Donna Coffey

High-grade serous ovarian cancer arises from fallopian tube in a mouse model.

Although ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy in women, little is known about how the cancer initiates and metastasizes. In the last decade, new evidence has challenged the dogma that the ovary is the main source of this cancer. The fallopian tube has been proposed instead as the primary origin of high-grade serous ovarian cancer, the subtype causing 70% of ovarian cancer deaths. By conditionally deleting Dicer, an essential gene for microRNA synthesis, and Pten, a key negative regulator of the PI3K pathway, we show that high-grade serous carcinomas arise from the fallopian tube in mice. In these Dicer-Pten double-knockout mice, primary fallopian tube tumors spread to engulf the ovary and then aggressively metastasize throughout the abdominal cavity, causing ascites and killing 100% of the mice by 13 mo. Besides the clinical resemblance to human serous cancers, these fallopian tube cancers highly express genes that are known to be up-regulated in human serous ovarian cancers, also demonstrating molecular similarities. Although ovariectomized mice continue to develop high-grade serous cancers, removal of the fallopian tube at an early age prevents cancer formation—confirming the fallopian tube origin of the cancer. Intriguingly, the primary carcinomas are first observed in the stroma of the fallopian tube, suggesting that these epithelial cancers have a mesenchymal origin. Thus, this mouse model demonstrates a paradigm for the origin and initiation of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas, the most common and deadliest ovarian cancer.

PAX 8 expression in non-neoplastic tissues, primary tumors, and metastatic tumors: a comprehensive immunohistochemical study

PAX 8 is a transcription factor that is essential for embryonic development of the kidney, Müllerian organs, and thyroid. It may also have a role in tumor development in these organs. The diagnostic utility of PAX 8 has not been comprehensively studied. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples for non-neoplastic tissues (n=1601), primary neoplasms (n=933), and metastatic neoplasms (n=496) were subjected to PAX 8 immunostain. In non-neoplastic tissues, PAX 8 was consistently noted in glomerular parietal epithelial cells, renal collecting ductal cells, atrophic renal tubular epithelial cells regardless of nephronic segments, and epithelial cells of the endocervix, endometrium, fallopian tube, seminal vesicle, epidydimis, thyroid, pancreatic islet cells, and lymphoid cells. PAX 8 was not seen in the rest of the tissue samples. In primary neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 194 of 240 (89%) renal cell neoplasms, by 238 of 267 (89%) Müllerian-type neoplasms, by 65 of 65 (100%) thyroid follicular cell neoplasms, by 8 of 8 (100%) nephrogenic adenomas, and by 17 of 17 (100%) lymphomas. Weak focal staining was noted in 5 of 12 (42%) cases of parathyroid hyperplasia/adenoma and in 6 of 17 (35%) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. PAX 8 was not seen in other neoplasms. In metastatic neoplasms, PAX 8 was expressed by 90 of 102 (88%) metastatic renal cell carcinomas, by 57 of 63 metastatic Müllerian tumors (90%), and by 6 of 6 metastatic papillary thyroid carcinomas (100%). There was also weak focal staining for 1 of 15 metastatic small cell carcinomas and for 1 of 9 metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. PAX 8 was not seen in other metastatic neoplasms. It can be successfully identified in routinely processed tissue samples, and its expression is mostly nuclear. PAX 8 expression in non-neoplastic mature tissues is limited to the organs, the embryonic development of which depends on this transcription factor. This tissue/cell-specific expression is maintained during both neoplastic transformation and metastasis. PAX 8 is a sensitive and specific marker for tumors of renal, Müllerian, or thyroid origin in both primary and metastatic sites.

Clinical and Biological Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Endometrial Cancer

Purpose: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is critical for angiogenesis and tumor progression; however, its role in endometrial cancer is not fully known. Therefore, we examined the clinical and therapeutic significance of VEGF in endometrial carcinoma using patient samples and an endometrioid orthotopic mouse model. Experimental Design: Following Institutional Review Board approval, VEGF expression and microvessel density (MVD) counts were evaluated using immunohistochemistry in 111 invasive endometrioid endometrial cancers by two independent investigators. Results were correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics. For the animal model, Ishikawa or Hec-1A cancer cell lines were injected directly into the uterine horn. Therapy experiments with bevacizumab alone or in combination with docetaxel were done and samples were analyzed for markers of angiogenesis and proliferation. Results: Of 111 endometrial cancers, high expression of VEGF was seen in 56% of tumors. There was a strong correlation between VEGF expression and MVD (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, stage (P = 0.04), grade (P = 0.003), VEGF levels (P = 0.03), and MVD (P = 0.037) were independent predictors of shorter disease-specific survival. In the murine model, whereas docetaxel and bevacizumab alone resulted in 61% to 77% tumor growth inhibition over controls, combination therapy had the greatest efficacy (85-97% inhibition over controls; P < 0.01) in both models. In treated tumors, combination therapy significantly reduced MVD counts (50-70% reduction over controls; P < 0.01) and percent proliferation (39% reduction over controls; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Increased levels of VEGF and angiogenic markers are associated with poor outcome in endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. Using a novel orthotopic model of endometrioid endometrial cancer, we showed that combination of antivascular therapy with docetaxel is highly efficacious and should be considered for future clinical trials.

PAX2 and PAX8 expression in primary and metastatic müllerian epithelial tumors: A comprehensive comparison

PAX2 and PAX8 are transcription factors that are essential in embryonic development of müllerian organs. They may also play a role in tumor development in these organs. The diagnostic utility of PAX2 and PAX8 relative to one another has not been comprehensively studied. Archival tissue samples for normal or non-neoplastic tissue (251), primary epithelial neoplasms (316 for PAX2 and 357 for PAX8), and metastatic epithelial neoplasms (16), all of müllerian origin, were subjected to PAX2 and PAX8 immunostaining. The staining frequency, extent, and intensity for these markers were compared. Virtually identical PAX2 and PAX8 expressions were noted in non-neoplastic tissue. They were constantly seen in most epithelial cells (but not in stromal cells) of the endocervix, endometrium, fallopian tube, paratubal cyst, endosalpingiosis, endometriosis, and endometrial polyp. Within the primary epithelial neoplasms, PAX2 and PAX8 expression was noted in 55% and 98% of serous tumors, 25% and 94% of endometrioid tumors, 19% and 100% of clear cell tumors, 11% and 67% of transitional/undifferentiated tumors, and 10% and 22% of mucinous tumors, respectively. Regardless of histologic subtypes, PAX2 staining was noted in fewer cells and with less staining intensity compared with PAX8. No tumor showed only PAX2 staining. Within the metastatic carcinomas, PAX2 and PAX8 expression was noted in 38% and 98% of cases, respectively, with a diffuse and strong staining for PAX8, contrasting with a patchy and weak PAX2 expression. PAX2 and PAX8 are constantly expressed in normal or non-neoplastic tissue of müllerian origin. For primary and metastatic müllerian epithelial tumors, PAX8 shows strong and diffuse staining in most cases of all histologic subtypes, except in mucinous tumors. In contrast, PAX2 expression is always less than PAX8, and exclusive staining for PAX2 is not seen. PAX8 supersedes PAX2 as probably the best epithelial marker hitherto for primary or metastatic müllerian epithelial tumors.

The role of relaxin in endometrial cancer

Relaxin (RLN) is a naturally occurring hormone that is known to modulate connective tissue remodeling in the uterus and cervix. Our goal was to investigate the role of RLN in endometrial cancer. RLN expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry in 57 samples of invasive endometrial carcinoma (EC) and 10 benign endometria. 67% of high-stage (III/IV) tumors demonstrated strong RLN expression compared to 37% of low-stage (I/II) cases. Strong RLN expression associated significantly with high-grade and depth of myometrial invasion. Notably, strong RLN expression was associated with a significantly shorter overall survival (p

Cytologic Malignancy Versus Benignancy: How Useful Are the “Newer” Markers in Body Fluid Cytology?

CONTEXT Differentiating reactive effusion, malignant mesothelioma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma in body cavity fluids can be challenging. Interpreting immunohistochemical markers in cell block preparations can be difficult because of nonspecific staining, focal staining, or poor staining quality. We selected a panel of conventional and newer markers to assess their utility in evaluating effusions. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of 5 immunohistochemical markers in the differential diagnosis of reactive mesothelial proliferation, malignant mesothelioma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma in body cavity fluids. DESIGN A total of 72 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell block specimens from pleural and peritoneal effusions, including 5 mesotheliomas, 48 adenocarcinomas, and 19 benign effusions were stained with antibodies against calretinin, D2-40, XIAP, MOC-31, and WT1. RESULTS All benign effusions and mesotheliomas demonstrated diffuse membranous staining with D2-40. All mesotheliomas displayed calretinin positivity, whereas only 58% of benign effusions stained focally with calretinin. MOC-31 was positive in all cases of adenocarcinoma, whereas all benign effusions and mesotheliomas were negative. All cases of the metastatic adenocarcinoma were negative for calretinin and D2-40. However, background reactive mesothelial cells were positive for calretinin and D2-40. Overall, D2-40 highlighted more mesothelial cells than calretinin. WT1 was positive in 50% of benign effusions, 60% of mesotheliomas, and 27% of adenocarcinomas. XIAP stained most mesotheliomas (80%), some adenocarcinomas (51%), and rare benign effusions (11%). CONCLUSIONS MOC-31 and D2-40 were very sensitive and specific markers of epithelial and mesothelial cells, respectively. Compared with calretinin, D2-40 was a more sensitive marker of mesothelial cells. WT1 proved to be nonspecific. XIAP was not a sensitive marker for malignancy and had a limited value in cytology. We recommend using a panel to include MOC-31 and D2-40 to improve diagnostic accuracy in body cavity effusions.

PAX-2 expression in non-neoplastic, primary neoplastic, and metastatic neoplastic tissue: A comprehensive immunohistochemical study.

PAX-2 is a transcription factor that controls the development of the kidney, organs deriving from the mesonephric (Wolffian) duct, and those related to the Müllerian duct. Although PAX-2 is shown to be a sensitive marker for tumors derived from these organs, but whether it is specific, that is, whether other tumor types also express PAX-2, has not been systematically evaluated in either primary or metastatic tumors. Tissue sections from 937 normal or reactive tissue samples, 759 primary neoplasms, and 332 metastatic neoplasms were submitted to PAX-2 immunostain. Among the non-neoplastic tissue, PAX-2 was expressed in glomerular parietal epithelial cells, renal collecting duct cells, atrophic renal tubular cells, epithelial cells of ovarian surface, fallopian tube, endocervix, endometrium, seminal vesicle, and lymphocytes. Among the primary neoplasms, PAX-2 was noted in 104/122 (85%) of renal cell carcinoma, 31/95 carcinomas of Müllerian origin, 17/17 (100%) lymphomas, 4/4 (100%) nephrogenic adenomas, and 1/16 (6%) benign parathyroid tumors, but was negative in 477 other tumors. Among the metastatic tumors, PAX-2 was noted in 70/95 (74%) metastatic renal cell carcinomas, 14/20 (70%) metastatic tumors of Müllerian origin, 1/20 (5%) metastatic colon carcinoma of lymph nodes, 1/62 (2%) metastatic breast carcinoma of lymph nodes, but was not seen in the remaining 247 metastatic tumors. PAX-2 expression in non-neoplastic mature tissue is limited to the organs whose embryonic development depends on this transcription factor. PAX-2 is a sensitive and specific marker for tumors of renal or Müllerian origin in both primary and metastatic contexts.

EphA2 overexpression is associated with lack of hormone receptor expression and poor outcome in endometrial cancer

EphA2 is a tyrosine kinase receptor in the ephrin family that is implicated in oncogenesis and angiogenesis. The objective of the current investigation was to study the role of EphA2 in endometrial cancer and its relation to steroid hormone receptor expression.

Clinical and biological impact of EphA2 overexpression and angiogenesis in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE. EphA2 overexpression predicts poor prognosis in endometrial cancer. To explore mechanisms for this association and assess its potential as therapeutic target, the relationship of EphA2 expression to markers of angiogenesis was examined using patient samples and an orthotopic mouse model of uterine cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. Expression of EphA2, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) was evaluated using immunohistochemistry in 85 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas (EEC) by two independent investigators. Results were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics. The effect of EphA2- agonist monoclonal antibody EA5, alone or in combination with docetaxel was studied in vitro and in vivo. Samples were analyzed for markers of angiogenesis, proliferation and apoptosis. RESULTS. Of 85 EEC samples, EphA2 was overexpressed in 47% of tumors and was significantly associated with high VEGF expression (p=0.001) and high MVD counts (p=0.02). High EphA2 expression, high VEGF expression and high MVD counts were significantly associated with shorter disease-specific survival. EA5 led to decrease in EphA2 expression and phosphorylation in vitro. In the murine model, while EA5 (33-88%) and docetaxel (23-55%) individually led to tumor inhibition over controls, combination therapy had the greatest efficacy (78-92%, p<0.001). In treated tumors, combination therapy resulted in significant reduction in MVD counts, percent proliferation and apoptosis over controls. CONCLUSIONS. EphA2 overexpression is associated with markers of angiogenesis and is predictive of poor clinical outcome. EphA2 targeted therapy reduces angiogenesis and tumor growth in orthotopic uterine cancer models and should be considered for future clinical trials.

Digital Slide Imaging in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Pilot Study

CONTEXT Digital whole slide imaging is the anticipated future of anatomic pathology, where sign-out of glass slides will be replaced by scanned images. Whole slide imaging has been successfully used in surgical pathology, but its usefulness and clinical application have been limited in cytology for several reasons, including lack of availability of z-axis depth focusing and large file size. Recently, several systems have become available in the United States for whole slide imaging with z-axis technology. OBJECTIVE To determine the accuracy and efficiency of whole slide imaging, as compared with traditional glass slides, for use in cervicovaginal diagnostic cytology. DESIGN Eleven cervicovaginal cytology cases (ThinPrep and SurePath) scanned at ×20, ×40, and ×40 z-stack magnifications using the BioImagene iScan Coreo Au 3.0 scanner were evaluated by 4 cytotechnologists and 3 pathologists in a blinded study. Different magnification scans were recorded as separate cases and presented in a randomized sequence. Corresponding glass slides were also reviewed. For each case, the diagnoses and total time to reach each diagnosis were recorded. RESULTS Diagnostic accuracy was higher and average time per case was lower with glass slides as compared with all digital images. Among the digital images, the ×40 or ×40 z-stack had the highest diagnostic accuracy and lowest interpretation time. CONCLUSIONS Whole slide imaging is a viable option for the purposes of teaching and consultations, and as a means of archiving cases. However, considering the large file size and total time to reach diagnosis on digital images, whole slide imaging is not yet ready for daily cervicovaginal diagnostic cytology screening use.