Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Debra Babcock is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Debra Babcock.


Movement Disorders | 2007

Diagnostic criteria for psychosis in Parkinson's disease: Report of an NINDS, NIMH work group

Bernard Ravina; Karen Marder; Hubert H. Fernandez; Joseph H. Friedman; William M. McDonald; Diane D. Murphy; Dag Aarsland; Debra Babcock; J. L. Cummings; Jean Endicott; Stewart A. Factor; Wendy R. Galpern; Andrew J. Lees; Laura Marsh; Mark Stacy; Katrina Gwinn-Hardy; Valerie Voon; Christopher G. Goetz

There are no standardized diagnostic criteria for psychosis associated with Parkinsons disease (PDPsy). As part of an NIH sponsored workshop, we reviewed the existing literature on PDPsy to provide criteria that distinguish PDPsy from other causes of psychosis. Based on these data, we propose provisional criteria for PDPsy in the style of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV‐TR. PDPsy has a well‐characterized temporal and clinical profile of hallucinations and delusions, which is different than the pattern seen in other psychotic disorders such as substance induced psychosis or schizophrenia. PDPsy is associated with a poor prognosis of chronic psychosis, nursing home placement, and death. Medications used to treat Parkinsons disease (PD) contribute to PDPsy but may not be sufficient or necessary contributors to PDPsy. PDPsy is associated with Lewy bodies pathology, imbalances of monoaminergic neurotransmitters, and visuospatial processing deficits. These findings suggest that PDPsy may result from progression of the disease process underlying PD, rather than a comorbid psychiatric disorder or drug intoxication. PDPsy is not adequately described by existing criteria for psychotic disorders. We established provisional diagnostic criteria that define a constellation of clinical features not shared by other psychotic syndromes. The criteria are inclusive and contain descriptions of the full range of characteristic symptoms, chronology of onset, duration of symptoms, exclusionary diagnoses, and associated features such as dementia. These criteria require validation and may be refined, but form a starting point for studies of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of PDPsy, and are a potential indication for therapy development.


Movement Disorders | 2006

Provisional diagnostic criteria for depression in Parkinson's disease: Report of an NINDS/NIMH Work Group

Laura Marsh; William M. McDonald; Jeffrey L. Cummings; Bernard Ravina; Nancy Abraham; Debra Babcock; Kevin J. Black; David J. Burn; Peter Como; Emmeline Edwards; Robin Elliott; Joseph Friedman; Katrina Gwinn-Hardy; Robert M. Hamer; Melinda Kelley; Bonnie Levin; Constantine G. Lyketsos; Jeffrey M. Lyness; Karen Marder; Mathew Menza; Lynn Morin; Peter Muehrer; Diane D. Murphy; Irene Hegeman Richard; Paul Sheehy; Robert L. Spitzer; Sharon Stone; Brenda Tucker; Margaret Tuchman; Carol Walton

Mood disorders are the most common psychiatric problem associated with Parkinsons disease (PD), and have a negative impact on disability and quality of life. Accurate diagnosis of depressive disturbances in PD is critical and will facilitate the testing and use of new interventions; however, there are no clear diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders in PD. In their current form, strict Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria are difficult to use in PD and require attribution of specific symptoms to PD itself or the depressive syndrome. Additionally, DSM criteria for major depression and dysthymia exclude perhaps half of PD patients with comorbid clinically significant depression. This review summarizes an NIH‐sponsored workshop and describes recommended changes to DSM diagnostic criteria for depression for use in PD. Participants also recommended: (1) an inclusive approach to symptom assessment to enhance reliability of ratings in PD and avoid the need to attribute symptoms to a particular cause; (2) the inclusion of subsyndromal depression in clinical research studies of depression of PD; (3) the specification of timing of assessments for PD patients with motor fluctuations; and (4) the use of informants for cognitively impaired patients. The proposed diagnostic criteria are provisional and intended to be defined further and validated but provide a common starting point for clinical research in PD‐associated depression.


JAMA | 2015

Effect of creatine monohydrate on clinical progression in patients with Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial.

Karl Kieburtz; Barbara C. Tilley; Jordan J. Elm; Debra Babcock; Robert A. Hauser; G. Webster Ross; Alicia H. Augustine; Erika U. Augustine; Michael J. Aminoff; Ivan G. Bodis-Wollner; James T. Boyd; Franca Cambi; Kelvin L. Chou; Chadwick W. Christine; Michelle Cines; Nabila Dahodwala; Lorelei Derwent; Richard B. Dewey; Katherine Hawthorne; David J. Houghton; Cornelia Kamp; Maureen A. Leehey; Mark F. Lew; Grace S. Liang; Sheng Luo; Zoltan Mari; John C. Morgan; Sotirios A. Parashos; Adriana Pérez; Helen Petrovitch

IMPORTANCE There are no treatments available to slow or prevent the progression of Parkinson disease, despite its global prevalence and significant health care burden. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Exploratory Trials in Parkinson Disease program was established to promote discovery of potential therapies. OBJECTIVE To determine whether creatine monohydrate was more effective than placebo in slowing long-term clinical decline in participants with Parkinson disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS The Long-term Study 1, a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 1:1 randomized efficacy trial. Participants were recruited from 45 investigative sites in the United States and Canada and included 1741 men and women with early (within 5 years of diagnosis) and treated (receiving dopaminergic therapy) Parkinson disease. Participants were enrolled from March 2007 to May 2010 and followed up until September 2013. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to placebo or creatine (10 g/d) monohydrate for a minimum of 5 years (maximum follow-up, 8 years). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measure was a difference in clinical decline from baseline to 5-year follow-up, compared between the 2 treatment groups using a global statistical test. Clinical status was defined by 5 outcome measures: Modified Rankin Scale, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, PDQ-39 Summary Index, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale, and ambulatory capacity. All outcomes were coded such that higher scores indicated worse outcomes and were analyzed by a global statistical test. Higher summed ranks (range, 5-4775) indicate worse outcomes. RESULTS The trial was terminated early for futility based on results of a planned interim analysis of participants enrolled at least 5 years prior to the date of the analysis (n = 955). The median follow-up time was 4 years. Of the 955 participants, the mean of the summed ranks for placebo was 2360 (95% CI, 2249-2470) and for creatine was 2414 (95% CI, 2304-2524). The global statistical test yielded t1865.8 = -0.75 (2-sided P = .45). There were no detectable differences (P < .01 to partially adjust for multiple comparisons) in adverse and serious adverse events by body system. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with early and treated Parkinson disease, treatment with creatine monohydrate for at least 5 years, compared with placebo did not improve clinical outcomes. These findings do not support the use of creatine monohydrate in patients with Parkinson disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00449865.


Neurology | 2014

Recommendations of the Alzheimer's Disease–Related Dementias Conference

Thomas J. Montine; Walter J. Koroshetz; Debra Babcock; Dennis W. Dickson; Wendy R. Galpern; M. Maria Glymour; Steven M. Greenberg; Michael Hutton; David S. Knopman; Andrey N. Kuzmichev; Jennifer J. Manly; Karen Marder; Bruce L. Miller; Creighton H. Phelps; William W. Seeley; Beth-Anne Sieber; Nina Silverberg; Margaret Sutherland; Christine L. Torborg; Salina P. Waddy; Berislav V. Zlokovic; Roderick A. Corriveau

The National Alzheimers Project Act, signed into law in 2011, mandates a National Plan to Address Alzheimers Disease that is updated annually. In the Plan, the term Alzheimer disease includes not only Alzheimer disease (AD) proper, but also several specified related dementias, namely, frontotemporal, Lewy body, vascular, and mixed dementia. In response to a specific action item in the 2012 National Plan, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, in collaboration with the National Institute on Aging, convened panels of experts and conducted a 2-day public conference to develop research priorities and timelines for addressing Alzheimer disease–related dementias (ADRD) in 5 topic areas: multiple etiology dementias, health disparities, Lewy body dementias including dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson disease dementia, frontotemporal dementia and related tauopathies, and vascular contributions to ADRD. By design, the product was up to 8 prioritized research recommendations in each topic area including estimated timelines from when work on a recommendation is started to completion or to full implementation of an ongoing activity, and recognition of shared research themes across recommendations. These included increased education and training of both researchers and health care professionals, addressing health disparities, fundamental neurobiology research, advanced diagnostics, collaborative biosample repositories, and a focus on developing effective interventions to prevent or treat ADRD by the year 2025 as targeted by the National Plan.


