Primary Care, England, UK. Participants Data from year 3 of the GP patient survey: 5 660 217 questionnaires sent to patients aged 18 and over, registered with a GP in England for at least 6 months; overall response rate was 42% after adjustment for sampling design. Outcome measures We used binary logistic regression analysis to investigate patients’ reported confidence and trust in the GP, analysing ratings of 7 interpersonal aspects of the consultation, controlling for patients’ sociodemographic characteristics. Further modelling examined moderating effects of age, gender and ethnicity on the relative importance of these 7 predictors. Results Among 1.5 million respondents (adjusted response rate 42%), the sense of ‘being taken seriously’ had the strongest association with confidence and trust. The relative importance of the 7 interpersonal aspects of care was similar for men and women. Non-white patients accorded higher priority to being given enough time than did white patients. Involvement in decisions regarding their care was more strongly associated with reports of confidence and trust for older patients than for younger patients. Conclusions Associations between patients’ ratings of interpersonal aspects of care and their confidence and trust in their GP are influenced by patients’ demographic characteristics. Taking account of these findings could inform patient-centred service design and delivery and potentially enhance patients’ confidence and trust in their doctor.


BMC Cardiovascular Disorders | 2004

A randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness study of systematic screening (targeted and total population screening) versus routine practice for the detection of atrial fibrillation in the over 65s: (SAFE) [ISRCTN19633732].

Dawn Swancutt; Richard J. Hobbs; David Fitzmaurice; Jonathan Mant; Ellen Murray; Sue Jowett; James Raftery; Stirling Bryan; Michael K. Davies; Gregory Y.H. Lip

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) has been recognised as an important independent risk factor for thromboembolic disease, particularly stroke for which it provides a five-fold increase in risk. This study aimed to determine the baseline prevalence and the incidence of AF based on a variety of screening strategies and in doing so to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies, including targeted or whole population screening, compared with routine clinical practice, for detection of AF in people aged 65 and over. The value of clinical assessment and echocardiography as additional methods of risk stratification for thromboembolic disease in patients with AF were also evaluated.MethodsThe study design was a multi-centre randomised controlled trial with a study population of patients aged 65 and over from 50 General Practices in the West Midlands. These purposefully selected general practices were randomly allocated to 25 intervention practices and 25 control practices. GPs and practice nurses within the intervention practices received education on the importance of AF detection and ECG interpretation. Patients in the intervention practices were randomly allocated to systematic (n = 5000) or opportunistic screening (n = 5000). Prospective identification of pre-existing risk factors for AF within the screened population enabled comparison between high risk targeted screening and total population screening. AF detection rates in systematically screened and opportunistically screened populations in the intervention practices were compared to AF detection rate in 5,000 patients in the control practices.


BMC Women's Health | 2008

Women's colposcopy experience and preferences: a mixed methods study

Dawn Swancutt; Sheila Greenfield; Sue Wilson


BMC Women's Health | 2011

Women's experience of colposcopy: a qualitative investigation

Dawn Swancutt; Sheila Greenfield; David Luesley; Sue Wilson


Health Services and Delivery Research | 2016

How can frontline expertise and new models of care best contribute to safely reducing avoidable acute admissions? A mixed-methods study of four acute hospitals

Jonathan Pinkney; Susanna Rance; Jonathan Benger; Heather Brant; Sian Joel-Edgar; Dawn Swancutt; Debra Westlake; Mark Pearson; Daniel Thomas; Ingrid Holme; Ruth Endacott; Rob Anderson; Michael J. Allen; Sarah Purdy; John Campbell; Rod Sheaff; Richard Byng


BMC Health Services Research | 2017

Not all waits are equal: an exploratory investigation of emergency care patient pathways.

Dawn Swancutt; Sian Joel-Edgar; Michael J. Allen; Daniel Thomas; Heather Brant; Jonathan Benger; Richard Byng; Jonathan Pinkney


Society of Academic Primary Care | 2004

Improving the evidence base for older people: can we recruit a representative sample?

Dawn Swancutt; Lesley Roberts; Elaine Kidney; Sue Wilson; Andrea Roalfe; James Parle


Archive | 2016

Practitioner experience and organisational ethnography

Jonathan Pinkney; Susanna Rance; Jonathan Benger; Heather Brant; Sian Joel-Edgar; Dawn Swancutt; Debra Westlake; Mark Pearson; Daniel Thomas; Ingrid Holme; Ruth Endacott; Robert F. Anderson; Michael J. Allen; Sarah Purdy; John Campbell; Rod Sheaff; Richard Byng


Archive | 2016

Summaries of ethnographic case studies (A–D)

Jonathan Pinkney; Susanna Rance; Jonathan Benger; Heather Brant; Sian Joel-Edgar; Dawn Swancutt; Debra Westlake; Mark Pearson; Daniel Thomas; Ingrid Holme; Ruth Endacott; Robert F. Anderson; Michael J. Allen; Sarah Purdy; John Campbell; Rod Sheaff; Richard Byng

Collaboration


Dive into the Dawn Swancutt's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan Pinkney

Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Byng

Plymouth State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan Benger

University of the West of England

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael J. Allen

Plymouth Marine Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge