Deborah J. MacDonald

Germ-Line BRCA1 Mutations in Jewish and Non-Jewish Women with Early-Onset Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND Mutations in a germ-line allele of the BRCA1 gene contribute to the familial breast cancer syndrome. However, the prevalence of these mutations is unknown in women with breast cancer who do not have the features of this familial syndrome. We sought BRCA1 mutations in women who were given a diagnosis of breast cancer at an early age, because early onset is characteristic of a genetic predisposition to cancer. METHODS Clinical information and peripheral-blood mononuclear cells were obtained from 418 women from the Boston metropolitan area in whom breast cancer was diagnosed at or before the age of 40. A comprehensive BRCA1 mutational analysis, involving automated nucleotide sequencing and a protein-truncation assay, was undertaken in 30 of these women, who had breast cancer before the age of 30. In addition, the BRCA1 mutation 185delAG, which is prevalent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, was sought with an allele-specific polymerase-chain-reaction assay in 39 Jewish women among the 418 women who had breast cancer at or before the age of 40. RESULTS Among 30 women with breast cancer before the age of 30, 4 (13 percent) had definite, chain-terminating mutations and 1 had a missense mutation. Two of the four Jewish women in this cohort had the 185delAG mutation. Among the 39 Jewish women with breast cancer at or before the age of 40, 8 (21 percent) carried the 185delAG mutation (95 percent confidence interval, 9 to 36 percent). CONCLUSIONS Germ-line BRCA1 mutations can be present in young women with breast cancer who do not belong to families with multiple affected members. The specific BRCA1 mutation known as 185delAG is strongly associated with the onset of breast cancer in Jewish women before the age of 40.

Differential Contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to Early-Onset Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND Germ-line mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes predispose women to breast cancer. BRCA1 mutations are found in approximately 12 percent of women with breast cancer of early onset, and the specific mutation causing a deletion of adenine and guanine (185delAG), which is present in 1 percent of the Ashkenazi Jewish population, contributes to 21 percent of breast cancers among young Jewish women. The contribution of BRCA2 mutations to breast cancer of early onset is unknown. METHODS Lymphocyte specimens from 73 women with breast cancer diagnosed by the age of 32 were studied for heterozygous mutations of BRCA2 by a complementary-DNA-based protein-truncation assay, followed by automated nucleotide sequencing. In addition, specimens from 39 Jewish women with breast cancer diagnosed by the age of 40 were tested for specific mutations by an allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS Definite BRCA2 mutations were found in 2 of the 73 women with early-onset breast cancer (2.7 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4 to 9.6 percent), suggesting that BRCA2 is associated with fewer cases than BRCA1 (P=0.03). The specific BRCA2 mutation causing a deletion of thymine (6174delT), which is found in 1.3 percent of the Ashkenazi Jewish population, was observed in 1 of the 39 young Jewish women with breast cancer (2.6 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.09 to 13.5 percent), indicating that it has a small role as a risk factor for early-onset breast cancer. Among young women with breast cancer, there are BRCA2 mutations that cause truncation of the extreme C terminus of the protein and that may be functionally silent, along with definite truncating mutations. CONCLUSIONS Germ-line mutations in BRCA2 contribute to fewer cases of breast cancer among young women than do mutations in BRCA1. Carriers of BRCA2 mutations may have a smaller increase in the risk of early-onset breast cancer.

Genetics, Genomics and Cancer Risk Assessment: State of the art and future directions in the era of personalized medicine

Scientific and technologic advances are revolutionizing our approach to genetic cancer risk assessment, cancer screening and prevention, and targeted therapy, fulfilling the promise of personalized medicine. In this monograph, we review the evolution of scientific discovery in cancer genetics and genomics, and describe current approaches, benefits, and barriers to the translation of this information to the practice of preventive medicine. Summaries of known hereditary cancer syndromes and highly penetrant genes are provided and contrasted with recently discovered genomic variants associated with modest increases in cancer risk. We describe the scope of knowledge, tools, and expertise required for the translation of complex genetic and genomic test information into clinical practice. The challenges of genomic counseling include the need for genetics and genomics professional education and multidisciplinary team training, the need for evidence‐based information regarding the clinical utility of testing for genomic variants, the potential dangers posed by premature marketing of first‐generation genomic profiles, and the need for new clinical models to improve access to and responsible communication of complex disease risk information. We conclude that given the experiences and lessons learned in the genetics era, the multidisciplinary model of genetic cancer risk assessment and management will serve as a solid foundation to support the integration of personalized genomic information into the practice of cancer medicine. CA Cancer J Clin 2011.

Reflex Immunohistochemistry and Microsatellite Instability Testing of Colorectal Tumors for Lynch Syndrome Among US Cancer Programs and Follow-Up of Abnormal Results

PURPOSE Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 protein expression and microsatellite instability (MSI) are well-established tools to screen for Lynch syndrome (LS). Although many cancer centers have adopted these tools as reflex LS screening after a colorectal cancer diagnosis, the standard of care has not been established, and no formal studies have described this practice in the United States. The purpose of this study was to describe prevalent practices regarding IHC/MSI reflex testing for LS in the United States and the subsequent follow-up of abnormal results. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 12-item survey was developed after interdisciplinary expert input. A letter of invitation, survey, and online-survey option were sent to a contact at each cancer program. A modified Dillman strategy was used to maximize the response rate. The sample included 39 National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCI-CCCs), 50 randomly selected American College of Surgeons-accredited Community Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Programs (COMPs), and 50 Community Hospital Cancer Programs (CHCPs). RESULTS The overall response rate was 50%. Seventy-one percent of NCI-CCCs, 36% of COMPs, and 15% of CHCPs were conducting reflex IHC/MSI for LS; 48% of the programs used IHC, 14% of the programs used MSI, and 38% of the programs used both IHC and MSI. One program used a presurgical information packet, four programs offered an opt-out option, and none of the programs required written consent. CONCLUSION Although most NCI-CCCs use reflex IHC/MSI to screen for LS, this practice is not well-adopted by community hospitals. These findings may indicate an emerging standard of care and diffusion from NCI-CCC to community cancer programs. Our findings also described an important trend away from requiring written patient consent for screening.

Perception of breast cancer risk among women in breast center and primary care settings: Correlation with age and family history of breast cancer

BACKGROUND A great deal of information about breast cancer risk is available to the public. The accuracy of impressions formed from this information is unknown. METHODS A total of 750 women attending a breast center and 112 women attending a primary care office completed written surveys of their perceptions of average population risk, personal lifetime risk, and personal 10-year risk of getting breast cancer. Data sufficient to apply the Gail model were obtained, and a calculated estimate of risk was generated. Ratios of perceived to calculated risk were correlated with the respondents age, family history of breast cancer, and location in a breast center or primary care office. RESULTS Women in both practice settings overestimated population risk by more than twofold. Eighty percent overestimated personal lifetime risk by more than 50% and 35% by more than fivefold. Only 7% significantly underestimated risk. Ten-year risk estimates were even more inaccurate, with 69% overestimating risk by more than fivefold, 46% by more than 10-fold, and 17% by more than 20-fold. Results from a primary care population were nearly identical. Women at the extremes of age were most inaccurate in estimating risk. It was surprising that family history had little impact on perception of personal risk. CONCLUSIONS Women in both breast center and primary care settings have a fals:ly high perception of both short-term and long-term breast cancer risk. Health care providers should recognize these misconceptions and be aware that many women may benefit from risk counseling.

Selection of family members for communication of cancer risk and barriers to this communication before and after genetic cancer risk assessment

Purpose: The impact of genetic cancer risk assessment on communication of cancer risk information within families is not fully known. We compared womens selection of family members for cancer risk communication and perceived barriers to this communication before genetic cancer risk assessment and 6 months afterward.Methods: Mailed surveys were used to collect prospective data from consenting women undergoing genetic cancer risk assessment because of a personal and/or family history of breast or ovarian cancers. Analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square and McNemar tests, and paired t tests.Results: A total of 122 women met the study criteria. Although risk communications increased with first-degree relatives (84%–90% for females; 53%–62% for males) and decreased with non–first-degree relatives (21%–9%) before and after genetic cancer risk assessment, the degree of change was nonsignificant. The most commonly cited communication barrier was loss of contact (30%). Demographics, personal or family cancer history, and BRCA status did not significantly influence findings.Conclusions: There was a high degree of cancer risk communications with female first-degree relatives, but less so with male first-degree relatives, both before and after genetic cancer risk assessment. For the majority of women, interpersonal barriers did not preclude risk discussions. Further research is needed to identify how best to facilitate risk communication.

Health literacy, numeracy, and interpretation of graphical breast cancer risk estimates

OBJECTIVE Health literacy and numeracy are necessary to understand health information and to make informed medical decisions. This study explored the relationships among health literacy, numeracy, and ability to accurately interpret graphical representations of breast cancer risk. METHODS Participants (N=120) were recruited from the Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered (FORCE) membership. Health literacy and numeracy were assessed. Participants interpreted graphs depicting breast cancer risk, made hypothetical treatment decisions, and rated preference of graphs. RESULTS Most participants were Caucasian (98%) and had completed at least one year of college (93%). Fifty-two percent had breast cancer, 86% had a family history of breast cancer, and 57% had a deleterious BRCA gene mutation. Mean health literacy score was 65/66; mean numeracy score was 4/6; and mean graphicacy score was 9/12. Education and numeracy were significantly associated with accurate graph interpretation (r=0.42, p<0.001 and r=0.65, p<0.001, respectively). However, after adjusting for numeracy in multivariate linear regression, education added little to the prediction of graphicacy (r(2)=0.41 versus 0.42, respectively). CONCLUSION In our highly health-literate population, numeracy was predictive of graphicacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Effective risk communication strategies should consider the impact of numeracy on graphicacy and patient understanding.

Reduced mammographic density with use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist - Based chemoprevention regimen in BRCA1 carriers

Purpose: Women with a BRCA1 mutation (BRCA1mut) need risk reduction options beyond mastectomy and oophorectomy. We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of hormonal chemoprevention with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHA) with low-dose add-back steroids in BRCA1mut carriers. Experimental Design: The 12-month open label clinical trial used the GnRHA deslorelin, ultra-low-dose estradiol (E2), and replacement testosterone, administered via daily intranasal spray in premenopausal women with a BRCA1mut, and intermittent oral medroxyprogesterone acetate. The end points included mammographic percent density, bone mineral density, endometrial hyperplasia, symptom inventory, and quality of life (Medical Outcomes SF-36 survey). Results: Six of eight BRCA1mut women (mean age, 30.3 years; range, 25-36 years) completed the study. Mammographic percent density was significantly reduced at 12 months (median absolute mammographic percent density decrease, 8.3%; P = 0.043), representing a 29.2% median reduction in mammographic percent density. Bone mineral density remained within reference limits for all participants; there were no cases of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and menses resumed within a median of 67 days (range, 35-110 days) after last drug treatment day. The treatment was well tolerated; hypoestrogenic side effects were minimal and transient; and there were no significant changes in quality of life. Conclusions: The GnRHA deslorelin, with low-dose add-back steroids, was well tolerated and significantly decreased mammographic percent density in BRCA1mut carriers. This regimen may reduce breast cancer risk and improve the usefulness of mammographic surveillance by reducing density. This is the first demonstration, to our knowledge, of a direct reduction of mammographic densities in young BRCA1mut carriers.

Outcomes from intensive training in genetic cancer risk counseling for clinicians

Purpose: Genetic cancer risk assessment is an emerging interdisciplinary practice that requires knowledge of genetics and oncology and specialized patient and family counseling skills. There is a growing need for cancer risk assessment practitioners, but most clinicians have inadequate cross-disciplinary training. An interdisciplinary course was developed to promote practitioner-level competency in cancer risk assessment to community-based clinicians.Methods: Participants were competitively selected from a pool of board-certified/eligible genetic counseling, masters-trained advanced practice nursing and physician applicants. Preference was given to clinicians with strong institutional backing practicing in underserved regions. The Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Education Unit-accredited course included didactic lectures, workshops, counseling practicum, and case conferences. Pre- and postcourse knowledge tests measured cancer genetics knowledge. Six month and one-year postcourse practice outcome surveys measured the impact of the program on professional self-efficacy and continued professional development.Results/Conclusions: Forty clinicians completed the course (23 genetic counselors, 14 nurses, and three physicians). There was a significant overall increase of 22.6% in postcourse knowledge scores (P < 0.001). Thirty-five (88%) completed prescribed practice development activities. Of 29 respondents to 1-year postcourse survey, 76% reported increased professional self-efficacy; 66% reported increase in number of patients seen, and virtually all indicated interest in additional training. Outcomes demonstrate the value and efficacy of interdisciplinary training in genetic cancer risk assessment targeted to motivated community-based clinicians. Courses such as this can help address the need for competent cancer risk assessment services in communities outside the academic health center.

Health Beliefs of Women With and Without Breast Cancer Seeking Genetic Cancer Risk Assessment

Genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) is increasingly being incorporated into clinical care. Planning supportive nursing care for women seeking GCRA requires knowledge of their health beliefs. We described and compared the cancer risk-related beliefs of 134 women with a personal history of breast cancer (affected group) and 80 women without breast cancer who had a family history of the disease (unaffected group), prior to risk assessment, using a mailed survey. This article reports their demographics, health characteristics, family history, and beliefs about cancer risk, risk factors, and genetic testing. Most participants were in their 40s (mean age = 47.9), Caucasian (79%), married (66%), and college-educated (60%), and had children (78%). Most women (87%) had a close relative with breast cancer and/or ovarian cancer. In general, both groups greatly overestimated near-term and lifetime cancer risk. Significantly more unaffected women believed they were at higher risk for breast cancer than affected women. Both groups expressed desire for, but lacked knowledge of, genetic testing. Nurses are in a prime position to assist women seeking GCRA by providing accurate information and emotional support regarding cancer risk, risk factors, and genetic testing.