Alzheimers & Dementia | 2011

Assessment of cognition in early dementia.

Nina Silverberg; Laurie Ryan; Maria C. Carrillo; Reisa A. Sperling; Ronald C. Petersen; Holly Posner; Peter J. Snyder; Robin C. Hilsabeck; Michela Gallagher; Jacob Raber; Albert A. Rizzo; Katherine L. Possin; Jonathan W. King; Jeffrey Kaye; Brian R. Ott; Marilyn S. Albert; Molly V. Wagster; John A. Schinka; C. Munro Cullum; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; David A. Balota; Stephen M. Rao; David A. Loewenstein; Andrew E. Budson; Jason Brandt; Jennifer J. Manly; Lisa L. Barnes; Adriana M. Strutt; Tamar H. Gollan; Mary Ganguli

Better tools for assessing cognitive impairment in the early stages of Alzheimers disease (AD) are required to enable diagnosis of the disease before substantial neurodegeneration has taken place and to allow for detection of subtle changes in the early stages of progression of the disease. The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimers Association convened a meeting to discuss state‐of‐the art methods for cognitive assessment, including computerized batteries, as well as new approaches in the pipeline. Speakers described research using novel tests of object recognition, spatial navigation, attentional control, semantic memory, semantic interference, prospective memory, false memory, and executive function as among the tools that could provide earlier identification of individuals with AD. In addition to early detection, there is a need for assessments that reflect real‐world situations so as to better assess functional disability. It is especially important to develop assessment tools that are useful in ethnically, culturally, and linguistically diverse populations as well as in individuals with neurodegenerative disease other than AD.


Movement Disorders | 2016

The NINDS Parkinson's disease biomarkers program

Liana S. Rosenthal; Daniel Drake; Roy N. Alcalay; Debra Babcock; F. DuBois Bowman; Alice Chen-Plotkin; Ted M. Dawson; Richard B. Dewey; Dwight C. German; Xuemei Huang; Barry Landin; Matthew J. McAuliffe; Vladislav A. Petyuk; Clemens R. Scherzer; Coryse St Hillaire-Clarke; Beth Anne Sieber; Margaret Sutherland; Chi Tarn; Andrew B. West; David E. Vaillancourt; Jing Zhang; Katrina Gwinn

Neuroprotection for Parkinsons disease (PD) remains elusive. Biomarkers hold the promise of removing roadblocks to therapy development. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke has therefore established the Parkinsons Disease Biomarkers Program to promote discovery of PD biomarkers for use in phase II and III clinical trials.


Biomarkers in Medicine | 2017

Parkinson's disease biomarkers: perspective from the NINDS Parkinson's Disease Biomarkers Program

Katrina Gwinn; Karen K. David; Christine Swanson-Fischer; Roger L. Albin; Coryse St Hillaire-Clarke; Beth Anne Sieber; Codrin Lungu; F. DuBois Bowman; Roy N. Alcalay; Debra Babcock; Ted M. Dawson; Richard B. Dewey; Tatiana Foroud; Dwight C. German; Xuemei Huang; Vlad Petyuk; Judith A. Potashkin; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Margaret Sutherland; David R. Walt; Andrew B. West; Jing Zhang; Alice Chen-Plotkin; Clemens R. Scherzer; David E. Vaillancourt; Liana S. Rosenthal

Biomarkers for Parkinsons disease (PD) diagnosis, prognostication and clinical trial cohort selection are an urgent need. While many promising markers have been discovered through the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Parkinsons Disease Biomarker Program (PDBP) and other mechanisms, no single PD marker or set of markers are ready for clinical use. Here we discuss the current state of biomarker discovery for platforms relevant to PDBP. We discuss the role of the PDBP in PD biomarker identification and present guidelines to facilitate their development. These guidelines include: harmonizing procedures for biofluid acquisition and clinical assessments, replication of the most promising biomarkers, support and encouragement of publications that report negative findings, longitudinal follow-up of current cohorts including the PDBP, testing of wearable technologies to capture readouts between study visits and development of recently diagnosed (de novo) cohorts to foster identification of the earliest markers of disease onset.


Neurology | 2017

Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias Summit 2016: National research priorities

Roderick A. Corriveau; W. J. Koroshetz; Jordan T. Gladman; Sophia Jeon; Debra Babcock; David A. Bennett; S. Thomas Carmichael; Susan Dickinson; Dennis W. Dickson; Marian Emr; Howard Fillit; Steven M. Greenberg; Michael Hutton; David S. Knopman; Jennifer J. Manly; Karen S. Marder; Claudia S. Moy; Creighton H. Phelps; Paul A. Scott; William W. Seeley; Beth Anne Sieber; Nina Silverberg; Margaret Sutherland; Angela Taylor; Christine L. Torborg; Salina P. Waddy; Amelie K. Gubitz; David M. Holtzman

Goal 1 of the National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease is to prevent and effectively treat Alzheimer disease and Alzheimer disease–related dementias by 2025. To help inform the research agenda toward achieving this goal, the NIH hosts periodic summits that set and refine relevant research priorities for the subsequent 5 to 10 years. This proceedings article summarizes the 2016 Alzheimers Disease–Related Dementias Summit, including discussion of scientific progress, challenges, and opportunities in major areas of dementia research, including mixed-etiology dementias, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal degeneration, vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia, dementia disparities, and dementia nomenclature.


NeuroImage | 2016

Parkinson's disease biomarkers program brain imaging repository.

Edward Ofori; Guangwei Du; Debra Babcock; Xuemei Huang; David E. Vaillancourt

The Parkinsons Disease Biomarkers Program (PDBP) is a multi-site study designed to identify Parkinsons disease (PD) biomarkers that can be used to improve the understanding of PD pathophysiology and to develop tools that provide novel measures to evaluate PD clinical trials. The PDBP consortium comprises numerous individual projects of which two are specifically geared to the development of brain imaging markers for diagnosis, progression, and prognosis of PD or related disorders. All study data from PD patients, atypical Parkinsonian patients, patients with essential tremor, and healthy controls collected from the sites are integrated in the PDBP database and will be publically available. All subjects are asked to submit blood samples, and undergo a battery of clinical evaluations that cover motor, cognitive, and other background information. In addition, a subset of subjects contributed cerebrospinal fluid samples. A restricted access, web-based Data Management Resource facilitates rapid sharing of data and biosamples across the entire PD research community. The PDBP consortium is a useful resource for research and collaboration aimed at the discovery of biomarkers and their use in understanding the pathophysiology of PD.


Science Translational Medicine | 2018

Finding useful biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease

Alice Chen-Plotkin; Roger L. Albin; Roy N. Alcalay; Debra Babcock; Vikram Singh Bajaj; Dubois Bowman; Alex Buko; Jesse M. Cedarbaum; Daniel Chelsky; Mark R. Cookson; Ted M. Dawson; Richard B. Dewey; Tatiana Foroud; Mark Frasier; Dwight C. German; Katrina Gwinn; Xuemei Huang; Catherine Kopil; Thomas Kremer; Shirley Lasch; Ken Marek; Jarrod A. Marto; Kalpana M. Merchant; Brit Mollenhauer; Anna Naito; Judith A. Potashkin; Alyssa Reimer; Liana S. Rosenthal; Rachel Saunders-Pullman; Clemens R. Scherzer

The recent advent of an “ecosystem” of shared biosample biorepositories and data sets will aid efforts to define biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease. The recent advent of an “ecosystem” of shared biofluid sample biorepositories and data sets will focus biomarker efforts in Parkinson’s disease, boosting the therapeutic development pipeline and enabling translation with real-world impact.

Collaboration


Dive into the Debra Babcock's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margaret Sutherland

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard B. Dewey

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katrina Gwinn

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xuemei Huang

Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Beth Anne Sieber

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clemens R. Scherzer

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dwight C. German

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge