Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dja Barrell is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dja Barrell.


New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 2014

A model of active faulting in New Zealand

Nicola Litchfield; R. Van Dissen; Rupert Sutherland; Patricia M. Barnes; Simon C. Cox; Richard J. Norris; Rj Beavan; R. Langridge; Pilar Villamor; Kelvin Berryman; Mark W. Stirling; A. Nicol; Scott D. Nodder; Geoffroy Lamarche; Dja Barrell; Jarg R. Pettinga; Timothy A. Little; N. Pondard; Joshu J. Mountjoy; Kate Clark

Active fault traces are a surface expression of permanent deformation that accommodates the motion within and between adjacent tectonic plates. We present an updated national-scale model for active faulting in New Zealand, summarize the current understanding of fault kinematics in 15 tectonic domains, and undertake some brief kinematic analysis including comparison of fault slip rates with GPS velocities. The model contains 635 simplified faults with tabulated parameters of their attitude (dip and dip-direction) and kinematics (sense of movement and rake of slip vector), net slip rate and a quality code. Fault density and slip rates are, as expected, highest along the central plate boundary zone, but the model is undoubtedly incomplete, particularly in rapidly eroding mountainous areas and submarine areas with limited data. The active fault data presented are of value to a range of kinematic, active fault and seismic hazard studies.


New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 2014

High-level stratigraphic scheme for New Zealand rocks

Nick Mortimer; Rattenbury; Peter R. King; Kyle J. Bland; Dja Barrell; F Bache; John Begg; Hamish J. Campbell; Simon C. Cox; James S. Crampton; Sw Edbrooke; Pj Forsyth; Johnston; Richard Jongens; Jm Lee; Graham S. Leonard; J. I. Raine; Dnb Skinner; Christian Timm; Dougal B. Townsend; A. J. Tulloch; I. M. Turnbull; Rose E. Turnbull

We formally introduce 14 new high-level stratigraphic names to augment existing names and to hierarchically organise all of New Zealands onland and offshore Cambrian–Holocene rocks and unconsolidated deposits. The two highest-level units are Austral Superprovince (new) and Zealandia Megasequence (new). These encompass all stratigraphic units of the countrys Cambrian–Early Cretaceous basement rocks and Late Cretaceous–Holocene cover rocks and sediments, respectively. Most high-level constituents of the Austral Superprovince are in current and common usage: Eastern and Western Provinces consist of 12 tectonostratigraphic terranes, 10 igneous suites, 5 batholiths and Haast Schist. Ferrar, Tarpaulin and Jaquiery suites (new) have been added to existing plutonic suites to describe all known compositional variation in the Tuhua Intrusives. Zealandia Megasequence consists of five predominantly sedimentary, partly unconformity-bounded units and one igneous unit. Momotu and Haerenga supergroups (new) comprise lowermost rift to passive margin (terrestrial to marine transgressive) rock units. Waka Supergroup (new) includes rocks related to maximum marine flooding linked to passive margin culmination in the east and onset of new tectonic subsidence in the west. Māui and Pākihi supergroups (new) comprise marine to terrestrial regressive rock and sediment units deposited during Neogene plate convergence. Rūaumoko Volcanic Region (new) is introduced to include all igneous rocks of the Zealandia Megasequence and contains the geochemically differentiated Whakaari, Horomaka and Te Raupua supersuites (new). Our new scheme, Litho2014, provides a complete, high-level stratigraphic classification for the continental crust of the New Zealand region.


New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 2016

The New Zealand Active Faults Database

R. Langridge; William Ries; Nicola Litchfield; Pilar Villamor; R. Van Dissen; Dja Barrell; Rattenbury; D Heron; S Haubrock; Dougal B. Townsend; Jm Lee; Kelvin Berryman; Andrew Nicol; Simon C. Cox; Mark W. Stirling

ABSTRACT The New Zealand Active Faults Database (NZAFD) is a national geospatial database of active faults – including their locations, names and degrees of activity – that have deformed the ground surface of New Zealand within the last 125,000 years. The NZAFD is used for geological research, hazard modelling and infrastructure planning and is an underlying dataset for other nationally significant hazard applications such as the National Seismic Hazard Model. Recent refinements to the data structure have improved the accuracy of active fault locations and characteristics. A subset of active fault information from the NZAFD, generalised for portrayal and use at a scale of 1:250,000 (and referred to as NZAFD250), is freely available online and can be downloaded in several different formats to suit the needs of a range of users including scientists, governmental authorities and the general public. To achieve a uniform spatial scale of 1:250,000 a simplification of detailed fault locational data was required in some areas, while in other areas new mapping was necessary to provide a consistent level of coverage. Future improvements to the NZAFD will include the incorporation of data on active folds and offshore active faults.


Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union | 2010

Previously Unknown Fault Shakes New Zealand's South Island

Mark Quigley; Pilar Villamor; Kevin P. Furlong; John Beavan; R. Van Dissen; Nicola Litchfield; T. Stahl; Brendan Duffy; Eric L. Bilderback; D. Noble; Dja Barrell; R. Jongens; Simon C. Cox

At 4:35 A.M. local time on 4 September (1635 UTC, 3 September), a previously unrecognized fault system ruptured in the Canterbury region of New Zealands South Island, producing a moment magnitude (Mw) 7.1 earthquake that caused widespread damage throughout the area. In stark contrast to the 2010 Mw 7.0 Haiti earthquake, no deaths occurred and only two injuries were reported despite the epicenters location about 40 kilometers west of Christchurch (population ˜386,000). The Canterbury region now faces a rebuilding estimated to cost more than NZ


New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 2012

Faulting and folding beneath the Canterbury Plains identified prior to the 2010 emergence of the Greendale Fault

Richard Jongens; Dja Barrell; Jocelyn K. Campbell; Jarg R. Pettinga

4 billion (US


New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 2012

Map of the 2010 Greendale Fault surface rupture, Canterbury, New Zealand: application to land use planning

Pilar Villamor; Nicola Litchfield; Dja Barrell; R. Van Dissen; S. Hornblow; Mark Quigley; S. Levick; William Ries; Brendan Duffy; John Begg; Dougal B. Townsend; T. Stahl; Eric L. Bilderback; D. Noble; Kevin P. Furlong; H Grant

2.95 billion). On the positive side, this earthquake has provided an opportunity to document the dynamics and effects of a major strike-slip fault rupture in the absence of death or serious injury. The low-relief and well-maintained agricultural landscape of the Canterbury Plains helped scientists characterize very subtle earthquake-related ground deformation at high resolution, helping to classify the earthquakes basic geological features [Quigley et al., 2010]. The prompt mobilization of collaborating scientific teams allowed for rapid data capture immediately after the earthquake, and new scientific programs directed at developing a greater understanding of this event are under way.


Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology | 2011

Strike-slip ground-surface rupture (Greendale Fault) associated with the 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake, Canterbury, New Zealand

Dja Barrell; Nicola Litchfield; Dougal B. Townsend; Mark Quigley; R. Van Dissen; R. Cosgrove; Simon C. Cox; Kevin P. Furlong; Pilar Villamor; John Begg; S. Hemmings-Sykes; R. Jongens; H. Mackenzie; D. Noble; T. Stahl; Eric L. Bilderback; Brendan Duffy; H. Henham; A. Klahn; E.M.W. Lang; L. Moody; R. Nicol; K. Pedley; A. Smith

Abstract Prior to the 2010–2011 earthquake sequence, several fault and fold structures were mapped beneath the Canterbury Plains using seismic reflection surveys and surface observations and depicted on the Christchurch and Aoraki 1:250,000 scale geological maps. Localised grabens associated with east-southeast-striking normal faults formed largely during the Late Cretaceous. South of Rakaia River, some graben-bounding faults show minor normal offset extending into the late Cenozoic. Near Ashley River, proximity to a Late Cretaceous–Paleogene graben suggests that the active, predominantly contractional, east-striking Ashley Fault is at least in part a rejuvenated pre-existing normal fault. The easterly strike of the previously unknown Greendale Fault implies that it too may be a reactivated Late Cretaceous fault. Northeast-striking, southeast-facing reverse faults and fault-propagation folds beneath the western and northern parts of the plains are primarily late Cenozoic features. Variation in the distributions of Miocene sedimentary strata strongly suggests that contractional faulting was initiated as early as the Miocene. The overall late Cenozoic tectonic pattern is extension beneath the southern Canterbury Plains and contraction farther north.


New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics | 2012

The geological setting of the Darfield and Christchurch earthquakes

Greg H. Browne; Brad Field; Dja Barrell; Richard Jongens; Kari N. Bassett; Ray Wood

Abstract Rupture of the Greendale Fault during the 4 September 2010, M W7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake produced a zone of ground-surface rupture that severely damaged several houses, buildings and lifelines. Immediately after the earthquake, surface rupture features were mapped in the field and from digital terrain models developed from airborne Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) data. To enable rebuild decisions to be made and for future land use planning, a fault avoidance zone was defined for the Greendale Fault following the Ministry for the Environment guidelines on ‘Planning for the Development of Land on or Close to Active Faults’. We present here the most detailed map to date of the fault trace and describe how this was used to define and characterise the fault avoidance zone for land use planning purposes.


Geology | 2012

Surface rupture during the 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake: Implications for fault rupture dynamics and seismic-hazard analysis

Mark Quigley; R. Van Dissen; Nicola Litchfield; Pilar Villamor; Brendan Duffy; Dja Barrell; Kevin P. Furlong; T. Stahl; Eric L. Bilderback; D. Noble

Abstract This paper provides a photographic tour of the ground-surface rupture features of the Greendale Fault, formed during the 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake. The fault, previously unknown, produced at least 29.5 km of strike-slip surface deformation of right-lateral (dextral) sense. Deformation, spread over a zone between 30 and 300 m wide, consisted mostly of horizontal flexure with subsidiary discrete shears, the latter only prominent where overall displacement across the zone exceeded about 1.5 m. A remarkable feature of this event was its location in an intensively farmed landscape, where a multitude of straight markers, such as fences, roads and ditches, allowed precise measurements of offsets, and permitted well-defined limits to be placed on the length and widths of the surface rupture deformation.


Archive | 2011

Surface rupture displacement on the Greendale Fault during the Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake, New Zealand, and its impact on man-madestructures.

R. Van Dissen; Dja Barrell; Nicola Litchfield; Pilar Villamor; Mark Quigley; A. King; Kevin P. Furlong; John Begg; Dougal B. Townsend; H. Mackenzie; T. Stahl; D. Noble; Brendan Duffy; Eric L. Bilderback; J. Claridge; A. Klahn; R. Jongens; Simon C. Cox; R. Langridge; William Ries; R. Dhakal; A. Smith; S. Horblow; R. Nicol; K. Pedley; H. Henham; R. Hunter; A. Zajac; T. Mote

Abstract The 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence occurred near the southeastern margin of Neogene deformation associated with the Australia–Pacific plate boundary. Basement comprises indurated rocks of the Torlesse Composite Terrane, of Permian to Early Cretaceous age, overlain by 1–2 km of less-indurated Cretaceous–Neogene rocks and unconsolidated Quaternary sediments. Proximity to the subduction interface between Gondwana and the paleo-Pacific Ocean produced a Mesozoic-age structural grain in the basement rocks, aligned broadly east–west in the Canterbury to Chatham Rise areas. These structures provided an inherited weakness that was likely reactivated by present-day stress. Mid- to Late Cretaceous extension, marked by localised fault-bounded grabens, was followed by deposition of a Late Cretaceous to Paleogene passive-margin transgressive sedimentary sheet and minor intraplate basaltic volcanics. Mid-Cenozoic inception of the modern Australia–Pacific plate boundary heralded deposition of a regressive succession of Neogene sediments and further episodes of volcanism, most notably constructing the Late Miocene Banks Peninsula intraplate volcanoes. The east- to northeast-striking faults associated with the Darfield and Christchurch earthquakes are probably aligned with the Mesozoic structural grain within the Torlesse basement rocks.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dja Barrell's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brendan Duffy

University of Canterbury

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Noble

University of Canterbury

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. Stahl

University of Canterbury

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Quigley

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge