Dina Habbal
University of Liège
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dina Habbal.
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine | 2013
Christoph Pokorny; Daniela S. Klobassa; Gerald Pichler; Helena Erlbeck; Ruben G. L. Real; Andrea Kübler; Damien Lesenfants; Dina Habbal; Quentin Noirhomme; Monica Risetti; Donatella Mattia; Gernot R. Müller-Putz
OBJECTIVE Within this work an auditory P300 brain-computer interface based on tone stream segregation, which allows for binary decisions, was developed and evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two tone streams consisting of short beep tones with infrequently appearing deviant tones at random positions were used as stimuli. This paradigm was evaluated in 10 healthy subjects and applied to 12 patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS) at clinics in Graz, Würzburg, Rome, and Liège. A stepwise linear discriminant analysis classifier with 10×10 cross-validation was used to detect the presence of any P300 and to investigate attentional modulation of the P300 amplitude. RESULTS The results for healthy subjects were promising and most classification results were better than random. In 8 of the 10 subjects, focused attention on at least one of the tone streams could be detected on a single-trial basis. By averaging 10 data segments, classification accuracies up to 90.6% could be reached. However, for MCS patients only a small number of classification results were above chance level and none of the results were sufficient for communication purposes. Nevertheless, signs of consciousness were detected in 9 of the 12 patients, not on a single-trial basis, but after averaging of all corresponding data segments and computing significant differences. These significant results, however, strongly varied across sessions and conditions. CONCLUSION This work shows the transition of a paradigm from healthy subjects to MCS patients. Promising results with healthy subjects are, however, no guarantee of good results with patients. Therefore, more investigations are required before any definite conclusions about the usability of this paradigm for MCS patients can be drawn. Nevertheless, this paradigm might offer an opportunity to support bedside clinical assessment of MCS patients and eventually, to provide them with a means of communication.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair | 2015
Caroline Schnakers; Joseph T. Giacino; Marianne Løvstad; Dina Habbal; Mélanie Boly; Haibo Di; Steve Majerus; Steven Laureys
Background. Despite recent evidence suggesting that some severely brain-injured patients retain some capacity for top-down processing (covert cognition), the degree of sparing is unknown. Objective. Top-down attentional processing was assessed in patients in minimally conscious (MCS) and vegetative states (VS) using an active event-related potential (ERP) paradigm. Methods. A total of 26 patients were included (38 ± 12 years old, 9 traumatic, 21 patients >1 year postonset): 8 MCS+, 8 MCS−, and 10 VS patients. There were 14 healthy controls (30 ± 8 years old). The ERP paradigm included (1) a passive condition and (2) an active condition, wherein the participant was instructed to voluntarily focus attention on his/her own name. In each condition, the participant’s own name was presented 100 times (ie, 4 blocks of 25 stimuli). Results. In 5 MCS+ patients as well as in 3 MCS− patients and 1 VS patient, an enhanced P3 amplitude was observed in the active versus passive condition. Relative to controls, patients showed a response that was (1) widely distributed over frontoparietal areas and (2) not present in all blocks (3 of 4). In patients with covert cognition, the amplitude of the response was lower in frontocentral electrodes compared with controls but did not differ from that in the MCS+ group. Conclusion. The results indicate that volitional top-down attention is impaired in patients with covert cognition. Further investigation is crucially needed to better understand top-down cognitive functioning in this population because this may help refine brain-computer interface–based communication strategies.
Brain Injury | 2014
Dina Habbal; Olivia Gosseries; Quentin Noirhomme; Jerome Renaux; Damien Lesenfants; Tristan A. Bekinschtein; Steve Majerus; Steven Laureys; Caroline Schnakers
Abstract Objective: The aim of the study was to validate the use of electromyography (EMG) for detecting responses to command in patients in vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) or in minimally conscious state (MCS). Methods: Thirty-eight patients were included in the study (23 traumatic, 25 patients >1 year post-onset), 10 diagnosed as being in VS/UWS, eight in MCS− (no response to command) and 20 in MCS+ (response to command). Eighteen age-matched controls participated in the experiment. The paradigm consisted of three commands (i.e. ‘Move your hands’, ‘Move your legs’ and ‘Clench your teeth’) and one control sentence (i.e. ‘It is a sunny day’) presented in random order. Each auditory stimulus was repeated 4 times within one block with a stimulus-onset asynchrony of 30 seconds. Results: Post-hoc analyses with Bonferroni correction revealed that EMG activity was higher solely for the target command in one patient in permanent VS/UWS and in three patients in MCS+. Conclusion: The use of EMG could help clinicians to detect conscious patients who do not show any volitional response during standard behavioural assessments. However, further investigations should determine the sensitivity of EMG as compared to neuroimaging and electrophysiological assessments.
Brain Injury | 2014
Marie Thonnard; Sarah Wannez; Shannan Keen; Serge Brédart; Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Olivia Gosseries; Athena Demertzi; Aurore Thibaut; Camille Chatelle; Vanessa Charland-Verville; Lizette Heine; Dina Habbal; Steven Laureys; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse
Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether the assessment of pursuit eye movements in patients in minimally conscious state (MCS) is influenced by the choice of the visual stimulus (study 1) and by the moving plane (study 2). Methods: Patients with MCS (MCS− and MCS+) in the acute (<1 month post-injury) or chronic (>1 month) setting were assessed. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) procedure was used to test visual pursuit of a moving mirror, object and person (study 1, n = 88) and to test vertical and horizontal visual tracking (study 2, n = 94). Results: Study 1: Patients with visual pursuit tracked preferentially the moving mirror over the moving person or object. Study 2: Patients displaying visual pursuit, especially in MCS− and in chronic setting, preferentially tracked on the horizontal rather than the vertical plane. Conclusion: The findings confirm the importance of using a mirror to assess visual pursuit in patients in MCS and of initiating testing using the horizontal plane, specifically in patients in MCS− and those in chronic setting. Assessment should then be done on the vertical plane if visual pursuit is not detected on the horizontal plane.
Neurology | 2016
Damien Lesenfants; Dina Habbal; Camille Chatelle; Caroline Schnakers; Steven Laureys; Quentin Noirhomme
Objective: To propose a new methodology based on single-trial analysis for detecting residual response to command with EMG in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC), overcoming the issue of trial dependency and decreasing the influence of a patients fluctuation of vigilance or arousal over time on diagnostic accuracy. Methods: Forty-five patients with DOC (18 with vegetative/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome [VS/UWS], 22 in a minimally conscious state [MCS], 3 who emerged from MCS [EMCS], and 2 with locked-in syndrome [LIS]) and 20 healthy controls were included in the study. Patients were randomly instructed to either move their left or right hand or listen to a control command (“It is a sunny day”) while EMG activity was recorded on both arms. Results: Differential EMG activity was detected in all MCS cases displaying reproducible response to command at bedside on multiple assessments, even though only 6 of the 14 individuals presented a behavioral response to command on the day of the EMG assessment. An EMG response was also detected in all EMCS and LIS patients, and 2 MCS patients showing nonreflexive movements without command following at the bedside. None of the VS/UWS presented a response to command with this method. Conclusions: This method allowed us to reliably distinguish between different levels of consciousness and could potentially help decrease diagnostic errors in patients with motor impairment but presenting residual motor activity.
Clinical Eeg and Neuroscience | 2018
Damien Lesenfants; Dina Habbal; Camille Chatelle; Andrea Soddu; Steven Laureys; Quentin Noirhomme
Electroencephalography (EEG) has been proposed as a supplemental tool for reducing clinical misdiagnosis in severely brain-injured populations helping to distinguish conscious from unconscious patients. We studied the use of spectral entropy as a measure of focal attention in order to develop a motor-independent, portable, and objective diagnostic tool for patients with locked-in syndrome (LIS), answering the issues of accuracy and training requirement. Data from 20 healthy volunteers, 6 LIS patients, and 10 patients with a vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) were included. Spectral entropy was computed during a gaze-independent 2-class (attention vs rest) paradigm, and compared with EEG rhythms (delta, theta, alpha, and beta) classification. Spectral entropy classification during the attention-rest paradigm showed 93% and 91% accuracy in healthy volunteers and LIS patients respectively. VS/UWS patients were at chance level. EEG rhythms classification reached a lower accuracy than spectral entropy. Resting-state EEG spectral entropy could not distinguish individual VS/UWS patients from LIS patients. The present study provides evidence that an EEG-based measure of attention could detect command-following in patients with severe motor disabilities. The entropy system could detect a response to command in all healthy subjects and LIS patients, while none of the VS/UWS patients showed a response to command using this system.
Journal of Neural Engineering | 2014
Damien Lesenfants; Dina Habbal; Zulay Lugo; M Lebeau; Petar Horki; Enrico Amico; Christoph Pokorny; Francisco Gómez; Andrea Soddu; Gernot R. Müller-Putz; Steven Laureys; Quentin Noirhomme
Functional Neurology | 2014
Marie Thonnard; Olivia Gosseries; Athena Demertzi; Zulay Lugo; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Camille Chatelle; Aurore Thibaut; Vanessa Charland-Verville; Dina Habbal; Caroline Schnakers; Steven Laureys
Swiss Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry | 2012
Vanessa Charland-Verville; Dina Habbal; Steven Laureys; Olivia Gosseries
Archive | 2016
Sarah Wannez; Jitka Annen; Charlène Aubinet; Marie Thonnard; Vanessa Charland-Verville; Lizette Heine; Dina Habbal; Charlotte Martial; Olivier Bodart; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Camille Chatelle; Aurore Thibaut; Caroline Schnakers; Athina Demertzi; Olivia Gosseries; Steven Laureys