Debora Smith
Houston Methodist Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Debora Smith.
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | 2013
Angela M. Wright; Debora Smith; Bakula Dhurandhar; Todd Fairley; Miriam Scheiber-Pacht; Subhendu Chakraborty; Blythe Gorman; Dina R. Mody; Donna Coffey
CONTEXT Digital whole slide imaging is the anticipated future of anatomic pathology, where sign-out of glass slides will be replaced by scanned images. Whole slide imaging has been successfully used in surgical pathology, but its usefulness and clinical application have been limited in cytology for several reasons, including lack of availability of z-axis depth focusing and large file size. Recently, several systems have become available in the United States for whole slide imaging with z-axis technology. OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy and efficiency of whole slide imaging, as compared with traditional glass slides, for use in cervicovaginal diagnostic cytology. DESIGN Eleven cervicovaginal cytology cases (ThinPrep and SurePath) scanned at ×20, ×40, and ×40 z-stack magnifications using the BioImagene iScan Coreo Au 3.0 scanner were evaluated by 4 cytotechnologists and 3 pathologists in a blinded study. Different magnification scans were recorded as separate cases and presented in a randomized sequence. Corresponding glass slides were also reviewed. For each case, the diagnoses and total time to reach each diagnosis were recorded. RESULTS Diagnostic accuracy was higher and average time per case was lower with glass slides as compared with all digital images. Among the digital images, the ×40 or ×40 z-stack had the highest diagnostic accuracy and lowest interpretation time. CONCLUSIONS Whole slide imaging is a viable option for the purposes of teaching and consultations, and as a means of archiving cases. However, considering the large file size and total time to reach diagnosis on digital images, whole slide imaging is not yet ready for daily cervicovaginal diagnostic cytology screening use.
Cancer Cytopathology | 2009
Yimin Ge; Debora Smith; Mary R. Schwartz; Dina R. Mody
Screening for cervical cancer precursors has evolved considerably with the introduction of new technologies to improve the early detection of disease. The objective of this study was to analyze the accuracy and effectiveness of combined screening with cytology and high‐risk human papillomavirus (HR‐HPV) testing in a low‐risk population of women aged ≥30 years.
Acta Cytologica | 2012
Yimin Ge; Dina R. Mody; Debora Smith; Rose C. Anton
Objective: Evaluation of hyperchromatic crowded groups in Papanicolaou (Pap) tests from women during menstruation can be a diagnostic pitfall due to similar morphological appearances with significant cervical lesions. We studied the results of p16INK4a and ProEx C on cell blocks from Pap tests during menstruation in an attempt to facilitate the differentiation. Study Design: Immunohistochemical stains for p16INK4a and ProEx C were performed on 25 cell blocks prepared from residual liquid-based cervical material with menstrual contamination. Results: Strong, diffuse, and full thickness staining pattern for p16INK4a and ProEx C was observed in cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and small cell carcinoma of the cervix. The low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cases and cases negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy were negative for ProEx C, with focal staining for p16INK4a. The benign endometrial cells had either negative or focal patchy staining, which is often associated with tubal metaplasia. Conclusion: p16INK4a and ProEx C are sensitive markers for identifying significant lesions in Pap test specimens with menstrual contamination. Patchy/mosaic staining may be seen in benign endometrial tissue with tubal metaplasia, but strong, diffuse staining likely indicates HSIL or carcinoma. These findings can be helpful in interpreting hyperchromatic crowded groups in menstrual Pap specimens. Further study may be prudent, being aware of the small study group.
Cancer Cytopathology | 2012
Haijun Zhou; Mary R. Schwartz; Donna Coffey; Debora Smith; Dina R. Mody; Yimin Ge
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology | 2012
Jana L. Wimmer; Bakula Dhurandhar; Todd Fairley; Jeanna Ramsaywak; Miriam Scheiber-Pacht; Laura S. Satrum; Debora Smith; Michael J. Thrall
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology | 2014
Haijun Zhou; Dina R. Mody; Mary R. Schwartz; Donna Coffey; Debora Smith; Omar A. Zwain; Naga P. Kamarapu; Jameisha B. Brown; Marcela Medina; Sonia Robazetti Hodgson; Christopher Hobday; Yimin Ge
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology | 2015
Haijun Zhou; Dina R. Mody; Debora Smith; Maura B. Lloyd; Jon Kemppainen; Jeffrey Houghton; Dennis Wylie; Anna E. Szafranska-Schwarzbach; Hidehiro Takei
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology | 2016
Debora Smith; Antonio Espinoza; Ivonne Vega
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology | 2013
Haijun Zhou; Hidehiro Takei; Debora Smith; Jon Kemppainen; Maura B. Lloyd; Anna E. Szafranska-Schwarzbach
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology | 2012
Kelly Khan; Debora Smith; Michael J. Thrall