Debra L. Weiner

C-reactive protein is a potent predictor of mortality independently of and in combination with troponin T in acute coronary syndromes : A TIMI 11A substudy

Abstract Objectives. We evaluated C-reactive protein (CRP) alone and in conjunction with a rapid qualitative assay for cardiac-specific troponin T (cTnT) for predicting 14-day mortality in patients with unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial infarction (NQMI). Background. Elevated CRP has been found to correlate with higher risk for cardiac events in patients with coronary disease. Methods. At enrollment into the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11A trial, a dose-ranging trial of enoxaparin for unstable angina and NQMI, serum was obtained for CRP measurement and rapid cTnT assay. Results. Quantitative CRP and rapid cTnT assays were performed in all patients. CRP was higher among patients who died than in survivors (7.2 vs. 1.3 mg/dl, p = 0.0038). The probability of a positive rapid cTnT assay rose with increasing CRP concentration (p Conclusions. Elevated CRP at presentation in patients with unstable angina or NQMI is correlated with increased 14-day mortality, even in patients with a negative rapid cTnT assay. Quantitative CRP and a rapid cTnT assay provide complementary information for stratifying patients with regard to mortality risk.

Analytical evaluation of particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assays for C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A and mannose-binding protein in human serum.

Against a background of growing interest in more sensitive assays for quantifying various acute phase proteins, we evaluated the performance of recently developed tests for C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA) and mannose-binding protein (MBP) on the Behring nephelometer II (BN II). Sample results outside the calibration ranges of 3·5 to 220 mg/L for CRP, 3·3 to 215 mg/L for SAA and 0·09 to 5·6 mg/L for MBP were automatically re-measured at another dilution. The lower limits of detection were 0·01, 0·7 and 0·01 mg/L for CRP, SAA and MBP, respectively. The coefficients of variation (CV) for intra- (n ⩾ 20) and inter- (n ⩾ 15) assay precision were < 5·2% and < 8·5%, respectively, for the three proteins at concentrations representing low, normal and high. Linearity for each method was within 5% of the expected values throughout the calibration range. We observed no significant interference from bilirubin (up to 300 mg/L) or haemoglobin (up to 10 g/L) for the three tests. Method comparison studies performed for CRP and SAA yielded the following results: y (CRP on BN II) = 0·75x (ELISA, Hemagen) −0·25 mg/L (r = 0·981, Sy/x = 2·1 mg/L; y (SAA on BN II) = 1·44x (ELISA, Hemagen) −9·9 mg/L (r = 0·972, Sy/x = 6·9 mg/L), where ELISA is enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Reference intervals established in 261 adult blood donors (aged 36·2 ± 9·0 years) were found to be log-normal with 2·5th, 50th and 97·5th centiles of < 0·17, 100 and 10·1 mg/L for CRP, < 0·84, 2·10 and 9·70 mg/L for SAA; and 0·30, 1·28 and 4·10 mg/L for MBP. We observed no relationship with CRP concentration and age; however, SAA levels increased with age while MBP levels decreased. The BN II provides a simple, rapid and sensitive system for measuring CRP, SAA and MBP in human serum.

Serum amyloid A predicts early mortality in acute coronary syndromes: A TIMI 11A substudy.

OBJECTIVES We evaluated the ability of serum amyloid A (SAA), alone and in combination with a rapid qualitative assay for cardiac-specific troponin T (cTnT), to predict 14-day mortality in patients with unstable angina or non-Q wave myocardial infarction (NQMI). BACKGROUND Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) has been associated with adverse outcomes in unstable coronary syndromes but data regarding its acute phase counterpart, SAA, are conflicting. METHODS Serum amyloid A measurement and a rapid cTnT assay were performed on blood obtained at enrollment into Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 11A, a dose-ranging trial of enoxaparin for unstable angina and NQMI. RESULTS Serum amyloid A was higher in patients who died compared with survivors (6.28 vs. 0.75 mg/dL, p = 0.002). Among patients with a negative rapid cTnT, mortality was higher for those in the top quintile of SAA (6.1 vs. 0.7%, p = 0.003). Patients with both an early positive rapid cTnT (< or =10 min until assay positive) and SAA in the fifth quintile had the highest mortality followed by those with either markedly elevated SAA or an early positive rapid cTnT, while patients with both a negative rapid cTnT and SAA in quintiles 1-4 were at very low risk, (9.1 vs. 3.6 vs. 0.7%, p <0.002). CONCLUSIONS Similar to CRP, baseline elevation of SAA identifies patients hospitalized with unstable angina and NQMI at higher risk for early mortality, even among those with a negative rapid assay for cTnT. These data support further investigation of inflammatory markers used alone and in combination with cardiac troponins for risk assessment in unstable coronary syndromes.

Nitric Oxide for Inhalation in the Acute Treatment of Sickle Cell Pain Crisis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Inhaled nitric oxide has shown evidence of efficacy in mouse models of sickle cell disease (SCD), case series of patients with acute chest syndrome, and 2 small placebo-controlled trials for treatment of vaso-occlusive pain crisis (VOC). OBJECTIVE To determine whether inhaled nitric oxide gas reduces the duration of painful crisis in patients with SCD who present to the emergency department or hospital for care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial for up to 72 hours of inhaled nitric oxide gas vs inhaled nitrogen placebo in 150 participants presenting with VOC of SCD at 11 centers between October 5, 2004, and December 22, 2008. Intervention Inhaled nitric oxide gas vs inhaled nitrogen placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary end point was the time to resolution of painful crisis, defined by (1) freedom from parenteral opioid use for 5 hours; (2) pain relief as assessed by visual analog pain scale scores of 6 cm or lower (on 0-10 scale); (3) ability to walk; and (4) patients and familys decision, with physician consensus, that the remaining pain could be managed at home. RESULTS There was no significant change in the primary end point between the nitric oxide and placebo groups, with a median time to resolution of crisis of 73.0 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.0-91.0) and 65.5 hours (95% CI, 48.1-84.0), respectively (P = .87). There were no significant differences in secondary outcome measures, including length of hospitalization, visual analog pain scale scores, cumulative opioid usage, and rate of acute chest syndrome. Inhaled nitric oxide was well tolerated, with no increase in serious adverse events. Increases in venous methemoglobin concentration confirmed adherence and randomization but did not exceed 5% in any study participant. Significant increases in plasma nitrate occurred in the treatment group, but there were no observed increases in plasma or whole blood nitrite. CONCLUSION Among patients with SCD hospitalized with VOC, the use of inhaled nitric oxide compared with placebo did not improve time to crisis resolution. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00094887.

Mannan-Binding Lectin Enhances Susceptibility to Visceral Leishmaniasis

ABSTRACT Levels of the serum opsonin mannan-binding lectin (MBL) were directly correlated with the probability of developing visceral leishmaniasis. Monocytes infected with MBL-opsonized Leishmania chagasi promastigotes secreted higher levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 than cells infected with nonopsonized parasites. Our findings indicate that MBL can modulate the clinical outcome of infection with L. chagasi and the function of infected macrophages.

Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization in Sickle Cell Disease: Prevalence in 2010

BACKGROUND: Transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs) is frequently required for care of individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Alloimmunization rates are high and may be reduced by matching for RBC antigens that can cause alloimmunization.

Failure of prophylactic and therapeutic use of a murine anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody in Escherichia coli sepsis in the rabbit.

OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of a murine anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) monoclonal antibody in the treatment of Escherichia coli peritonitis and sepsis in the rabbit. DESIGN Prospective, paired, randomized, blinded, controlled animal trial. SETTING Animal research laboratory. SUBJECTS Male New Zealand white rabbits. INTERVENTIONS Anesthetized rabbits were cannulated with indwelling femoral arterial and venous catheters. Peritonitis and sepsis were induced by intraperitoneal challenge using live E. coli O18ac bacteria. All animals were treated with gentamicin and ceftriaxone 1 hr after challenge. One group (prophylaxis experiment) consisting of ten rabbit pairs (the prophylaxis group), was treated with either murine anti-TNF monoclonal antibody or an equivalent volume of 5% albumin 3 hrs before E. coli challenge. A second group (therapeutic experiment) of 17 rabbit pairs, the treatment group, was also treated with murine anti-TNF monoclonal antibody or albumin control 1 hr after E. coli challenge. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS All animals were bacteremic 1 hr after challenge. Physiologic measures of sepsis (heart rate, mean arterial pressure, serum bicarbonate, and arterial pH) did not differ between control, prophylaxis, and treatment groups. Peak serum TNF concentration was significantly (p < .01) lower in animals receiving anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, in both the prophylaxis and treatment groups, than in control animals. The survival rate was not improved significantly in either the prophylaxis or treatment group. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic and therapeutic use of anti-TNF monoclonal antibody in a rabbit model of E. coli peritonitis and sepsis significantly lowers TNF concentrations but does not ameliorate the physiologic effects of sepsis and does not significantly improve survival.

