Dionne M. Hines
IMS Health
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Dionne M. Hines.
Value in Health | 2016
Carl V. Asche; Panagiotis Zografos; J.M. Norlin; Bill Urbanek; Carl Mamay; Charles Makin; S. Erntoft; Chi Chang Chen; Dionne M. Hines; Daniel M. Siegel
OBJECTIVE To compare health care resource utilization and treatment patterns between patients with actinic keratosis (AK) treated with ingenol mebutate gel (IngMeb) and those treated with other field-directed AK therapies. METHODS A retrospective, propensity-score-matched, cohort study compared refill/repeat and adding-on/switching patterns and outpatient visits and prescriptions (health care resource utilization) over 6 months in patients receiving IngMeb versus those receiving imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, diclofenac sodium, and methyl aminolevulinate or aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (MAL/ALA-PDT). RESULTS The final sample analyzed included four matched treatment cohort pairs (IngMeb and comparator; n = 790-971 per treatment arm). Refill rates were similar except for imiquimod (15% vs. 9% for imiquimod and IngMeb, respectively; P < 0.05). MAL/ALA-PDT treatment repetition rates were higher than IngMeb refill rates (20% vs. 10%; P < 0.05). Topical agent add-on/switch rates were comparable. PDT had higher switch rates than did IngMeb (5% vs. 2%; P < 0.05). The IngMeb cohort had a significantly lower proportion of patients with at least one AK-related outpatient visit during the 6-month follow-up than did any other cohort: versus imiquimod (50% vs. 66%; P < 0.0001), versus 5-fluorouracil (50% vs. 69%; P < 0.0001), versus diclofenac sodium (51% vs. 56%; P = 0.034), and versus MAL/ALA-PDT (50% vs. 100%; P < 0.0001). There were significantly fewer AK-related prescriptions among patients receiving IngMeb than among patients in other cohorts. CONCLUSIONS Results based on the first 6 months after treatment initiation suggested that most field-directed AK therapies had clinically comparable treatment patterns except imiquimod, which was associated with higher refill rates, and PDT, which was associated with significantly more frequent treatment sessions and higher switching rates. IngMeb was also associated with significantly fewer outpatient visits than were other field-directed therapies.
Journal of Medical Economics | 2018
Debajyoti Bhowmik; Dionne M. Hines; Michele Intorcia; Rolin L. Wade
Abstract Aims: To estimate incremental healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with skeletal-related events (SREs) secondary to multiple myeloma (MM), and HRU and cost differences in patients with one vs multiple SREs. Methods: Adults with MM diagnosis between January 1, 2010–December 31, 2014, with benefits coverage ≥12 months pre- and ≥6 months post-diagnosis were followed to last coverage date or December 31, 2015, excluding patients with prior anti-myeloma treatment or cancers. SREs were identified by diagnosis or procedure codes (pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation, or surgery to the bone). SRE patients (index = first post-diagnosis SRE) were propensity score matched 1:1 to patients without SRE (assigned pseudo-index) using baseline characteristics, and ≥1 month of continuous enrollment after index/pseudo-index date was required. Per-patient-per year (PPPY) HRU and costs (2016 US
Journal of Dermatological Treatment | 2017
Qiufei Ma; Yaozhu Juliette Chen; Dionne M. Hines; J. Munakata; Nicolas Batty; Beth Barber; Z. Zhao
) were determined for inpatient, outpatient, emergency department (ED), and outpatient pharmacy services during follow-up. Wilcoxon signed rank for means and McNemar’s tests for proportions were used to assess differences. Negative binomial regression and generalized linear regression analyses estimated differences in HRU and costs, respectively, for the comparison of single vs multiple SREs. Results: Each cohort included 848 patients (mean age = 61 – 62 years, 57% male) with no significant differences in pre-index demographic or clinical characteristics between matched cohorts. Versus non-SRE patients, SRE patients had significantly higher PPPY use (p < .0001) of inpatient hospitalizations, ED visits, outpatient pharmacy, and higher direct medical costs (
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | 2014
J. Yeaw; Shawn Halinan; Dionne M. Hines; A.M. DeLozier; Magaly Perez; Mark E. Boye; Kristina S. Boye; Christopher M. Blanchette
188,723 vs
Advances in Therapy | 2016
Fredrik Nyberg; Laura Horne; Robert Morlock; Javier Nuevo; Chris Storgard; Lalitha Aiyer; Dionne M. Hines; Xavier Ansolabehere; Pierre Chevalier
108,160, p < .0001). Adjusted PPPY total costs were
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
John R. Penrod; Beata Korytowsky; Allison Petrilla; Juan P. Wisnivesky; Chris Craver; Mark E. Salvati; Dionne M. Hines; P. Donga; Christopher M. Blanchette; Rolin L. Wade; Lucinda Orsini
209,820 in patients with multiple SREs;
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases | 2015
Javier Nuevo; Fredrik Nyberg; Laura Horne; R. Morlock; C. Storgard; L. Aiyer; Dionne M. Hines; Xavier Ansolabehere; Pierre Chevalier
159,797 in patients with one SRE. Limitations: SRE misclassification and residual confounding are possible. Conclusions: Among patients with MM, average annual costs were substantially higher in patients with SRE compared with matched non-SRE patients. The economic burden of SRE increased further with multiple events.
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs | 2015
Dionne M. Hines; Catherine Balderston McGuiness; Raymond Schlienger; Charles Makin
Abstract Objectives: This retrospective analysis of the IMS PharMetrics Plus claims database aimed to describe the current real-world treatment patterns for metastatic melanoma in the USA. Methods: Included patients (aged ≥18 years) had ≥1 prescription for ipilimumab, vemurafenib, temozolomide or dacarbazine between 1 January 2011 and 31 August 2013; diagnosis of melanoma and metastasis before first use (index date); no index drug use prior to the index date; continuous health plan enrollment for ≥6 months before and ≥3 months after index date. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was defined as days exposed to index therapy divided by continuously enrolled days between index date and last prescription date. Results: Overall, 1043 patients were included (median age 57 years, 63% male), of whom 39% received the index drug ipilimumab, 35% vemurafenib, 19% temozolomide and 7% dacarbazine. Mean treatment duration (days) was 174 (vemurafenib), 100 (temozolomide) and 64 (dacarbazine). Mean PDC was 81% (vemurafenib), 67% (temozolomide) and 51% (dacarbazine). For patients receiving ipilimumab, 58% had the full 4 doses, 20% 3 doses, 14% 2 doses and 9% 1 dose only for the first induction course; 4% received re-induction, and none had a second re-induction. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the treatment patterns for metastatic melanoma, including newer agents, in real-world clinical practice.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2014
Lucinda Orsini; B. Korytowsky; Allison Petrilla; Juan P. Wisnivesky; C. Craver; Mark E. Salvati; Dionne M. Hines; P. Donga; C. Blanchette; Rolin L. Wade; John R. Penrod
Value in Health | 2013
J. Yeaw; S. Halinan; Dionne M. Hines; A.M. DeLozier; Magaly Perez; Mark E. Boye; Kristina S. Boye; C.M. Blanchette