Dieter Meier

Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II)

Summary Background Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke has been investigated in several clinical trials, with variable results. We have assessed the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (0·9 mg/kg bodyweight) within 6 h of stroke onset. Methods This non-angiographic, randomised, double-blind, trial enrolled 800 patients in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. Computed tomography was used to exclude patients with signs of major infarction. Alteplase (n=409) and placebo (n=391) were randomly assigned with stratification for time since symptom onset (0–3 h or 3–6 h). The primary endpoint was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days, dichotomised for favourable (score 0–1) and unfavourable (score 2–6) outcome. Analyses were by intention to treat. Findings 165 (40·3%) alteplase-group patients and 143 (36·6%) placebo-group patients had favourable mRS outcomes (absolute difference 3·7%, p=0·277). In a post-hoc analysis of mRS scores dichotomised for death or dependency, 222 (54·3%) alteplase-group and 180 (46·0%) placebo-group patients had favourable outcomes (score 0–2; absolute difference 8·3%, p=0·024). Treatment differences were similar whether patients were treated within 3 h or 3–6 h. 85 (10·6%) patients died, with no difference between treatment groups at day 90·14 days (43 alteplase, 42 placebo). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 36 (8·8%) alteplase-group patients and 13 (3·4%) placebo-group patients. Interpretation The results do not confirm a statistical benefit for alteplase. However, we believe the trend towards efficacy should be interpreted in the light of evidence from previous trials. Despite the increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage, thrombolysis with alteplase at a dose of 0·9 mg/kg in selected patients may lead to a clinically relevant improvement in outcome.

Dichotomized Efficacy End Points and Global End-Point Analysis Applied to the ECASS Intention-to-Treat Data Set Post Hoc Analysis of ECASS I

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE It is not yet known which end points are the most suitable for evaluation of the effects of acute stroke intervention. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) I study used 2 primary end points. The study was powered to detect a 15% improvement of the median of each primary end point. The study failed to show this effect and was negative in the intention-to-treat analysis. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) study used 4 dichotomized end points and applied a global end-point analysis. This study was positive and led to FDA approval of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. This study was undertaken to answer the question of whether a different statistical design may have shown a positive results of the ECASS I trial. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of the ECASS I intention-to-treat data set (615 randomized and treated patients, rtPA treatment versus placebo) and post hoc application of the NINDS trial statistical methodology (global end-point analysis). The scores of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) were dichotomized according to the criteria used in the NINDS trial. Favorable outcome was defined as a score of 0 or 1 on mRS, a score of 95 or 100 on BI, and a score of 0 or 1 on NIHSS. RESULTS The number of patients reaching favorable outcome were higher in all 3 end points in the rtPA-treated group. The effect sizes were 8% for mRS, 6% for BI, and 14% for NIHSS, respectively. The differences are statistically significant for the mRS (P=0.044; odds ratio [OR], 1. 4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 2.0) and the NIHSS (P=0.001; OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.8), while for the BI significance was missed (P=0.102; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.8). The global end-point statistics, however, shows a significant increase (P=0.008; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0) of favorable outcome in the rtPA-treated patient group. CONCLUSIONS Using the global end-point analysis, ECASS is positive in the intention-to-treat analysis. This may indicate that the time window for thrombolysis may be as long as 6 hours. Looking at the 3 dichotomized end points, the effect sizes for 2 end points, mRS and BI, are smaller in the ECASS 6-hour intention-to-treat population compared with the NINDS trial, whereas the effect size for the NIHSS is larger. While in the NINDS trial all 3 end points reveal statistically significant results, in ECASS only 2 of the 3 corresponding end points, mRS and NIHSS, were statistically significant. This finding underlines an important difference of a global end-point approach: it may show a positive overall result although one of the end points is not positive.

Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Mediates Cerebrolysin-Improved Neurological Function After Stroke

