Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dixie Stanforth is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dixie Stanforth.


Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | 2014

Body composition changes among female NCAA division 1 athletes across the competitive season and over a multiyear time frame.

Philip R. Stanforth; Brittany N. Crim; Dixie Stanforth; Matthew A. Stults-Kolehmainen

Abstract Stanforth, PR, Crim, BN, Stanforth, D, and Stults-Kolehmainen, MA. Body composition changes among female NCAA division 1 athletes across the competitive season and over a multiyear time frame. J Strength Cond Res 28(2): 300–307, 2014—Body composition can affect athletic performance. Numerous studies have documented changes in body composition in female collegiate athletes from pre- to postseason; however, longitudinal studies examining changes across years are scarce. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to assess longitudinal body composition changes among female collegiate athletes across 3 years. Two hundred twelve female athletes from basketball (BB; n = 38), soccer (SOC; n = 47), swimming (SW; n = 52), track (sprinters and jumpers; TR; n = 49), and volleyball (VB; n = 26) with an initial mean age of 19.2 ± 1.2 years, height of 172.4 ± 8.9 cm, and total mass of 66.9 ± 9.0 kg had body composition assessments using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry pre- and postseason over 3 years. A restricted maximum-likelihood linear mixed model regression analysis examined body composition differences by sport and year. Changes (p < 0.05) over 3 years included the following: Lean mass increased in VB from year 1 to 2 (0.7 kg), year 2 to 3 (1.1 kg), and year 1 to 3 (1.8 kg) and in SW from year 1 to 3 (0.6 kg); and percent body fat (%BF) increased in BB from year 1 to 3 (1.7%). There were no changes in SOC or TR. These results indicate that during their college careers, female collegiate athletes can be expected to maintain their %BF and athletes in sports like SW and VB can anticipate an increase in lean mass, but the increases may be less than many athletes, coaches, and trainers envision.


Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | 2016

Bone mineral content and density among female NCAA Division I athletes across the competitive season and over a multi-year time frame.

Dixie Stanforth; Tao Lu; Matthew A. Stults-Kolehmainen; Brittany N. Crim; Philip R. Stanforth

Abstract Stanforth, D, Lu, T, Stults-Kolehmainen, MA, Crim, BN, and Stanforth, PR. Bone mineral content and density among female NCAA Division I athletes across the competitive season and over a multi-year time frame. J Strength Cond Res 30(10): 2828–2838, 2016—Longitudinal and cross-sectional bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) comparisons were made among impact and nonimpact sports. Female collegiate athletes, 18–23 years of age, from basketball (BB; n = 38), soccer (SOC; n = 47), swimming (SW; n = 52), track sprinters and jumpers (TR; n = 49), and volleyball (VB; n = 26) had BMC/BMD measures preseason and postseason over 3 years. Control groups of 85 college females, 18–24 years of age, who completed 2 tests 1–3 years apart and of 170 college females, 18–20 years of age, were used for the longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses, respectively. A restricted maximum likelihood linear mixed model regression analysis with a compound symmetric heterogeneous variance-covariance matrix structure was used for all analyses (p ⩽ 0.05). Increases from year-1 preseason to year-3 postseason included the following: total BMC (3.3%), total BMD (1.4%), and spine BMD (4.5%) for BB; total BMC (1.5%) and leg BMD (1.2%) for SOC; arm (1.8%), leg (1.9%), and total BMD (5.7%) for SW; total BMC (2.0%), arm (1.7%), leg (2.3%), pelvis (3.4%), spine (6.0%), and total BMD (2.3%) for TR; and arm (4.1%), leg (2.0%), pelvis (2.0%), spine (2.0%), and total BMD (2.7%) for VB. Comparisons among sports determined that BB had higher BMC and BMD values than all other sports for all variables except spine and total BMD; BB, SOC, TR, and VB had higher total BMC (11–29%), leg BMD (13–20%), and total BMD (9–15%) than SW and CON, and there were few differences among SOC, TR, and VB. In conclusion, small, significant increases in many BMC and BMD measures occur during female athletes collegiate careers. The BMC and BMD differences between impact and nonimpact sports are large compared with smaller differences within impact sports.


Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research | 2000

Physiologic and Metabolic Responses to a Body Pump Workout

Dixie Stanforth; Philip R. Stanforth; Margaret E Hoemeke


Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 1998

A 10 WEEK TRAINING STUDY COMPARING RESISTABALL?? AND TRADITIONAL TRUNK TRAINING.

S. Hahn; Dixie Stanforth; Philip R. Stanforth; A. Phillips


Public Health Nursing | 2011

Undermining of nutrition and exercise decisions: experiencing negative social influence.

Michael Mackert; Dixie Stanforth; Alexandra A. García


American Journal of Health Behavior | 2011

An Investigation of Exercise and the Placebo Effect

Dixie Stanforth; Mary A. Steinhardt; Michael Mackert; Philip R. Stanforth; Christian T. Gloria


Acsm's Health & Fitness Journal | 2009

SOCIAL UNDERMINING OF HEALTHY EATING AND EXERCISE BEHAVIORS

Dixie Stanforth; Michael Mackert


Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport | 1996

The effect of adding external weight on the aerobic requirement of bench stepping.

Philip R. Stanforth; Dixie Stanforth


Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 2016

Signage Increases Stair Use: Applying Visual Metaphors with Health and Non-health Messages For Behavior Change: 479 Board #316 June 1, 11: 00 AM - 12: 30 PM.

Dixie Stanforth; Allison J. Lazard; Philip R. Stanforth; Benjamin Wyeth; Michael Mackert; Xiaoshan Li


Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise | 2016

Regional Body Composition Changes with Weight Loss: 1953 Board #105 June 2, 3: 30 PM - 5: 00 PM.

Philip R. Stanforth; Anna E. Talley; Victoria Jarzabkowski; Dixie Stanforth

Collaboration


Dive into the Dixie Stanforth's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip R. Stanforth

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Mackert

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexandra A. García

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allison J. Lazard

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christian T. Gloria

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary A. Steinhardt

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Whitney Atkins

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge