Dmitriy Sonkin

The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity.

The systematic translation of cancer genomic data into knowledge of tumour biology and therapeutic possibilities remains challenging. Such efforts should be greatly aided by robust preclinical model systems that reflect the genomic diversity of human cancers and for which detailed genetic and pharmacological annotation is available. Here we describe the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE): a compilation of gene expression, chromosomal copy number and massively parallel sequencing data from 947 human cancer cell lines. When coupled with pharmacological profiles for 24 anticancer drugs across 479 of the cell lines, this collection allowed identification of genetic, lineage, and gene-expression-based predictors of drug sensitivity. In addition to known predictors, we found that plasma cell lineage correlated with sensitivity to IGF1 receptor inhibitors; AHR expression was associated with MEK inhibitor efficacy in NRAS-mutant lines; and SLFN11 expression predicted sensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitors. Together, our results indicate that large, annotated cell-line collections may help to enable preclinical stratification schemata for anticancer agents. The generation of genetic predictions of drug response in the preclinical setting and their incorporation into cancer clinical trial design could speed the emergence of ‘personalized’ therapeutic regimens.

Pharmacogenomic agreement between two cancer cell line data sets

Large cancer cell line collections broadly capture the genomic diversity of human cancers and provide valuable insight into anti-cancer drug response. Here we show substantial agreement and biological consilience between drug sensitivity measurements and their associated genomic predictors from two publicly available large-scale pharmacogenomics resources: The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer databases.

Inhibiting Tankyrases sensitizes KRAS mutant cancer cells to MEK inhibitors via FGFR2 feedback signaling

Tankyrases (TNKS) play roles in Wnt signaling, telomere homeostasis, and mitosis, offering attractive targets for anticancer treatment. Using unbiased combination screening in a large panel of cancer cell lines, we have identified a strong synergy between TNKS and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) in KRAS-mutant cancer cells. Our study uncovers a novel function of TNKS in the relief of a feedback loop induced by MEK inhibition on FGFR2 signaling pathway. Moreover, dual inhibition of TNKS and MEK leads to more robust apoptosis and antitumor activity both in vitro and in vivo than effects observed by previously reported MEKi combinations. Altogether, our results show how a novel combination of TNKS and MEK inhibitors can be highly effective in targeting KRAS-mutant cancers by suppressing a newly discovered resistance mechanism.

Somatic cancer variant curation and harmonization through consensus minimum variant level data.

BackgroundTo truly achieve personalized medicine in oncology, it is critical to catalog and curate cancer sequence variants for their clinical relevance. The Somatic Working Group (WG) of the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), in cooperation with ClinVar and multiple cancer variant curation stakeholders, has developed a consensus set of minimal variant level data (MVLD). MVLD is a framework of standardized data elements to curate cancer variants for clinical utility. With implementation of MVLD standards, and in a working partnership with ClinVar, we aim to streamline the somatic variant curation efforts in the community and reduce redundancy and time burden for the interpretation of cancer variants in clinical practice.MethodsWe developed MVLD through a consensus approach by i) reviewing clinical actionability interpretations from institutions participating in the WG, ii) conducting extensive literature search of clinical somatic interpretation schemas, and iii) survey of cancer variant web portals. A forthcoming guideline on cancer variant interpretation, from the Association of Molecular Pathology (AMP), can be incorporated into MVLD.ResultsAlong with harmonizing standardized terminology for allele interpretive and descriptive fields that are collected by many databases, the MVLD includes unique fields for cancer variants such as Biomarker Class, Therapeutic Context and Effect. In addition, MVLD includes recommendations for controlled semantics and ontologies. The Somatic WG is collaborating with ClinVar to evaluate MVLD use for somatic variant submissions. ClinVar is an open and centralized repository where sequencing laboratories can report summary-level variant data with clinical significance, and ClinVar accepts cancer variant data.ConclusionsWe expect the use of the MVLD to streamline clinical interpretation of cancer variants, enhance interoperability among multiple redundant curation efforts, and increase submission of somatic variants to ClinVar, all of which will enhance translation to clinical oncology practice.

Integrative modeling of multi-omics data to identify cancer drivers and infer patient-specific gene activity

BackgroundHigh throughput technologies have been used to profile genes in multiple different dimensions, such as genetic variation, copy number, gene and protein expression, epigenetics, metabolomics. Computational analyses often treat these different data types as independent, leading to an explosion in the number of features making studies under-powered and more importantly do not provide a comprehensive view of the gene’s state. We sought to infer gene activity by integrating different dimensions using biological knowledge of oncogenes and tumor suppressors.ResultsThis paper proposes an integrative model of oncogene and tumor suppressor activity in cells which is used to identify cancer drivers and compute patient-specific gene activity scores. We have developed a Fuzzy Logic Modeling (FLM) framework to incorporate biological knowledge with multi-omics data such as somatic mutation, gene expression and copy number measurements. The advantage of using a fuzzy logic approach is to abstract meaningful biological rules from low-level numerical data. Biological knowledge is often qualitative, thus combining it with quantitative numerical measurements may leverage new biological insights about a gene’s state. We show that the oncogenic and altered tumor suppressing state of a gene can be better characterized by integrating different molecular measurements with biological knowledge than by each data type alone. We validate the gene activity score using data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and drug sensitivity data for five compounds: BYL719 (PIK3CA inhibitor), PLX4720 (BRAF inhibitor), AZD6244 (MEK inhibitor), Erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor), and Nutlin-3 (MDM2 inhibitor). The integrative score improves prediction of drug sensitivity for the known drug targets of these compounds compared to each data type alone. The gene activity scores are also used to cluster colorectal cancer cell lines. Two subtypes of CRCs were found and potential cancer drivers and therapeutic targets for each of the subtypes were identified.ConclusionsWe propose a fuzzy logic based approach to infer gene activity in cancer by integrating numerical data with descriptive biological knowledge. We compute general patient-specific gene-level scores useful to determine the oncogenic or tumor suppressor status of cancer gene drivers and to cluster or classify patients.

Prediction of drug response using genomic signatures from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia

Accurate prediction of patient drug response is required for successful personalized medicine. Cancer is a disease resulting from myriad genetic alterations. Accordingly, it should be possible to predict drug response of specific cancers using genetic and molecular signatures. To aid this effort, an ongoing collaboration established between Novartis and the Broad Institute called the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) has (i) comprehensively characterized genome-scale mRNA expression, copy number alteration and mutation profiles for nearly 1000 cancer cell line models spanning many tumor types and (ii) profiled ~500 of these cell lines against ~1000 anticancer compounds. Using these data, we are developing a scalable, extensible predictive modeling framework based on various supervised learning methods that include both categorical classification and linear regression approaches to predict compound sensitivity. By cross-validation of the generated models against test data sets, we quantitatively estimated model performance. Our initial results validate several preexisting genetic predictors of sensitivity. In addition, our models reported 70% or higher sensitivity and specificity for a number of compounds and yielded interesting potentially novel predictive features that, in some cases, outperform previously existing genetic predictors of sensitivity. Our integrative approach demonstrates that pharmacological profiling of large, genomically annotated cancer model systems, coupled with systematic predictive modeling, can uncover novel predictors of drug response and may ultimately aid patient stratification. This talk is also presented as Poster A4.

Integrating somatic variant data and biomarkers for germline variant classification in cancer predisposition genes

In its landmark paper about Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) did not address how to use tumor data when assessing the pathogenicity of germline variants. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) established a multidisciplinary working group, the Germline/Somatic Variant Subcommittee (GSVS) with this focus. The GSVS implemented a survey to determine current practices of integrating somatic data when classifying germline variants in cancer predisposition genes. The GSVS then reviewed and analyzed available resources of relevant somatic data, and performed integrative germline variant curation exercises. The committee determined that somatic hotspots could be systematically integrated into moderate evidence of pathogenicity (PM1). Tumor RNA sequencing data showing altered splicing may be considered as strong evidence in support of germline pathogenicity (PVS1) and tumor phenotypic features such as mutational signatures be considered supporting evidence of pathogenicity (PP4). However, at present, somatic data such as focal loss of heterozygosity and mutations occurring on the alternative allele are not recommended to be systematically integrated, instead, incorporation of this type of data should take place under the advisement of multidisciplinary cancer center tumor‐normal sequencing boards.

Adapting crowdsourced clinical cancer curation in CIViC to the ClinGen minimum variant level data community-driven standards

Harmonization of cancer variant representation, efficient communication, and free distribution of clinical variant‐associated knowledge are central problems that arise with increased usage of clinical next‐generation sequencing. The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Somatic Working Group (WG) developed a minimal variant level data (MVLD) representation of cancer variants, and has an ongoing collaboration with Clinical Interpretations of Variants in Cancer (CIViC), an open‐source platform supporting crowdsourced and expert‐moderated cancer variant curation. Harmonization between MVLD and CIViC variant formats was assessed by formal field‐by‐field analysis. Adjustments to the CIViC format were made to harmonize with MVLD and support ClinGen Somatic WG curation activities, including four new features in CIViC: (1) introduction of an assertions feature for clinical variant assessment following the Association of Molecular Pathologists (AMP) guidelines, (2) group‐level curation tracking for organizations, enabling member transparency, and curation effort summaries, (3) introduction of ClinGen Allele Registry IDs to CIViC, and (4) mapping of CIViC assertions into ClinVar submission with automated submissions. A generalizable workflow utilizing MVLD and new CIViC features is outlined for use by ClinGen Somatic WG task teams for curation and submission to ClinVar, and provides a model for promoting harmonization of cancer variant representation and efficient distribution of this information.

The identification and characterization of a STAT5 gene signature in hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND The JAK-STAT pathway is an important signaling pathway downstream of multiple cytokine and growth factor receptors. Dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple human malignancies. OBJECTIVE Given this pivotal role of JAK-STAT dysregulation, it is important to identify patients with an overactive JAK-STAT pathway for possible treatment with JAK inhibitors. METHODS We developed a gene signature assay to detect overactive JAK-STAT signaling. The cancer cell line encyclopedia and associated gene-expression data were used to correlate the activation status of STAT5 with the induction of a set of STAT5 target genes. RESULTS Four target genes were identified (PIM1, CISH, SOCS2, and ID1), the expression of which correlated significantly with pSTAT5 status in 40 hematologic tumor cell lines. In pSTAT5-positive models, the expression of the gene signature genes decreased following ruxolitinib treatment, which corresponded to pSTAT5 downmodulation. In pSTAT5-negative cell lines, neither pSTAT5 modulation nor a change in signature gene expression was observed following ruxolitinib treatment. CONCLUSIONS The gene signature can potentially be used to stratify or enrich for patient populations with activated JAK-STAT5 signaling that might benefit from treatments targeting JAK-STAT signaling. Furthermore, the 4-gene signature is a predictor of the pharmacodynamic effects of ruxolitinib.

Abstract 105: Integrative analysis of genomic and pharmacologic data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia

The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) represents a collaborative effort to assemble a comprehensive resource of human cancer models for basic and translational research. Thus far, the CCLE contains high-density SNP array data, gene expression microarray data and selected cancer gene mutation data for approximately 1,000 human cancer cell lines spanning many tumor types. Additionally, we are assessing the sensitivity of these same cell lines using a series of pharmacological compounds that represent both conventional cytotoxic and targeted agents. Another goal of the CCLE collaboration involves systematic integration of the genomic and pharmacologic datasets in order to identify putative targets of prevalent genetic alterations as well as predictors and modifiers of pharmacologic sensitivity and resistance. The availability of high-quality data generated by uniform criteria across hundreds of cell lines markedly enhances the statistical power to discover genetic alterations involved in carcinogenesis and molecular predictors of pharmacologic vulnerability. As proof of principle, we have carried out systematic nomination of putative targets of genetic alterations using integrative analyses. Here, significant regions of genomic gains and losses have been linked to expression and mutation data to find significant correlations at both single-gene and pathway levels. We have also begun to assemble systematic algorithms that identify genetic predictors of sensitivity or resistance to particular pharmacological compounds, taking advantage of the fact that the CCLE is a comprehensive resource with extensive genomic characterization. Toward this end, we integrated a preliminary sensitivity dataset for 28 compounds accurately profiled against more than 400 cell lines with all genomic data available in the CCLE. To enhance the robustness of our method, we reduced the number of significant genomic features for each cell line to a number that allows properly determined prediction of sensitivity. Expression data was converted to cell line-specific readouts of gene set expression; and DNA gains and losses are reduced to statistically significant regions using the GISTIC algorithm. These values were combined with critical oncogene mutations as inputs to a multifaceted prediction model for pharmacological sensitivity, the accuracy of which was assessed using cross-validation. Our results suggest that this integrative approach applied to a robust cancer cell line collection has considerable power to discover novel associations that augment ongoing basic research into cancer biology and drug discovery. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 105.