Background and Purpose— Cerebrolysin, a mixture of neurotrophic peptides, enhances neurogenesis and improves neurological outcome in experimental neurodegenerative diseases and stroke. The Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway stimulates neurogenesis after stroke. The present study tests whether the Shh pathway mediates cerebrolysin-induced neurogenesis and improves neurological outcome after stroke. Methods— Rats subjected to embolic stroke were treated with cerebrolysin with or without cyclopamine. Results— Using neural progenitor cells derived from the subventricular zone of the lateral ventricle of adult rats, we found that cerebrolysin significantly increased neural progenitor cells proliferation and their differentiation into neurons and myelinating oligodendrocytes, which were associated with upregulation of Shh and its receptors patched and smoothened. Blockage of the Shh signaling pathway with a pharmacological smoothened inhibitor, cyclopamine, abolished cerebrolysin-induced in vitro neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis. In the ischemic rats, treatment with cerebrolysin starting 24 hours after stroke significantly increased neural progenitor cell proliferation in the subventricular zone and enhanced neurogenesis, oligodendrogenesis, and axonal remodeling in the peri-infarct area. Moreover, profound neurological function improvements were observed in rats treated with cerebrolysin from week 3 to week 5 after stroke onset compared with vehicle-treated rats. However, in vivo inhibition of the Shh pathway with cyclopamine completely reversed the effects of cerebrolysin on neurorestoration and functional recovery. Conclusions— These results demonstrate that the Shh pathway mediates cerebrolysin-enhanced neurogenesis and white matter remodeling and improves functional recovery in rats after stroke.

Neuropeptide Treatment with Cerebrolysin Enhances the Survival of Grafted Neural Stem Cell in an α-Synuclein Transgenic Model of Parkinson’s Disease

Neuronal stem cell (NSC) grafts have been investigated as a potential neuro-restorative therapy in Parkinsons disease (PD) but their use is compromised by the death of grafted cells. We investigated the use of Cerebrolysin (CBL), a neurotrophic peptide mixture, as an adjunct to NSC therapy in the α-synuclein (α-syn) transgenic (tg) model of PD. In vehicle-treated α-syn tg mice, there was decreased survival of NSCs. In contrast, CBL treatment enhanced the survival of NSCs in α-syn tg groups and ameliorated behavioral deficits. The grafted NSCs showed lower levels of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling positive cells in the CBL-treated mice when compared with vehicle-treated α-syn tg mice. No evidence of tumor growth was detected. Levels of α-syn were similar in the vehicle in CBL-treated tg mice. In conclusion, CBL treatment might be a potential adjuvant for therapeutic NSC grafting in PD.

NEURO-PEPTIDE TREATMENT WITH CEREBROLYSIN IMPROVES THE SURVIVAL OF NEURAL STEM CELL GRAFTS IN THE APP TRANSGENIC MODEL OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE

P4-204 NEURO-PEPTIDE TREATMENT WITH CEREBROLYSIN IMPROVES THE SURVIVAL OF NEURAL STEM CELL GRAFTS IN THE APP TRANSGENIC MODEL OFALZHEIMER’S DISEASE Edward Rockenstein, Paula Desplats, Michael Mante, Jazmin Florio, Scott Anderson, Dieter Meier, Stefan Winter, Anthony Adame, Herbert Moessler, Eliezer Masliah, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States; University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States; University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States; University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States; Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH, Unterach, Austria; Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH, Unterach, Austria; Ever Neuro Pharma GmbH, San Diego, California, United States; University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States. Contact e-mail: erockenstein@ucsd.edu

Demonstration of therapeutic window of Cerebrolysin in embolic stroke: A prospective, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled study:

Background and aims In an effort to characterize the effects of Cerebrolysin for treatment of stroke that are essential for successful clinical translation, we have demonstrated that Cerebrolysin dose dependently enhanced neurological functional recovery in experimental stroke. Here, we conduct a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study to examine the therapeutic window of Cerebrolysin treatment of rats subjected to embolic stroke. Methods Male Wistar rats age 3–4 months (n = 100) were subjected to embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion. Animals were randomized to receive saline or Cerebrolysin daily for 10 consecutive days starting 4, 24, 48, and 72 h after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Neurological outcome was measured weekly with a battery of behavioral tests (adhesive removal test, modified neurological severity score (mNSS), and foot-fault test). Global test was employed to assess Cerebrolysin effect on neurological recovery with estimation of mean difference between Cerebrolysin and control-treated groups and its 95% confidence interval in the intent-to-treat population, where a negative value of the mean difference and 95% confidence interval < 0 indicated a significant treatment effect. All rats were sacrificed 28 days after middle cerebral artery occlusion and infarct volume was measured. Results Cerebrolysin treatment initiated within 48 h after middle cerebral artery occlusion onset significantly improved functional outcome; mean differences and 95% confidence interval were −11.6 (−17.7, −5.4) at 4 h, −7.1 (−13.5, −0.8) at 24 h, −8.4 (−14.2, −8.6) at 48 h, and −4.9 (−11.4, 1.5) at 72 h. There were no differences on infarct volume and mortality rate among groups. Conclusions With a clinically relevant rigorous experimental design, our data demonstrate that Cerebrolysin treatment effectively improves stroke recovery when administered up to 48 h after middle cerebral artery occlusion.