NIH Roundtable on Emergency Trauma Research

STUDY OBJECTIVE The National Institutes of Health (NIH) formed an NIH Task Force on Research in Emergency Medicine to enhance NIH support for emergency care research. The NIH Trauma Research Roundtable was convened on June 22 to 23, 2009. The objectives of the roundtable are to identify key research questions essential to advancing the scientific underpinnings of emergency trauma care and to discuss the barriers and best means to advance research by exploring the role of trauma research networks and collaboration between NIH and the emergency trauma care community. METHODS Before the roundtable, the emergency care domains to be discussed were selected and experts in each of the fields were invited to participate in the roundtable. Domain experts were asked to identify research priorities and challenges and separate them into mechanistic, translational, and clinical categories. During and after the conference, the lists were circulated among the participants and revised to reach a consensus. RESULTS Emergency trauma care research is characterized by focus on the timing, sequence, and time sensitivity of disease processes and treatment effects. Rapidly identifying the phenotype of patients on the time spectrum of acuity and severity after injury and the mechanistic reasons for heterogeneity in outcome are important challenges in emergency trauma research. Other research priorities include the need to elucidate the timing, sequence, and duration of causal molecular and cellular events involved in time-critical injuries, and the development of treatments capable of halting or reversing them; the need for novel experimental models of acute injury; the need to assess the effect of development and aging on the postinjury response; and the need to understand why there are regional differences in outcomes after injury. Important barriers to emergency care research include a limited number of trained investigators and experienced mentors, limited research infrastructure and support, and regulatory hurdles. CONCLUSION The science of emergency trauma care may be advanced by facilitating the following: (1) development of an acute injury template for clinical research; (2) developing emergency trauma clinical research networks; (3) integrating emergency trauma research into Clinical and Translational Science Awards; (4) developing emergency care-specific initiatives within the existing structure of NIH institutes and centers; (5) involving acute trauma and emergency specialists in grant review and research advisory processes; (6) supporting learn-phase or small, clinical trials; (7) performing research to address ethical and regulatory issues; and (8) training emergency care investigators with research training programs.

Clinical practice guideline improves the treatment of sickle cell disease vasoocclusive pain

Pain is the most common complication of sickle cell disease requiring emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalization. A Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) to manage acute sickle cell pain offers clinicians a standardized approach for the provision of evidence‐based, cost‐effective care. After CPG implementation, monitoring of pre‐established indicators is a strategy to evaluate progress toward meeting the goal of providing rapid, effective pain relief for patients with acute sickle cell pain.

IMPROVE trial: A randomized controlled trial of patient-controlled analgesia for sickle cell painful episodes: rationale, design challenges, initial experience, and recommendations for future studies

Background The hallmark of sickle cell disease (SCD) is pain from a vaso-occlusive crisis. Although ambulatory pain accounts for most days in pain, pain is also the most common cause of hospitalization and is typically treated with parenteral opioids. The evidence base is lacking for most analgesic practice in SCD, particularly for the optimal opioid dosing for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), in part because of the challenges of the trial design and conduct for this rare disease. Purpose The purpose of this report is to describe our Network’s experiences with protocol development, implementation, and analysis, including overall study design, the value of pain assessments rather than ‘crisis’ resolution as trial endpoints, and alternative statistical analysis strategies. Methods The Improving Pain Management and Outcomes with Various Strategies (IMPROVE) PCA trial was a multisite inpatient randomized controlled trial comparing two PCA-dosing strategies in adults and children with SCD and acute pain conducted by the SCD Clinical Research Network. The specified primary endpoint was a 25-mm change in a daily average pain intensity using a Visual Analogue Scale, and a number of related pain intensity and pain interference measures were selected as secondary efficacy outcomes. A time-to-event analysis strategy was planned for the primary endpoint. Results Of 1116 individuals admitted for pain at 31 participating sites over a 6-month period, 38 were randomized and 4 withdrawn. The trial was closed early due to poor accrual, reflecting a substantial number of challenges encountered during trial implementation. Limitations While some of the design issues were unique to SCD or analgesic studies, many of the trial implementation challenges reflected the increasing complexity of conducting clinical trials in the inpatient setting with multiple care providers and evolving electronic medical record systems, particularly in the context of large urban academic medical centers. Lessons learned Complicated clinical organization of many sites likely slowed study initiation. More extensive involvement of research staff and site principal investigator in the clinical care operations improved site performance. During the subsequent data analysis, alternative statistical approaches were considered, the results of which should inform future efficacy assessments and increase future trial recruitment success by allowing substantial reductions in target sample size. Conclusions A complex randomized analgesic trial was initiated within a multisite disease network seeking to provide an evidence base for clinical care. A number of design considerations were shown to be feasible in this setting, and several pain intensity and pain interference measures were shown to be sensitive to time- and treatment-related improvements. While the premature closure and small sample size precluded definitive conclusions regarding treatment efficacy, this trial furnishes a template for design and implementation considerations that should improve future SCD analgesic trials.