Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dmitry D. Frederiks is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dmitry D. Frederiks.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

Multiwavelength observations of GRB 050820A : an exceptionally energetic event followed from start to finish

S. B. Cenko; Mansi M. Kasliwal; Fiona A. Harrison; Valentin Pal'Shin; Dale A. Frail; P. B. Cameron; Edo Berger; Derek B. Fox; Avishay Gal-Yam; S. R. Kulkarni; D.-S. Moon; Ehud Nakar; Eran O. Ofek; Bryan E. Penprase; Paul A. Price; Re'em Sari; Brian Paul Schmidt; Alicia M. Soderberg; R. L. Aptekar; Dmitry D. Frederiks; S. Golenetskii; D. N. Burrows; Roger A. Chevalier; N. Gehrels; Patrick J. McCarthy; John A. Nousek; Tsvi Piran

We present observations of the unusually bright and long γ-ray burst GRB 050820A, one of the best sampled broadband data sets in the Swift era. The γ-ray light curve is marked by a soft precursor pulse some 200 s before the main event; the lack of any intervening emission suggests that it is due to a physical mechanism distinct from the GRB itself. The large time lag between the precursor and the main emission enabled simultaneous observations in the γ-ray, X-ray, and optical bandpasses, something only achieved for a handful of events to date. While the contemporaneous X-rays are the low-energy tail of the prompt emission, the optical does not directly track the γ-ray flux. Instead, the early-time optical data appear consistent with the forward shock synchrotron peak passing through the optical and are therefore likely the beginning of the afterglow. On hour timescales after the burst, the X-ray and optical light curves are inconsistent with an adiabatic expansion of the shock into the surrounding region, but rather indicate that there is a period of energy injection. Observations at late times allow us to constrain the collimation angle of the relativistic outflow to 6°.8 ≾ θ ≾ 9°.3. Our estimates of both the kinetic energy of the afterglow (EKE = 5.2^(+7.9)_(4.1) × 10^(51) ergs) and the prompt γ-ray energy release (Eγ = 7.5^(+6.7)-(2.4) × 10^(51) ergs) make GRB 050820A one of the most energetic events for which such values could be determined.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2006

GRB 060313: A New Paradigm for Short-Hard Bursts?

Peter W. A. Roming; Daniel E. Vanden Berk; Valentin Pal’shin; Claudio Pagani; Jay P. Norris; Pawan Kumar; Hans A. Krimm; Stephen T. Holland; Caryl Gronwall; Alex J. Blustin; Bing Zhang; Patricia Schady; Takanori Sakamoto; Julian P. Osborne; John A. Nousek; F. E. Marshall; P. Meszaros; S. Golenetskii; Neil Gehrels; Dmitry D. Frederiks; Sergio Campana; David N. Burrows; Patricia Therese Boyd; S. D. Barthelmy; R. L. Aptekar

We report the simultaneous observations of the prompt emission in the gamma-ray and hard X-ray bands by the Swift BATand the Konus-Wind instruments of the short-hard burst, GRB 060313. The observations reveal multiple peaks in both the gamma-ray and hard X-ray bands suggesting a highly variable outflow from the central explosion. We also describe the early-time observations of the X-ray and UV/optical afterglows by the Swift XRT and UVOT instruments. The combination of the X-ray and UV/optical observations provides the most comprehensive light curves to date of a short-hard burst at such an early epoch. The afterglows exhibit complex structure with different decay indices and flaring. This behavior can be explained by the combination of a structured jet, radiative loss of energy, and decreasing microphysics parameters occurring in a circumburst medium with densities varying by a factor of approximately two on a length scale of 10 17 cm. These density variations are normally associated with the environment of a massive star and inhomogeneities in its windy medium. However, the mean density of the observed medium (n � 10 � 4 cm 3 ) is much less than that expected for a massive star. Although the collapse of a massive star as theoriginofGRB060313isunlikely,themergerofacompactbinaryalsoposesproblemsforexplainingthebehavior of this burst. Two possible suggestions for explaining this scenario are that some short bursts may arise from a mechanism that does not invoke the conventional compact binary model, or that soft late-time central engine activity is producing UV/optical but no X-ray flaring.


Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2014

GRB 130925A: an ultralong gamma ray burst with a dust-echo afterglow, and implications for the origin of the ultralong GRBs

P. A. Evans; R. Willingale; J. P. Osborne; Paul T. O'Brien; Nial R. Tanvir; Dmitry D. Frederiks; Valentin Pal'Shin; D. Svinkin; Amy Lien; J. R. Cummings; N. Gehrels

This work made use of data supplied by the UK Swift Science Data Centre at the University of Leicester. PAE, JPO, KW and APB acknowledge UK Space Agency support. The Konus-Wind experiment is partially supported by a Russian Space Agency contract, RFBR grants 12-02-00032a and 13-02-12017 ofi-m. DNB and JAK acknowledge support from NASA contract NAS5-00136. This work includes observations made with the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC), installed in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, in the island of La Palma. This work was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry project AYA2012-29727-C03-01.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2008

A Giant Flare from a Soft Gamma Repeater in the Andromeda Galaxy (M31)

E. P. Mazets; R. L. Aptekar; T. L. Cline; Dmitry D. Frederiks; John O. Goldsten; S. Golenetskii; K. Hurley; A. von Kienlin; Valentin Pal'Shin

The light curve, energy spectra, energetics, and IPN localization of an exceedingly intense, short-duration, hard-spectrum burst, GRB 070201, obtained from Konus-Wind, INTEGRAL (SPI-ACS), and MESSENGER data are presented. The total fluence of the burst and the peak flux are -->S = 2.00+ 0.10−0.26 × 10−5 erg cm−2 and -->Fmax = 1.61+ 0.29−0.50 × 10−3 erg cm−2 s−1. The IPN error box has an area of 446 arcmin2 and covers the peripheral part of the M31 galaxy. Assuming that the source of the burst is indeed in M31 at a distance of 0.78 Mpc, the measured values of the fluence S and maximum flux -->Fmax correspond to a total energy of -->Q = 1.5 × 1045 erg and a maximum luminosity -->L = 1.2 × 1047 erg s−1. These data are in good agreement with the corresponding characteristics of the previously observed giant flares from other soft gamma repeaters. The evidence for the identification of this event as a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the M31 galaxy is presented.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2003

An Extended Burst Tail from SGR 1900+14 with a Thermal X-Ray Spectrum

Geoffrey T. Lenters; Peter M. Woods; Johnathan E. Goupell; C. Kouveliotou; Ersin Gogus; K. Hurley; Dmitry D. Frederiks; S. Golenetskii

The soft gamma repeater SGR 1900+14 entered a new phase of activity in 2001 April initiated by the intermediate flare recorded on April 18. Ten days following this flare, we discovered an abrupt increase in the source flux between consecutive Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) orbits. This X-ray flux excess decayed over the next several minutes and was subsequently linked to a high fluence burst from SGR 1900+14 recorded by other spacecraft (Ulysses and Wind/Konus) while the SGR was Earth-occulted for RXTE. We present here spectral and temporal analysis of both the burst of April 28 and the long X-ray tail following it. We find strong evidence of an exclusively thermal X-ray tail in this event and bring this evidence to bear on other bursts and flares from SGR 1900+14 that have shown extended X-ray excesses (e.g., 1998 August 29). We include in this comparison a discussion of the physical origins of SGR bursts and extended X-ray tails.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2002

Afterglow Upper Limits for Four Short-duration, Hard Spectrum Gamma-ray Bursts

K. Hurley; Edo Berger; A. J. Castro-Tirado; J. M. Castro Cerón; T. L. Cline; M. Feroci; Dale A. Frail; F. Frontera; N. Masetti; C. Guidorzi; E. Montanari; Dieter H. Hartmann; Arne A. Henden; Stephen E. Levine; E. Mazets; S. Golenetskii; Dmitry D. Frederiks; Graham Lindsay Morrison; A Oksanen; M Moilanen; H.-S. Park; Paul A. Price; Jason X. Prochaska; J. Trombka; George Grant Williams

We present interplanetary network localization, spectral, and time history information for four short-duration, hard spectrum gamma-ray bursts, GRB 000607, GRB 001025B, GRB 001204, and GRB 010119. All of these events were followed up with sensitive radio and optical observations (the first and only such bursts to be followed up in the radio to date), but no detections were made, demonstrating that the short bursts do not have anomalously intense afterglows. We discuss the upper limits and show that the lack of observable counterparts is consistent with both the hypothesis that the afterglow behavior of the short bursts is like that of the long-duration bursts, many of which similarly have no detectable afterglows, as well as the hypothesis that the short bursts have no detectable afterglows at all. Small number statistics do not allow a clear choice between these alternatives, but given the present detection rates of various missions, we show that progress can be expected in the near future.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2000

Observations of a possible new soft gamma repeater, SGR 1801-23

T. L. Cline; Dmitry D. Frederiks; S. Golenetskii; K. Hurley; C. Kouveliotou; E. P. Mazets; J. van Paradijs

We report on two 1997 June observations of a soft bursting source whose time histories and energy spectra are consistent with those of the soft gamma repeaters. The source can be localized only to an ≈38 long error box in the direction of the Galactic center, whose area is ≈80 arcmin2. The location of the source, while not consistent with that of any of the four known soft repeaters, is consistent with those of several known and possible supernova remnants.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1999

Where is SGR 1806-20?

K. Hurley; C. Kouveliotou; T. L. Cline; E. P. Mazets; S. Golenetskii; Dmitry D. Frederiks; J. van Paradijs

We apply a statistical method to derive very precise locations for soft gamma repeaters using data from the interplanetary network. We demonstrate the validity of the method by deriving a 600 arcsec2 error ellipse for SGR 1900+14 whose center agrees well with the VLA source position. We then apply it to SGR 1806-20, for which we obtain a 230 arcsec2 error ellipse, the smallest burst error box to date. We find that the most likely position of the source has a small but significant displacement from that of the nonthermal core of the radio supernova remnant G10.0-0.3, which was previously thought to be the position of the repeater. We propose a different model to explain the changing supernova remnant morphology and the positions of the luminous blue variable and the bursting source.


Astronomy Letters | 2007

Giant flare in SGR 1806-20 and its Compton reflection from the Moon

Dmitry D. Frederiks; S. Golenetskii; Valentin Pal'Shin; R. L. Aptekar; V. N. Ilyinskii; F. P. Oleinik; E. Mazets; T. L. Cline

We analyze the data obtained when the Konus-Wind gamma-ray spectrometer detected a giant flare in SGR 1806-20 on December 27, 2004. The flare is similar in appearance to the two known flares in SGR 0526-66 and SGR 1900+14 while exceeding them significantly in intensity. The enormous X-ray and gamma-ray flux in the narrow initial pulse of the flare leads to almost instantaneous deep saturation of the gamma-ray detectors, ruling out the possibility of directly measuring the intensity, time profile, and energy spectrum of the initial pulse. In this situation, the detection of an attenuated signal of inverse Compton scattering of the initial pulse emission by the Moon with the Helicon gamma-ray spectrometer onboard the Coronas-F satellite was an extremely favorable circumstance. Analysis of this signal has yielded the most reliable temporal, energy, and spectral characteristics of the pulse. The temporal and spectral characteristics of the pulsating flare tail have been determined from Konus-Wind data. Its soft spectra have been found to contain also a hard power-law component extending to 10 MeV. A weak afterglow of SGR 1806-20 decaying over several hours is traceable up to 1 MeV. We also consider the overall picture of activity of SGR 1806-20 in the emission of recurrent bursts before and after the giant flare.We analyze the data obtained when the Konus-Wind gamma-ray spectrometer detected a giant flare in SGR 1806-20 on December 27, 2004. The flare is similar in appearance to the two known flares in SGR 0526-66 and SGR 1900+14 while exceeding them significantly in intensity. The enormous X-ray and gamma-ray flux in the narrow initial pulse of the flare leads to almost instantaneous deep saturation of the gamma-ray detectors, ruling out the possibility of directly measuring the intensity, time profile, and energy spectrum of the initial pulse. In this situation, the detection of an attenuated signal of Compton back-scattering of the initial pulse emission by the Moon with the Helicon gamma-ray spectrometer onboard the Coronas-F satellite was an extremely favorable circumstance. Analysis of this signal has yielded the most reliable temporal, energy, and spectral characteristics of the pulse. The temporal and spectral characteristics of the pulsating flare tail have been determined from Konus-Wind data. Its soft spectra have been found to contain also a hard power-law component extending to 10 MeV. A weak afterglow of SGR 1806-20 decaying over several hours is traceable up to 1 MeV. We also consider the overall picture of activity of SGR 1806-20 in the emission of recurrent bursts before and after the giant flare.


Astronomy Letters | 2007

On the possibility of identifying the short hard burst GRB 051103 with a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the M81 group of galaxies

Dmitry D. Frederiks; Valentin Pal'Shin; R. L. Aptekar; S. Golenetskii; T. L. Cline; E. Mazets

The light curve, energy characteristics, and localization of the short hard burst GRB 051103 are considered. Evidence for identifying this event with a giant flare from a soft gamma repeater in the nearby M81 group of interacting galaxies is discussed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Dmitry D. Frederiks's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Golenetskii

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. Mazets

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Valentin Pal'Shin

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. L. Aptekar

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. L. Cline

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Svinkin

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas L. Cline

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

K. Hurley

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin C. Hurley

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. D. Barthelmy

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge