Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dennis E. Amundson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dennis E. Amundson.


Chest | 2008

Definitive Care for the Critically Ill During a Disaster: A Framework for Allocation of Scarce Resources in Mass Critical Care: From a Task Force for Mass Critical Care Summit Meeting, January 26–27, 2007, Chicago, IL

Asha V. Devereaux; Jeffrey R. Dichter; Michael D. Christian; Nancy Neveloff Dubler; Christian Sandrock; John L. Hick; Tia Powell; James Geiling; Dennis E. Amundson; Tom E. Baudendistel; Dana Braner; Mike A. Klein; Kenneth A. Berkowitz; J. Randall Curtis; Lewis Rubinson

BACKGROUND Anticipated circumstances during the next severe influenza pandemic highlight the insufficiency of staff and equipment to meet the needs of all critically ill victims. It is plausible that an entire country could face simultaneous limitations, resulting in severe shortages of critical care resources to the point where patients could no longer receive all of the care that would usually be required and expected. There may even be such resource shortfalls that some patients would not be able to access even the most basic of life-sustaining interventions. Rationing of critical care in this circumstance would be difficult, yet may be unavoidable. Without planning, the provision of care would assuredly be chaotic, inequitable, and unfair. The Task Force for Mass Critical Care Working Group met in Chicago in January 2007 to proactively suggest guidance for allocating scarce critical care resources. TASK FORCE SUGGESTIONS In order to allocate critical care resources when systems are overwhelmed, the Task Force for Mass Critical Care Working Group suggests the following: (1) an equitable triage process utilizing the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring system; (2) the concept of triage by a senior clinician(s) without direct clinical obligation, and a support system to implement and manage the triage process; (3) legal and ethical constructs underpinning the allocation of scarce resources; and (4) a mechanism for rapid revision of the triage process as further disaster experiences, research, planning, and modeling come to light.


Chest | 2008

Definitive care for the critically III during a disaster: A framework for allocation of scarce resources in mass critical care

Asha V. Devereaux; Jeffrey R. Dichter; Michael D. Christian; Nancy Neveloff Dubler; Christian Sandrock; John L. Hick; Tia Powell; James Geiling; Dennis E. Amundson; Tom E. Baudendistel; Dana Braner; Mike A. Klein; Kenneth A. Berkowitz; J. Randall Curtis; Lewis Rubinson

BACKGROUND Anticipated circumstances during the next severe influenza pandemic highlight the insufficiency of staff and equipment to meet the needs of all critically ill victims. It is plausible that an entire country could face simultaneous limitations, resulting in severe shortages of critical care resources to the point where patients could no longer receive all of the care that would usually be required and expected. There may even be such resource shortfalls that some patients would not be able to access even the most basic of life-sustaining interventions. Rationing of critical care in this circumstance would be difficult, yet may be unavoidable. Without planning, the provision of care would assuredly be chaotic, inequitable, and unfair. The Task Force for Mass Critical Care Working Group met in Chicago in January 2007 to proactively suggest guidance for allocating scarce critical care resources. TASK FORCE SUGGESTIONS In order to allocate critical care resources when systems are overwhelmed, the Task Force for Mass Critical Care Working Group suggests the following: (1) an equitable triage process utilizing the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring system; (2) the concept of triage by a senior clinician(s) without direct clinical obligation, and a support system to implement and manage the triage process; (3) legal and ethical constructs underpinning the allocation of scarce resources; and (4) a mechanism for rapid revision of the triage process as further disaster experiences, research, planning, and modeling come to light.


The Journal of Infectious Diseases | 2002

Coccidioidomycosis Outbreak among United States Navy SEALs Training in a Coccidioides immitis–Endemic Area—Coalinga, California

Nancy F. Crum; Carla Lamb; Gregory Utz; Dennis E. Amundson; Mark S. Wallace

An outbreak of coccidioidomycosis among 22 Navy SEALs occurred during training exercises in Coalinga, California. Ten (45%) of the 22 men had serologic evidence of acute coccidioidomycosis, the highest attack rate ever reported for a military unit. All case patients were symptomatic, and 50% had abnormal chest radiographs. There were no cases of dissemination and no deaths to date. Coccidioidomycosis continues to be a threat to military members and civilians who reside or train in areas where Coccidioides immitis, the causative agent, is endemic.


American Journal of Preventive Medicine | 2003

Halting a pneumococcal pneumonia outbreak among United States Marine Corps trainees

Nancy F. Crum; Mark R. Wallace; Carla Lamb; Ava Marie S. Conlin; Dennis E. Amundson; Patrick E. Olson; Margaret A. K. Ryan; Ted J Robinson; Gregory C. Gray; Kenneth C. Earhart

BACKGROUND Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of bacterial pneumonia in all age groups. Identifying outbreaks of pneumococcal disease and key risk factors may lead to improvements in vaccination and prevention strategies for high-risk groups. A significant outbreak of S. pneumoniae pneumonia that occurred among Marine recruits is reported here. METHODS An outbreak was investigated using standard microbiologic procedures and epidemiologic evaluation to define the extent of the outbreak, determine the microbiologic causative agent(s), identify risk factors for the development of disease, and institute preventive measures against further cases of pneumonia among recruits. RESULTS Fifty-two cases of radiographically confirmed pneumonia occurred among 3367 Marine recruits over a 2-week period in November 2000. Twenty-five of these cases occurred in a single company of 481 men, with an attack rate of 5.2%. Twelve of the 25 cases were caused by S. pneumoniae, serotypes 4 and 9v. The outbreak rapidly ended following isolation of cases, prophylaxis with oral azithromycin, and administration of the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine. CONCLUSIONS This outbreak of pneumococcal disease occurred in the setting of intense military training and a crowded environment. The use of the pneumococcal vaccine year-round in military trainees and other high-risk populations to reduce pneumococcal disease should be considered.


Postgraduate Medicine | 2002

Vesicants and nerve agents in chemical warfare. Decontamination and treatment strategies for a changed world.

Asha Devereaux; Dennis E. Amundson; J. S. Parrish; Angeline A. Lazarus

PREVIEW Our evolving global political climate mandates preparation for attacks using chemical agents, which aggressive countries or organizations can easily make, transport, and deploy. In this article, a complement to the bioterrorism symposium featured in the August issue, Drs Devereaux, Amundson, Parrish, and Lazarus provide an overview of the vesicants and the nerve agents most likely to be used in chemical warfare. An article on the pulmonary agents, cyanides, incapacitating agents, and riot control agents will appear in a subsequent issue.


Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 1988

A fatal case of propranolol poisoning.

Dennis E. Amundson; Stephanie K. Brodine

Propranolol hydrochloride is a beta-adrenergic blocking drug used in a variety of clinical conditions. Overdoses can result in severe hypotensive states usually associated with bradycardia or asystole or with profound myocardial depression. We report on an 18-year-old man who ingested a massive dose of propranolol HCl in a suicide attempt. The patient was brought to the hospital in an unresponsive state within 30 minutes of ingestion. He was initially stabilized but subsequently died nine hours after the drug was ingested. Invasive monitoring during this period revealed the shock to be secondary to marked depression of his systemic vascular resistance. Cardiac rhythm and left ventricular output were maintained throughout the attempted resuscitation. This hemodynamic picture suggests that decreased systemic vascular resistance may be another mechanism of shock in significant propranolol HCl overdoses.


Critical Care Nurse | 2013

Plasmapheresis in the Management of Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

Gilbert Seda; Jill M. Meyer; Dennis E. Amundson; Massoud Daheshia

Plasmapheresis can benefit a variety of critically ill patients. A woman with diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypertriglyceridemia was treated with plasmapheresis when conventional treatments did not markedly reduce her triglyceridemia. The patient was admitted to a medical intensive care unit because of diabetic ketoacidosis with severe lipemia. The lipemia-associated interference in laboratory studies made treatment of electrolyte abnormalities extremely difficult. The hypertriglyceridemia was initially treated with insulin, antilipidemic medications, and heparin, but the levels of triglycerides remained elevated, delaying results of needed laboratory studies for hours. After plasmapheresis, the serum level of triglycerides decreased by 77% in less than 24 hours. Severe lipemia interferes with photometric laboratory studies, yielding an underestimation of serum levels of electrolytes. Plasmapheresis is safe, rapid, and effective for emergent management of severe hypertriglyceridemia in critically ill patients. The impact of the procedure on critical care nursing is growing as nurses become involved in the treatment and follow-up care of patients who have plasmapheresis.


Chest | 2014

Resource-Poor Settings: Response, Recovery, and Research: Care of the Critically Ill and Injured During Pandemics and Disasters: CHEST Consensus Statement

James Geiling; Frederick M. Burkle; T. Eoin West; Timothy M. Uyeki; Dennis E. Amundson; Guillermo Dominguez-Cherit; Charles D. Gomersall; Matthew L. Lim; Valerie A. Luyckx; Babak Sarani; Michael D. Christian; Asha V. Devereaux; Jeffrey R. Dichter; Niranjan Kissoon

BACKGROUND Planning for mass critical care in resource-poor and constrained settings has been largely ignored, despite large, densely crowded populations who are prone to suffer disproportionately from natural disasters. As a result, disaster response has been suboptimal and in many instances hampered by lack of planning, education and training, information, and communication. METHODS The Resource-Poor Settings panel developed five key question domains; defining the term resource poor and using the traditional phases of the disaster cycle (mitigation/preparedness/response/recovery). Literature searches were conducted to identify evidence to answer the key questions in these areas. Given a lack of data on which to develop evidence-based recommendations, expert-opinion suggestions were developed, and consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi process. RESULTS The five key questions were as follows: definition, capacity building and mitigation, what resources can we bring to bear to assist/surge, response, and reconstitution and recovery of host nation critical care capabilities. Addressing these led the panel to offer 33 suggestions. Because of the large number of suggestions, the results have been separated into two sections: part I, Infrastructure/Capacity in the accompanying article, and part II, Response/Recovery/Research in this article. CONCLUSIONS A lack of rudimentary ICU resources and capacity to enhance services plagues resource-poor or constrained settings. Capacity building therefore entails preventative strategies and strengthening of primary health services. Assistance from other countries and organizations is often needed to mount a surge response. Moreover, the disengagement of these responding groups and host country recovery require active planning. Future improvements in all phases require active research activities.


Chest | 2014

Resource-Poor Settings: Infrastructure and Capacity Building: Care of the Critically Ill and Injured During Pandemics and Disasters: CHEST Consensus Statement

James Geiling; Frederick M. Burkle; Dennis E. Amundson; Guillermo Dominguez-Cherit; Charles D. Gomersall; Matthew L. Lim; Valerie A. Luyckx; Babak Sarani; Timothy M. Uyeki; T. Eoin West; Michael D. Christian; Asha V. Devereaux; Jeffrey R. Dichter; Niranjan Kissoon; Lewis Rubinson; Robert A. Balk; Wanda D. Barfield; Martha Bartz; Josh Benditt; William Beninati; Kenneth A. Berkowitz; Lee Daugherty Biddison; Dana Braner; Richard D. Branson; Bruce A. Cairns; Brendan G. Carr; Brooke Courtney; Lisa D. DeDecker; Marla J. De Jong; David J. Dries

BACKGROUND Planning for mass critical care (MCC) in resource-poor or constrained settings has been largely ignored, despite their large populations that are prone to suffer disproportionately from natural disasters. Addressing MCC in these settings has the potential to help vast numbers of people and also to inform planning for better-resourced areas. METHODS The Resource-Poor Settings panel developed five key question domains; defining the term resource poor and using the traditional phases of disaster (mitigation/preparedness/response/recovery), literature searches were conducted to identify evidence on which to answer the key questions in these areas. Given a lack of data upon which to develop evidence-based recommendations, expert-opinion suggestions were developed, and consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi process. RESULTS The five key questions were then separated as follows: definition, infrastructure and capacity building, resources, response, and reconstitution/recovery of host nation critical care capabilities and research. Addressing these questions led the panel to offer 33 suggestions. Because of the large number of suggestions, the results have been separated into two sections: part 1, Infrastructure/Capacity in this article, and part 2, Response/Recovery/Research in the accompanying article. CONCLUSIONS Lack of, or presence of, rudimentary ICU resources and limited capacity to enhance services further challenge resource-poor and constrained settings. Hence, capacity building entails preventative strategies and strengthening of primary health services. Assistance from other countries and organizations is needed to mount a surge response. Moreover, planning should include when to disengage and how the host nation can provide capacity beyond the mass casualty care event.


Southern Medical Journal | 2010

Predominant Cartilaginous Hamartoma: An Unusual Variant of Chondromatous Hamartoma

Gilbert Seda; Dennis E. Amundson; Mercury Y. Lin

Chondromatous hamartomas are the most common benign lung tumors and the third most common pulmonary nodule. Histologically, they are characteristically composed of hyaline cartilage mixed with fibromyxoid stroma and adipose tissue surrounded by epithelial cells. We report the case of a healthy, 60-year-old woman with an incidentally discovered chondromatous hamartoma that was thorascopically excised. Her pulmonary hamartoma was predominantly cartilaginous, which only occurs in 1% of hamartomas.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dennis E. Amundson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge