Rolin L. Wade

Nephrotoxicity and other adverse events among inpatients receiving liposomal amphotericin B or amphotericin B lipid complex.

Nephrotoxicity evaluations between liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) have provided mixed results. This retrospective study used an electronic medical record database of hospitalized patients with invasive fungal infections treated with either L-AMB or ABLC. Patients had renal insufficiency, clinical condition suggesting intolerance to amphotericin B deoxycholate (CAB), or recent CAB exposure. Baseline SCr, exposure to other nephrotoxic agents, and total amphotericin B exposure were similar between the groups. In 105 patients administered L-AMB, 10.6% had nephrotoxicity versus 22.6% of 222 patients administered ABLC (P = 0.020). A logistic regression model found ABLC patients had 3.48 higher odds (95% CI 1.05-11.52) than L-AMB of developing nephrotoxicity. Infusion reactions were more prevalent with ABLC (23.9% versus 9.5%, P = 0.002) as was hypomagnesemia (44.3% versus 28.1%, P = 0.033). This study demonstrated that L-AMB is associated with less nephrotoxicity, infusion reactions and hypomagnesemia than ABLC in patients at increased risk of nephrotoxicity.

Exenatide BID Observational Study (ExOS): results for primary and secondary endpoints of a prospective research study to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of exenatide BID use in patients with type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting

Abstract Objective: The Exenatide BID Observational Study (ExOS) was designed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of exenatide BID use in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a real-world clinical practice setting in the United States. Methods: Patients were enrolled from 74 practice sites from 9/2007 through 1/2009 and followed for 12 months. The primary effectiveness endpoint was achieving or maintaining hemoglobin A1C of ≤7.0%, or an absolute drop of 0.5% from baseline. Secondary measures included absolute and percentage change from baseline for a variety of clinical measures (lipid markers, weight, BMI, etc.), and quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life (IWQOL)-Lite. Results: A total of 452 patients were included in the primary study population. At baseline, patients (60% female) had mean (SD) age of 55 (11), T2D duration of 9 (8) years, HbA1c of 8.0 (1.7) %, and body mass index (BMI) of 38.2 (7.4) kg/m2. Family history of T2D was reported in 73.9% of patients. Hypertension was reported in 61.5% of patients, and 47.1% had hyperlipidemia. The HbA1c goal was achieved in 76.3% of the 118 patients with A1C measurements available at 12 months (P < 0.0001). Patients with available clinical measurements achieved significant improvements in HbA1c, weight, BMI, and QOL measurements at 12 months. A mean improvement of 4.56 was seen in the total IWQOL-Lite score at 12 months (P = 0.001). The single-arm design of this study is a limitation; however, the overall objective of the study was to observe patients on exenatide BID therapy over time, comparing their status at endpoint to baseline, rather than to make comparisons among different drug therapies. Conclusions: The Exenatide BID Observational Study supports the clinical effectiveness of exenatide BID observed in previous clinical trials and retrospective database studies.

Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes using concomitant exenatide BID and long-acting insulin therapy.

Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the frequency of hypoglycemia among patients with type 2 diabetes who had concomitantly used exenatide BID (exenatide) and long-acting insulin and continued this combination vs those who continued long-acting insulin alone. Methods: Retrospective analyses, using a large managed care database, were used to estimate the frequency of hypoglycemia (episodes/patient/6 months) for patients who concomitantly used exenatide and long-acting insulin during a 6-month follow-up period. Results: From among 2082 patients on concomitant exenatide and long-acting insulin, those who continued this combination (n = 472) had a lower frequency of hypoglycemia compared to those who remained on long-acting insulin alone (n = 312) (0.03 ± 1.9 vs 0.10 ± 1.01 [episodes/patient/6 months]; p < 0.0001). Limitations: Only hypoglycemia that required medical intervention (coded for hypoglycemia) was captured. The study could not evaluate any association between insulin dose titration and hypoglycemia or examine other outcomes such as HbA1c, weight, and body mass index, due to lack of data availability. Conclusions: Patients who concomitantly used exenatide BID and long-acting insulin experienced a lower rate of hypoglycemia.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Time to Next Treatment, and Economic Outcomes in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Pomalidomide or Carfilzomib

BACKGROUND Negligible real-world evidence exists for later line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) to assist treatment decisions or reimbursement models, such as episode-based payments. OBJECTIVE To describe the treatment patterns and clinical/economic outcomes when pomalidomide or carfilzomib is used for relapsed/refractory MM. METHODS A U.S. claims database was used to identify MM patients with an initial pomalidomide or carfilzomib claim (index date) between February 1, 2013, and February 28, 2015, which was assumed to be relapse therapy. Treatment regimens were defined as all MM chemotherapy observed within 60 days of index. Patients receiving pomalidomide and carfilzomib within 60 days of index were excluded. Time to next treatment (TTNT), a progression proxy, was defined as the addition of a new agent > 60 days from index or as treatment restart following a > 90-day therapy gap. Cost estimations used plan-allowed amounts. Descriptive statistics were used to compare outcomes between treatment groups, and regression models were used to adjust for baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS There were 454 patients initiating treatment with pomalidomide (n = 264) or carfilzomib (n = 190) during the index period. The most frequent initial regimens for pomalidomide patients included pomalidomide + dexamethasone (47.0%) and pomalidomide alone (33.0%); the most frequent regimens for carfilzomib patients were carfilzomib alone (45.3%) and carfilzomib + dexamethasone (14.7%). The most frequent next line treatment for pomalidomide patients who progressed was the addition of (14.0%) or switch to (15.0%) carfilzomib ± dexamethasone and for carfilzomib patients, the most frequent next line treatment was pomalidomide + dexamethasone (9.3%) and carfilzomib alone or carfilzomib + dexamethasone + cyclophosphamide (6.7% each). The median (95% CI) TTNT for pomalidomide patients was 11.9 (10.7-14.8) compared with 9.4 (7.7-10.0) months for carfilzomib (P = 0.060). For patients followed to progression (pomalidomide: n = 100, 37.9%; carfilzomib: n = 75, 39.5%), mean TTNT was longer for patients initiating therapy with pomalidomide (6.9 months) versus carfilzomib (5.3 months, P = 0.016). When adjusted for baseline confounders, pomalidomide patients had a nonsignificant longer time to a subsequent treatment line. Inpatient encounters observed during the index line were very low (mean = 1) for both groups; outpatient encounters were fewer in pomalidomide patients. Adjusted analyses revealed inpatient encounters were higher (P = 0.005), while outpatient use was lower in pomalidomide patients (P = 0.006). Unadjusted median costs incurred during the initial line were similar between the 2 groups (pomalidomide:

Treatment of candidemia with echinocandins: data on hospital resource use from a real world setting.

102,805; carfilzomib:

Economic burden of skeletal-related events in patients with multiple myeloma: analysis of US commercial claims database

127,203; P = 0.110) but significantly lower in pomalidomide patients after adjusting for baseline characteristics (P = 0.013). Unadjusted per patient per month (PPPM) costs incurred over the entire follow-up period were lower in pomalidomide-initiated patients (

Estimation of Missed Statin Prescription Use in an Administrative Claims Dataset

18,298 vs.

Evaluation of Patient Migration Patterns and Related Health Care Costs Within a National Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan After Implementation of an Oxycodone HCl Extended-Release Access Restriction

24,734, P = 0.001) but not statistically significant in adjusted analyses (P = 0.230). CONCLUSIONS A longer time to a subsequent line of therapy was observed in pomalidomide patients compared with carfilzomib patients, although the difference lost significance in adjusted analyses. Compared with carfilzomib, pomalidomide patients were observed to have lower unadjusted median PPPM costs over the entire post-index period and lower adjusted mean monthly costs during initial therapy. DISCLOSURES Funding for this study was provided by Celgene. Chen, McGuiness, and Wade are employees of QuintilesIMS, which was contracted by Celgene to undertake this research. McGuiness also owns stock in Pfizer. Parikh, Abouzaid, Purnomo, and Hussein are employees of Celgene and participated fully in the development and approval of the manuscript. Portions of the results of this research were previously presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2016 Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2016; Chicago, Illinois. Study concept and design were contributed by Chen, Parikh, Abouzaid, McGuiness, and Wade. Chen and McGuiness took the lead in data collection, along with Wade, and data interpretation was performed by Hussein and Wade, with assistance from the other authors. The manuscript was written by McGuiness, Chen, and Wade, with assistance from Parikh and Abouzaid, and revised by McGuiness and Hussein, along with the other authors.

Comparative Assessment of Adherence Measures and Resource Use in SSRI/SNRI-Treated Patients with Depression Using Second-Generation Antipsychotics or L-Methylfolate as Adjunctive Therapy

Abstract Objective: Real-world data on patients treated with echinocandins for candidemia are limited. This study examined the effect of three echinocandin-based treatment regimens on resource utilization in patients with Candida infection. Research design and methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized between 2005 and 2010 with a blood culture positive for Candida. Length of stay (LOS) following AF initiation (post-AF LOS) and total days with AF treatment were compared in patients treated with three different echinocandin regimens: patients with echinocandin only, patients who received fluconazole prior to an echinocandin (fluconazole-echinocandin), and patients who received an echinocandin prior to fluconazole (echinocandin-fluconazole). Generalized linear models were used to adjust for confounders. Results: A total of 647 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients treated with echinocandin only were more acutely ill, having more organ dysfunction and sepsis. Unadjusted post-AF LOS was significantly greater in the groups that received both echinocandin and fluconazole (mean, 13.1 days for echinocandin-only vs 25.5 and 21.2 days for fluconazole-echinocandin and echinocandin-fluconazole groups, respectively, p < 0.001). These groups also had a higher total number of days with AF orders. These differences remained after multivariate adjustment and in survivor-only analyses. Compared with echinocandin-only treatment, the average marginal effect of fluconazole-echinocandin and echinocandin-fluconazole regimens were associated with significantly longer adjusted post-AF LOS (by 7.2 days and 9.3 days, respectively, p < 0.001) and significantly more adjusted total AF days (by 5.3 days for fluconazole-echinocandin and 6.5 days for echinocandin-fluconazole patients, p < 0.001). Limitations included lack of visibility to specific reasons for therapy changes. Conclusions: Fluconazole before or after echinocandin was associated with significantly greater resource utilization than echinocandin use alone.

Implementation of a pharmacy-based adult vaccine benefit: recommendations for a commercial health plan benefit.

Abstract Aims: To estimate incremental healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with skeletal-related events (SREs) secondary to multiple myeloma (MM), and HRU and cost differences in patients with one vs multiple SREs. Methods: Adults with MM diagnosis between January 1, 2010–December 31, 2014, with benefits coverage ≥12 months pre- and ≥6 months post-diagnosis were followed to last coverage date or December 31, 2015, excluding patients with prior anti-myeloma treatment or cancers. SREs were identified by diagnosis or procedure codes (pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation, or surgery to the bone). SRE patients (index = first post-diagnosis SRE) were propensity score matched 1:1 to patients without SRE (assigned pseudo-index) using baseline characteristics, and ≥1 month of continuous enrollment after index/pseudo-index date was required. Per-patient-per year (PPPY) HRU and costs (2016 US