Donald F. Hayes

Dredging processes and remedy effectiveness: Relationship to the 4 Rs of environmental dredging

Timely and effective remediation of contaminated sediments is essential for protecting human health and the environment and restoring beneficial uses to waterways. A number of site operational conditions influence the effect of environmental dredging of contaminated sediment on aquatic systems. Site experience shows that resuspension of contaminated sediment and release of contaminants occur during dredging and that contaminated sediment residuals will remain after operations. It is also understood that these processes affect the magnitude, distribution, and bioavailability of the contaminants, and hence the exposure and risk to receptors of concern. However, even after decades of sediment remediation project experience, substantial uncertainties still exist in our understanding of the cause-effect relationships relating dredging processes to risk. During the past few years, contaminated sediment site managers, researchers, and practitioners have recognized the need to better define and understand dredging-related processes. In this article, we present information and research needs on these processes as synthesized from recent symposia, reports, and remediation efforts. Although predictions about the effect of environmental dredging continue to improve, a clear need remains to better understand the effect that sediment remediation processes have on contaminant exposures and receptors of concern. Collecting, learning from, and incorporating new information into practice is the only avenue to improving the effectiveness of remedial operations.

Needs-based sewerage prioritization: Alternative to conventional cost-benefit analysis

This paper presents an empirical approach to select and prioritize sewerage projects within set budgetary limitations. The methodology includes a model which quantifies benefits of a sewerage project as an index or dimensionless number. The index considers need and urgency of sewerage and other project goals. Benefit is defined as the difference in anticipated impact between the current condition (without the project) and the expected condition with the project. Anticipated benefits primarily include reduction in environmental pollution, reduction of human diseases and morbidity, and other tangible and intangible improvement. This approach is a powerful decision tool for sewerage prioritization and an effective alternative to conventional cost-benefit analysis. Unlike conventional analysis, this approach makes no attempt to convert project benefits and other impacts into a monetary measure. This work recognizes that the decision to provide sewerage based solely on net benefits is not practical. Instead, benefit-cost ratios (B/C) are calculated utilizing cost-effectiveness approach. Using these ratios, 16 unserviced areas of Ensenada, Mexico are ranked. The prioritization rankings produced by this method must be further scrutinized and carefully reviewed for logic, accuracy of input data, and practicality of implementation. A similar framework may also be useful for prioritizing other public works projects.

Dynamic Programming Methodology for Prioritizing Sewerage Projects

A simple yet effective approach is developed on the basis of dynamic programming (DP) as a means of objectively selecting and prioritizing sewerage projects within available funds and system capacity. The methodology consists of two DP models: a collection system model with an embedded benefit assessment technique to identify areas for wastewater collection; and a transportation system model to select routes of wastewater conveyance. Unlike conventional benefit analysis, benefits in this approach are defined as changes in adverse environmental, public health, and other noneconomic consequences as a result of sewerage provisions. The approach is a useful decision tool for planning sewerage system expansion. The models are used to identify “best” sewerage expansion plans for Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico. Sixteen potential areas for sewerage expansion and three existing plants with additional wastewater treatment capacity are considered.